• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.293-301
• /
• 2011

Objectives : The aim of the trial was to study the effect of plaque control(tooth brushing instruction) for oral health improvement on periodontitis patients. Methods : 30 patients(35~65 years) with advanced periodontal disease were subjected to a baseline examination including assessment of oral hygiene status(O'leary index), gingival condition(bleeding). the assessment were repeated after 2, 4, 6 weeks. cognitive, behavioral and clinical outcomes were assessed in the primary care setting by questionnaire and clinical oral examination. Results : The oral hygiene status expressed as the individual mean percentage of tooth surfaces with plaque 59.3% at baseline and 21.2% after 6 weeks(p<0.001). The gingival bleeding status expressed as the individual mean point of interdental papilla 3.8 at baseline and 1.9 after 6 weeks(p<0.001). Also, the patients self-assessment about correct tooth brushing behavior was 3.9(5-point likert scales), satisfaction of plan practices 4.1(5-point likert scales), efficacy of tooth brushing instruction 8.7(10-point likert scales). Patients wanted to continuous participation. Conclusions : A verification of effect after individualized oral health instruction and repeated dental plaque control represented to significance on plaque control score, oral care practice and oral health recognition. The important oral care step against periodontal disease is to establish good oral health habits. Also, oral health behavior recognition is more important for the practice of oral health. Therefore professional plaque control and tooth brushing instruction absolutely need in improving oral health.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.468-478
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 상호작용을 강화한 형성평가 수업전략이 학생들의 과학 개념 이해 및 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 효과와 이 수업전략에 대한 학생들의 인식을 조사하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 서울 소재 남녀공학 중학교의 2학년 4개 반을 실험집단으로 다른 4개 반을 비교집단으로 선정하여 실험집단에는 상호작용을 강화한 형성평가 수업전략을, 비교집단에는 교사 강의식 전통적 수업전략을 적용하였다. 그 결과 본 연구에서 적용한 형성평가 수업전략은 전통적 수업전략에 비해 학생들의 과학 개념 이해에는 효과적이나 과학 관련 태도에는 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 실험집단에서 수업 전후에 과학 개념 이해의 향상 정도는 집단 내의 과학성적 수준이나 인지 수준별로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 본 연구의 수업전략에 대한 학생들의 인식은 질문과 응답에 의한 상호작용이 많고, 이를 통해 사고를 촉진할 수 있고 반복학습의 효과가 있으며, 학습 내용을 이해하는데 도움이 되는 것으로 드러났다.

• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.31-43
• /
• 2005

In this study, after establishing assessment framework and reviewing the conceptual evolution and component of EL(Environmental Literacy) through literature review, through middle school students as population, the level of EL and relationship of its related variables were examined. The investigation was consisted of second and third grades of urban and rural middle schools in Choongbook. The used measurement methods were objective evaluation and Likert-type scale. The questionnaire instrument variables were consisted of 80 items on environmental literacy variables and six items on student gender, area of residence, environmental lesson, degree of environmental concern, environmental information, environmental activity as background variables. The major findings of this study were as follows: 1. Although the broad and obscure concept of EL has been evolved until 1992, it has been developed more systematic and precise after 1992. But there is not still an agreed concept. 2. The subordinate components of EL were consisted of cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects. Both ecological knowledge(KEOC) and environmental skill(SKILL) were determined to serve as two powerful predictors of EL. 3. The level of EL of middle school student was showed statistically significant difference to some variables by student gender, residential area, environmental lesson, environmental concern, environmental information, and environmental activity variables. And the most influential variables of EL in middle school student were environmental skill(SKILL), and locus of control (LOC). Based on the findings of this study, the following suggestions are drawn: It should be established a precise concept on EL as the ultimate aim of environmental education both interdisciplinary cooperation and experts of environmental education and also performed further longitudinal study which assessed multidimensional variables which are able to exactly measure the EL of middle school student.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제14권7호
• /
• pp.363-371
• /
• 2016

벤처기업의 기술혁신을 위한 기술력 평가는 급변하는 기업환경, 평가시 사용하는 언어의 모호성과 애매성, 평가지표의 부정확성을 고려해야 한다. 본 논문에서는 벤처기업의 대표적인 정성적 평가요인인 흡수역량 및 기술적 기업가정신을 대상으로 다기준 의사결정법인 Fuzzy-AHP를 적용하여 요인의 중요도와 우선순위 및 동적역량을 산출하는 ACTEM(Absorption Capacity and Technology Entrepreneurship Monitor) 모델을 제안하였다. 평가척도가 되는 요인에 대한 가중치 산출은 퍼지이론을 도입하여 인지적 판단의 애매성을 보완하고, 기존의 기술력 평가 측정에 관한 연구에서 고려하지 않은 흡수역량과 기술적 기업가정신 및 동적역량에 대한 평가 기준들을 제시함으로써, 현실적인 대안을 선택하는 것이 가능하도록 하였다. ACTEM 모델을 기존의 AHP 평가방법과 비교한 결과, 흡수역량에서는 '지식획득', 기술적 기업가 정신에서는 '제품화 능력'이 가장 높게 나오는 등의 타당성을 검증할 수 있었다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제52권1호
• /
• pp.52-65
• /
• 2022

