• 한국자동차공학회논문집
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.163-170
• /
• 2005

Urban transit is a complex system that is combined electrically and mechanically, it is necessary to construct maintenance system for securing safety accompanying high-speed driving and maintaining promptly. Expert system is a computer program which uses numerical or non-numerical domain-specific knowledge to solve problems. In this research, we intend to develop the expert system which diagnose failure causes quickly and display measures. For the development of expert system, standardization of failure code classification system and creation of BOM(Bill Of Materials) have been first performed. Through the analysis of failure history and maintenance manuals, knowledge base has been constructed. Also, for retrieving the procedure of failure diagnosis and repair linking with the knowledge base, we have built RBR(Rule Based Reasoning) engine by pattern matching technique and CBR(Case Based Reasoning) engine by similarity search method. This system has been developed based on web to maximize the accessibility.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.81-90
• /
• 2000

This study proposes the knowledge discovery process for the effective mining of knowledge on the web. The proposed knowledge discovery process uses the Prior knowledge base and the Prior knowledge management system to reflect tacit knowledge in addition to explicit knowledge. The prior knowledge management system constructs the prior knowledge base using a fuzzy cognitive map, and defines information to be extracted from the web. In addition, it transforms the extracted information into the form being handled in mining process. Experiments using case-based reasoning and neural network" are performed to verify the usefulness of the proposed model. The experimental results are encouraging and prove the usefulness of the proposed model.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.37-50
• /
• 2014

사례기반 추론기법(case-based reasoning)은 수많은 데이터 속에서 현재 문제와 유사한 과거데이터를 실시간으로 탐색하고 복원해내야 하기 때문에, 과거에 축적된 데이터의 양이 방대하거나 또는 데이터의 축적 속도가 빠를 경우 계산비용(computational cost)이 급격히 높아지는 확장성(scalability) 문제를 갖는다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여, 기존의 일부 연구들은 클러스터링(clustering) 기법을 적용하여, 전체 데이타를 사전에 몇 개의 그룹으로 분류한 후, 특정 클러스터 내에서만 과거 사례를 탐색하도록 하는 클러스터링과 사례기반 추론의 하이브리드 기법을 제안하였다. 그러나 이러한 기법은 클러스터 수를 얼마로 설정했는지에 따른 성능편차가 심하고, 또한 기본적인 사례기반 추론기법에 비해 일반적으로 낮은 예측성능을 도출하는 문제점이 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 기존의 클러스터-사례기반추론기법의 문제점을 실증적으로 분석하고, 이를 극복할 수 있는 새로운 하이브리드(hybrid) 사례기반 추론기법을 제안한다. 제안된 기법은 실제 심장병환자를 예측하는 문제에 적용하였으며, 그 결과 제안된 기법이 기존의 사례기반 추론기법에 비해 현격하게 낮은 계산비용을 사용하면서도, 유사한 수준의 예측성능을 도출할 수 있음을 확인하였다.

• 한국공간구조학회논문집
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.75-82
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 국내 초고층 건물 사례들을 바탕으로 사례 데이터베이스를 구축하여 구조시스템 대안 생성 및 선정 업무를 효율적으로 처리 할 수 있는 설계지원시스템을 개발하였으며, 사례 데이터베이스의 정보를 이용한 사례기반추론기법을 제안하였다. 국내 47개 초고층 건물에 대한 사례 데이터베이스의 설계정보를 분석하여 초기설계 단계에서 구조시스템 선정을 위한 귀납적 조회 모듈 및 유사사례선정을 위한 최근린 조회기법도 제시하였다.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.25-47
• /
• 2007

Background and Purpose: There was seldom study about method that diagnose 8 Constitution beside method of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine. Objectives: This study is to make out check list for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning). Methods: Review of literatures about special quality element of 8 Constitution and supplement learning advice of 8 Constitution Medicine Experts constructed knowledge base. And then, knowledge base divided through AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), and made out check list with this. Results: Knowledge base based on special quality element of 8 Constitution was divided by 5 greate classification and 25 bisection kind, and check list consisted of 251 item was made out through this. Conclusion: Based on this research, cases necessary to make 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System can be gathered through check list, and further study for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning) is needed to supplement this research.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.41-65
• /
• 2005

The credit ration is a significant area of financial management which is of major interest to practitioners, financial and credit analysts. The components of credit rating are identified decision models are developed to assess credit rating an the corresponding creditworthiness of firms an accurately ad possble. Although many early studies demonstrate a priori which of these techniques will be most effective to solve a specific classification problem. Recently, a number of studies have demonstrate that a hybrid model integration artificial intelligence approaches with other feature selection algorthms can be alternative methodologies for business classification problems. In this article, we propose a hybrid approach using rough set theory as an alternative methodology to select appropriate attributes for case-based reasoning. This model uses rough specific interest lies in lthe stable combining of both rough set theory to extract knowledge that can guide dffective retrevals of useful cases. Our specific interest lies in the stable combining of both rough set theory and case-based reasoning in the problem of corporate credit rating. In addition, we summarize backgrounds of applying integrated model in the field of corporate credit rating with a brief description of various credit rating methodologies.

