• 제목/요약/키워드: citations

검색결과 276건 처리시간 0.025초

Research Output of the Pakistani Library and Information Science Authors: A Bibliometric Evaluation of Their Impact

  • Anwar, Mumtaz Ali;Jan, Sajjad Ullah
    • Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.48-61
    • /
    • 2017
  • This paper uses 601 cited papers of Pakistani LIS researchers with the purpose to examine the individual performance of these Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers in terms of their research output and its impact on the LIS (national/international) literature by using various bibliometric indicators. A list of 139 authors was compiled with the help of the Library, Information Science, and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) and some other sources. Data were collected from Google Scholar and SPSS version 20 was utilized in order to identify the relationship between self-citations and various performance indices of the authors. The average citations received per paper vary from 1.80 to 10.08. About half of the papers were single-authored whereas less than one-fifth were by three or more authors. The authors who worked in collaboration produced more papers and received more citations. The h-index, g-index, hI-index, hI-norm, and e-index were used to determine the rank for each author. The intra-group citations grid revealed the volume of self-citations and a small group who cite each other more due to close academic and social relationships. The correlations between self-citations and the impact indices used revealed significant differences. Findings are useful for concerned institutions regarding award, promotions, etc. Further, future research should seriously consider the self-citations and social networking of authors while examining their citations-based research performance.

Impact of Self-Citations on Impact Factor: A Study Across Disciplines, Countries and Continents

  • Pandita, Ramesh;Singh, Shivendra
    • Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
    • /
    • 제3권2호
    • /
    • pp.42-57
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose. : The present study is an attempt to find out the impact of self-citations on Impact Factor (IF) across disciplines. The study examines the number of research articles published across 27 major subject fields covered by SCImago, encompassing as many as 310 sub-disciplines. The study evaluates aspects like percentage of self-citations across each discipline, leading self-citing countries and continents, and the impact of self-citation on their IF. Scope. : The study is global in nature, as it evaluates the trend of self-citation and its impact on IF of all the major subject disciplines of the world, along with countries and continents. IF has been calculated for the year 2012 by analyzing the articles published during the years 2010 and 2011. Methodology/Approach. : The study is empirical in nature; as such, statistical and mathematical tools and techniques have been employed to work out the distribution across disciplines. The evaluation has been purely under-taken on the secondary data, retrieved from SCImago Journal and Country Ranking. Findings. : Self-citations play a very significant part in inflating IF. All the subject fields under study are influenced by the practice of self-citation, ranging from 33.14% to 52.38%. Compared to the social sciences and the humanities, subject fields falling under the purview of pure and applied sciences have a higher number of self-citations, but a far lesser percentage than the social sciences and humanities. Upon excluding self-citations, a substantial amount of change was observed in the IF of subject fields under study, as 18 (66.66%) out of 27 subjects fields faced shuffle in their rankings. Variation in rankings based on IF with and without self-citation was observed at subject level, country level, and continental level.

온라인 데이터베이스정보의 분포특성 분석 (The Distribution of Citations in Online Databases)

  • 이효숙
    • 한국정보관리학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국정보관리학회 1995년도 제2회 학술대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.41-44
    • /
    • 1995
  • Twenty six databases relevant to ‘trade’ have been searched to test for a Bradford's law of scatter. Citations in the databases adhere to the linearity of Bradford's distribution, however, they show that the concentration of citations in core databases is not as great as being expected.

  • PDF

Korean Medical Citation Index(KoMCI) and Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

  • Yang, Hee-Jin;Chung, Hyun-Tai;Park, Chul-Kee;Yi, Min-A;Kim, Dong-Gyu
    • Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
    • /
    • 제40권4호
    • /
    • pp.300-303
    • /
    • 2006
  • The authority and reputation of a medical journal is based on the number of received citations. Korean Medical Citation Index [KoMCI] provides information about citations of Korean medical journals since 2002. All six issues of KoMCI [from 2000 to 2005] were used for analysis. Citations, impact factor, and their changes were evaluated. We compared the data of Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society[JKNS] with other Korean medical journals. The impact factor[IF] of 2005 maintained increased value since 2004, although the impact factor excluding self citation[ZIF] returned previous low value. Improvement in proportion of Korean citations and in proportions of non-self received citations were encouraging changes. Although there were some improvements, the status of JKNS with respect to ZIF is still behind other Korean medical journals selected for comparison. Improvement of the status of JKNS by aid of KoMCI and enhanced reputation of KoMCI by its positive influence on JKNS or other Korean medical journals will be beneficial to members and medical societies of Korea.

