• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.52-79
• /
• 2002

The hospital is characterized by it's remarkable labor industry and human resources input by unit. Recently, the administrative personnel are recognized as an important staff to provide a hospital guidance to consumer and also easiness for consumer's visit to hospital. The purpose of this study is to find the organizational effectiveness of the administrative personnel in hospitals. The survey data involved in the study was derived from 229 personnels working in 3 medium and small sized hospitals and 1 university hospital in Inchon area. The major finding are as follows; 1. The organizational efficiency in accordance with the general characteristics of subjects in order of over 31 years of age, university graduates, long-term tenure and high position is higher, whereas, in as much as wage and well trained personnels in are higher, general hospital's organizational efficiency is higher in comparison with those of university hospital. 2. The organizational efficiency in accordance with satisfaction and the psychological motive contributional factors is higher as much as the high satisfactory level in every hospitals in general. 3. The organizational efficiency in accordance with the factors of job characteristics is higher in as much as difficulty of the jobs is lesser, however there was not statically significance. In as much as job standard level is higher and the more job responsibility the higher organizational efficiency. It was obvious that the higher professional expertise as well as the training and application level are improving the organizational efficiency. 4. The organizational efficiency in accordance with the factors of structural characteristics was higher in as much as the intercommunication was smooth and the structural formalization level are higher, however there was not statically significance between the participation level of decision making and the organizational efficiency. 5. In as much as older age, management of organization and the job level are satisfied, the higher structural formalization level, the smooth intercommunication have affected as major influence factors of organizational efficiency. 6. In the university hospitals is satisfied in the management and job level of hospital organization as there are no difficult jobs while the level of hospital's organizational formality is high and the intercommunication is smooth, which are improving the organizational efficiency. In the general hospitals is also satisfied the management and job level of hospital organization and psychological motive contributional factors is higher, it was apparent that the organizational efficiency is higher in as much as the level of job standardization is high and the intercommunication is smooth. As a result of this study, in order for improving the organizational efficiency of administrative personnel in hospitals, the management and job level as well as personal relation are preferably satisfied, whereas formalization of organization, intercommunication and etc. should be satisfied, and, therefore, it is advisable to buildup discriminated organizational management and environment for different division on the basis above factors. Since this study is carried on four hospitals in Inchon area, there is a certain limit to generalize its result to all domestic hospitals, nevertheless the gallop poll was made by developing the questionnaires with reasonability and reliability. Especially. as the study was carried by analyzing the comparison of influence factors' difference of organizational efficiency in accordance with the divisional characteristics of the university and general hospitals.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제31권
• /
• pp.27-56
• /
• 2006

Today's financial institutions usually take environmental issues seriously into consideration as they could not evade lender liability in an increasing number of cases. On the international scene, a brand-new concept of the "Equator Principles" in the New Millenium has driven more and more international banks to adopt these Principles in project financing. Sustainable development has been a key word in understanding new trends of the governments, financial institutions, corporations and civic groups in the 21st century. The Equator Principles are a set of voluntary environmental and social guidelines for sustainable finance. These Principles commit bank officers to avoid financial support to projects that fail to meet these guidelines. The Principles were conceived in 2002 on an initiative of the International Finance Corporation(IFC), and launched in June 2003. Since then, dozens of major banks, accounting for up to 80 percent of project loan market, have adopted the Principles. Accordingly, the Principles have become the de facto standard for all banks and investors on how to deal with potential social and environmental issues of projects to be financed. Compliance with the Equator Principles facilitates for endorsing banks to participate in the syndicated loan and help them to manage the risks associated with large-scale projects. The Equator Principles call for financial institutions to provide loans to projects under the following circumstances: - The risk of the project is categorized in accordance with internal guidelines based upon the environmental and social screening criteria of the IFC. - For Category A and B projects, borrowers or sponsors are required to conduct a Social and Environmental Assessment, the preparation of which must meet certain requirements and satisfactorily address key social and environmental issues. - The Social and Environmental Assessment report should address baseline social and environmental conditions, requirements under host country laws and regulations, sustainable development, and, as appropriate, IFC's Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines, etc. - Based on the Social and Environmental Assessment, Equator banks then make agreements with borrowers on how they mitigate, monitor and manage the risks through a Social and Environmental Management System. Compliance with the plan is included in the covenant clause of loan agreements. If the borrower doesn't comply with the agreed terms, the bank will take corrective actions. The Equator Principles are not a mere declaration of cautious banks but a full commitment of lenders. A violation of the Principles in the process of project financing, which led to an unexpected damage to the affected community, would not give rise to any specific legal remedies other than ordinary lawsuits. So it is more effective for banks to ensure consistent implementation of the Principles and to have them take responsible measures to solve social and environmental issues. Public interests have recently mounted up with respect to environmental issues on the occasion of the Supreme Court's decision (2006Du330) on the fiercely debated reclamation project at Saemangeum. The majority Justices said that the expected environmental damages like probable pollution of water and soil were not believed so serious and that the Administration should continue to implement the project seeking ways to make it more environment friendly. In this case, though the Category A Saemangeum Project was carried out by a government agency, the Supreme Court behaved itself as a signal giver to approve or stop the environment-related project like an Equator bank in project financing. At present, there is no Equator bank in Korea in contrast to three big banks in Japan. Also Korean contractors, which are aggressively bidding for Category A-type projects in South East Asia and Mideast, might find themselves in a disadvantageous position because they are generally ignorant of the environmental assessment associated with project financing. In this regard, Korean banks and overseas project contractors should care for the revised Equator Principles and the latest developments in project financing more seriously. It's because its scope has expanded to the capital cost of US$10 million or more across all industry sectors regardless of developing countries or not. It should be noted that, for a Korean bank, being an Equator bank is more or less burdensome in a short-term period, but it must be conducive to minimizing risks and building up good reputation in the long run.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.135-149
• /
• 2020

