• Acta Via Serica
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.131-148
• /
• 2022

While much has been written about Imperial Japan's encounter with geopolitics and developing ideas about Geography as a political and cultural discipline, little if anything has been written about relational and research Geographies between Japan and Silk Roads both ancient and modern. Memories of the ancient Silk Road were revivified in the late 19^th century in tandem with the Great Game of European nations, as Japan modernized and sought new places and influence globally following the Meiji restoration. Imperial Japan thus sought to conquer and co-opt spaces imagined to be part of or influenced by the ancient Silk Road and any modern manifestation of it. This paper explores a particular process in that co-option and appropriation, research collaboration between institutions of the Empire. In particular it considers the exploration of Mengjiang/Inner Mongolia after its conquest in 1939/1940, by a collaborative team of Korean and Japanese Geographers, led by Professor Tada Fumio. This paper considers the making knowable of spaces imagined to be on the ancient Silk Road in the Imperial period, and the projecting of the imperatives of the Empire back into Silk Road history, at the same time as such territory was being made anew. This paper also casts new light on the relational and collaborative processes of academic exchange, specifically in the field of Geography, between Korean and Japanese academics during the Korean colonial period.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제39호
• /
• pp.281-318
• /
• 2014

본고는 일본 제국의 식민지 지배와 '전후보상'처리와 관련하여, 일본 제국주의와 조선 식민지, GHQ와 점령지 일본에서 이루어진 결재 과정과 이 과정에서 생산된 기록 원본의 출처를 밝히는 것을 목적으로 한다. 1910년부터 1952년까지를 대상으로 역사학과 기록학의 관점에서 분석하였다. 이 연구에서는 식민지 지배와 그 처리문제를 시공간적으로 연속선상에서 파악함으로써 제국과 식민지 점령지 기록에 대한 인식의 지평을 확대할 수 있는 기반을 마련하고자 하였다. 1910년부터 1945년까지 일제의 식민지 조선에 대한 강점지배에 대한 기록과 1945년부터 1952년까지 GHQ 점령기의 '전후보상'처리에 대한 결재원본은 한국, 일본, 미국 등에 분산 보존되어 있다. 가장 큰 원인은 일본제국정부와 조선총독부, GHQ와 일본종속정부의 결재구조에 있다. 즉, 중요정책, 인사, 예산에 대한 결재는 제국 본국에서 처리되고, 그 시행에 관한 결재는 식민지 및 종속국에서 처리되는, 상명하달식 이중결재구조 때문이다. 이에 따라 결재 원본도 일국에 완결적으로 보존되는 게 아니라 제국과 식민지 종속국가에 각각 분산 보존되어 상호 보완적 관계를 갖고 있다. 특히 최근 한일간 외교문제로 부각되고 있는 강제 동원된 조선인 미불금 문제는 GHQ의 정책결정과 일본정부의 정령 시행으로 공탁처리되어, '채무'에서 '경제협력'으로 둔갑해 버렸다. GHQ-일본의 상명하달식 결재시스템에 의해, '전후보상'을 위한 기본적인 원본기록 역시 미국과 일본에 각각 분산 보존 되게 되었다. 그러므로 1910년부터 1952년까지, 일제에 의한 식민지지배와 '전후보상'을 둘러싼 문제는 의사결정 프로세스와 기록의 출처 분석 등을 통해 시간적 공간적 측면에서 구조적 종합적으로 재인식될 필요성이 있다.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.56-68
• /
• 2003

