• 제목/요약/키워드: fecal occult blood test

검색결과 24건 처리시간 0.022초

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Korea, 2005-2015: After the Introduction of the National Cancer Screening Program

  • Mai, Tran Thi Xuan;Lee, Yoon Young;Suh, Mina;Choi, Eunji;Lee, Eun Young;Ki, Moran;Cho, Hyunsoon;Park, Boyoung;Jun, Jae Kwan;Kim, Yeol;Oh, Jin-Kyoung;Choi, Kui Son
    • Yonsei Medical Journal
    • /
    • 제59권9호
    • /
    • pp.1034-1040
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: This study aimed to investigate inequalities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in Korea and trends therein using the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) across income and education groups. Materials and Methods: Data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annually conducted, nationwide cross-sectional survey, were utilized. A total of 17174 men and women aged 50 to 74 years were included for analysis. Prior experience with CRC screening was defined as having either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or a lifetime colonoscopy. CRC screening rates and annual percentage changes (APCs) were evaluated. Then, SII and RII were calculated to assess inequality in CRC screening for each survey year. Results: CRC screening rates increased from 23.4% in 2005 to 50.9% in 2015 (APC, 7.8%; 95% CI, 6.0 to 9.6). Upward trends in CRC screening rates were observed for all age, education, and household income groups. Education inequalities were noted in 2009, 2014, and overall pooled estimates in both indices. Income inequalities were inconsistent among survey years, and overall estimates did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Education inequalities in CRC screening among men and women aged 50 to 74 years were observed in Korea. No apparent pattern, however, was found for income inequalities. Further studies are needed to thoroughly outline socio-economic inequalities in CRC screening.

Awareness of Cancer Screening During Treatment of Patients with Renal Failure: A Physician Survey in Turkey

  • Uysal-Sonmez, Ozlem;Tanriverdi, Ozgur;Uyeturk, Ummugul;Budakoglu, Isil Irem;Kazancioglu, Rumeyza;Turker, Ibrahim;Budakoglu, Burcin;Yalcintas-Arslan, Ulku;Oksuzoglu, Berna
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제15권5호
    • /
    • pp.2165-2168
    • /
    • 2014
  • Background: Today, survival rate of patients with chronic renal failure/hemodialysis has increased so that chronic illnesses are more likely to occur. Cancer is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in such patients. Aim: In this study, physician attitudes were examined about cancer screening in patients with renal failure. Materials and Methods: This study was done by face to face questionnaire in the $27^{th}$ National Nephrology Congress to determine if the physicians dealing with chronic renal failure, hemodialysis or renal transplanted patients, recommend cancer screening or not and the methods of screening for cervix, prostate, breast and colon cancer. Results: One hundred and fifty six physicians were included in the survey. A total of 105 (67%) participants were male and the age of responders was $48{\pm}9$ years. About 29% were specialists in nephrology, 28% internal medicine, and 5% were other areas of expertise. Some 48% of participants were hemodialysis certified general practitioners. Patients were grouped as compensated chronic renal failure, hemodialysis or renal transplanted. Of the 156 responders, 128 (82%) physicians recommended breast cancer screening and the most recommended subgroup was hemodialysis patients (15%). The most preferred methods of screening were combinations of mammography, self breast examination and physicianbreast examination. 112 (72%) physicians recommended cervix cancer screening, and the most preferred method of screening was pap-smear. Colon cancer screening was recommended by 102 (65%) physicians and prostate screening by 109 (70%) physicians. The most preferred methods of screening were fecal occult blood test and PSA plus rectal digital test, respectively. Conclusions: It is not obvious whether cancer screening in renal failure patients is different from the rest of society. There is a variety of screening methods. An answer can be found to these questions as a result of studies by a common follow-up protocol and cooperation of nephrologists and oncologists.

OC Sensor PLEDIA를 이용한 LX Detergent Cleaning Solution과 OC Detergent Cleaning Solution의 동등성 평가 (Analysis of a Comparability Test between LX Detergent Cleaning Solution and OC Detergent Cleaning Solution Using OC Sensor PLEDIA)

  • 차경재
    • 대한임상검사과학회지
    • /
    • 제53권1호
    • /
    • pp.19-31
    • /
    • 2021
  • 이 연구의 목적은 기능적, 정량적 분석을 바탕으로 수입 LX 세정액(LX-CS)과 자가제조 OC 세정액(OC-CS)의 성능을 비교하였다. 기능적 분석은 ADC값을 사용하여 평가하였다. 정량적 분석을 위해 CLSI 지침에 따라 정도 관리 물질을 이용하여 정밀도, 직선성 및 오염률을 평가하였다. OC-Sensor PLEDIA(Eiken Chemical, Japan)를 이용한 모든 cuvette의 ADC값은 허용기준을 만족하였다. 정량적 분석의 경우 두 제품의 정밀도는 5.0% 미만이었고, 오염율은 ±1.00% 이하였다. 직선성 기울기와 r2 값은 LX-CS에서 각각 1.0017와 0.9982였으며, OC-CS에서 0.9924와 0.9996이였다. 상관계수(r)는 0.9997이였다. 또한 40개의 가변을 이용한 % difference는 10% 미만, P값은 0.1 미만이였다. 각 각 차이: 표준 편차 비(D: ±1 SD 비)에 기초한 두 제품 모두 유사한 결과를 보였다. 결론적으로 두 제품의 기능적, 정량적 분석을 비교한 결과 유사하였다. 향후 자가제조한 OC세정액은 수입 LX세정액보다 훨씬 더 안정적이고 빠른 공급을 제공할 수 있을 것이라 기대된다.

Screening in the Era of Economic Crisis: Misperceptions and Misuse from a Longitudinal Study on Greek Women Undergoing Benign Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy

  • Domeyer, Philip John;Sergentanis, Theodoros Nikolaos;Katsari, Vasiliki;Souliotis, Kyriakos;Mariolis, Anargiros;Zagouri, Flora;Zografos, George Constantine
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제14권9호
    • /
    • pp.5023-5029
    • /
    • 2013
  • Background: To evaluate knowledge about screening tests and tests without proven screening value in a Greek Breast Unit population undergoing benign vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Materials and Methods: This study included 81 patients. Three knowledge-oriented items (recommended or not, screening frequency, age of onset) were assessed. Regarding screening tests two levels of knowledge were evaluated: i). crude knowledge (CK), i.e. knowledge that the test is recommended and ii). advanced knowledge (AK), i.e. correct response to all three knowledge-oriented items. Solely CK was evaluated for tests without proven screening value. Risk factors for lack of knowledge were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. A second questionnaire was administered 18 months after VABB to assess its impact on the performance of tests. Results: Concerning screening tests considerable lack of AK was noted (mammogram, 60.5%; Pap smear, 59.3%; fecal occult blood testing, 93.8%; sigmoidoscopy, 95.1%). Similarly lack of CK was documented regarding tests without proven screening value (breast self-examination, 92.6%; breast MRI, 60.5%; abdominal ultrasound, 71.6%; barium meal, 48.1%; urine analysis, 90.1%; chest X-Ray, 69.1%; electrocardiogram, 74.1%; cardiac ultrasound, 75.3%). Risk factors for lack of AK were: place of residence (mammogram), age (Pap smear), personal income (sigmoidoscopy); risk factors for lack of CK included number of offspring (breast MRI, chest X-Ray), BMI (abdominal ultrasound), marital status (urine analysis), current smoking status (electrocardiogram). VABB's only effect was improvement in mammogram rates. Conclusions: A considerable lack of knowledge concerning screening tests and misperceptions regarding those without proven value was documented.