• 대한간호
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.48-65
• /
• 1990

The government has adopted a policy to introduce Home Health Care Program, and has established a three stage plan to implement it. The three stage plan is : First, to amend Article 54 (Nurses for Different Types of Services) of the Regulations for Implementing the Law of Medical Services; Second, to tryout the new system through pilot projects established in public hospitals and clinics; and third, to implement at all hospitals and equivalent medical institutions. In accordance with the plan, the Regulation has been amend and it was promulgated on January 9,1990, thus establishing a legal ground for implementing the policy. Subsequently, however, the Medical Association raised its objection to the policy, causing a delay in moving into the second stage of the plan. Under these circumstances, a study was conducted by collecting and evaluating the opinions of physicians, nurses, non-medical personnel and patients on the need and expected result from the home health care for the purpose of help facilitating the implementation of the new system. As a result of this study, it was revealed that: 1. Except the physicians, absolute majority of all other three groups - nurses, non-medical personnel and patients -gave positive answers to all 11 items related to the need for establishing a program for Home Health Care. Among the physicians, the opinions on the need for the new services were different depending on their field of specialty, and those who have been treating long term patients were more positive in supporting the new system. 2. The respondents in all four groups held very positive view for the effectiveness and the expected result of the program. The composite total of scores for all of 17 items, however, re-veals that the physicians were least positive for the- effectiveness of the new system. The people in all four groups held high expectation on the system on the ground that: it will help continued medical care after the discharge from hospitals; that it will alleviate physical and economic burden of patient's family; that it will offer nursing services at home for the patients who are suffering from chronic disease, for those early discharge from hospital, or those who are without family members to look after the patients at home. 3. Opinions were different between patients( who will receive services) and nurses (who will provide services) on the types of services home visiting nurses should offer. The patients wanted "education on how to take care patients at home", "making arrangement to be admitted into hospital when need arises", "IV injection", "checking blood pressure", and "administering medications." On the other hand, nurses believed that they can offer all 16 types of services except "Controlling pain of patients", 4. For the question of "what types of patients are suitable for Home Health Care Program; " the physicians, the nurses and non-medical personnel all gave high score on the cases of "patients of chronic disease", "patients of old age", "terminal cases", and the "patients who require long-term stay in hospital". 5. On the question of who should control Home Health Care Program, only physicians proposed that it should be done through hospitals, while remaining three groups recommended that it should be done through public institutions such as public health center. 6. On the question of home health care fee, the respondents in all four groups believed that the most desireable way is to charge a fixed amount of visiting fee plus treatment service fee and cost of material. 7. In the case when the Home Health Care Program is to be operated through hospitals, it is recommended that a new section be created in the out-patient department for an exclusive handling of the services, instead of assigning it to an existing section. 