• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.304-314
• /
• 2009

A new harbor as been constructing in Gadukdo. However, a lot of fugitive dust gas been often generated from construction site reclaiming sea sand, especially when the Northwester is blown strongly. It has resulted insome appeals of residents in Gadukdo. In this study, we estimated the amount of fugitive dust caused by new harbor construction using Fugitive dust formula. Also, the concentration of PM10 for recipient is predicted by AERMOD. The amount of fugitive dust is 26.56 ${\mu}g/sec{\cdot}m^2$ and 11.84 ${\mu}g/sec{\cdot}m^2$ respectively by the Fugitive dust formula. PM10 outlet concentration and the amount of fugitive dust increase according to wind velocity and directions. AERMOD is performed on the basis of weather data and the amount of fugitive dust generated with wind velocity. As a result of AERMOD, the PM10 concentration of Sunchang and Oinul are predicted over 100 ${\mu}g/m^3$. The PM10 concentration of Sunchang and Oinul are predicted over 130 ${\mu}g/m^3$ when wind velocity of northwester in winter is over 11 m/s (Air Quality for Particulate Matter (100 ${\mu}g/m^3$ for 24 hours)). Also, the measured error between AERMOD and actual measurement is lower than 5%.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.249-255
• /
• 2000

The comparison of three different kind of simulation by screen3 model, Tem-8 model and EPA formula were undertaken to get a potential concentration and hourly maximum concentration of fugitive dust produced from each construction site in the downtown area of puchon city. The amount of dust estimate U.S EPA formula and fugitive dust formula 22.6078g/sec, 27.9572g/sec respectively. Hourly maximum concenstration at the distance from each construction site by screen3 model are average of $78.89{\sim}728.40{\mu}g/m^3$ and Tem-8 model are $97{\mu}g/m^3$ in site-1, $241{\mu}g/m^3$ in site-2, $268{\mu}g/m^3$ in site-3, $232{\mu}g/m^3$ in site-4, $69{\mu}g/m^3$ in site-5, $36{\mu}g/m^3$ in site-6. Through our experiment, Screen3 model is more encouragingly used than any other model.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.237-247
• /
• 2006

In case of studied area located around the sea, the data measured from the regional meteorological office is highly different from the local weather data because the diffusivity of fugitive dust varies considerably with meteorological conditions. Especially, it is very difficult to predict the amount of fugitive dust accurately as wind speed remains high frequently. In this study, the fluxes of suspended particulates as a function of the friction velocity were applied to consider the effect of wind speed on the amount of fugitive dust generated from the reclamation site. The amount of fugitive dust estimated as mentioned above was simulated by using ISCST3 model. As a result, in case of using only the Fugitive Dust Formula which is usually used in Environment Impact Assessment, the predicted $PM_{10}$ concentrations with points were $43.4{\sim}67.8{\mu}g/m^3$. However, in case of applying to the flux of suspended particulates, the predicted values of $PM_{10}$ with points were $43.3{\sim}69.1{\mu}g/m^3$, $49.5{\sim}90.4{\mu}g/m^3$ and $76.0{\sim}182.6{\mu}g/m^3$ with the wind speeds of 4.4, 5.8 and 7.7m/s, respectively. It could be possible to predict the amount of fugitive dust accurately because these predicted values were similar to the measured values. Consequently, we can establish alternatives for reduction of fugitive dust in this area damaged by fugitive dust which is caused by wind.