The objects of this study are to find out (1) real situation of the food supply in prison under Imperial Government of Japan more cleary (historical meaning) and (2) which might help in understanding wrong present food consumption patterns in Korea which causes environmental as well as health problems. It is generally known that the length of the Japanese occupation for Korea is 36 years. However, it is concluded in this study that it was longer (70 years ; from 1875 to 1945 from when Japanese Army attacked and occupied Yungjongdo and Kanghwado island to e time when they were defeated on World War II.) Korea was annexed by Japan in 1910 then the Imperial Government of Japan dismissed the Korea Army, controlled the Office of Justice and the management of prison by force. Since then about 50% of all land was fell into Japanese Government ownership and 80% of Korean farmers became as tenant. After this change, Korea farmers were forced to pay extremely high rent (up to 80% of its harvest). Forced immigration, low price procurement of grain by Japanese government up to more than 30%of their production, was practiced. Accordingly, the food situation of Korean farmers became miserable, which may caused more violations of Imperial Japanese Law. Malnutrition, epidemic diseases, mortality rate of infants soared and average life expectancy shortened to 20-30 years old. This was the period of World Economic Crises and Food Crises in Japan. It was said then that if one Japanese comes to Korea then 200 Koreans will starved to death. Meanwhile, Proconsul Bureau of Chosun requested to the Department of Medicine, the Imperial University of Kyungsung to survey food supply situation of Koreans in prison throughout Korea. Objectives of the survey then was not only to find out scientifically whether it is agreeable in maintaining prisoner's health and also find out the possibility to save food during food crisis. Survey was started from 1923 and ended in 1945, and it focussed on prisoners in the Seodaemoon Prison. This report is the outcome of the first survey. They concluded that the food supplied was nutritionally (had) no problem, in compare with those of workers in the factory, students in the dormitory in Japan and with those of prisoners in Taiwan, France and Germany. Amount of grain supplied were different according to their work lord and was divided into 9 different levels. Total grain was consisted of 50% millet, 30% soybean and 20% indica rice(variety). However, there were no difference in the amount of supply of side dishes between work groups. For the highest working group, 3280g of boiled grain per day was supplied to make stomach full but as a side dishes, salty fermented bean paste, fermented fish and salty soups, etc. was supplied. Deficiency of animal protein were observed, however, high intake of soybean may possibly caused animal protein deficiency problem. On the contrary, the intake of water soluble vitamins were insufficient but the level of calcium and iron intake seems to be sufficient, however, imbalance of intake of nutrition may caused low absorbtion rate which might caused malnutrition. High intake of dietary fiber and low intake of cholesterol may possibly prohibited them from so called modem disease but may caused the defect in disease resistancy againist epidemics and other traditional disease. Over intake of salt(20-30g per day) was observed. Surveyors who attended in this survey, mentioned that the amount of food intake may nutritionally be sufficient enough but the quality of food(and possibly, the taste of food) were like that of animal feed. For the officials who received this report might consider that considering the war situation and food crisis, the supply situation of food in the prison may considered to be good enough(because they are not starving). But as a Korean who studied this report, one feel extremely pity about those situation because (situation of) those period were very harsh under the Imperial Law and keeping the Law by Koreans were almost impossible, therefore, about one third adult violated the Law and were put into jail. And they were treated like animals.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제53권1호
• /
• pp.64-87
• /
• 2020

한국의 문화재 관리 제도는 일제강점기에 제정 시행된 근대 문화재 법제와 구황실재산 관리 제도를 기반으로 성립되었다. 그동안 학계에서는 근대 문화재 법제를 중심으로 한 문화재 관리 제도에 대한 연구 성과는 축적해 왔으나 문화재 관리 제도의 또 다른 축을 이루고 있는 구황실재산 관리 제도에 대해서는 이를 문화재 제도사 관점에서 접근한 연구가 거의 없다. 구황실재산은 갑오개혁에 의해 봉건적 가산에서 분리 독립하였으나 일제의 식민지 침탈과정에서 정리 해체되어 일제강점기에는 식민지 왕가의 세습 재산으로 관리되었다. 그 후 정부 수립 후인 1954년 「구황실재산법」이 제정 시행됨으로써 구황실재산은 국유화와 함께 역사적 고전적 문화재로 규정되었고 구황실재산사무총국에 의해 관리되었다. 이때 구황실재산 중 영구 보존 재산으로 지정된 재산은 1963년 「문화재보호법」 1차 개정 시 부칙 제2조에 의거 국유 문화재로 정식 편입됨으로써 민족의 문화유산으로 인정받았다.결론적으로 말해서 한국의 문화재 형성과 문화재 관리 제도는 두 개의 서로 다른 연원인 근대 문화재 법제와 구황실 재산 관리 제도가 하나로 통합되어 이루어졌다고 할 수 있다. 근대 문화재 법제의 변천이 일본의 그것을 식민지 조선에 이식·적용하여 문화재를 규율하고 관리하는 과정이었다면 구황실재산 관리는 일제가 대한제국을 식민지화 하면서 구황실재산을 침탈하고 정리하여 운용한 과정이었다고 할 수 있다. 광복과 대한민국 정부수립으로 이 각기 다른 두 개의 흐름이 하나로 합쳐지는 계기가 마련되었고 마침내 1961년 문화재관리국 설치와 1962년 주체적인 「문화재보호법」 체제가 성립됨으로써 제도적 통합이 이루어졌다고 평가할 수 있다.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제40권
• /
• pp.239-264
• /
• 2015

