• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지구과학회 2004년도 춘계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.58-58
• /
• 2004

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.147-158
• /
• 2001

오늘날 지구 환경 문제가 크게 부각됨에 따라 환경 교육의 중요성도 점차 강조되고 있다. 과학은 환경에 대한 교육, 환경 안에서의 교육, 환경을 위한 교육 등에 크게 기여할 수 있는 과목이다. 과학의 여러 분야 중에서 지구 과학은 연구의 대상이 지구에서 일어나는 자연적 또는 인위적 변화의 과정이라는 점에서 볼 때, 환경 교육적 차원에서 접근할 수 있는 내용이 상당히 많다. 따라서, 지구 과학 교육은 환경 교육에 큰 역할을 할 수 있음이 분명하다 이는 지구계 교육과 환경 교육의 목표가 거의 일치하고 있고, 지구에 대한 소양을 갖추기 위한 내용이 환경에 대한 소양을 갖추기 위한 내용에서 크게 벗어나지 않음에서도 알 수 있다. 그러나, 우리 나라의 지구 과학 교육 과정에서는 환경 교육적 차원의 관심이 적은 것으로 나타났다. 지구 환경을 전체적으로 고려한 지구 과학 교육이야말로 지구 과학 교육에 대한 새로운 관심을 집중시키는 방법이 될 뿐만 아니라, 인류의 당면 과제인 지구 환경 문제를 해결하고자 하는 환경교육에 적극적으로 참여하게 되는 길이기도 하다.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.336-346
• /
• 2005

This study identifies and compares science content standards that are approved by departments of education in six states: California, Connecticut, Michigan, New Jersey, Texas, and Virginia. Specifically, the study examines the goals/visions, the organizing/progression principles, the strands of science content, and earth science content found in the states curriculum standards compared to National Science Education Standards. Although many states followed the recommendations of NSES or Project 2061, the format and content of the state science standards reviewed are very diverse. The diversity seems to reflect the diverse perspectives and needs of the states. The results of this study provide Korean educators and teachers with useful models or examples to incorporate Korean national science curriculum guides into the science curriculum frameworks of their regions or schools.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.313-326
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to explore the applying possibility of the Earth Systems Education(ESE) in elementary school science education through the improving of students' recognition with the earth systematic nature by systems thinking education - for this was the recognizing as earth systematic nature was the key element of ESE, and the systems thinking skill is accredited very effective tool for the understanding with earth systematic nature. For this, the systems thinking's teaching-learning programs were developed and applied to the 6th students (21s) for 10hours' classes. The results of this study are as follows; In most of the 6th students didn't recognize with earth systematic nature from a lack of understanding of the vapor being in every nature environments. In systems teaching-learning classes, most of students participated positively in learning activities and achieved the aim of a lesson. In the testing results for students' recognition improving to earth systematic nature after the systems thinking education, about 24% students were showed the improving results of the recognition with earth systematic nature. Consequently, It is suggested that just as the achieving of the points of ESE in elementary school science education, the approaching method of the systems thinking education is worth attempting to applying of the ESE.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.93-102
• /
• 2000