• 한국정보처리학회논문지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.96-106
• /
• 1999

사례기반 추론은 이전에 해결된 문제에 대한 해를 재사용 함으로써 새로운 문제를 해결한다. 그러나 과거의 사례와 새로운 문제 사이에는 차이가 있다. 이러한 문제점을 해결하기 위해서 사례기반 추론 시스템은 이전 사례의 해를 새로운 상황에 맞게 적응 시켜야 한다. 최근의 사례기반 추론 시스템에서, 사례 적응은 시스템 개발자에 의해 손으로 코딩된 규칙을 사용하는 규칙기반 방법을 이용한다. 따라서 시스템 설계자는 과거의 전통적인 전문가 시스템 설계에서 발견되는 지식획득의 병목방법을 제안하였다. 적응 지식을 학습하기 위해 사례 베이스의 사례들을 비교하는 방법을 사용하였다. 본 논문에서 제안한 방법은 여행 가격 결정을 위한 영역에서 실험하였다. 실험 결과 사례 추출만을 지원하는 시스템보다 해에 대한 정확도가 향상되었음을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.107-126
• /
• 2008

Background : There was seldom study about method that diagnose 8 Constitution beside method of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine. Objectives : This study is to make out 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning). Methods : First, at case base construction process we constructed case base for CBR embodiment because gathering 925 cases all to patient who constitution is verified, and second, at study model establishment process superior expert system development by purpose CBR of reasoning process dividing fundamental type CBR that spend basis data value and expert type CBR that reflect weight in basis data value accordin I II III to advice expert opinion, and third, system embodiment process explained about way to give process and weight that diagnose constitution through Nearest Neighbor Method sampling process of CBR techniques, and fourth, at system estimation process we selected superior CBR model because comparing and estimate the diagnosis rate of expert system with fundamental type system (GECBR) model and expert type I II III CBR system (AVCBR, AACBR, AGCBR) model that reflect expert opinion in fundamental type system. GECBR and AGCBR chose on superior study model. Through such 4 study process, we developed 8 constitution diagnosis expert system lastly. Results : 1. When we select GECBR that is fundamental type by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 78.91% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 90.4%, Cholecystonia 63.0%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 71.2%, Colonotonia 74.4%, Renotonia 37.5%, Vesicotonia 67.1% expect. 2. When we select AGCBR that is expert type III by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 77.51% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 93.4%, Cholecystonia 58.5%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 73.1%, Colonotonia 64.4%, Renotonia 41.7%, Vesicotonia 72.2% expect. Conclusion : Based on this study, 8 constitution diagnosis expert system may give help to diagnose 8 constitution, and it is going to utilize as objective estimation tool of 8 constitution diagnosis, and further study for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning) is needed to supplement this study.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.142-184
• /
• 2008

Background: There was seldom study about method that diagnose 8 Constitution beside method of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine. Objectives: This study is to make out 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning). Methods: First, at case base construction process we constructed case base for CBR embodiment because gathering 925 cases all to patient who constitution is verified, and second, at study model establishment process superior expert system development by purpose CBR of reasoning process dividing fundamental type CBR that spend basis data value and expert type I II III CBR that reflect weight in basis data value according to advice expert opinion, and third, system embodiment process explained about way to give process and weight that diagnose constitution through Nearest Neighbor Method sampling process of CBR techniques, and fourth, at system estimation process we selected superior CBR model because comparing and estimate the diagnosis rate of expert system with fundamental type system (GECBR) model and expert type I II III CBR system (AVCBR, AACBR, AGCBR) model that reflect expert opinion in fundamental type system. GECBR and AGCBR chose on superior study model. Through such 4 study process, we developed 8 constitution diagnosis expert system lastly. Results: 1. When we select GECBR that is fundamental type by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 78.91% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 90.4%, Cholecystonia 63.0%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 71.2%, Colonotonia 74.4%, Renotonia 37.5%, Vesicotonia 67.1% expect. 2. When we select AGCBR that is expert type III by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 77.51% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 93.4%, Cholecystonia 58.5%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 73.1%, Colonotonia 64.4%, Renotonia 41.7%, Vesicotonia 72.2% expect. Conclusion: Based on this study, 8 constitution diagnosis expert system may give help to diagnose 8 constitution, and it is going to utilize as objective estimation tool of 8 constitution diagnosis, and further study for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning) is needed to supplement this study.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.43-61
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 사용자의 정적, 외부환경과 연관된 동적 상황정보와 사회적 관계와 연관된 개인적 상황정보들을 의사결정 요소로서 고려한 의사결정의 동적 변환(Dynamic Adaptation)을 제안한다. 즉, 의사결정자의 정적, 외재적 정보보다 과거의 경험, 주관적 선호도 및 사회적 관계와 연관된 상황정보(Social Context)를 의사결정에 동적으로 반영하고 동시에 의사결정 해의 사용시점에서의 가용성에 따라 유용 가능한 대안을 추출하는 방법론을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위해, 정적, 외재적 및 사회적 상황정보를 이용하여 의사결정 추론한다. 추론은 의사결정자의 과거 경험에 기반한 사례기반 추론과 해당 의사결정 결과가 가용하지 않을 경우 수정을 위한 제약식 만족추론으로 이루어진다. 이를 위해 개인적 경험 등의 정보에 기반한 '문제상황 온톨로지'(Problem Context Ontology)와 집단의 경험적 지식에 기반한 '솔루션 온톨로지'(Solution Ontology)를 구축하였다. 의사결정단계는 상황정보 인식 및 문제상황 온톨로지에 매핑하는 단계, 경험적 사례로부터 문제상황에 가장 적합한 사례를 선택하는 단계, 생성된 솔루션이 가용하지 않을 경우 솔루션 온톨로지와 제약식 만족추론을 통해 새로운 대안을 생성하는 단계로 이루어진다. 본 방법론을 모임에 적합한 식당을 제안하는 예제를 적용함으로써 타당성을 검증하였다. 또한 실험을 통해 사회적 상황정보를 고려하여 생성된 의사결정대안이 그렇지 않은 경우보다 의사결정자의 만족도를 향상시켰으며, 생성된 의사결정대안이 가용하지 않은 경우 제약조건식과 솔루션 온톨로지를 이용해 생성한 대안이 유의미함을 검증하였다.