20세기 초 '제국'일본의 지(知)를 축적하고 전파하기 위하여 제국대학, 도서관, 박물관 등이 있었다면, 식민지 문화의 영유(領有)를 위해서는 극장이 설립되었다. 극장에서는 연극단과 흥행단, 활동사진 등 다양한 장르의 흥행이 이루어졌다. 그리고 박람회가 가지는 다양한 성격 가운데 '박람회는 구경거리', 즉 일상적이지 않은 이벤트이면서 '시정(始政)5년 기념'이라는 국가제전과 융합되었다. 1915년 경성 최장기 흥행은 일본 예기들에 의한 무용 공연이었으며 그들의 노래[패(唄)]는 지배의 정통성을 전한다. 본고는 극장이라는 '문화' 전파의 공간에서 펼쳐진 퍼포먼스에 주목함으로써 그들이 담당한 '제국'의 문화적 파장을 조명하고, 이러한 문화 접경지대에 나타나는 히에라르키의 긴장관계를 주목하였다. 특히 1915년 연예관 공연은 경성의 일본인 연극계에서 획기적인 사건이었다. 첫째는 연예관이라는 대형 공연장의 출연, 둘째, 50 여 일간의 지속적이고 안정적인 공연이 이루어졌다는 점 등에서 그러하다. 또 시기적으로 뒤를 이어 1915년 11월 예술좌의 경성공연 등 거물급 극단의 출연 등을 들 수 있다. 이상, 본고에서 검토한 1915년 경성 연예관 공연의 예술단, 공연장르의 문제, 관객구성의 문제 등을 살펴보고 흥행성과 오락성을 담보하면서 문화지배를 통한 오락과 통치가 공존한다는 사실을 확인할 수 있었으며 재조선 일본인의 문화역량을 결집시킨 '경성협찬회'라는 조직적 운영이 동반되었다는 점을 밝혔다. 결국 1915년 경성 연예관 공연은 예술장르 간의 긴장관계, 공연주체 간 경합관계, 문화권력의 문제를 고스란히 담고 있었다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.7-19
• /
• 2002

Architectural Bureau(建築所, Kunchukso) that Imperial Japan set up in the Dept. of Treasury (度支部, Takjibu) executed many construction works from Oct. 1906 to Aug. 1910. In the meantime, this bureau produced many architectural records. But they were hardly preserved. Because Imperial Japan disposed the architectural records which had the historical value in according to the legal and administrative criteria. Nevertheless, it is important to inquiry precisely the architectural records considerating that the buildings that Architectural Bureau made were the products of government initiated construction and its activities influenced those of similar architectural bureaus after 1910. The results are summarized as follows : First, Architectural Bureau put through all processes from plan, design, executation to examination. Second, Architectural Bureau were producted many architectural records which cotained not only drawings but also various types of documents. Third, Architectural Bureau applied the preservation method at the first time in order to control buildings. Therefore, we can verify many informations that the drawings didn't give by analyzing the architectural records. In conclusion, we can establish the foundation that clarify the facts of buildings under the rule of Japan Imperialism and grasp the meanings if we raise the value of records and draw up the use plan by seeking new the architectural records and dividing them into the several groups on the production organizations.

• Journal of East-Asian Urban History
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.113-128
• /
• 2020

Right before the outbreak of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression (1937-1954), the Great Eastern Broadcasting Station (GEBS) was established in Shanghai under the aegis of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA). Prior to the launching of the GEBS, Japan had not owned similar radio stations in China for years. As a result, the Embassy of Japan in China held rounds of discussions on the plan and Japanese governments, ranging from the MOFA, the Navy, the Army, the Ministry of Communications (MOC), and NHK-Japan Broadcasting Corporation (Nihon Hoso Kyoku) provided financial, technological, and equipment support. In the mid-1930s when the Sino-Japanese relations became intensified, the GEBS assumed the primary role of disseminating government policies to over 30,000 Japanese expatriates in Shanghai to make sure that they could remain settled while supporting military endeavors of the Japanese army once the war between China and Japanese broke out. After 1937, the GEBS became an essential propaganda tool to advance imperial policies of Japan. Although the station differed from the Army-controlled Greater Shanghai Broadcasting Station (Dai Shanhai Hoso Kyoku) in many aspects, it was in line with the latter in terms of advancing wartime ideology of the Japanese empire. As the Japanese-occupied areas were enlarged, target audience of the GEBS also expanded to Chinese people and foreign nationals when Japanese, English, Russian, and Shanghai-dialect news was broadcast by the station. Suffice it to say that the GEBS was closely related to wartime propaganda of the Japanese imperial expansion.

