• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.498-505
• /
• 2013

The main processes involved in a defect dispute are consulting, reviewing, and finally judging as an arbiter. This process of defect consulting produces a defect consulting report, but business practices and standards of judgment will differ among consultants, and have many problems. This study reviews the structure of a defect consulting report and considers the structure's problem, which is that it is not standardized. To achieve this, data of sixteen defect consulting report were collected involving defect lawsuit cases before or after 2010. The structure and index of the defect consulting reports were then reviewed, and the results are as follows. As for a structure based on fourteen index, there are suitable that judge a outline, a cost estimate data and a consulting work item by a consulting standard. Furthermore, analysis by each common parts and private parts is considered as appropriate about consulting items and estimate by standard. However, consulting item in construction progress and responsibility period for security that related on a cause and a responsibility of defect need to complement. Meanwhile, the first thing of issues are connected a defect consulting is urgent a standardization for a defect type.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2013년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.166-167
• /
• 2013

There has been a defect dispute of apartment building in Korea. The defect dispute is complicated by main issues and details of dispute. It is yet to be solved. Meanwhile, a judge does not a inspection and analysis, but, related field expert who contracted professional engineer does. As a result, defect consulting report that an important judgment is used in a defect dispute. Therefore, this study does research on structure of defect consulting report. A defect consulting report has same items, irrespective of a defect consultant as a result that check 7 indexes about 10 cases. It has different structure's details depending on each defect consultants. And, it inserts new detail or deletes existing detail, does not show clear distinction.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2015년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.87-88
• /
• 2015

A defect dispute surrounding an apartment building is in constant trouble, a defect consulting is necessary that objective and impartial for solving a defect. The defect dispute about a defect lawsuit is conducted in the order that filling of lawsuit, consulting order, defect inspecting, estimating a repairing cost, writing a consulting report, submitting a consulting report, and decision by court. Of these, a step of defect inspecting is extensively investigated an occurred defect that each defect index and type from each part and place. At this time, it is collected of many data and created many information. For this, it need to organize and manage. The study is a modeling of field investigation work process that second phase of defect inspecting step. A literature study is defined a work until level 2. This study is defined the work until level 3 to 4. In addition, the modeling can do for using a job name, a place to job, a job to do, and a person concerned about defect consulting case. The modeling is expected a contribution of improving a defect consulting process and systematizing a judgment standard.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.195-206
• /
• 2014

공동주택의 하자감정과 관련된 다양한 문제점에 대한 개선을 하기 위하여, 본 연구에서는 선행연구와 관련기준 등을 분석하여 하자감정서의 분석체계를 마련하였다. 이를 활용하여 하자감정서 24건을 분석하였고 형식 요소와 질적 요소를 검토한 결과, 형식 요소의 경우 구성을 다소 변경하는 수준으로 손쉬운 대안을 제안하였다. 질적 요소를 분석한 결과, 감정인에 대한 평가제도와 참여기술자에 대한 전문교육제도의 마련을 통해 하자감정의 내실화를 강화할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.