• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.615-637
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 심화수학 교과서 과제의 인지적 노력수준에 대한 학생 인식을 분석함으로써 학생에게 주어진 학습기회의 실제 발현 여부를 살펴보는 것을 목표로 하였다. 이를 위해, 첫째, 이론적 틀에 기반 한 분석을 통해 심화수학 교과서 과제의 분포에 나타난 특징과 한계점을 살펴보았다. 둘째, 실제 심화수학 교과서를 사용하는 학생들이 교과서 과제의 인지적 노력수준 분포와 관련하여 인식하고 있는 특징과 한계점을 살펴보고, 교과서에 제공된 학습기회가 실제로 어떻게 발현되고 있는지 살펴보았다. 셋째, 심화수학 교과서가 과학고등학교 학생을 위한 교재라는 측면에서, 영재교육을 위한 학습기회가 제공되고 있는지 여부를 살펴보았다. 연구 결과, 심화수학 교과서에는 PNC 과제가 주로 제시되어 있었으며, 학생들 역시 PNC 과제의 해결경험이 많다고 인식하고 있었다. 또한, 영재교육을 위한 과제가 제공되지 않았으며, 학생들 역시 이에 대한 경험이 부족함을 인식하고 있었다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.11-28
• /
• 2002

The purposes of this study were to analyze elementary school mathematics textbooks developed in accordance with the 7th national amended curriculum and to find implications for the development of a new revised curriculum to meet the needs of the knowledge-based society. Elementary school mathematics textbooks and accompanying practice books were analyzed. Teacher's manuals were also studied to examine the intentions of the textbook developers. The two major questions were sought. First, to what degree do elementary school mathematics textbooks and practice books match with the intentions of the national curriculum\ulcorner Second, how do elementary school mathematics textbooks and practice books facilitate student's learning for understanding mathematics\ulcorner The findings were as follows. First textbooks, practice books, and teacher's manuals appeared not to reflect the intentions of the 7th amended curriculum to the full extent. Second, characteristics and roles of textbooks, practice books, and teacher's manuals were not clearly defined and therefore, they were not very feasible for teaming for understanding mathematics. The recommendations for a new revised curriculum were suggested. First, regarding the contents presented in the textbooks, the idea of structure of subject matter need to be considered in order to help students to understand connections of concepts and relationships between concepts and functions in mathematics. Second, more ill defined problems should be presented to develop problem solving ability in real life contexts in students. Third, contents for relearning and enrichment need to be reorganized to reflect students' real ability. Fourth, uses of the concrete and the manipulative need to be more realistically suggested. Fifth, more prototypes of performance assessment tasks, scoring rubrics, and portfolios need to be presented in a more teacher-friendly manner. Sixth, characteristics and roles of textbooks and practice books need to be more discernible.