• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제30권6D호
• /
• pp.553-560
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 신호위반 단속건수에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 관하여 자료를 수집하고 분석하여 신호위반 단속건수와의 관계를 규명하고 모형을 개발하여 예측된 모형을 통해 신호위반 단속건수에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 규칙을 파악하는 방법으로 교통사고의 위험을 항시 내포하고 있는 교통법규 위반행위가 빈번한 지역에 대한 무인다기능단속시스템의 설치기준을 제시하고자 하는 연구이다.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제8권6호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2009

1997년 우리나라에서 무인과속단속시스템 32대가 처음 도입된 이래 2008년 1월 현재 약 3,700기가 설치되어 운영 중에 있으며, 이는 운전자의 운전행태 및 교통특성 변화를 유도함으로서 교통안전을 개선시켜 결과적으로 교통사고건수 및 사망자 수를 크게 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 현재의 설치효과 평가방법은 설치전후 각 1년간 단순 비교하는 방법으로, 설치 바로 전년도의 교통사고건수가 다른 요소에 의해 최근 몇 년간 발생건수에 의해 급격히 증가(감소)하였을 경우 시스템 설치 후 감소(증가)되었어도 명확히 시스템 설치 효과라고 단정 짓기 어려운 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 시스템 설치전후 4단계 분석기법을 근간으로 하여 과속단속시스템의 설치효과에 대하여 새롭게 평가하였다. 그 결과 2006년도에 설치한 205대의 과속단속시스템 설치효과는 기존의 분석방법에서 제시한 18%의 교통사고건수 감소효과가 아니라 시스템 설치효과에 의해 $27.4{\pm}3%$, 도로개선 등 기타 요인으로 인한 오차범위가 ${\pm}12.89%$인 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제34권5호
• /
• pp.144-152
• /
• 2019

According to the National Police Agency, point-to-point speed enforcement system is being installed and operated in 97 sections across the country. It is more effective than other enforcement systems in terms of stabilizing the traffic flow and inhibiting the kangaroo effect. But it is only 5.1% of the total enforcement systems. The National Police Agency is also aware that its operation ratio is very low and it is necessary to expand point-to-point speed enforcement system. Hence, this study aims to provide the expansion basis of the point-to-point speed enforcement operation through analysis of the quantitative effects and development the accident prediction model. Firstly, this study analyzed the effectiveness of point-to-point speed enforcement system. Naive before-after study and comparison group method(C-G Method) were used as methodologies of analyzing the effectiveness. The result of using the naive before-after study was significant. Total accidents, EPDOs and casualty crashes decreased by 42.15%, 70.64% and 45.30% respectively. And average speed and the ratio of exceeding speed limit decreased by 6.92% and 20.50%p respectively. Moreover, using the C-G method total accidents, EPDOs and casualty crashes decreased by 31.35%, 66.62% and 10.04% respectively. And average speed and the ratio of exceeding speed limit decreased by 3.49% and 56.65%p respectively. Secondly, this study developed a prediction model for the probability of casualty crash. It was dependant on factors of traffic volume, ratio of exceeding speed limit, ratio of heavy vehicle, ratio of curve section, and presence of point-to-point speed enforcement. Finally, this study selected the most danger sections to the major highway and evaluated proper installation sections to the recent installation section by applying the accident prediction model. The results of this study are expected to be useful in establishing the installation standards for the point-to-point speed enforcement system.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제68권
• /
• pp.65-87
• /
• 2015

This article examines the Stay of Enforcement of ICSID Arbitration Award. The effect of the stay is that the award is not subject to enforcement proceedings under Article 54 of the ICSID Convention pending the outcome of the annulment application. The annulment committee must decide the stay, unless the applicant sought the stay with the request for annulment, in which case the ICSID Secretary -General must grant it automatically. This automatic stay -which can only relate to the entire award-remains in force until the committee is constituted and issues a decision on the request for stay. ICSID committees have taken different positions on whether a stay of enforcement is exceptional or not. Some committees have held that because the ICSID Convention explicitly recognizes that the rights of the award creditor could be subject to a stay, stays are not exceptional. ICSID practice shows that most committees have rejected the proposition that the merits and prospects of the application for annulment should influence the committee's decision whether to grant a stay. In addition, ICSID practice regarding the specific circumstances that will justify a stay of enforcement is unclear, and committees have focused on different factors to decide whether to grant a stay such as prospect of prompt compliance with the ward, hardship to one of the parties, risk of non-recovery and irreparable harm to the award debtor. Also, ICSID practice shows that even though the Convention is silent on this issue, committees have generally held that they are empowered to condition the stay of enforcement on the granting of security by the requesting party.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.27-37
• /
• 2007

