• 지역연구
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.31-47
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 신혼부부 가구가 주거경제적 측면에서 부모로부터 독립하는지 여부를 실증적으로 증명하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서는 인구학적, 사회경제적, 주택 특성 및 주택 정책 변수를 활용하여 주거 점유 시 부모로부터의 지원 여부와 생활비 지원 여부로 구분하여 분석을 수행하였다. 아울러 본 연구에서는 주택시장의 공간적 이질성을 고려하여 수도권과 비수도권으로 구분하여 연구를 진행하였다. 본 연구는 종속변수에 미치는 요인을 규명하기 위해 이항 로짓모형을 적용하였으며, 신혼부부 가구의 다양한 특성을 반영할 수 있는 2015년도 신혼부부 가구패널조사 자료를 활용하였다. 분석결과, 수도권과 비수도권 모두 높은 주택가격과 교통 접근성 선호는 주거 점유 시 부모로부터 지원을 받는 것에 정(+)의 영향을 받는 것으로 드러났다. 반대로 대출상품의 활용은 지원에 부(-)의 상관관계를 보이는 것으로 드러났다. 생활비 지원은 주거지출 항목과 정(+)의 관련성이 존재하는 것으로 나타나 신혼부부 가구의 주거지출비 부담을 경감하는 것이 필요하다고 판단된다. 본 연구의 의의는 부모의 지원과 신혼부부 간의 주거경제적 연관성에 주목하여 분석을 수행하였다는 점과 이를 통해 신혼부부 가구의 주거독립을 위한 정책을 제안하였다는 데 있다.

• Agribusiness and Information Management
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2012

Cameroon, with her numerous resources, still depends on foreign aid while the rate of poverty remains high. Thus, even though historical evidence gives impetus to the impasse over role of developmental aid, from the top down approach through to development as a springboard raising states from the doldrums of poverty, it is still very difficult to draw a substantial relationship between developmental aid and poverty reduction. Against this backdrop of controversy, I find it apt to put Cameroon on a balance scale. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to critically assess the implications of developmental aid on poverty reduction and agro-rural development in Cameroon, using the RUMPI Area Development Project in the South West region of Cameroon as a case study. The study will situate and contextualize the top-down and bottom-up approaches to development within the basis of a Cameroonian perspective, using the Sachs-Easterly debate. The RUMPI Project was introduced with the objective of improving agriculture and empowering the rural woman; thereby fighting poverty within the South West region of Cameroon. Despite its criticism of the barriers to development created by corruption, political pressure and limited use of local and grass-root partnerships, the study, in assessing these failures also tries to outline vital ways in which the project can be improved upon.

• East Asian Economic Review
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.81-100
• /
• 2013

This paper investigates the new link between the export-creating effects of Korea's tied aid and the export-diverting effects coming from China's export expansion, which have been rarely explored by the existing studies. A panel data consisting of 98-104 aid recipients of Korea through the period of 1995-2009 shows that the net export-creating effects are weaker at the export destinations where the export competition between Korea and China is fierce, while they are stronger at the export markets where it is not so severe. These findings applies to consumption goods rather than capital and intermediate goods.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.49-83
• /
• 2011

2000년의 UN 세계정상회의에서 새천년 개발목표(MDG)가 합의된 후 OECD/DAC 공여국은 빈곤퇴치를 원조의 주된 목적으로 삼아왔다. 이러한 목적을 더욱 효과적으로 달성하기 위해 원조공여국과 수원국은 2005년에 원조효과에 관한 파리선언에 합의하고 그 실천과정과 달성 정도를 격년마다 점검하고 평가해 왔다. 그 점검 평가를 위한 2011년 고위급 세계개발원조총회가 한국의 부산에서 개최되었다. 본 논문은 DAC 회원국이 과연 어느 정도 이러한 빈곤퇴치의 목적을 달성하는데 도움이 되는 원조배분정책을 수립하고 실제로 실천하고 있는가를 2005~09년 자료를 이용하여 분석 평가한다. 또 급격히 증가하고 있는 DAC 비회원국의 원조배분정책과 실적을 분석 평가하기 위해, 한국이 DAC에 가입하기 전인 2005~09년 기간의 원조배분실적을 분석 평가하여 DAC 회원국 평균과 비회원국 간의 차이를 분석 평가하고 정책적 의미를 찾아낸다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권12호
• /
• pp.43-54
• /
• 2014

