• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2018

Objectives: From a policy perspective, the introduction of confidential information reviews is a vital task for expanding workers' right to know and improving hazardous materials information communication. In this study, rational methods for introducing and administering confidential information reviews were examined as a part of advancing chemical information communication. Methods: The domestic status, social demands, and control cases from other countries about confidential information in material safety data sheets(MSDSs) were all examined. Additionally, principles for introducing MSDS confidential information review, what needs to be revised prior to its introduction, and procedures and manners of reviewing confidential information were suggested. Results and Conclusions: When composition information on MSDS needs to be protected in the EU and Canada, confidential information should be claimed and then approved by competent authorities with a principle of reviewing confidential information prior to rescinding information from MSDS. Applying the same principle, certain information on an MSDS that needs to be protected should be reviewed and approved in Korea. As a result, the MSDS is communicated with approval numbers replacing composition information. MSDS confidential information review has five steps, including deciding whether chemicals claimed to be confidential are excluded from applying for a confidentiality exemption, the names and concentration ranges of ingredients are adequate, and the claimed information is valid in terms of confidentiality.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제53권
• /
• pp.181-206
• /
• 2012

The straight bill of lading is regarded as the documents of title except in American law after The Rafaela S case. The Carewins case also decided that the exclusion clause of bill of lading did not exempt carriers from liability when the carriers delivered the cargo to the consignee without the production of original bill of lading. And the court said that the carrier was responsible for delivering the goods against a forged bill of lading regardless of exemption clause of bill of lading in the Motis case. It may be assumed through these cases that the straight bill of lading as a document of title gives documentary security to the banks in trade finance. However, there can be some downside to the efficacy of the straight bill of lading as collateral. First, when it is subject to the English law, the shipper can arbitrarily change the consignee different from the one named in the document. Second, some bills of lading bear provisions relating to the carrier delivering the goods upon reasonable proof of identity without the surrender of an original and/or genuine bill of lading.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.187-192
• /
• 2014

연구윤리는 학문을 탐구하는 사람이 갖추어야 할 가장 근본적인 자세라고 할 수 있다. 많은 선학들의 훌륭한 연구 업적 덕분에 지금의 학문 체계가 마련될 수 있었다. 최근 증가되고 있는 결과 중심의 연구 풍토와 업적을 중시하는 평가 시스템은 일부 학자로서의 양심을 벗어난 연구를 부추기는 부작용을 낳을 수 있다고 사료된다. 이에 저자는 뉘른베르크 강령과 헬싱키 선언으로 시작된 연구윤리의 개념을 되짚어보고, 이를 강조하는 주체에 대한 각국의 입장과 국내 실정을 소개하며, 최근 개정된 "생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률"에 따른 기관생명윤리위원회의 역할, 심의면제 그리고 심의절차 등에 관해 검토해보고, 향후 연구자가 숙지해야할 내용을 점검해 보았다. 또한 연구 객관성의 확보와 연구부정행위에 대한 검증 및 대비를 위해 연구노트의 적극적인 활용을 고려해 보는 것을 제안하는 바이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제66권
• /
• pp.119-148
• /
• 2015

Generally, the liability for breach is defined as the civil liability that arises from the conduct of violation of a contract. There are two notable principles governing liability for breach that have fundamental impacts on the unified Contract Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter Chinese Contract Law) in the remedies. In China, during the drafting of the Contract Law, there was a great debate as to whether damages for breach of contract ought to follow the fault principle or to follow the strict liability principle. Ultimately the Chinese Contract Law follows the model of the CISG on this point, namely, it follows the strict liability principle (article 107) with an exemption cause of force majeure. Under Chinese Contract Law, it is interpreted as strict liability in principle. Strict Liability is a notion introduced into Chinese Contract Law from the Anglo-Saxon Law. The strict liability or no fault doctrine, on the contrary, allows a party to claim damages if the other party fails to fulfill his contractual obligations regardless of the fault of the failing party. Pursuant to the strict liability doctrine, if the performance of a contract is due, any non-performance will constitute a breach and the fault on the party in breach is irrelevant. This paper reviews problems of legal character or legal ground of contractual liability in Chinese contract law. Specifically, focusing on the interpretation of Chinese contract law sections and analysis of three cases related contractual liability in freight agency, the paper proposes some implications of structural features of Chinese contract law and international commercial transactions.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.197-210
• /
• 1998

