• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2000

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(hereinafter referred as "the Law") adopted in 1982 was enacted on November 16, 1994. South Korea, China, and Japan signed and ratified the Law, respectively. These three countries announced their domestic laws relating to Exclusive Economic Zone(EEZ) with reserving their applications. The enactment of the Law and announcement of EEZ inevitably brought new order on the seas. The New Fishery Agreement based on the Law with EEZ was concluded between South Korea and Japan and ratified by each country′s parliament. Another New Fishery Agreement between South Korea and China is also going to be concluded in near future. The New Fishery Agreements, however, do not include regulations relating to the marine scientific research, the protection of the marine environment, and so forth, which are essential for the States to fully implement the Law According to the New Fishery Agreements, it is impossible for the Coastal States to excercise their jurisdiction. Because the agreement of delimitation ocean boundaries among the three countries are not easy to settle, provisional agreements can only be concluded. Thus, many problems including the sovereignty over Dok-do between South Korea and Japan and delimitation of EEZ between South Korea and China can be arose anytime. This paper investigates the problems and possible counter measures in legal excercise on the seas by South Korean Government. The above mentioned problems introduced by the New Fishery Agreements include potential problems in the Middle Sea Zone, Provisional Zone, and so forth. In this paper, only the legal aspect of the Zones will be discussed excluding the law enforcement and the economic aspect of the Zones.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.167-172
• /
• 2012

현행법상 우리나라는 수사절차단계에서 참고인의 허위진술을 처벌하는 명문규정을 두고 있지 않다. 이러한 이유로 수사현실을 고려하여 형사사법상 실체적 진실발견확보 차원에서 참고인의 허위진술을 규제하는 방안이 필요하다는 견해가 지배적이다. 그러나 이러한 방안은 수사권 과잉으로 인하여 인권이 유린될 개연성이 있으므로 찬성하기 어렵다. 형사사법에서 가장 큰 원칙은 실체적 진실발견이 아니라 인권보호이며, 참고인의 허위진술을 규제하는 방안은 비록 제한적이기는 하지만, 해석에 의하여 현행 형법상 위계에 의한 공무집행방해죄, 범인은닉 도피죄, 무고죄 등으로 처벌이 가능하기 때문이다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.197-227
• /
• 2009

This study describe the brief history and current statutes of Philippine arbitration. The practice of arbitration in the Philippines can be traced as far back as the barangay. From 1521, Spanish Civil Code became effective in the Philippines. During this period, the Supreme court was discouraged by the tendency of some courts to nullify arbitration clauses on the ground that the clauses ousted the judiciary of its jurisdiction. According to the growing need for a law regulating arbitration in general was acknowledged when Republic Act No.876(1953), otherwise known as the Arbitration Law, was passed. In 1958, the Philippines became a signatory to the New York Convention and in 1967 the said Convention was ratified. But no legislation has been passed. As a consequence, foreign arbitral awards have sometimes been deemed only presumptively valid, rather than conclusively valid. Fifty years after, the Philippine Congress enacted, Republic Act No. 9285, otherwise know as the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004. The enactment was the Philippines solution to making arbitration an efficient and effective method specially for international arbitration. To keep pace with the developments in international trade, ADR Act of 2004 also ensured that international commercial arbitration would be governed by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Arbitration and also fortified the use and purpose of the New York Convention by specifically mandating. If the international commercial arbitration will be revitalization in the near future in the Philippine, it will be shown that the model law's comprehensive provisions will give the beat framework for arbitration.. The writer expect that Philippines continues in its effort to be the premier site for international arbitration in Southeast Asia.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.11-52
• /
• 2010

Medical Dispute Arbitration Law had been debated on its legislation several times since Korean Medical Association's submission of the bill to the National Assembly in 1988, eventually in December, 2009, passed the National Assembly Standing Committee and was laid before the Legislation and Judiciary Committee, and thus its legislation is now near at hand. During the long process, it has provided a hot issue with our society. And yet, Medical Dispute Arbitration Law has differed considerably in legislative content depending on the main body of proceeding the enactment, which subsequently was given the mixed comments of 'Act on Malpractice-related Damage Relief' or 'Medical Indemnity Act', and this legislative bill also cannot be free from this debate. It is desirable that medical disputes between doctors and patients be resolved through conciliation between the parties concerned. But, because reaching a compromise is difficult owing to deep emotional conflicts between the parties, difficulties in investigating a cause and requiring a high amount of settlement money, etc., it is inevitable to seek a resolution by third party intervention. By the way, such an arbitration by third party is based on the compromise of the interested parties and thus has a limitation of not being able to satisfy both parties completely. Therefore, the legislative bill made for arbitration of medical disputes between the parties will have to prepare an institutional system for the parties to easily understand and accept. Also, problems occurred in the legislative bill will have to be corrected through an in-depth discussion in order for the legislative bill to work as an effective system.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.69-100
• /
• 2011

