• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.187-216
• /
• 2004

Northeast Asia logistics hub strategy was undertaken by Korean Government to gain a national competitive advantage in Northeast Asia. Current Government has Northeast Asian Economic Hub Strategy including construction of SOC in Northeast Asia for promoting peace, promotion of formation of Northeast Asia Community, logistics hub, Financial hub and national innovation for R&D Cluster. To realize Northeast Asian logistics hub, the Northeast Asia logistics hub road map has undertaken as follows: expansion of logistics infra in Incheon Airport, Busan Port and Gwangyang Port, systematic improvements such as adjustment of investment distribution, special logistics companies, transparent customs in logistics transactions, logistics manpower, improvement of system supporting global logistics and attraction of international logistics companies to the logistics center, construction of seamless and paperless logistics information network, Northeast Asia railway infra. The purpose of this paper is to study investment priority and improvements in the Northeast Asia Logistics Hub Road Map and to contribute to gain the national competitive advantage as logistics hub in Northeast Asia

• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.182-200
• /
• 2010

교수요목기 부터 제7차 교육과정까지 고등학교 세계지리 교과서에서 동아시아 관련 지명 표기가 어떻게 이루어져 왔으며, 그 위치와 범위는 어떻게 구분되어 왔는지 살펴보았다. 주요 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 먼저, 우리나라 고등학교 세계지리 교과서에서는 한국, 중국, 일본의 3국을 중심으로 하는 지역을 동부 아시아로 표기하고 있으며, 지도상의 범위는 한국, 중국, 몽골, 일본, 대만을 포함하는 지역을 표시하는 실체적 지명이었다. 둘째, 동아시아라는 지명은 2차 교육과정에서 처음 표기되었으며, 이는 동부 아시아를 하나의 문화 지역으로 표기할 때 사용되는 지명이었다. 제언하면, 교과서에서 동아시아란 지명을 표기할 때는 동북아시아와 동남아시아를 모두 포괄하는 지명으로 사용해야한다. 그리고 한국, 중국, 몽골, 일본, 대만으로 위치와 범위를 한정할 때는 동북아시아라는 지명을 사용해야 한다.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.29-32
• /
• 2002

• 복식
• /
• 제3권
• /
• pp.29-46
• /
• 1980

The purpose of this thesis is to find out how the upper garment styles in the Ancient East and est had been influenced with each other. Analytical studies conclude the fellowing findings: 1) Upper garment styles in the feat Asia and the Egypt already highly developed in 28th century B.C. and show us the original style of the wrap-over to the left and that of the round neckline(曲領). Upper garment of the open in the center front shown in Babylonia in 18th century B.C. had been inherited to the caftan of the Hebrew and later succeeded to the Persia. 2) The tunic styles of the round neckline, the wrap-over to the left and the open in the cotter front, which were the basic styles of the upper garment, had teen widely accepted to the central Asia and the East Asia, as well as the Northern Europe, from the West Asia. 3) The styles of the wrap-over to the right originated from China since it had begun to show in the Shang Dynasty(商代, 殷代). 4) The East and the West costumes had been very much intermixed in 4th century B.C. Alexander the Great of Macedoria in 4th century B.C. expanded his territory to the central Asia and built up the Bacteria, when the most western civilization had been greatly transmitted to the Orient. Meanwhile the tunic being clad in the West and Central Asia began to be worn by soldiers in the period of the Warring States in China (326-299 B.C.) and afterwards worn even by civil officials since the age of the T'ang Dynasty of China. 5) The Upper garments of the open in the center front, the wrap-over to the right, the wrap-over to the left and the round neckline were found in Korea, which mean that the upper garment styles in the Ancient Korea were intermixed of the factors from the West Asia, the central Asia and the East Asia. 6) The styles of costume in the East Asia were influenced by the West Asia through the central Asia. The upper garment styles Europe were also influenced by the West Asia. Thus the upper garment styles in the Ancient East and West had been mutually affected with each other.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2004년도 Asia Navigation Conference
• /
• pp.54-63
• /
• 2004

There are two principal routes for the Asia-North America containerized cargo, that of Asia-West Coast and Asia-East Coast. On the West Coast, the Asia-Los Angeles, dominate the commerce, whereas on the Asia-East Coast it's the Panama Canal. Each of these routes has different characteristics. All are similar in that each is the door to the commerce of containerized cargo originating in Asia; each combines maritime and overland transportation; each has important intermodal connections and is able to distribute cargo throughout the West and East Coasts of the United States. Each route also has its port of preference that has the necessary infrastructure, equipment and intermodal connections. For example, in the case of the Port of Los Angeles, in spite of some of its advantages, it has several serious problems due to the interminable containerized cargo traffic that must be solved rapidly and satisfactorily in order to progress. In this paper, we would like to show the problems of two main routes.

