• 수완나부미
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.53-84
• /
• 2017

The paper demonstrates the potential contribution of integrating discursive and affective analytic regimes in framing the study of Southeast Asia. I examine the "emotional possibilities" available to migrants with particular focus on the experience of Filipino domestic helpers in Hong Kong thrown into relief in 2016 by news of maids falling to their deaths while cleaning windows of their employers' above-ground apartments. First, I situate the study in recent calls for Critical Discourse Studies and Migration Studies to transcend foundational methodologies in their respective fields in order to apprehend formerly disregarded aspects of the human condition, including affect and emotion. I then briefly present the debate in the affective turn in social analysis, which has to do with rethinking the attachment of affect and discourse. My own inquiry is premised on the assertion that emotion is multidimensional. I specifically explore the usefulness of taking emotion as "affective-discursive practice" by focusing on an analysis of the appropriation of the victim role by foreign domestic helper employer groups that could be seen in pertinent news reports of selected online Hong Kong newspapers. In the end, I also emphasize the necessity of reflexivity in projects that take affect as central object of inquiry.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.620-636
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to analyze one science teacher's understanding of student argumentation and his explicit teaching strategies for implementing it in the classroom. One middle school science teacher, Mr. Field, and his students of 54 participated in this study. Data were collected through three semi-structured interviews, 60 hours of classroom observations, and two times of students' lab reports for eight weeks. Coding categories were developed describing the teacher's understanding of scientific argumentation and a description of the main teaching strategy, the Claim-Evidence Approach, was introduced. Toulmin's approach was employed to analyze student discourse as responses to see how much of this discourse was argumentative. The results indicated that Mr. Field defined scientific inquiry as the abilities of procedural skills through experimentation and of reasoning skills through argumentation. The Claim-Evidence Approach provided students with opportunities to develop their own claims based on their readings, design the investigation for evidence, and differentiate pieces of evidence from data to support their claims and refute others. During this approach, the teacher's role of scaffolding was critical to shift students' less extensive argumentation to more extensive argumentation through his prompts and questions. The different level of teacher's involvement, his explicit teaching strategy, and the students' scientific knowledge influenced the students' ability to develop and improve argumentation.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권23호
• /
• pp.10367-10374
• /
• 2015

Background: Cancer and non-communicable diseases are a major issue not only for the developed but also developing countries. Public health and primary care nursing offer great potential for primary and secondary prevention of these diseases through community and family-based approaches. Within Thailand there are related established educational curricula but less is known about how graduate practitioners enact ideas in practice and how these can influence policy at local levels. Aim: The aim of this inquiry was to develop family nursing practice in primary care settings in the Isaan region or Northeastern Thailand and to distill what worked well into a nursing model to guide practice. Materials and Methods: An appreciative inquiry approach involving analysis of written reports, focus group discussions and individual interviews was used to synthesize what worked well for fourteen family nurses involved in primary care delivery and to build the related model. Results: Three main strategies were seen to offer a basis for optimal care delivery, namely: enacting a participatory action approach mobilizing families' social capital; using family nursing process; and implementing action strategies within communities. These were distilled into a new conceptual model. Conclusions: The model has some features in common with related community partnership models and the World Health Organization Europe Family Health Nurse model, but highlights practical strategies for family nursing enactment. The model offers a basis not only for planning and implementing family care to help prevent cancer and other diseases but also for education of nurses and health care providers working in communities. This articulation of what works in this culture also offers possible transference to different contexts internationally, with related potential to inform health and social care policies, and international development of care models.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.200-213
• /
• 2000