한국치위생학회지 게재논문의 피인용수에 영향을 미친 요인 (Factors affecting the number of citations in papers published in the Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene)

  • 전세정
    • 한국치위생학회지
    • /
    • 제21권5호
    • /
    • pp.639-644
    • /
    • 2021
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that affected the number of citations for articles published in the Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene based on previous studies. Methods: Information on papers including the number of citations was collected using a web crawling technique. The effect of the number of author keywords, the number of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords, MeSH match rate, abstract word count and keyword-abstract ratio on the number of citations was analyzed by multiple regression analysis. Results: The use of the MeSH keyword did not have a significant effect on the number of citations. Among the other factors, only the keyword-abstract ratio was statistically significant. Conclusions: Select a topic of constant interest in the field, write the title in detail using colons or asterisks if necessary, and do not repeat the words used in the title in keywords. Select specific keywords deeply related to the topic. In particular, choice words or phrases that are frequently used in the abstract. If the MeSH keyword selection contradicts the previous strategies, boldly give up the MeSH keyword.

외국인 유학생의 보고서 쓰기에 나타나는 인용의 수사학적 유형 양상 (A study of the Patterns of Typology of Rhetorical of citations in International Students Papers)

  • 곽수진
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제8권2호
    • /
    • pp.251-257
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구에서는 외국인 학부 유학생이 보고서를 쓰는 과정에서 자신의 의견, 주장의 논리를 강화하기 위해 선정한 자료를 인용하는 경우, 어떤 수사학적 유형을 많이 사용하고 있는지, 한국어 능력이 상위인 그룹과 하위인 그룹의 수사학적 기능 선택 양상은 어떻게 다른지를 살펴보기 위해 유학생의 보고서 30편을 분석해 보았다. 외국인 유학생들은 자신의 보고서에서 자신의 논의를 설득력 있게 전개하고 보완하기 위해 '통계" 인용을 가장 많이 사용하였으며, 다음으로는 귀속, 사례제시, 용어 사용 순이었다. 또한, 한국어 능력이 상위에 속하는 그룹은 자신의 보고서에서 보통 8-11회 정도의 인용을 사용하였으며 귀속, 사례제시, 용어 사용, 통계, 자료간의 관계 구축, 자신의 주장과 다른 자료를 비교하는 등 다양한 수사학적 유형을 사용한 반면, 하위에 속하는 그룹은 다양한 인용의 유형을 거의 사용하지 못하고 있었다. 따라서 "인용"이 자신의 논리를 강화할 수 있는 하나의 중요한 전략이라는 인식을 갖게 하고 다양한 인용의 유형을 유용한 보고서 쓰기 전략으로서 교육해야 하며 교수방안을 마련해야 할 것이다.

연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구 (Some Improvements on H-Index : Measuring Research Outputs by Citations)

  • 이재윤
    • 정보관리학회지
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.167-186
    • /
    • 2006
  • Hirsch가 제안한 h-지수는 인용을 통해서 개인의 연구 성과를 측정하려는 시도이다. h-지수는 용이한 산출 방법과 함께 지수의 강건성 등이 인정되면서 발표 이후 다양한 분야에서 이를 적용하거나 보완하는 연구가 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 이 연구에서는 우선 h-지수와 이를 보완한 g-지수를 비롯한 변형 지수에 대해서 현재까지 전개되고 있는 논의를 살펴보았다. 그리고 h-지수와 g-지수의 단점을 보완할 수 있는 개량 지수를 몇가지 제안하고 가상 자료와 실제 자료에 대해서 측정해보았다. 측정 결과 제안한 지수들이 h-지수와 g-지수를 대체할 가능성이 있음을 확인하였다.