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a scale to measure spiritual distress in cancer patients. Methods: A total of 69 preliminary items for the spiritaul distress assessment tool (SDAT) were compiled, based on a literature review, selection of empirically relevant items through concept analysis of hybrid models, confirmation of content validity by experts, cognitive interviews, and a pretest. Self-administered questionnaires were collected between April 1 and July 31, 2018, from 225 cancer patients at four medical institutions and one nursing home. The data were analyzed using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity, and Pearson correlation for criterion validity. Reliability was tested by Cronbash's α coefficient. Results: The final version of the SDAT consisted of 20 items. Five-factors, loss of peace, burden of family, avoidance of confronting death, guilt and remorse, regret for not being able to apololgize and forgive were extracted, and showed 62.8% of total variance. The factors were confirmed through convergent and discriminant validity. Criterion validity was confirmed by functional assessment chronic illness therapy spiritual well-being scale 12 (FACIT-Sp12). The overall Cronbach's α was .91, and the coefficients of each subscale ranged from .78~.83. Conclusion: The SDAT for cancer patients is valid and reliable. It is suggested that the tool can be used to measure spiritual distress in cancer patients.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.268-274
• /
• 2023

Objectives: This study investigated whether the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent Restructured Form (MMPI-ARF) can differentiate between two groups of adolescents, one diagnosed with internalizing disorders and another with externalizing disorders, and examined the clinical utility of the MMPI-A-RF by examining which subscales can significantly discriminate between these two groups. Methods: A total of 105 adolescents aged 13-18 years completed the MMPI-A-RF (53 internalizing disorder and 52 externalizing disorder groups). Independent t-test, chi-square test (χ²), and discriminant analysis were used to examine whether MMPI-A-RF can distinguish between the two groups. Results: Sixteen MMPI-A-RF scales best predicted differences between the groups with internalizing and externalizing disorders. Fourteen scales (Higher-Order Scale [Emotional/Internalizing Dysfunction], Restructured Clinical [RC] Scale [RC demoralization, Somatic Complaints (RC1), and Low Positive Emotions (RC2)], Personality Psychopathology Five Scale [Introversion/Low Positive Emotionality-Revised, Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism-Revised], Somatic/Cognitive Scale [Malaise, Head Pain Complaints, and Gastrointestinal Complaints], Internalizing Scale [Stress/Worry, Self-Doubt], Externalizing Scale [Negative School Attitudes], Interpersonal Scale [Social Avoidance, Shyness]) were associated with the internalizing disorder group, whereas two scales (Externalizing Scale [Conduct Problems, Negative Peer Influence]) were associated with the externalizing disorder group. Conclusion: The MMPI-A-RF can be an efficient assessment tool for a quick diagnosis as it can classify individuals with internalizing and externalizing disorders in clinical settings that lack a variety of assessment tools for children and adolescents.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.84-96
• /
• 2008

This research investigated the landscape characteristics of the skyline and the cognitive characteristics of Mt. Mudeung (1,186m) from various viewpoints. Mt. Mudeung, the representative landscape of Gwangju City, has been recognized as a natural landmark and theme of paintings. By analyzing the perspective from 32 points with a digital terrain model, some landscape indices of the skyline were derived and the relationships are discussed. Assessment of the semantic differential scale with 21 adjective variables and representativeness to 15 landscape photographs of the mountain were accomplished. 1. Through regression analysis of the skyline indices, significant relationships were found between them the angle from the visual axis and number of skyline jumps, the vertical angle fluctuation and number of jumps per degree, the visual depth fluctuation and vertical angle fluctuation of skyline, and between the vertical angle mean and number of jumps per degree. Meaningful relations were found between the number of jumps of skyline to number of jumps per degree and the angle from visual axis to visual distance. However, in the representative assessment no difference was found on the angle from visual axis of viewpoints. On the other hand, it seemed to relate representativeness with visual clarity based on visual distance. 2. We found 4 factors "familiarity", "fluctuation of skylines", "openness", and "feeling of texture" in the results of factor analysis of semantic differential assessment. When considering the results of assessment for representativeness, adjective words for familiarity and openness seemed to have a close assessment. Specifically, the research showed that the landscape representation was highly assessed in a view which could be seen from the higher parts to the lower part of hills. This result indicates that the management of viewpoints which could get a scene from intermediate to distant, and locating a high elevation is important. 3. In the picturesque expression of Mt. Mudeung, various impressions from the different points, a skyline based on the top of Mt. Mudeung and a mono structure by overlapping hills were common characteristics. These common characteristics were also partially found through the analysis of topographical landscape indices and landscape images. Therefore, the viewpoints for the representative landscape management should be selected in natural or open spaces.