교육부의 제6차 교육 과정 개편과 더불어 모든 고등 학교의 필수 교과로 도입된 공통 과학이 현재 고등 학교에서 어떻게 운영되고 있는가를 조사해 본 연구이다. 그 결과 3.2%의 학교에서만이 교사 1인이 담당하고 있었고 나머지 대부분의 학교에서는 담당 과학 교사의 전공별로 각 단원을 분담하여 가르치고 있었다. 이 경우 각 단원에 통합 과학적인 요소들이 많아서 애로가 많음을 토로하고 있었으며, 시간표상에 배치된 공통 과학이 다른 학과목과 같이 편성되어 있기 때문에 하나의 학습 주제를 해결하기엔 시간이 너무 짧다는 의견들이 많았다. 또한 공통 과학을 위한 전문 실험실이 없고 담당 학생수가 너무 많아서 고민하고 있었다. 또한 공통 과학의 지식 편은 강의식 학습으로, 탐구 편은 탐구 학습으로 운영하고 있었으며, 평가는 지식편인 경우, 객관식 또는 주관식 질문지법을 이용하여 평가하였으며. 탐구편인 경우, 학생들의 보고서를 중심으로 평가하고 있었다. 공통 과학에 대한 학생들의 반응은 보통을 넘지 못하고 있어서 과학에 대한 흥미 도를 고조시키기 위하여 도입된 본래의 의도에서 빗나가고 있음을 나타내고 있었다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.173-184
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to analyse the problems of 'Science Inquiry Experiment Contest(SIEC)' which was one of 8 programs of 'The 2nd Student Science Inquiry Olympic Meet(SSIOM)'. The results and conclusions of this study were as follows: 1. It needs to reconsider the role of practical work within science experiment because practical work skills form one of the mainstays in current science. But the assessment of students' laboratory skills in the contest was made little account of. It is necessary to remind of what it means to be 'good at science'. There are two aspects: knowing and doing. Both are important and, in certain respects, quite distinct. Doing science is more of a craft activity, relying more on craft skill and tacit knowledge than on the conscious application of explicit knowledge. Doing science is also divided into two aspects, 'process' and 'skill' by many science educators. 2. The report's and checklist's assessment items were overlapped. Therefore it was suggested that the checklist assessment items were set limit to the students' acts which can't be found in reports. It is important to identify those activities which produce a permanent assessable product, and those which do not. Skills connected with recording and reporting are likely to produce permanent evidence which can be evaluated after the experiment. Those connected with manipulative skills involving processes are more ephemeral and need to be assessed as they occur. The division of student's experimental skills will contribute to the accurate assess of student's scientific inquiry experimental ability. 3. There was a wide difference among the scores of one participant recorded by three evaluators. This means that there was no concrete discussion among the evaluators before the contest. Despite the items of the checklists were set by preparers of the contest experiments, the concrete discussions before the contest were necessary because students' experimental acts were very diverse. There is a variety of scientific skills. So it is necessary to assess the performance of individual students in a range of skills. But the most of the difficulties in the assessment of skills arise from the interaction between measurement and the use. To overcome the difficulties, not only must the mark needed for each skill be recorded, something which all examination groups obviously need, but also a description of the work that the student did when the skill was assessed must also be given, and not all groups need this. Fuller details must also be available for the purposes of moderation. This is a requirement for all students that there must be provision for samples of any end-product or other tangible form of evidence of candidates' work to be submitted for inspection. This is rather important if one is to be as fair as possible to students because, not only can this work be made available to moderators if necessary, but also it can be used to help in arriving at common standards among several evaluators, and in ensuring consistent standards from one evaluator over the assessment period. This need arises because there are problems associated with assessing different students on the same skill in different activities. 4. Most of the students' reports were assessed intuitively by the evaluators despite the assessment items were established concretely by preparers of the experiment. This result means that the evaluators were new to grasp the essence of the established assessment items of the experiment report and that the students' assessment scores were short of objectivity. Lastly, there are suggestions from the results and the conclusions. The students' experimental acts which were difficult to observe because they occur in a flash and which can be easily imitated should be excluded from the assessment items. Evaluators are likely to miss the time to observe the acts, and the students who are assessed later have more opportunity to practise the skill which is being assessed. It is necessary to be aware of these problems and try to reduce their influence or remove them. The skills and processes analysis has made a very useful checklist for scientific inquiry experiment assessment. But in itself it is of little value. It must be seen alongside the other vital attributes needed in the making of a good scientist, the affective aspects of commitment and confidence, the personal insights which come both through formal and informal learning, and the tacit knowledge that comes through experience, both structured and acquired in play. These four aspects must be continually interacting, in a flexible and individualistic way, throughout the scientific education of students. An increasing ability to be good at science, to be good at doing investigational practical work, will be gained through continually, successively, but often unpredictably, developing more experience, developing more insights, developing more skills, and producing more confidence and commitment.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.501-515
• /
• 2018