8. For the qualification of the nurses for-home visiting, the majority of respondents recommended that they should be "registered nurses who have had clinical experiences and who have attended training courses for home health care". 9. On the question of if the program should be implemented; 74.0% of physicians, 87.5% of non-medical personnel, and 93.0% of nurses surveyed expressed positive support. 10. Among the respondents, 74.5% of -physicians, 81.3% of non-medical personnel and 90.9% of nurses said that they would refer patients' to home health care. 11. To the question addressed to patients if they would take advantage of home health care; 82.7% said they would if the fee is applicable to the Health Insurance, and 86.9% said they would follow advises of physicians in case they were decided for early discharge from hospitals. 12. While 93.5% of nurses surveyed had heard about the Home Health Care Program, only 38.6% of physicians surveyed, 50.9% of non-medical personnel, and 35.7% of patients surveyed had heard about the program. In view of above findings, the following measures are deemed prerequisite for an effective implementation of Home Health Care Program. 1. The fee for home health care to be included in the public health insurance. 2. Clearly define the types and scope of services to be offered in the Home Health Care Program. 3. Develop special programs for training nurses who will be assigned to the Home Health Care Program. 4. Train those nurses by consigning them at hospitals and educational institutions. 5. Government conducts publicity campaign toward the public and the hospitals so that the hospitals support the program and patients take advantage of them. 6. Systematic and effective publicity and educational programs for home heath care must be developed and exercises for the people of medical professions in hospitals as well as patients and their families. 7. Establish and operate pilot projects for home health care, to evaluate and refine their programs.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.29-35
• /
• 2014

목 적 : 본 연구는 이미 상용화가 시작된 호흡 동조 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료(Gated RapidArc) 이전의 자동화가 되지 않는 장비들에서 호흡 동조 방사선 치료(Gated radiation therapy)와 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료(VMAT)를 동시에 시행할 수 있게 Gated RapidArc의 정확성을 분석하여 유용성을 평가하고, 진폭모드(Amplitude mode)를 이용하여 Gated RapidArc가 자동으로 되지 않는 장비에 환자를 적용하여 보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 방사선량 분포의 분석은 물 등가물질 고체 팬톰과 GafChromic 필름(EBT2 QD+, USA)을 이용하였으며, Film QA (ver. 2.2, USA) 필름 분석 프로그램을 이용하여 Gamma 인자(3%, 3 mm)를 분석하였다. 또한, 삼차원 선량 분포의 정확도를 확인하기 위해서 Matrixx(IBA Dosimery, Germany) 선량 측정 장비와 Compass(IBA Dosimetry, Germany) 선량 분석 프로그램을 이용하였다. 고체 팬톰을 이용한 호흡 동조 주기 신호는 4D 팬톰(Dynamic Thorax Phantom, CIRS, USA)과 Varian RPM(Real-Time Position Monitor) 호흡 동조 시스템을 이용하여 만들었으며, 자유호흡(free breathing)과 호흡정지(breath holding) 시에 따른 방사선량 분포를 각각에 대하여 분석 평가하였다. 환자에게 적용하기 위하여 2013년 2월부터 2013년 8월까지 간암환자 4명을 대상으로 4DCT의 영상을 얻기 위하여 충분한 호흡주기 연습후에 환자의 호흡주기에 맞게 위상모드(Phase mode)를 이용하여 환자가 고글의 호흡주기 패턴을 눈으로 보고 정확하게 따라할 수 있도록 하면서 4DCT의 영상을 획득하였다. Gated RapidArc 치료를 위하여 진폭모드(Amplitude mode)의 호흡주기를 만들어 3회 호흡을 시행한 후 40%~60%의 구간에서 5~6초 호흡을 참을 수 있도록 연습을 하고, 치료 시 40%~60%의 구간에서 환자가 숨을 참을 때 Beam On 버튼을 눌러주는 방식의 반자동으로 치료를 시행하였다. 결 과 : 비 호흡 및 호흡 동조 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료기법 간의 절대선량은 전산화 치료 계획을 이용한 계산값과 1% 이내의 차이를 보였으며, 치료 기법 간의 차이 또한 1% 이내의 차이를 보였다. Gamma 인자(3%, 3 mm)는 99% 이상의 일치함을 보였으며, 각 장기별 선량 차이는 대체로 95% 이상의 일치함을 보였다. 또한 호흡 동조 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료를 위하여 만든 진폭모드(Amplitude mode)의 호흡주기와 실제 환자의 호흡주기가 잘 일치하는 것을 볼 수 있었다. 결 론 : 비 호흡 동조와 호흡 동조 시 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료간의 절대 선량 및 방사선량의 분포가 매우 잘 일치함을 보였다. 이는 호흡 동조 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료 기법을 이용하여 호흡에 따라 움직이는 흉부나 복부의 종양 치료에 적용이 가능한 것으로 사료된다. 또한 실제 치료환자를 대상으로 고글을 통하여 진폭모드(Amplitude mode)의 호흡주기를 만들어 Gated RapidArc가 자동으로 되지 않는 장비에 치료를 적용한 결과, 5~6초정도 정지된 호흡에서 호흡 동조 체적 세기조절 회전 방사선 치료가 원활히 이루어짐을 알 수 있었다.