• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.119-134
• /
• 2010

The article's purpose is to depict the experiences and cognition of Korean male workers on the relationship between work and family, in a conglomerate company. It examines the data of 11 interviews, especially focusing on the issue of participation in family lives. The cases consist of new comer employees, managerial officers, and executive personnel. According to the interviewee's report, Korean companies have drastically changed from a so called collectivistic culture to an individualisic one. In addition, the styles of their stories have changed drastically. New comers and managerial officers accentuate the importance of family in contrast to the attitudes of executive staff. These individuals also discuss the trend of increasing participation in domestic chores. However, the study does not illustrate a change in the younger generations' inner identities in relation to familial responsibility. Many of the interviewees' opinions taken from the study are almost similar in that these individuals do not encompass the lives of family in future plans. In conclusion, workers from large companiesin Korea maintain the attitude of focusing on official life one-sidedly.

• 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.379-407
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 우리나라 대기업 중년 남성 임원들의 비자발적 퇴직 이후 성공적인 적응을 위한 심리적·사회적 요인들을 알아보았다. 이를 위하여 퇴직 임원 13명(남성, 평균 58.2세)을 대상으로 퇴직 이후 시간의 경과에 따른 변화 경험과 이에 대한 평가나 해석에 대해 심층면담하고 그 내용을 현상학적 방법으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, '경제적 준비'와 '배우자 지원'이 적응 선행요건이었다. 적응 과정에서 출발점은 '현실 수용'으로, 과거 삶의 재평가, 다양한 변화들을 인정하고 과거에서 탈피, 평범한 50대 퇴직자로서 자신의 모습을 수용, 불안과의 동거, 적절한 시간의 필요 등의 하위요소로 구성되었다. 그 다음 이들은 인지적·정서적 재평가와 삶의 가치를 재정비하고, 일의 의미와 목표를 재구성하면서 미래를 설계했으며, 새로 선택한 활동들을 중심으로 '심리적 재구조화'와 '자아정체성'을 재정립했다. 이들의 퇴직과 퇴직 후 적응은 심리적·사회적 자본이 충족되었던 임원 재직 경험에 대한 대립과정이자, 이로 인한 부적응적 대처 양상에 대한 스토리이며, 이후 인지·정서·행동 차원에서 이러한 부조화를 극복해가는 일련의 과정에 대한 서사였다. 본 연구결과는 기업이나 국가 그리고 퇴직자에게 퇴직에 대한 대처와 관련하여 시사점을 제공한다.

• Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.17-35
• /
• 2017

This research is a case study that focuses on how conglomerate illegality and corresponding penalty affects corporate performance and strategy. The research aims to provide base information for policy-makers as well as the general public about the corporate environment. The analysis results can be summarized as follows. First, profitability is represented as an M-curve. Profitability falls from indictment to the final pronouncement of the corporate head and increases upon his or her return. The result suggests that the absence of a corporate head could result in low profitability as the firm is exposed to owner risk. Secondly, significant effects on investment were not found. Investment showed a continuous increase from indictment to final judgment. This could have resulted from investment decisions made prior to the indictment, which are generally long-term. Meanwhile, the rate at which investments rose for core subsidiaries were lower, which makes it reasonable to suspect dwindling executive capacity due to the absence of a corporate head. Thirdly, employment showed a slight increase, but the rate was found to be greater during the periods following the final judgment. From a political perspective, this increase can be inferred from a give-and-take tradeoff between corporate employment and the pardon of the corporate head.