과속단속시스템은 지능형교통체계(ITS)의 한 영역인 첨단교통관리시스템(ATMS)으로서 중요한 역할을 수행하고 있다. 그러나 과속사고를 방지하기 위해 설치된 시스템이 시거가 확보되지 않은 구간이나 급커브 지역 등에 설치됨으로써 추가적인 교통사고 위험을 내포하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 고속도로의 기하구조별로 시스템 설치위치를 구분하고, 각 위치에서 발생한 교통사고 자료를 시스템 설치 전 후로 나누어 기하구조별 과속단속시스템의 설치 전 후의 사고건수(Frequency), 대물피해환산법(EPDO, Equivalent Property Damage Only)을 통한 사고심각도와 사고비용(Accident Cost)을 분석하였다. 이와 같은 연구수행 절차를 통해 시거가 충분히 확보되지 않는 구간에서의 과속단속시스템의 설치가 사고에 미치는 영향을 알아보고 최종적으로 과속단속시스템의 설치위치에 따른 영향을 분석하고자 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.23-50
• /
• 2008

In a global economy where, private parties increasingly favour arbitration over litigation, many foreigners are unfortunately reluctant to arbitration with China's parties because the China national courts do not scrutinize the merits when deciding whether to recognize and enforce foreign awards. As a result, the finality of arbitral awards hangs in uncertainty. Overseas concern is that China's courts may abuse "Public Policy" grounds provided for in the New York Convention to set aside or refuse to enforce foreign awards. The purpose of this article is to examine the distrust to enforcement of arbitral awards whether that is just an assumption. In spite of the modernize and internationalize her international arbitration system and many reforms provided in the related law and rules, the most vexing leftover issues are caused of the lack of "rule of law" in China. This situation imply the risk of pervert 'Public Policy' as the ground for refusing enforcement of arbitral awards. Some cases reflect the fear. But it is unclear whether those cases caused from the lack of "rule of law" in China. Same uncertainty present between Hon Kong-China under th one country-two legal system after the return of Hong Kong to China on 1 July 1997. While China is striving to improve its enforcement mechanism in regard to the enforcement of arbitral awards, it can only be expect following the establishment of rule of law in the future.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.33-52
• /
• 2017

This article tried to describe the laws concerning the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Indonesia. This issue is relevant in the light of frequent curiosity of foreign commentators, business communities, practicing lawyers, concerning the arbitration in Indonesia, in particular its enforcement of foreign arbitration awards. The main laws on arbitration analyzed were, firstly, the Indonesian law on arbitration, namely Law No 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Presidential Regulation No 34 of 1981 concerning the Ratification of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958. The provisions of Law of 1999 analyzed were confined to its international provisions on arbitration, in particular the requirements for the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards and also the requirement that the awards do not violate Indonesian public policy. The problem with the Indonesian arbitration law (and the courts' practice) were that no provisions which provided guidance or meaning with regard to public policy. The absence or lack of guidance or definition on public policy had some times confused lawyers or the parties in dispute fearing that their arbitration awards would not be enforced due to the violation of public policy. Secondly was the different opinion of two Indonesian arbitration experts, Prof. Sudargo Gautama and Prof. Priyatna Abdurrasyid. Both scholars had rather different opinions with regard to the meaning of public policy in Indonesia. Thirdly was a recent case law, Astro Nusantara Bv et.al., vs PT Ayunda Primamitra Case (2010) decided by the Indonesian Supreme Court with regard to the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards. This article concluded that the Indonesian court, in particular the Central of Jakarta Court, so far have given its support that the execution of foreign awards was duly enforced.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.3-23
• /
• 2021

