• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지구과학회 2010년도 춘계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.73-73
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to analyze illustrations, contents, and experiment in 6 kinds of science textbook from the 9th grade covering the phase change of the Moon (on the phase change of the Moon in six 9th grade science textbook) and to suggest coherent and effective contents and frame of the science textbook. Hence, the researcher decided the study problem. The study problems are as follows; 'Are the illustrations in the science textbook presented to help understand the phase change of the Moon depending on the position of the observer?', 'Does the contents of the book clearly mention the phase change of the Moon?', 'Can students understand the phase change of the Moon through the experiments in the science textbook?', 'Do illustrations, contents, and experiment of the science textbook consistently explain phase change of the Moon?'. 10 persons (9graduate students including the researcher) took part in this study. All things unanimously agreed upon by all participants were reflected in the results. The results are as follows. First, the universe observer's view point is mixed with the earth observer's view in illustration of these science textbook regarding the phase change of the Moon. Moreover, illustrations of some textbooks are presented with such words as 'sunrise', 'midnight' and consequently contain too much contents. Second, the contents of the science textbook concerning the phase change of the Moon is not described clearly. In addition, they don't give clear and detailed explanations for the reason of the phase change of the Moon. Third, all of the textbooks, except one textbook, describe the experiment regarding the phase change of the Moon with the earth observer's view point but don't specifically mention that the view point is that of the earth observer's view point. Fourth, illustrations, contents, and experiments in the science textbook don't coherently explain the phase change of the Moon. In addition, it is confirmed through the process of the result analysis that the described contents in the science curriculum is not well constructed or logical.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제29권8호
• /
• pp.874-885
• /
• 2009

본 연구의 목적은 달의 위상변화를 다룬 중학교 3학년 과학 교과서 6종의 삽화, 내용, 실험의 문제점을 분석하고, 달의 위상변화에 대한 교과서 삽화, 내용, 실험의 일관성 있는 새로운 구성을 제안하기 위함이다. 이를 위해 연구자는 '교과서 삽화가 달의 위상변화를 이해하는데 도움이 되는가?', '교과서 내용이 달의 위상변화를 이해하는 데 도움이 되는가?', '교과서 실험이 달의 위상변화를 이해하는데 도움이 되는가?', '교과서 삽화, 내용, 실험이 일관성 있게 달의 위상변화를 설명하고 있는가?'를 연구문제로 선정하였다. 연구자를 포함해 교육대학원생 10명이 본 연구에 참여하였으며, 연구 참여자 모두의 의견이 일치된 내용만을 연구결과에 반영하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 달의 위상변화와 관련된 교과서 삽화에 우주관찰자 관점, 지구관찰자 관점이 혼재되어 나타나 있었다. 또한 일부 교과서 삽화에서는 '일출', '일몰' 등의 단어를 함께 제시하고 있어 너무 많은 내용을 하나의 삽화에 제시하고 있다. 둘째, 달의 위상변화와 관련된 교과서 내용이 불명확하게 진술되어 있었다. 특히 달의 위상변화 원인에 대한 명확하고 자세한 설명이 이루어지고 있지 않았다. 셋째, 한 교과서를 제외한 나머지 다섯 교과서에서 달의 위상변화와 관련된 실험을 지구관찰자 관점에서 다루고 있었지만, 지구관찰자에 대한 구체적인 언급을 하고 있지 않았다. 넷째, 교과서 삽화, 내용, 실험이 일관성 있게 달의 위상변화를 설명하고 있지 못했다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.56-65
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to investigate how elementary school student understands or students understand the illustrations on the phase change of the Moon in science textbook and to find out how textbook illustration helps students form the conception of the phase change of the Moon. To identify this purpose, we selected illustrations on the phase change of the Moon in the science textbook revised in 2007 and 2009 revised science textbook. For this study we selected and interviewed 20 students in the fifth grade. We integrated all data collected through interviews and created a transcription and a protocol and then, confirmed scientific conceptions related to the phase change of the Moon in students' illustration reading. The result are as followings: First, students read more scientific conceptions related to the phase change of the Moon in illustration of the 2009 revised science textbook which is presented with the universal observer's view point and the earth observer's view point. Second, students who find meaning in the various elements of the illustration and interpret with the integration of the various elements, get a lot of relevant information from illustration. All students have no differences recognizing the elements presented in illustration. But there are differences of contents of illustration reading depending on how students interpret the illustrations with integration of the various elements and if students cannot figure out the four scientific concepts needed to understand the phase change of the Moon, they ignore the information provided by illustration or analysis in their own way according to information provided by illustration. So misconception appears in this process.