• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권23호
• /
• pp.10421-10425
• /
• 2015

Background: While the incidence of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) has been rising worldwide, the reasons remain undefined. Recent research has focused on effect of red andf processed meat intake as a risk factor, but with inconclusive results. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis of data published to date, to ascertain the overall association between intake and NHL. Materials and Methods: A published literature search was performed through Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Science Citation Index Expanded databases for articles published in English. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using random or fixed effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi-square and I2 statistics. Dissemination bias was evaluated by funnel plot analysis.We performed a formal meta-analysis using summary measures from these studies. Results: In total, 11 published studies were included in the final analysis. The combined analysis revealed that there was significant association between the red meat and NHL risk (OR=1.10, 95%CI: 1.02 to 1.19, p=0.01). Additionally, there was showed significance association between processed red meat and NHL risk (OR=1.17, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.29, p=0.001). In subgroup analysis, a statistical significant association was noted between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (OR=1.20, 95%CI: 1.04 to 2.37, P=0.01) and red meat intake. Conclusions: In this meta-Analysis, there was evidence for association between consumption of red meat, or processed meat and risk of NHL, particularly with the DLBCL subtype in the red meat case.

• 한국생물정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국생물정보시스템생물학회 2005년도 BIOINFO 2005
• /
• pp.357-360
• /
• 2005

In this paper we consider the well-known semiparametric proportional hazards (PH) models for survival analysis. These models are usually used with few covariates and many observations (subjects). But, for a typical setting of gene expression data from DNA microarray, we need to consider the case where the number of covariates p exceeds the number of samples n. For a given vector of response values which are times to event (death or censored times) and p gene expressions (covariates), we address the issue of how to reduce the dimension by selecting the significant genes. This approach enable us to estimate the survival curve when n < < p. In our approach, rather than fixing the number of selected genes, we will assign a prior distribution to this number. The approach creates additional flexibility by allowing the imposition of constraints, such as bounding the dimension via a prior, which in effect works as a penalty. To implement our methodology, we use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. We demonstrate the use of the methodology to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) complementary DNA(cDNA) data.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.32-35
• /
• 2018

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is known to be a rare and unusual cause of biliary obstruction. We report a case of biliary obstruction that a 25-year-old male showed icteric sclera and yellow discoloration of his skin caused by metastasis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Initial imaging & endoscopic work-up led us to an impression of either cholangiocarcinoma or IgG4-related disease, yet the pathological results weren't diagnostic. Through our thorough re-examination, we found a 5cm sized round, fixed, non-tender sternal mass, and additional imaging studies were suggestive of lymphoma, which was also consistent with the results of incisional chest wall biopsy. Biliary obstruction by lymphoma was successfully treated by endoscopic plastic stent insertion procedure and chemotherapy. Although it is widely accepted that lymphoma accounts for very few portion of malignant biliary obstruction, due to the fact that lymphoma and cholangiocarcinoma are often indistinguishable, careful diagnostic approach should be done.

• 핵의학기술
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.17-23
• /
• 2009

많은 암 환자들 중 특히 미만성 거대 B 세포 림프종 환자의 추적 검사에서 PET/CT 검사는 기타 다른 검사들과 견주어 볼 때 매우 중요하다는 것은 이미 알려져 있다. 이들 환자의 치료는 대부분 환자의 장기 한 곳에 국한된 경우가 없으므로, 방사선 치료나 항암 화학 요법 치료로 시행한다. 이러한 항암 화학 요법 치료는 골수의 활동을 억제하는 치료이기 때문에 환자에게서 호중구감소증과 같은 백혈구의 감소가 나타날 수 있다. 이러한 증상을 개선하기 위하여 과립구 자극요소(Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor)인 Filgrastim 성분의 골수촉진제를 사용하는 경우가 일반적이며, 이 약제가 투여된 환자에게서 단기간에 PET/CT 검사를 진행하게 되면, 검사에 사용되는 $^{18}F$-FDG의 섭취가 조혈 세포가 모여 있는 골수의 활성화로 그 곳에 섭취가 가중되어 정확한 영상의 정보를 얻는데 한계가 있다. 이 연구의 목적은 Filgrastim의 약제 투여 1일 후의 영상과 어느 정도 시간이 지난 후 영상의 SUV를 각각 비교하여 수치화하고, 대략 어느 정도 시간이 지난후에 정확한 영상의 정보를 줄 수 있는 $^{18}F$-FDG의 섭취가 일어나는지를 유추해 보고자 한다. 환자대상은 2007년 1월~2009년 1월까지 미만성 거대 B 세포 림프종을 진단받고 추적 검사 중인 환자 10명을 대상으로 하였다. 남자 4명, 여자 6명이고, 평균나이는 53.8세 평균 체중은 57.3 kg이다. PET/CT (Discovery STe; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) 검사를 위해 환자에게 $^{18}F$-FDG 정맥주사 후 1시간 가량 안정시키고, PET/CT 영상을 획득하였다. 영상 분석은 ROI ($12\;mm^2$)를 $C_6$ (6 번 경추), $L_4$ (4 번 요추), 간, 비장, 폐에 각각 그린 후 표준화 섭취 계수(SUV)를 측정하였다. 같은 환자를 골수촉진제 주사 1일 후 영상과 5~7일 후 영상을 각각 분석하였으며, 통계 프로그램으로는 SPSS version 12. Wilcoxon signed rank test를 사용하여 두 집단 간의 유의성을 확인하였다. 검사를 시행한 10명의 환자의 SUV를 분석한 결과, 골수촉진제를 투여하고 1일 후의 SUV가 5~7일 후에 비해 $C_6$ (6 번경추), L4 (4 번 요추), 비장에서 현저하게 높게 나타났고, 간과 폐에서는 비슷하게 나타났다. SUV의 차이와 더불어, 5~7일 후의 영상에서는 뼈의 섭취가 거의 없어진 정상 섭취 영상을 얻을 수 있었다. 위의 연구에서도 보여진 것과 같이 과립구 자극요소 약제투여 후 1일째 환자의 영상과 5~7일 후의 영상에서 SUV의 현저한 차이가 있었으며, 약제를 투여한 환자의 영상에 뼈의 $^{18}F$-FDG 섭취가 집중되었으며, 평균 5~7일 후에 검사에서는 뼈의 섭취가 현저하게 줄어든 정상적이 영상을 얻을 수 있었다. 본 연구를 통하여 SUV를 측정하고, 통계분석 함으로서 기존의 사실을 수치화 하였으며, 정상 섭취가 가능한 기간을 유추 할 수 있었다. 추후에 과립구 자극요소인 Filgrastim 이 외에 Pegfilgrastim, Lenograstim등 기타약제와의 유사성과 차이점에 대한 유사 연구에도 기여할 수 있으리라 사료된다.