『요산당신집의방금낭지보(樂山堂新集醫方錦囊至寶)』의 편제에 대한 연구 (A Study on the Organization of the 『Yosandangsinjipeuibangkeumnangjibo』)

  • 금유정;엄동명;송지청
    • 대한한의학원전학회지
    • /
    • 제33권3호
    • /
    • pp.37-47
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objectives : This paper aims to examine the overall form of the 『Yosandangsinjipeuibangkeumnangjibo』 (『Yosandang』). Methods : The table of contents, organization of the body, citations in the 『Yosandang』 were examined, then compared to the organization of 『Donguibogam』 (『Bogam』) and 『Jejungsinpyeon』 (『Jejung』). Results & Conclusions : Based on the organization of the body, it could be determined that Byun Gwangwon referenced 『Bogam』 and 『Jejung』. However, it was found that 『Yosandang』 strived to be more faithful to the 『Bogam』 than the 『Jejung』 while it also tried to minimize the complicatedness of 『Bogam』. Its organization was unique in that it created new chapters and added contents. Also, through examination of the citations, it could be assumed that those in the 『Yosandang』 were secondary citations of the 『Bogam』 and 『Jejung』. Despite these features, it also cited the 『Zhengzhizhunsheng』 and showed efforts to include new knowledge with citation labels such as '新增[newly added]' '自述[original writing]' and 'Yosan(樂山)'. Discussion : The findings of the comparison and examination process of the organization and citations of the book revealed that the uniqueness of the organization of 『Yosandang』 is most obvious in the pediatrics chapter. This indicates that the author's intention was to deal with pediatric diseases professionally.

Analysis of Research status based on Citation Context

  • Kim, Byungkyu;Choi, Seon-heui;Kang, Muyeong;Kang, Ji-Hoon
    • International Journal of Contents
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.63-68
    • /
    • 2015
  • A citation analysis utilizes the relations among citations and is the most popular bibliometric method. This analysis is based on 1) the evaluation by paper, journal and researcher of the research output, 2) the identification of emerging research topics, 3) the production of a map of the intellectual structure of the research domain and 4) various services for academic information. However, this approach has a limitation in that a citation is treated in a very simple manner, even though the purpose of citation can vary greatly. To address this problem, new approaches have been studied that take into account the citation context. This research separates the citations according to the citation functions and tries to conduct an analysis according to the newly classified citations. Furthermore, research on the citation summarization and visualization based on both the citation context and the citation function of the citations was also attempted. However, since there are very few studies related to citation context in South Korea, more research and development is needed in this area. This study analyzes the status of the research in terms of the citation context. For this, we utilized social network analysis methods.

Classification of the journal category "oral surgery" in the Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded: flaws and suggestions

  • Kim, Seong-Gon
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제45권4호
    • /
    • pp.186-191
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the journal category "oral surgery" in Scopus and in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Materials and Methods: The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS), The Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (JKAOMS), and The Journal of Prosthodontic Research (JPR) were selected from the Scopus list of journals as oral surgery journals. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (MPRS) was selected from PubMed as a Scopus oral surgery title. From these titles, 10 recently published articles were collected and used for reference analysis. Results: The percentage of citations from oral surgery journals was 26.7%, 24.5%, and 40.1% for JKAOMS, MPRS, and JOMS, respectively. In total, 1.1% of JPR's citations were from oral surgery journals and significantly fewer from other journals (P<0.001). The percentage of citations from dentistry journals excluding oral surgery journals was 11.9%, 34.4%, and 15.8% for JKAOMS, MPRS, and JOMS, respectively. For JPR, 80.6% of citations were from dentistry journals and significantly more were from other journals (P<0.001). Conclusion: Selected samples revealed that JPR is incorrectly classified as an oral surgery journal in Scopus. In addition, the scientific interaction among JKAOMS, MPRS, and JOMS was different to JPR in the reference analysis.