현행 '항공법'의 벌칙조항 및 '항공안전 및 보안에 관한 법률'은 항공교통의 안전이 지상 및 해상교통과 비교해볼 때 상대적으로 운항안전체계의 영향을 많이 받고 있고, 범죄의 대상이 될 경우 항공기에 탑승한 승객 및 승무원의 안전만을 위협하는 것이 아니라, 항공기 그 자체가 지상의 인원과 재산에 막대한 피해를 입힐 수 있는 가능성을 고려하여 입법되었다고 할 수 있다. 그러나 현행법을 분석해 보면, 일부 규정의 경우 적용대상 및 행위방법이 지나치게 광범위하여 구체성을 상실하고 있으며, 그 적용대상 및 행위방법을 개별화하지 않고 일률적으로 지나치게 높은 법정형을 규정하고 있는 경우가 다수이고, 입법상의 몇가지 중대한 흠결이 존재하고 있으며, 입법 체계상 법률 상호간의 적용영역에서도 문제의 소지가 있다. 이와 같은 항공관련 형사특별법의 입법상의 문제는 그 입법과정에 형사법 전문가 보다는, 항공안전전문가나 정책입안자의 참여가 더 적극적으로 이루어진 결과이거나, 전문가그룹 간의 상호 의사소통이 충분히 이루어지지 않은 결과로 보인다.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2011

본 우리나라는 전 세계 IT 생산량의 7%를 차지하는 IT 강국이지만 정보교육을 소홀이 다루고 있어 핵심 원천기술과 SW를 개발할 인력이 부족한 형편이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 열악한 교육체제를 개선하고 정보교육을 활성화하기 위한 "정보교육진흥법"의 제정 방안을 제안하였다. 그리고 이 법에서 담아야할 내용으로 체계적이고 안정적인 정보교육의 활성화를 위한 국가와 지방자치단체의 "정보교육종합계획 수립"에 대한 책무, 정보교육의 활성화를 추진하기 위한 위원회 구성, 학교교육과 사회교육에서의 정보교육 활성화 방안, 정보활용능력인증제 도입 등에 대한 구체적인 방안을 제시하였다. 따라서 본 논문을 통해 도출되는 연구 결과는 침체되어 있는 우리나라의 정보교육을 활성화할 수 있는 "정보교육진흥법" 제정의 방향을 제시해 주는 지표가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.3-32
• /
• 2008

In proportion to recent developments in aviation technology and growth of the air transport market, the risk of damages to third parties caused by aircrafts and the likelihood of unlawful interference on an aircraft in flight has grown larger. The war risk insurance market was paralyzed by the 9/11 terror event. And if another event on the scale of 9/11 occurs, compensations for third party damages will be impossible. Recognizing the need to modernize the existing legal framework and the absence of a globally accepted authority that deals with third party liability and compensation for catastrophic damage caused by acts of unlawful interference, the ICAO and various countries have discussed a liability and compensation system that can protect both third party victims and the aviation industry for the 7 years. In conclusion, in order to provide adequate protection for victims and the appropriate protection for air transport systems including air carriers, work on modernizing the Rome Convention should be continued and the new Convention should be finalized in the near future. Korea has not ratified the relevant international treaties, i.e. Rome Convention 1933, 1952 and 1978, and has no local laws which regulate the damage caused by aircraft to third parties on land. Consequently, it has to depend on the domestic civil tort laws. Most of the advanced countries in aviation such as the United States, England, Germany, France and even China, have incorporated the International Conventions to their national air law and governed carriers third party liability within their jurisdiction. The Ministry of Justice organized the Special Enactment Committee for Air Transport chapter under Commercial Law. The Air Transport chapter, which currently includes third party liability, is in the process of instituting new legislation. In conclusion, to settle such problems through local law, it is necessary to enact as soon as possible domestic legislation on the civil liability of the air carrier which has been connected with third party liability and aviation insurance.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.446-454
• /
• 2012