본 연구에서는 지구과학의 탐구 방법으로서 복수 작업가설의 방법을 특정한 구조를 지닌 암석의 형성 과정에 대한 귀추적 추론 과정에 적용하고, 그 속에서 드러난 복수 작업가설의 방법의 특징을 탐색하였다. 연구 참여자는 한교육대학교에서 진행된 수업에 참여한 31명의 4학년 학생들이었으며, 이들은 수업 활동의 일환으로 문제 암석의 형성 과정에 대한 복수의 작업가설을 상정하고 그것들을 함께 고려하여 귀추적 탐구를 수행하였다. 학생들의 추론 과정과 결과를 스케치북 보고서에 기록하게 하고, 보고서의 내용을 분석적 귀납의 원리에 따라 분석하여 4가지 연구 주장을 도출하였다. 첫째, 학생들의 작업가설은 자원 모델을 바탕으로 상정되고 이 과정에서 종종 자원 모델의 변형이 일어난다. 둘째, 자원 모델의 활성화에는 증거의 지각적 특성이 영향을 미친다. 셋째, 관찰한 증거의 종류와 증거에 대한 다른 해석이 작업가설들에 대한 서로 다른 판단을 초래한다. 넷째, 종종 대안적인 가설들이 결합하여 또 다른 가설이 만들어진다. 이러한 연구 결과가 지구과학 교육과 관련 연구에 시사하는 점을 논의하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.75-88
• /
• 2008

이 연구는 과학탐구실험을 진행하는 과정에서 나타나는 상호작용의 변화양상을 분석하여 상호작용의 특성과 상호작용의 변화에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 1년 동안 13개의 탐구실험활동이 진행되는 동안 교사가 추천한 두 동질모둠을 관찰하면서 녹음/녹화하였다. 40차시의 녹음/녹화자료는 모두 전사되었으며, 자료는 메모하면서 보고 듣는 과정을 반복하는 방법을 기초로 분석하였다. 분석결과 두 동질모둠의 변화방향은 현저히 달랐는데, 모둠 A는 모둠원간 감정대립이 심해 상호작용을 통한 학습이 불가능하게 된 반면, 모둠 B는 상호작용의 수준이 높아지고 있었다. 두 모둠의 상반된 변화는 모둠원의 의견이나 감정을 중재할 수 있는 동료의 존재여부에 의해 가장 크게 영향 받는 것으로 보인다. 전반적으로 볼 때, 학생들은 동료의 의견을 받아 논의하는 방법에 서툴렀고, 보고서 완성을 중시하였으며, 성취도가 낮은 학생이 소외되는 경향이 있었다. 또한 목표를 이해에 두는가, 동료의 의견을 존중하는가, 동료를 배려하는가, 분위기의 중재자가 있는가에 의해 상호작용의 변화방향이 달라지고 있었다. 이로부터 상호작용을 강조한 활동의 진행과 모둠구성에 대한 시사점을 얻을 수 있었으며, 이에 대해 논의하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.385-394
• /
• 2007

In order to investigate elementary school students' readiness to write on scientific subject, we analyzed the participants' draft in elementary student section [National Student Science Writing Contest] which is sponsored by a daily press. As a first step, we designed an assessment framework to analyze the students' writing. It is composed of three domains: scientific thinking, logical validity, creativeness. Each domain has three sub-domains. By using the framework, seven raters scored the students' inquiry reports. The findings reveal that the students needed the training for scientific writing. Especially they had great difficulty in the sub-domain of 'suggestion of rational alternative solution' in scientific thinking domain, the sub-domains of 'clearness' and 'coherence' in logical validity domain, and in the sub-domains of 'creative problem solving' and 'creative presentation' in creative domain.

• 대한한방내과학회지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.889-895
• /
• 2000

I experienced a case of a patient with clinical features of cerebellar dysfunction in the intracranial hemorrhage which encroached the basis of lower pontine and all parts of pontine tegmentum. So I report this case with bibliographical inquiry. In addition, I applied the treatment of Oriental medicine to sequelae of intracranial hemorrhage like disorders of eye movement, central dizziness, cerebellar tremor and ataxias but the effect did not meet my expectation. I anticipate more clinical studies and reports on this hereafter.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.12-19
• /
• 2011

This study aimed to analyze the teachers' cognitions about the primary science textbooks(experiment and observation) used in elementary schools. This study surveyed 211 teachers in Seoul and Gyeonggi province. The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS WIN 10.0. The results of this study are as follows : Most of the teachers showed positive opinions on the directions of the compilation of experiment and observation textbook. Teachers used experiment and observation textbook as summary notes, experiment reports and evaluating methods. The experiment and observation textbooks should be compiled and reorganized in order as follows : Lesson introduction, inquiry activities, and intensive and supplementary activities which are followed by space of description in experiment and observation textbook.