Purpose - This study examines how perceived benefits and costs of traditional market support affect relationship quality and support for a marketeer. In addition, it investigates whether support for traditional market aid programs leads to support for the government. The author developed a structural model comprising several variables, in which perceived benefits and costs comprising economic, social, and environmental costs were proposed, to affect the relationship quality (satisfaction and trust) of traditional market aid programs and the government. Consequently, marketeers satisfied and trusted by traditional market aid programs and the government would support the traditional market aid program, resulting in higher support for the government. The model proposed that customer satisfaction would improve customer loyalty and business performance. Thus, the relationship quality (satisfaction and trust) of the traditional market aid program and government was proposed as a core mediating variable between perceived benefits and costs and support. Research design, data, and methodology - To analyze the proposed model, this study investigates the scenario with a traditional marketeer. Data were collected from 331 respondents, and analyzed with SPSS/PC 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. To test the unidimensionality and nomological validity of the measures of each construct, we employed a scale refinement procedure. The result of the reliability test with Cronbach's and confirmatory factor analysis warranted unidimensionality of the measures for each construct. In addition, nomological validity of the measures was warranted from the result of correlation analysis. Results - First, perceived benefit affects the relationship quality of traditional market aid programs and government. Second, perceived costs affect the satisfaction of traditional market aid programs and government. Third, the relationship quality of a traditional market aid program affects the support of a traditional market aid program, and the relationship quality of government affects the support of government. Finally, the support of traditional market aid program affects support of government. The results confirm the findings of previous studies that local development positively influences support, based on the social exchange theory. Conclusions - The theoretical and managerial contributions of this study are as follows. First, it is the first such study, and defines mediating variables, analyzing relationship quality (satisfaction and trust) between perceived benefits and costs and support for the traditional market industry. Further, it investigates the structural relationships between them with the AMOS program. Second, while most previous studies investigating the relationship between similar variables and those of the present study analyzed how perceived benefits and costs influenced support, this study identified the transfer relationship between the support for traditional market programs and support for the government. This study confirms that support for traditional market aid program increases support for the government. Therefore, government policy makers for traditional market aid programs should explain to marketeers the benefits and costs of traditional market development in terms of economic, social, and environmental factors. At the end, limitations, further research directions, and implications are suggested.

• 한국보건간호학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.287-298
• /
• 2003

This study was conducted to identify the health care utilization, health care costs, and potential health care demands of the disabled in the Medicaid Aid beneficiaries. This study focused on the heath care costs not included in the medical aid allowance such as transportation, informal nursing costs, and ambulatory aids etc. Participants were the 864 subjects who were beneficiaries of the National Medical Aid program living in 10 district of Korea. A questionnaires were distributed to the disabled in the Medical Aid beneficiaries during August to September, 2001 through public offices. Data were collected through a home visiting by social workers working in public offices. Direct and indirect medical costs expended for one month by the participating disabled were examined. They expended 110.748 won $({\$}100)$ for heath care costs, which was not included in the medical aid allowance during the month. The disabled with cerebral diseases or who have level 4 disability expended more health care costs compare to those with other diseases. Gradual expansion of medical aid allowance for the disabled is recommended to alleviate economic burden of the disabled and their family.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.118-126
• /
• 2013

We investigated the major trends in health aid financing in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) by identifying the primary donor organizations and examining several data sources to track overall health aid trends. We collected gross disbursements from bilateral donor countries and international organizations toward the DPRK according to specific health sectors by using the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development creditor reporting system database and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs financial tracking service database. We analyzed sources of health aid to the DPRK from the Republic of Korea (ROK) using the official records from the ROK's Ministry of Unification. We identified the ROK, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) as the major donor entities not only according to their level of health aid expenditures but also their growing roles within the health sector of the DPRK. We found that health aid from the ROK is comprised of funding from the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund, private organizations, local governments, and South Korean branches of international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF. We also distinguished medical equipment aid from developmental aid to show that the majority of health aid from the ROK was developmental aid. This study highlights the valuable role of the ROK in the flow of health aid to the DPRK, especially in light of the DPRK's precarious international status. Although global health aid from many international organizations has decreased, organizations such as GFATM and UNFPA continue to maintain their focus on reproductive health and infectious diseases.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.41-74
• /
• 2007