해상에서 위법행위를 한 외국선박의 단속과 관련하여 자국의 형사관할권을 영역 외까지 확대하는 것은 많은 국가의 관심사이다. 국제 해상테러와 해적행위의 단속에 있어 영해 외 해역에서 자국의 형사관할권을 행사하는 문제도 새로이 주목을 받고 있다. 미국과 일본의 경우 국경에서의 혐의자 또는 혐의선박에 대한 수색과 관련하여 일반적인 형사소송법상의 강제처분의 요건과는 다른 완화된 요건을 기초로 하는 수색권을 인정하려 하기도 한다. 이러한 시도는 모두 자국의 영역 외 또는 국경에서 자국의 관할권 행사를 강화하여 자국의 이익을 수호하려는 움직임들이다. 본 논문은 이러한 최근의 변화되고 있는 국제적인 동향에 대한 고찰을 통해 영해 외 해역에서 우리 형사관할권의 영역적 한계와 범위의 확대 문제에 대하여 실체법과 절차법의 측면에서 고찰하고 효율적인 형사관할권 행사 방안에 대해서 논하고 있다. 더불어 최근 입법된 해양경비법의 내용을 해양검문검색과 추적 및 나포에 관한 규정을 중심으로 관련하여 고찰하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.91-125
• /
• 2006

The arbitration rule of CIETAC was vastly revised and was put in force on May 1, 2005. By its revision, China has improved its arbitration system. Chinese arbitration law had many problems when it was enacted in 1995, but the problems could not be avoided because of the poor surroundings for arbitration in China. As China has not had much experience in operating its legal system effectively, and also has little in the way of studies on legal theory that would allow it to deal with its laws in a flexible manner, authorities usually wait to revise a law until enough relevant experience has been accumulated. Therefore, during the 10 years since its enactment, China has resolved the problems within its arbitration law through revision of arbitration rule rather than by revision of the law itself. As this law is a basic one in ruling the arbitration system in China, there are some limitations as to how far the system can be developed through revision of arbitration rule alone. In spite of the limitations, the revision in 2005 contributed a great deal to resolving the existing problems within Chinese arbitration law. The biggest problem in the arbitration law is the Chinese arbitration law that restricts party autonomy. With the revision of the arbitration rule, many problems concerning party autonomy were circumvented. This occurred because the arbitration rule now provides parties the opportunity to choose arbitration rule other than the CIETAC arbitration rule, and even allows parties to agree to amend articles in the CIETAC arbitration rule -- a very important revision indeed. In addition to party autonomy, there are other improvements for example, there is an enhancement of the independent character of the CIETAC, clearing of jurisdiction, easing in the formation of arbitration agreement, improvement in the way arbitrators are chosen, and enhancement in the cultural neutrality of the arbiter. Problems still remain that can only be solved by revision of the arbitration law itself. These problems relate to the governing law of the arbitration agreement, the collection of evidence, custody of property, selection of chief arbiter, interlocutory awards, etc. In addition, some non-legal problems must also be resolved, like the actual judicial review of arbitration awards or difficulties of executing arbitration awards.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.9-21
• /
• 2013

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to analyze the history and characteristics of laws and regulations of the medical and pharmaceutical system in Korea-focusing on the Korean (Oriental) medical and pharmaceutical system-from the modern period to the early days of the Republic. We reviewed how traditional notions and categories of Oriental medicine, which were regarded as experiential and conventional, became part of the current dualistic medical and pharmaceutical system, and examined problems and effects during the course of positioning. Methods : We classified the development of the medical and pharmaceutical laws and regulations chronologically, from the Korean Empire to the beginning of the Republic. The abolishment of the traditional medical system that was based on laws and regulations of the Joseon Dynasty, the implementation of dualistic medical system in the Korean Empire, the attempt to demolish Korean (Oriental) medicine under the Japanese colonial rule, and the process of developing a statute-based continental law system were thoroughly reviewed. Results : Although the dualistic medical system was specified in legislation via the enactment of the National Medical Services Law in 1951, we found that it was actually enacted in 1963, when the laws and systems regarding the educational institution of Korean (Oriental) medicine were stably established. Moreover, the dualistic pharmaceutical system was specified in legislation through the partial amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act in 1994, but we concluded that the actual enactment was rather in 2000, when the first Korean (Oriental) pharmacist was produced. Discussions and conclusions : An effort to establish a dualistic medical system of Korean (Oriental) medicine and Western medicine during the Korean Empire bore fruit a few decades later, after the Republic of Korea was founded. It means the basis for the legal system finally took shape in spite of the numerous attempts during the Japanese colonial era and the beginning of the Republic to abolish Korean (Oriental) medical and pharmaceutical system.