• 감성과학
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.523-538
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 의인화된 인터페이스 에이전트와 사용자의 성별이 에이전트에 대한 사용자의 평가에 미치는 효과를 알아보기 위해 실시되었다. 또한 에이전트의 시각적인 사실성의 수준에 관계없이 성별과 정서 표현 방식의 효과가 나타나는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 1은 공감적인 정서를 표현하는 얼굴 사진을 에이전트로 제시하고 에이전트의 성별과 사용자의 성별에 따라 사용자의 평가가 어떻게 달라지는지 알아보았다. 참가자로 하여금 에이전트와 함께 과제에 참가하게 한 다음 에이전트에 대한 느낌을 대인 평가 척도를 이용해 평정하도록 한 결과, 전반적으로 여성 에이전트를 선호하는 경향이 나타났다. 또한 참가자가 이성의 에이전트를 보다 긍정적으로 평가하는 경향을 나타내었다. 연구 2는 시각적인 사실성이 떨어지는 그래픽 캐릭터를 이용하여 에이전트로 제시하고 성별과 정서 표현 방식을 조작하였다. 참가자로 하여금 에이전트와 함께 과제에 참가하게 한 다음 에이전트에 대한 느낌을 평정하도록 한 결과, 연구 1과 마찬가지로 여성 에이전트를 더 긍정적으로 평가하는 경향이 나타났다. 또한 참가자는 참가자의 상태에 호응하는 방식으로 공감적인 정서를 표현하는 에이전트를 에이전트 자신의 정서를 표현하는 조건이나 정서를 표현하지 않는 조건보다 더 긍정적으로 평가하였다. 본 연구의 결과로부터 시각적인 사실성이 떨어지는 에이전트가 사용자와 상호작용할 경우에도 에이전트의 성별의 효과와 공감적인 정서 표현 방식의 효과는 여전히 사용자의 평가에 영향을 미친다는 것을 지지하였다.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.150-159
• /
• 2003

본 연구에서는 지구과학 지식과 창의력을 동시에 적용해야 해결할 수 있는 지구과학 창의력을 평가할 수 있는 문항의 개발 방법을 제시하고자 하였다. R&D과정을 거친 본 연구의 결과는 첫째, 조작적 정의를 통해 창의력과 과학창의력간의 인지능력 차이를 명료화하였고 둘째, 과학창의력을 구성하는 하위 요소들 중에서 문항 개발이 가능하다고 판단된 유창성, 융통성, 정교성, 독창성을 선정하여 각각에 대한 조작적 정의를 내린 후 각 요소들에 대한 평가와 채점의 준거를 제시하였다. 셋째, 평가도구의 구비 조건인 타당도, 신뢰도, 변별도, 난이도를 검증하기 위하여 3번의 현장검증을 실시하였으며, 본 연구에서 개발한 지구과학창의력 평가도구는 각 하위 요소별로 2문항씩 총 8문항으로 구성되어 있다. 넷째, 문항합치도 지수 평균은 .99, 문항 내적 합치도 지수인 Cronbach ${\alpha}$값은 .79, 각 문항별 평가자간 신뢰도는 0.78,각 하위 요소별 평가자간 신뢰도는 0.75, 변별도 지수인 점이연상관 지수는 .19, 문항 난이도 지수는 .00이었다. 이와 같이 평가도구의 구비조건들이 허용 범위 내에 있는 것으로 볼 때 본 연구에서 개발한 지구과학 창의력 평가도구는 유용한 것으로 판단할 수 있다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2010

This study is aimed to reflect non-cognitive traits that should be assessed in admissions interviews for medical school applicants, with the goal being to increase the reliability of the admissions interview. The admissions interview is valued for its ability to assess noncognitive and nonteachable attributes of good doctors, especially which cannot be evaluated with other admission assessment tools. Various characteristics of applicants including age, gender, exam scores, and nonverbal communication were found to have influenced the interview results. Bias from interviewers was a significant factor in the results of the interview. A Structured interview in multiple stations such as the Multiple Mini-Interview showed the highest reliability and validity. To make the interview fair, no information about the applicants was provided to the interviewers and interviewers were recruited from different backgrounds. There have been few research papers on admission interviews in Korea. Active research on the qualities of good doctors and effective and reliable admission interview methods should be encouraged. A strategy should be developed to overcome the philosophical obstacles that medical school professors want to admit academically excellent applicants.