인공지능을 기반으로 한 다양한 연구들이 현대사회에 많은 변화를 불러일으키고 있다. 금융시장 역시 예외는 아니다. 로보어드바이저 개발이 활발하게 진행되고 있으며 전통적 방식의 단점을 보완하고 사람이 분석하기 어려운 부분을 대체하고 있다. 로보어드바이저는 인공지능 알고리즘으로 자동화된 투자 결정을 내려 다양한 자산배분 모형과 함께 활용되고 있다. 자산배분 모형 중 리스크패리티는 대표적인 위험 기반 자산배분 모형의 하나로 큰 자산을 운용하는 데 있어 안정성을 나타내고 현업에서 역시 널리 쓰이고 있다. 그리고 XGBoost 모형은 병렬화된 트리 부스팅 기법으로 제한된 메모리 환경에서도 수십억 가지의 예제로 확장이 가능할 뿐만 아니라 기존의 부스팅에 비해 학습속도가 매우 빨라 많은 분야에서 널리 활용되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서 리스크패리티와 XGBoost를 장점을 결합한 모형을 제안하고자 한다. 기존에 널리 사용되는 최적화 자산배분 모형은 과거 데이터를 기반으로 투자 비중을 추정하기 때문에 과거와 실투자 기간 사이의 추정 오차가 발생하게 된다. 최적화 자산배분 모형은 추정 오차로 인해 포트폴리오 성과에서 악영향을 받게 된다. 본 연구는 XGBoost를 통해 실투자 기간의 변동성을 예측하여 최적화 자산배분 모형의 추정 오차를 줄여 모형의 안정성과 포트폴리오 성과를 개선하고자 한다. 본 연구에서 제시한 모형의 실증 검증을 위해 한국 주식시장의 10개 업종 지수 데이터를 활용하여 2003년부터 2019년까지 총 17년간 주가 자료를 활용하였으며 in-sample 1,000개, out-of-sample 20개씩 Moving-window 방식으로 예측 결과값을 누적하여 총 154회의 리밸런싱이 이루어진 백테스팅 결과를 도출하였다. 본 연구에서 제안한 자산배분 모형은 기계학습을 사용하지 않은 기존의 리스크패리티와 비교하였을 때 누적수익률 및 추정 오차에서 모두 개선된 성과를 보여주었다. 총 누적수익률은 45.748%로 리스크패리티 대비 약 5% 높은 결과를 보였고 추정오차 역시 10개 업종 중 9개에서 감소한 결과를 보였다. 실험 결과를 통해 최적화 자산배분 모형의 추정 오차를 감소시킴으로써 포트폴리오 성과를 개선하였다. 포트폴리오의 추정 오차를 줄이기 위해 모수 추정 방법에 관한 다양한 연구 사례들이 존재한다. 본 연구는 추정 오차를 줄이기 위한 새로운 추정방법으로 기계학습을 제시하여 최근 빠른 속도로 발전하는 금융시장에 맞는 진보된 인공지능형 자산배분 모형을 제시한 점에서 의의가 있다.