• Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.175-191
• /
• 2003

An empirical Bayesian approach is discussed for estimation of characteristics from the two-way balanced rotation sampling design which includes U.S. Current Population Survey and Canadian Labor Force Survey as special cases. An empirical Bayesian estimator is derived for monthly effect under presence of two types of biases and correlations It is shown that the marginal distribution of observation provides more general correlation structure than that frequentist has assumed. Consistent estimators are derived for hyper-parameters in Normal priors.

• 응용통계연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.117-132
• /
• 2007

두 평정자가 있는 이차원 분류표에서 우연에 의한 합치 비율을 보정한 Cohen의 합치도($\kappa$)는 문제점이 있는 측도로 알려져 있다. $\kappa$는 평정자의 분류 비율(주변확률)에 매우 민감하고, 합치도로서의 조건도 만족하지 못한다. 그러나 $\kappa$를 비롯한 기존 합치도들은 주변확률이 0.5에 가까울 때 안정되며 비슷한 값을 갖는다. 본 연구에서는 이차원 분류표의 불균형적 주변분포를 보정함으로써 $\kappa$의 역설을 해결하는 새로운 합치도 H를 제안한다. 또한 예제를 통해 기존의 합치도들과 제안된 합치도를 비교한다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 2021

PURPOSE. To investigate the biomechanical effect of marginal bone resorption (MBR) on the mandibular mini implant (MI)-retained overdenture (MI-OD) on the edentulous model. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The experimental mandibular edentulous model was modified from a commercial model with 2 mm thick artificial soft tissue under denture base. Two MIs (Φ2.6 mm × 10 mm) were bilaterally placed between the lateral incisor and the canine area and attached with magnetic attachments. Three groups were set up as follows: 1) alveolar bone around the MI without MBR (normal group), 2) with MBR to 1/2 the length of the implant (resorption group), and 3) complete denture (CD) without MI (CD group). Strain around the MI, pressure near the first molar area, and displacement of denture were simultaneously measured, loading up to 50 N under bilateral/unilateral loading. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples t test and one-way ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS. The strain around the MI with MBR was approximately 1.5 times higher than that without MBR. The pressure in CD was higher than in MI-ODs (P<.05), while there was no statistical difference between the normal and resorption group (P>.05). Similarly, the CD demonstrated a greater displacement of the denture base than did the MI-ODs during bilateral and unilateral loadings (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The strain around the MI with MBR was approximately 1.5 times higher than that without MBR. The pressure on posterior alveolar ridge and denture displacement of MI-ODs significantly decreased compared to CDs, even when MBR occurs. Bilateral balanced occlusion was recommended for MI-ODs, especially when MBR occurred.