• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.101-107
• /
• 2015

In anteroposterior radiation test for cervical vertebra, it is general that the incidence angle of X-ray is $15^{\circ}$ to $20^{\circ}$ degrees to head regardless of position. So this study suggests appropriate incidence angle of cervical vertebra depended on the position. From 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013, cervical spine radiographys and magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 107 people who visited P Hospital located in Pusan. Among them, 39 people(men 24, women 15) were below 80 above 20 years old(average age 54 years) with normal cervical lordosis(normal $40^{\circ}{\pm}5^{\circ}$). In erect position, the incidence angle of cervical vertebra is measured from lateral radiographic images. And in supine position, it measured from MRI sagittal images. Results based on gender, the incidence angle of cervical vertebra in erect position was $25.9^{\circ}$ for men, women was $23.1^{\circ}$, showed statistically significant (p<0.05). And the angle in supine was $11.6^{\circ}$ for men, women was $12.6^{\circ}$, showed not statistically significant (p>0.05) An analysis of age group shows, the incidence angle of cervical vertebra in erect position was $24.6^{\circ}$ under 50, and $25.0^{\circ}$ over 50. The angle in supine was $12.0^{\circ}$ under 50, and $11.9^{\circ}$ over 50. And all of them showed not statistically significant (p>0.05). At all ages, the average of incidence angles in erect position were $24.8^{\circ}$, and the angle in supine was $12.0^{\circ}$, showed statistically significant (p<0.05). The cervical vertebra incidence angle for X-ray was $15^{\circ}$ to $20^{\circ}$ degrees to head in general. But, through the results, it is recommended that the angle is $24.8^{\circ}$ in erect and $12.0^{\circ}$ in supine position. It could be shown true anteroposterior(AP) view of cervical vertebra and accurate intervertebral fusion fixing devices.

• The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.15-24
• /
• 2021

Purpose SPECT/CT was noted for its excellent correction method and qualitative functions based on fusion images in the early stages of dissemination, and interest in and utilization of quantitative functions has been increasing with the recent introduction of companion diagnostic therapy(Theranostics). Unlike PET/CT, various conditions like the type of collimator and detector rotation are a challenging factor for image acquisition and reconstruction methods at absolute quantification of SPECT/CT. Therefore, in this study, We want to find out the effect on the radioactivity concentration estimate by the increase or decrease of the total acquisition time according to the number of projections and the acquisition time per projection among SPECT/CT imaging conditions. Materials and Methods After filling the 9,293 ml cylindrical phantom with sterile water and diluting 99mTc 91.76 MBq, the standard image was taken with a total acquisition time of 600 sec (10 sec/frame × 120 frames, matrix size 128 × 128) and also volume sensitivity and the calibration factor was verified. Based on the standard image, the comparative images were obtained by increasing or decreasing the total acquisition time. namely 60 (-90%), 150 (-75%), 300 (-50%), 450 (-25%), 900 (+50%), and 1200 (+100%) sec. For each image detail, the acquisition time(sec/frame) per projection was set to 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 15.0 and 20.0 sec (fixed number of projections: 120 frame) and the number of projection images was set to 12, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 240 frames(fixed time per projection:10 sec). Based on the coefficients measured through the volume of interest in each acquired image, the percentage of variation about the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was determined as a qualitative assessment, and the quantitative assessment was conducted through the percentage of variation of the radioactivity concentration estimate. At this time, the relationship between the radioactivity concentration estimate (cps/ml) and the actual radioactivity concentration (Bq/ml) was compared and analyzed using the recovery coefficient (RC_Recovery Coefficients) as an indicator. Results The results [CNR, radioactivity Concentration, RC] by the change in the number of projections for each increase or decrease rate (-90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%) of total acquisition time are as follows. [-89.5%, +3.90%, 1.04] at -90%, [-77.9%, +2.71%, 1.03] at -75%, [-55.6%, +1.85%, 1.02] at -50%, [-33.6%, +1.37%, 1.01] at -25%, [-33.7%, +0.71%, 1.01] at +50%, [+93.2%, +0.32%, 1.00] at +100%. and also The results [CNR, radioactivity Concentration, RC] by the acquisition time change for each increase or decrease rate (-90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%) of total acquisition time are as follows. [-89.3%, -3.55%, 0.96] at - 90%, [-73.4%, -0.17%, 1.00] at -75%, [-49.6%, -0.34%, 1.00] at -50%, [-24.9%, 0.03%, 1.00] at -25%, [+49.3%, -0.04%, 1.00] at +50%, [+99.0%, +0.11%, 1.00] at +100%. Conclusion In SPECT/CT, the total coefficient obtained according to the increase or decrease of the total acquisition time and the resulting image quality (CNR) showed a pattern that changed proportionally. On the other hand, quantitative evaluations through absolute quantification showed a change of less than 5% (-3.55 to +3.90%) under all experimental conditions, maintaining quantitative accuracy (RC 0.96 to 1.04). Considering the reduction of the total acquisition time rather than the increasing of the image acquiring time, The reduction in total acquisition time is applicable to quantitative analysis without significant loss and is judged to be clinically effective. This study shows that when increasing or decreasing of total acquisition time, changes in acquisition time per projection have fewer fluctuations that occur in qualitative and quantitative condition changes than the change in the number of projections under the same scanning time conditions.