본 연구는 지구계 교육을 고찰하고, 내용을 분석한 후, 우리 나라에서 지구계 교육의 적용 가능성을 알아보는 데 그 목적이 있다. 먼저 지구계 교육을 고찰하여 교육적 의의를 알아보았다. 지구계 교육의 현장적용 가능성을 알아보기 위해 우리 나라 현행 중학교 교과서 2종과 지구계 교육의 활동 프로그램과 내용을 비교 ${\cdot}$ 분석하고, 지구계 교육의 목표, 내용 구성, 수업 전략 등에 관한 교사 설문을 실시하였다. 중학교 1학년 2학급 96명에게 지구계 교육의 활동프로그램을 투입한 후 면담을 실시하여 그 결과를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 지구계 교육은 지구적 소양의 향상에 기여하며, 지구계를 중심으로 과학 과목을 간학문적으로 통합하여, 학생들이 자연을 통합적으로 탐구할 수 있도록 돕는다. 2. 현행 우리 나라 교과서의 내용에서 지구계나 하위계와 같은 관점은 나타나지 않지만, 하위계 간의 상호 작용과 그로 인한 변화에 대해 설명하고 있다. 3. 교사 설문 결과 지구계 교육의 시스템적 접근(system approach)이나 내용 구성, 수업 전략 등에서 긍정적인 반응을 나타내고 있다. 4. 학생 면담결과 지구계를 구성하는 하위계와 각 하위계 간의 상호 작용에 대해 잘 인식하고 있는 것으로 나타나 지구계 교육의 적용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다. 따라서 지구계 교육은 지구와 과학에 대한 새로운 인식을 심어 주는 효과적인 수업으로서, 나아가 통합 과학교육 과정을 구성하기 위한 새로운 방안으로서 우리 나라에 적용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.297-308
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to suggest the earth science lesson model based on the creativity character education. To conduct this study, the curriculum revision in 2009 was analyzed by the causal mapping method. One after another, the creativity character education and earth system education were analyzed by the same method. Through as mentioned above, the key words which have relating concepts each other were picked out. Lastly, the key words were connected and compounded for the earth science lesson model based on the creativity character education. The model indicates that the earth science lesson based on the creativity character education requires the reconstructs of the processing and contents of the lesson. In other words, the teaching/learning must be progressed as corresponding between scientific facts and mental recognition, scientific concepts and compounding thinking skill, scientific laws and reconstructing thinking skill. In contents were reconstructed as relating to knowledge, creativity, characters and guidance counseling. The results of this study suggested the earth science lesson model based on the creativity character education needs developing and applying teaching/learning materials and managing discussing and cooperative learning.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.32-38
• /
• 2004

Some fine specimens of Annulariopsis bunkeiensis were collected from two fossil sites of the Amisan Formation of Nampo Group distributed in the Jogaegol, Boryeng City, Chungnam Province. According to our detailed study from our new material, the leaves of A. bunkeiensis are not mucronate, but emarginate at their apices. Accordingly, we revised the diagnostic characters given by Kimura and Kim (1988) mainly in regard to the leaf apex.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.391-404
• /
• 2020

This study identified and examined earth science education department programs in Korea. Major courses provided by 11 universities and their course requirements were analyzed, and the main research results are as follows. First, many basic courses, other major requisite, and elective courses are provided in geology, astronomy, and atmospheric science. oceanography, geophysics, earth environmental science, and natural disaster and energy resources had fewer major requisite courses provided in addition to basic courses, and few elective courses were offered. Second, many courses in science education focused on earth science, while others focused on general science and there were few courses that covered education theory regarding the specific subject. Third, science course application requirements emphasized the understanding of science in general or of earth science specifically. From the above results, additional studies are proposed to reflect on the current state and supplement these programs.

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지구과학회 2003년도 추계학술발표회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.69-70
• /
• 2003

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제27권7호
• /
• pp.730-744
• /
• 2006

The United States curriculum reform movement has recently started in each area of science education. The initiatives on curriculum reform stem from a notion that the low rate of science curricula offered in schools has been a serious problem. The schools in the United States are not only facing a lack of offerings within science curricula but also low enrollment in science courses, especially in physics, chemistry, and earth science. This trend resulted in low performances on international achievement tests including TIMSS and PISA. This paper introduces the efforts to solve existing problems through curriculum reform; including ChemCom, BioCom, EarthComm, and Active Physics. In this paper, a discussion is presented to show how the curricula can help address the status quo in science education. More specifically, this paper focuses on curriculum reform in high school earth science (EarthComm), providing a closer look at the scope and sequence of the reform movement. EarthComm was chosen because it was released based on the development of the National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996). Consequently, EarthComm became a curriculum that espoused the visions of the Standards, which has been guiding the reform of the US curriculum. At the end of this paper, two research outcomes of the EarthComm curriculum implementation in schools are discussed in terms of student learning and differences from conventional curricula.