England is a significant base for international trade in Europe, and dispute resolution through arbitration is active. Therefore, due to the geographical relationship with the European continent, the settlement of trade transactions and disputes with European countries is one of the most essential tasks. In this regard, arbitration procedures in England have been actively used for a long time. In England, dispute resolution methods through arbitration have been developed centered on merchant groups such as guilds from the 16th century and have been actively used until today. However, the arbitration procedure also had the characteristics of the common law because there was no legislation related to arbitration. Therefore, arbitration based on common law was carried out until the first half of the 19th century. In the 'Arbitration Act 1889', two types of arbitration systems, 'common law arbitration' and 'statutory arbitration' coexisted. However, in the arbitration procedure, according to the newly enacted 'Arbitration Act 1889', the arbitration agreement was binding from the time the arbitration agreement was reached. There was a way to select an arbitrator even if it was not explicitly stipulated in the arbitration agreement, and the arbitration award was quickly enforced. Arbitration under contract was preferred over common law arbitration, where withdrawal and revocation of awards were possible. However, in response to these provisions, the England courts considered the arbitration system to deprive the courts of jurisdiction, while a strengthened judicial review of arbitration procedures was done. In particular, England unified the arbitration-related laws, which had been scattered for a long time, adopted the model law, and enacted the 'Arbitration Act 1996'. Under the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in 'Arbitration Act 1996', Section 66 deals with the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards and foreign arbitral awards. Section 2 of the 'Arbitration Act 1950' is inherited and used as it is. Second, it deals with the execution of arbitral awards under the New York Convention: Article 100 (New York Convention), Section 101 (Approval and Enforcement of Awards), Section 102 (Evidence Presented by a Party Seeking Recognition and Enforcement), and Section 103 (Provides Matters Concerning Rejection Recognition and Enforcement).

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권12호
• /
• pp.302-309
• /
• 2021

구간과속단속시스템은 시점 순간속도, 종점 순간속도, 구간 평균속도를 측정하여 가장 많이 과속한 부분에 대해서만 과태료를 부과하는 방식으로 관련 연구 자료에 따르면 해당 시스템을 적용한 도로에서 속도 및 사고 감소 효과가 있는 것으로 알려져 있다. 하지만 도로교통법에 따라 시스템의 대부분은 고속도로에 설치되어 기존의 연구는 고속도로 구간을 대상으로 수행되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 관련법령 개정에 따라 일반국도에도 구간과속단속시스템의 설치가 확대될 것으로 예상 되는 바 일반국도 자동차전용도로인 국도3호선 성남이천로에 설치된 구간과속단속시스템을 대상으로 ITS 수집 및 운영 자료를 활용하여 설치 전, 시범운영기간, 단속이후로 구분하여 통행속도, 통행속도에 대한 표준편차 및 교통사고 감소여부를 분석하였다. 분석결과 설치 후 통행속도, 표준편차, 교통사고는 각각 13%, 25%, 70% 감소하여 구간과속단속시스템 설치가 사고감소에 기여하는 바가 큰 것으로 확인되었다.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.67-77
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 고속도로 버스전용차로 단속시스템을 개발하여 현장 성능평가를 수행하였다. 영동고속도로 마성터널 입구 버스전용차로에서 조사한 결과, 버스전용차로를 위반하는 차량의 비율이 99%에 달하는 것으로 조사되었다. 하지만 현재의 경찰관에 의한 인력식 단속은 단속율도 낮고 불필요한 안전문제 및 지체를 발생시킨다. 고속도로 버스전용차로는 6인 이상 탑승한 9인승 이상 승합차도 통행이 가능하기 때문에 승합차량의 승차인원을 검지하는 기술개발이 필요하다. 조도에 관계없는 승차인원 검지를 위해 적외선 카메라를 사용하였고 짧은 차두시간을 감안한 신속한 영상처리 기법으로 YOLOv5 딥러닝 알고리즘을 사용하였다. 개발시스템 성능 검증을 위해 테스트베드 및 실 현장 평가를 실시한 결과, 테스트베드와 실 현장에서 각각 7%, 8% 오차를 나타내 만족할 만한 성능을 보였다. 본 연구 결과물을 현장에 적용할 경우 고속도로 버스전용차로 운영 효율화 및 단속에 따른 불필요한 지체를 감소시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.