본 논문은 한국의 공적개발원조(ODA)의 효과를 원조기관 설립법의 목적달성 여부에 기반을 두고 평가하였다. 구체적인 평가의 기준은 설립법의 목적을 가장 잘 나타낼 수 있는 수원국의 1인당 국내총생산(GDP) 성장과 공여국인 한국의 수출 및 해외직접투자(FDI) 증진을 기준으로 하여 평가하였다. 또한 수원국을 지역, 소득수준 및 경제적 자유도별로 구분하여 원조의 효과를 평가하였다. 한국국제협력단(KOICA)의 양자 간 무상원조(bilateral grants)와 대외경제협력기금(EDCF)의 양자 간 유상원조를 1990~2003년 사이의 163개 수혜국을 대상으로 실증적 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 한국의 공적개발원조는 수원국의 1인당 GDP 성장에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미쳤다는 근거를 발견하지 못하였다. 해외직접투자에 있어서는 공적개발원조가 전 기간에 걸쳐서 수원국에서 한국의 해외직접투자를 증진시켰다. 수출에 있어서는 2000~03년 기간을 제외하고 공적개발원조가 수원국에서 한국의 수출을 증진시킨 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 앞으로의 한국의 공적개발원조정책 수립에 참고가 될 권고를 하였다. 먼저, 수원국의 수를 집중과 선택의 원칙에 따라서 줄이고, 공적원조의 규모를 확대하고, 다른 원조공여국 및 국제개발원조기구와의 공동협력원조를 증진하여야 한다. 둘째, 원조의 목적과 원조자원의 배분기준을 명확하게 규명하고, 이를 구체화하는 집행지침이 마련되어야 할 것이다. 셋째, 원조의 질적 향상을 위하여, 각 수원국별로 유 무상 원조를 아우르는 하나의 조화된 중기원조사업계획을 수립하여 집행한다. 끝으로, 원조기관은 개별적인 원조사업에 대한 사전 사후 평가기준과 사업집행의 점검 감독 기준과 절차를 마련하여 준수하도록 하여야 한다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.63-74
• /
• 1999

This paper presents a R&D investment model for the Information and telecommunications(l&T) technology using multiple objective linear programming(MOLP). The MOLP model involves the simultaneous maximization of three linear objective functions associated with three criteria, which are social, technological, and economic criterion. This model is different from the traditional one which only involves the maximization of economic criterion. It yields a suitable R&D investment ratio to each technology field. Its application to the National R&D Project in l&t Industry is also presented. In this application, the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) is proposed to estimate the weights, which used as the coefficients in each objective function of the MOLP model. Then the problem is solved using the interactive method STEM. It is showed that with the aid of STEM, the MOLP model can be useful decision aid in formulation R&D investment plan in l&t industry. It is expected that the MOLP model works as the basis for planning R&D investment strategy in l&T industry.

• East Asian Economic Review
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.333-361
• /
• 2012

Development assistance plays an important role in contributing to the development process of Cambodia. The top bilateral donors, China, Japan, and Korea provide ODA to Cambodia in different characteristics and from different perspectives. This study tries to pull out some implications for Cambodia as recipient and for donors in order to achieve the development of Cambodia's economy-effectively by using the ODA. As a viewpoint, ODA structure emphasizes the intention of donors, either for their self-interest and benefit or for achieving MDGs. China's ODA to Cambodia seems to distort the ODA allocation by other donors with unconditional loans or loans with conditionality focusing only on infrastructure. Cambodia benefits from the better infrastructure, but it has to pay the price set by China, even for concessional loans. The driving interests of Japan and Korea are more influenced by their national policy goals and the expected perceptions of their voters. The aid projects should at least catch the attention of national media or win obvious and unbiased support from the suffering people in the recipient countries.