IAEA는 1996년 방사성물질 안전 운송규정을 개정하였다. 이 규정은 방사성물질의 우송이나 포장에 관하여 우리나라를 비롯한 각국의 운송관련 규정의 기준이 되는 것으로 전반부에서는 IAEA가 1991년에 출간된 국제방사선방호위원회 (ICRP)의 신권고(Publication 60)를 받아들여 개정한 Safety Series No.115(전리방사선에 대한 방호 또는 방사선원의 안전을 위한 기본 안전기준)의 내용 등을 개정의 배경으로 하여 요약하였다. 후반부에서는 이들 개정된 기본 안전 기준들에 기초하여 IAEA의 새로운 운송규정에서 방사선방호의 목적으로 고찰된 요건들에 관한 주요 검토 개정사항을 방사선방어체계, 운송물등의 방사선준위, 방사선방호계획의 규정화, Q 시스템의 개념, 규제면제 등의 측면에서 Safety Series No.6 1985년판과 비교 검토하였다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.97-120
• /
• 2011

본 연구의 목적은 고부가가치 창출을 위한 부산항 환적화물 유치 속성과 항만경쟁력이 무엇인지를 밝히고자 하였다. 환적화물 경쟁력을 항만물동량과 시장점유율로 정의하고 환적항만 환경요인을 내부환경과 외부환경으로 구분하여 이들이 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 연구결과 최적의 환적항만이 되기 위해서는 내부환경으로 배후규모와 입지, 시설 및 요율이, 외부환경으로는 국제 네트워크와 물류관리 정보화가 물동량증가에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 환적화물 유치전략을 극대화하기 위한 방안을 제시하면 첫째 입항에서 하역, 운송, 가공, 선적에 이르는 일괄관리시스템을 구축하여야 한다. 둘째, 관세법에서 규정한 개항을 자유무역지역으로 지정하여 관세 및 내국세 비과세를 통한 외국자본의 유업 및 물동량 증가라는 시스템을 구축하여야 한다. 셋째, 자본의 자유로운 이동을 위하여 불법적인 자본이동을 제외한 외국환거래의 대폭적인 자유화를 보장하여 화주 및 선박회사의 부산항 화물유치 증대 및 투자유치를 적극 추진하여야 한다.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.239-266
• /
• 2012

본 논문은 세계적 수준의 양적인 성장에도 불구하고 여러 가지 문제점을 갖고 있는 국내의 장내 파생상품시장에 대한 바람직한 개선방향을 모색하고자 한다. 우리나라의 장내 파생상품시장에서는 외가격 또는 극외가격의 거래비중이 높고, 미결제약정 당 거래량이 많아 포지션을 짧게 보유하는 투기적 거래의 성향이 강한 것으로 보인다. 또한 외국에 비해 개인투자자의 파생상품시장 참여가 높은데 이로 인한 손실이 지속되고 있고 개인투자자들의 부가 기관 및 외국인투자자들에게 이전되고 있다. 이처럼 여러 문제점을 갖고 있는 장내 파생상품시장에 대한 바람직한 정비방향을 모색하기 위해 투자자보호를 위한 행위규제 측면에서 향후 규제체계 개선방향에 대한 여러 가지 방안을 제안한다. 우선 투기성향의 거래를 완화하기 위해서는 현재 외가격 위주로 거래되고 있는 코스피200옵션시장을 등가격 위주의 시장으로 유도할 필요성이 있다. 이를 위해 등가격 거래에 대한 거래수수료 할인 또는 면제, 등가격 종목에 대한 시장조성자제도 도입 등을 고려할 수 있다. 개인투자자 보호를 위해서는 전문투자자와 개인투자자에 대한 차등 규제, 기본예탁금 관리 강화, 위험관리 교육 및 모의거래 기회 확대 등을 시행 가능한 방안으로 제안하고자 한다.

• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.183-194
• /
• 2022

Background: No study has examined the regulatory factors associated with fatal health problems due to the use of humidified disinfectants (HD) in South Korea. Objectives: This study aimed to identify and discuss the deficiencies and limitations found in the Toxic Chemical Control Acts (TCCA) that failed to prevent the health risk of chemicals in HD products. Methods: The South Korean TCCA was reviewed focusing on acts in operation from 1994 through the end of 2011, the period when HD was allowed in manufacturing and marketing. Results: The TCCA was the act intended to regulate the toxicity of chemicals in HD products. We found the TCCA to lack three key legal clauses which would have been essential to controlling the health risk of HD. First, there was the exemption of toxic and hazard testing for existing chemicals, including chloromethylisothiazolinone (CMIT), methylisothiazolinone (MIT), and benzalkonium chloride (BKC). Secondly, there were no articles requiring industry to provide animal inhalation test result for polymers such as polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG) and Oligo(2-)ethoxyethoxyethyl guanidine chloride (PGH). Finally, there was a lack of articles on examining the risk of products as well as on addressing changes in the usage of products. These articles were found to be generally provided in the US Toxic Substance Chemical Act (TSCA) and the EU Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH). Conclusions: In conclusion, the Ministry of Environment of South Korea had not updated key articles for regulating hazardous chemicals, causing large-scale health problems due to HD which had been fundamentally addressed in chemical-related acts in other countries.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.185-201
• /
• 2021

This paper analyzes the penalty tax system under the Customs Act of Korea and examines whether the penalty tax provision violate the constitutional principle of proportionality when imposed on a person who does not made import declaration intentionally or travelers who has not been made an import declaration of their carry-on items. It examines the provisions that adopt a penalty tax as a means to secure the effectiveness of the customs law. In relation to penalty tax, the case studies of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Korea are analyzed by major issues such as the legal nature of the penalty tax, whether the penalty tax is unconstitutional, and the reasons for exemption from the penalty tax. There is no reasonable basis for the high penalty tax imposed on travelers' carry-on items for which import declaration has not been made. It is necessary to unify the penalty tax imposed when an import declaration is not made and the penalty tax on traveler's carry-on items. It is necessary to establish a limit on penalty tax and to create new regulations to exempt or reduce penalty tax when punished by administrative punishment to avoid double jeopardy. It is necessary to effectively secure the effectiveness of the Customs Act by converting the penalty tax into civil penalty that does not presuppose the faithful and accurate performance of tax obligations by the taxpayer. The government revised the penalty tax system in the Customs Act in 2019, but there are still many types of penalty tax and there are elements that are unconstitutional. It seems that the Korean government should lower the burden on the people by improving the system for the penalty tax system.

• 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.5-21
• /
• 2019

Purpose: Institutional review board (IRB) classifies risks of clinical trials into less than minimal risk, minor increase over minimal risk, and more than minimal risk. Based on classification and evaluation for risk, IRB decides whether permitting consent exemption or asking additional protection for clinical research subject or not. The purpose of this study is to analyze how IRB members evaluate minimal risk by sending questionnaire survey with 12 predetermined scenarios. Methods: IRB members and researchers (pediatrician, gastroenterologist, neurologist, and neurosurgeon) in 11 different hospitals were asked to answer survey questions via email or online. We analyzed the differences of answers among several subgroups in each predetermined scenarios. Result: Responders were 212 personnel(110 researchers and 102 IRB members) from 11 centers. There were significant differences between IRB members and researchers in response such as blood sampling, skin prick test, one time catheterization in a girl, spinal tapping in child, non-enhance MRI in child, non-enhance MRI with chrolal hydrate in a child, spinal tapping without anesthesia in adult, bioequivalence test, gastric endoscopy, and non-enhance CT. significant differences between medical IRB members and non-medical members were also revealed in one time catheterization in a girl, spinal tapping in a child, non-enhance MRI in a child, bioequivalence test. Depending on researchers' department, they responded differently in several questionnaires as well. Conclusions: We have found that IRB members and researchers evaluate the risks differently. Researchers compared to IRB members, medical IRB members compared to non-medical members answered less than minimal risk in many cases. In assessing and evaluating the risks associated with the study, medical IRB members answered predetermined scenarios as less dangerous compared to non-medical IRB members. Difference among researchers where also revealed significantly. Researchers answered predetermined scenarios as less dangerous compare to other department researchers, especially in predetermined scenarios containing procedures they are familiar with.