• 동북아문화연구
• /
• 제28권
• /
• pp.339-363
• /
• 2011

This thesis examines analyzing how historic knowledge was shaped in museum. Examining by Tokyo Imperial Museum, Government General Museum of Taiwan, Yi Wang Ga Museum, Government General Museum of Chosun, and NanTong Museum of late 19th and early 20th century, tried to find out similarities and differences. These museums are similar in that they adopt museums as modern system considering models of other countries(Europe or Japan) and exhibitions played important roles in gathering relics. Experts who leaded adoption of western civilization played an important role. These experts were conservatives who valued tradition and relics while they aimed for western civilization. It originated in the character of museum system. Historical Knowledge by museums was constituted with five combinations of conceptions which are nationality, locality, coloniality, and artistry. Every museum cannot help having modernity for museum itself is modern system. Modernity was symbolized by museum building of western style in Yi Wang Ga Museum, Government General Museum of Chosun. Tokyo Imperial Museum revealed nationality in that it tried building of imperial history which includes colonies. In early time, Tokyo Imperial Museum pursued modernity and artistry, however it concentrated on artistry than modernity later. We can find locality in that Tokyo Imperial Museum tried to find meaning about Japanese art by relating with natural characteristics. It is Taiwan Governor Museum that extremely expressed coloniality and artistry was not considered. Government General Museum of Chosun could not be exceptions of features of coloniality, but it need to recognize that artistry was focused all over the exhibitions. It was NanTong Museum that most directly expressed locality. Like these, Museums of East Asia established in around 1900 made different historical knowledge by varying weigh of five factors, nationality, locality, modernity, coloniality and artistry.

• 복식
• /
• 제61권4호
• /
• pp.103-116
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to investigate the revision of the western-styled court costume in the Daehan Empire. For this purpose, 1) historical documents were reviewed, 2) one set of the court costume of Chigimgwan and another set of the court costume of Juimgwan were probed, 3) the photos of people wearing court costume were analyzed. The results of this study are as follows. First, the $14^{th}$ Imperial order of "official costume statute" had been revised in 1904, 1905 and 1907 through official gazettes. The last version of official costume statute enacted the more detail than the first rule. Second, the $15^{th}$ Imperial order of "official costume rules" had been revised in 1904, 1905, and transformed into official costume rules reform on $12^{th}$ Dec., 1906. The revision in 1905 made gold embroidery of court costume more simple than the first rule. The form of court costume was totally revised by change of the shape of adjusting on the top in the revised rule of 1906. Third, the revision in 1905 was actually manufactured and worn by the people because it can be confirmed in the relics of the court costume of $2^{nd}$ Chigimgwan in Yonsei University Museum, and the court costume of juimgwan in Kwangju Municipal Folk Museum. The relics made by the revision in 1906 had not been reported until now, but they can be confirmed in the photos left. Fourth, the sovereignity of the Daehan Empire was actually lost by $22^{th}$ Imperial family order which urged the servant having the title of nobility of Japan to wear the court costume of Japan. Therefore, the endeavor of the Daehan Empire which wanted to establish and develop the costume system of modern independent nation was discontinued.

• International Journal of Costume and Fashion
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2008

This research analyzes the patterns in modernization of costume that reflects the attitude of accepting the Western culture and the differences in perception, during modernization period (1850-early 1910) in Japan. The Japanese attitude toward the Western costume can be roughly classified into three periods: impetuous acceptance in the early Restoration of Imperial Regime(1867-1883), aggressive acceptance in Rokumeikan period(1883-1887), and the coexistence of traditional and modern costumes after Meiji 20(1887-1910). A Western costume symbolizes wealth and power until Rokumeikan period, however, as it becomes more common, it is considered as an ordinary dress rather than a ceremonial dress. The exact opposite phenomenon occurs to traditional costume. Although Japanese modernization is initially forced by western ideology of power, positive reactions to western culture and changes in perception toward China leads to more active importation of western culture. This reflects the governmental effort such as the Foreigners Employment Policy in the early Meiji period, and the public also became receptive toward change. However, acceptance of the Western culture is only limited to academic and technological areas, while the traditional Japanese ethos(the Emperor system, Shintoism, patriarchism) is obstinately protected. Therefore, it can be inferred that such extreme polarization of modernization and traditional inheritance enabled both perspectives to retain their own characteristics.