• Title/Summary/Keyword: canine parvovirus

Search Result 62, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Evaluation for Protective Effect of CPV-2 and CPV-2b Vaccines against a Korean CPV-2a Isolate in Pups (국내에서 유행하는 CPV-2a 분리주에 대한 CPV-2와 CPV-2b 백신의 방어효능 평가)

  • Jeoung, Seok-Young;Yi, Jun-Seok;Kim, Hyun-Tae;Kim, Doo
    • Journal of Veterinary Clinics
    • /
    • v.31 no.5
    • /
    • pp.361-366
    • /
    • 2014
  • The aim of this study was to determine if vaccines containing CPV-2 or CPV-2b provided protection against challenge with a recent Korean CPV-2a isolate. Twenty mongrel pups aged 9 weeks old were used. The commercial CPV-2 or CPV-2b vaccines were administered to each of the 8 pups thrice every 3 weeks, respectively. Two weeks after the last vaccination, all pups were challenged with CPV-2a (VR00174 strain) $1{\times}10^6\;TCID_{50}$. Clinical signs, fecal excretion of challenged CPV, and serological response of pups were observed for 2 weeks after challenge. All vaccinated pups did not display any clinical signs of disease after challenge with Korean CPV-2a isolate, whereas all non-vaccinated pups exhibited mucoid or hemorrhagic diarrhea, vomiting and anorexia. In all non-vaccinated pups, the virus could be detected in feces from 4 days after challenge, whereas in vaccinated pups, no evidence of viral excretion could be detected. Two of 4 non-vaccinated pups died 6 days after the challenge. This study showed that the two commercial CPV-2 and CPV-2b vaccines were effective in preventing infection and/or disease caused by the Korean CPV-2a isolate.

Application of a PCR Method for the Detection of Mycoplasma in Veterinary Live Viral Vaccines (동물용 생 바이러스 백신에서 Mycoplasma 검출을 위한 PCR 기법 적용)

  • Jeon Woo-Jin;Kim Byoung-Han;Jung Byeong-Yeal;An Dong-Jun;Yi Chul-Hyun;Jang Hwan;Chung Gab-Soo
    • Korean Journal of Microbiology
    • /
    • v.41 no.4
    • /
    • pp.269-274
    • /
    • 2005
  • We evaluated the PCR assay and two commercialized PCR kits for the detection of mycoplasma in veterinary via live vaccines. The PCR assay could specifically detect all the tested Mycoplasma spp. and Acholeplasma spp., whereas two commercialized PCR kits did not. Also, the specificity of the PCR assay showed that 4 reference strains and 7 field isolates belonging to avian mycoplasma species could be all detected. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was determined using pure cultured Mycoplasma spp. and Acholeplasma spp. with a range of 1 to 100 colony forming units/ml in 9 CFR Mycoplasma broth. To test the availability of the PCR assay for veterinary live viral vaccines, A. laidlawii was artificially inoculated into the swine transmissible gastroenteritis-rota virus combined vaccine and canine parvovirus vaccine, respectively and the sensitivity of the PCR assay was similar with the result of cultured samples. In this study, the PCR assays could be used as rapid and sensitive methods for the detection of mycoplasma in veterinary live viral vaccines.