• 동남아시아연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.1-41
• /
• 2012

동남아의 1천년에 관한 우리의 얘기는 아직도 쌀의 8천년에 관한 아시아의 얘기를 시작조차 못하고 있다. 그러한 서사가 왜 우리의 역사책에는 실리지 않는가? 적어도 동남아에 있어서 역사는 여전히 민족주의를 맴돌고 있다. 따라서 모든 민족은 농민과 전답이 아니라 제왕과 전투가 역사의 주연으로 등장하는 각자의 얘기를 가지고 있다. 그 줄거리는 정치와 민족성이지 농업과 생태학이 아니며, 그 가르침은 갈등과 경쟁이지 협동과 상생이 아니다. 그렇다면 지금도 숨어있는 것은 쌀이 일찍이 만들었고 아직도 좋아하는 지방의 협동과 지역의 보편성이다(O'Connor 2004, 29).

• Acta Via Serica
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.165-184
• /
• 2021

This article demonstrates the significance of long-distance networks formed by traders from Afghanistan and Central Asia to the forging of present-day transregional connections within Asia. It identifies two connective corridors authored by these traders: a 'Eurasian corridor' connecting East Asia to post-Soviet Eurasia and extending into Western Europe and a 'West Asian corridor' involving traders originally from Central Asia linking East Asia to Turkey and the Arabian Peninsula. Empirically, the paper documents and analyses the varying cultural and political orientations of traders operating along these networks, and ways in which specific nodes in the networks contribute to their activities as a whole. Conceptually, the papers suggest that the study of 'inter-Asian' connections stands to benefit from deploying oceanic and inland models of geography in a non-dichotomous manner.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2020

Trends toward an influx of new migrants have been pronounced in East Asia through a development we call the third round of migrant incorporation. At the same time, other features of East Asian societies, such as strong levels of ethnic nationalism, have changed little, posing challenges to multiculturalism. In this introduction to this special issue, we review the latest research trends broadly concerning multiculturalism, migrant groups that have received little attention, racism and xenophobia. We first discuss the state of migrant incorporation in East Asia and the limits of multiculturalism in this region, where various features of the developmental state persist. We then introduce research on voices opposing multiculturalism in East Asia. This introduction highlights what is peculiar―and ordinary―about migrant incorporation and the associated challenges in East Asia.

• 수완나부미
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.77-94
• /
• 2016

The paper examined Southeast Asia as a whole and focused on similarities among countries composing what is now known as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In order to determine these similarities, the analysis focused on the fact that during World War II the whole of Southeast Asia was occupied by one political power: Japan. The policies the Japanese implemented in the region were to a degree very similar in terms of pressures and tensions that occurred in the different countries. The paper argues that these pressures and the responses of the various peoples of Southeast Asia instilled a nucleus of common identity in Southeast Asia as a whole. Basically, the policies that the Japanese implemented all over Southeast Asia were the following: the setting up regional administrations; the extraction of resources and emphasis on local self-sufficiency; the implementation of cultural Japanization; and local indigenization policies. The Southeast Asian responses that crystalized this joint Southeast Asian identity may be described as: accommodating and resisting the Japanese; commemorating portraying; and collectively remembering the era. The process of action and reaction between Japan and Southeast Asia was formative of this joint Southeast Asian identity.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.159-186
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 1991-2012년간 동아시아 국가 간 산업별 부품무역의 비교우위를 분석하여, 동아시아 FTA 체결 시 예상되는 무역과 생산분할 구조를 분석한다. 분석기간 중 동아시아 내 부품무역의 상호의존도는 지속적으로 증가하여 왔으며, 동아시아 FAT 체결 시 구조적 변화가 없다면 한국과 일본이 동아시아 내 전기 및 전자기기, 수송기기 부품수출을 더 강화하고, 중국과 ASEAN이 최종재를 수출하는 구조는 유지될 것으로 예상된다.