• 한국통계학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국통계학회 2005년도 춘계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.17-23
• /
• 2005

In this paper we consider the well-known semiparametric proportional hazards models for survival analysis. These models are usually used with few covariates and many observations (subjects). But, for a typical setting of gene expression data from DNA microarray, we need to consider the case where the number of covariates p exceeds the number of samples n. For a given vector of response values which are times to event (death or censored times) and p gene expressions(covariates), we address the issue of how to reduce the dimension by selecting the significant genes. This approach enables us to estimate the survival curve when n ${\ll}$p. In our approach, rather than fixing the number of selected genes, we will assign a prior distribution to this number. The approach creates additional flexibility by allowing the imposition of constraints, such as bounding the dimension via a prior, which in effect works as a penalty To implement our methodology, we use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. We demonstrate the use of the methodology to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) complementary DNA (cDNA) data and Breast Carcinomas data.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권17호
• /
• pp.7207-7211
• /
• 2014

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of primary extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (pENL) patients, focusing on treatment and survival outcome. Materials and Methods: Between October 2003 and March 2012, 802 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were diagnosed and treated in two different cancer centers of Southern Turkey. Results: pENL, constituted 12.4% (100/802) of all NHL studied during this period. Median age of the patients was 56 years (range 17-87 years) and the male: female distribution was 3:2. Eighty-five of 100 patients (85%) were in stage I/II, 9/100 (9%) in stage III, whereas 6/100 (6%) were in stage IV. Head and neck constituted the most common site (51/100, 51%), followed by gastrointestinal tract (GIL) (37/100, 37%), and cerebrum (CL) (5/100, 5%). Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common histological type, observed in 53% of patients, followed by marginal zone extranodal lymphoma (13%). Most of patients (76%) received a CHOP containing regimen. Complete remission (CR) were achieved in 71% of patients. The median follow-up duration of all patients was reported as 37.6 months (range, 0.8-165 months). This period was reported as 137.5 months (range, 117.5-1578.6 months) in gastrointestinal lymphoma (GIL) patients, 119.0 months (range, 91.8-146.1 months) in head and neck lymphoma (HNL) patients, and 18.4 months (range, 12.6-24.1 months) in cerebral lymphoma (CL) patients. Conclusions: Head and neck, and the gastrointestinal tract were the two most common extranodal sites observed. Histologically DLBC accounted for the majority of cases. Most patients were on earlier stages, had low-low intermediate IPI scores and had a favorable prognosis.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.151-158
• /
• 2015

Objective: This study was designed to compare pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with a rituximab with cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, oncovin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen in terms of clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Method: Clinical efficacy was measured by trough level of absolute neutrophil count (ANC), days of ANC under 50% of baseline value, days of ANC under 90% of baseline value, duration of ANC recovery to baseline value, days of ANC less than $0.5{\times}10^9cells/L$, and difference of peak and trough level of ANC during 1 cycle of R-CHOP regimen. To evaluate cost-effectiveness, total prices of used filgrastim and pegfilgrastim within 1 cycle of R-CHOP were analyzed. Results: In terms of clinical efficacy, trough level of ANC and days to ANC recovery showed statistical significance. The median trough levels of ANC with administration of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim were 0.18 and 1.94 (p = 0.021), respectively, and the median durations of ANC recovery to baseline value were 5.5 days and 2 days (p = 0.023), respectively. For the median days of ANC under 50% of baseline value, days of ANC under 90% of baseline value, days of ANC less than $0.5{\times}10^9cells/L$, and difference of peak and trough level of ANC during 1 cycle of R-CHOP, the pegfilgrastim group performed better than the filgrastim group. However the difference was not statistically significant. In terms of overall expense during 1 cycle of R-CHOP, pegfilgrastim is about 3.43 times more expensive than filgrastim. Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim is more efficient than filgrastim in terms of clinical efficacy. In terms of prices, pegfilgrastim is more expensive than filgrastim for patients, but it is more convenient in clinical use. Therefore, pegfilgrastim should be the preferred choice of G-CSF for neutropenic patients. Further comparative study of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim is needed.