• Title/Summary/Keyword: anestesia

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Etiopathogenesis of sacroiliitis: implications for assessment and management

  • Baronio, Manuela;Sadia, Hajra;Paolacci, Stefano;Prestamburgo, Domenico;Miotti, Danilo;Guardamagna, Vittorio A.;Natalini, Giuseppe;Bertelli, Matteo
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.294-304
    • /
    • 2020
  • The sacroiliac joints connect the base of the sacrum to the ilium. When inflamed, they are suspected to cause low back pain. Inflammation of the sacroiliac joints is called sacroiliitis. The severity of the pain varies and depends on the degree of inflammation. Sacroiliitis is a hallmark of seronegative spondyloarthropathies. The presence or absence of chronic sacroiliitis is an important clue in the diagnosis of low back pain. This article aims to provide a concise overview of the anatomy, physiology, and molecular biology of sacroiliitis to aid clinicians in the assessment and management of sacroiliitis. For this narrative review, we evaluated articles in English published before August 2019 in PubMed. Then, we selected articles related to the painful manifestations of the sacroiliac joint. From the retrieved articles, we found that chronic sacroiliitis may be caused by various forms of spondyloarthritis, such as ankylosing spondyloarthritis. Sacroiliitis can also be associated with inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, gout, tuberculosis, brucellosis, and osteoarthritis, indicating common underlying etiological factors. The pathophysiology of sacroiliitis is complex and may involve internal, environmental, immunological, and genetic factors. Finally, genetic factors may also play a central role in progression of the disease. Knowing the genetic pre-disposition for sacroiliitis can be useful for diagnosis and for formulating treatment regimens, and may lead to a substantial reduction in disease severity and duration and to improved patient performance.

The Effects of Xylazine Premedication on the Propofol Anesthesia in the Dog (개에서 Xylazine 전투여가 Propofol 마취에 미치는 영향)

  • 김지완;장인호
    • Journal of Veterinary Clinics
    • /
    • v.16 no.1
    • /
    • pp.86-94
    • /
    • 1999
  • To invstigate the available dosage and effects of xylazine as preanesthetics on the propofol anesthesia in the dog, the experimental animals were randomly divided into 3 groups (xylazine 0.55 mg/kg (group 1), 1 mg/kg (group 2) and 2 mg/kg (group 3) were premedicated) and, monitored analgesic and anesthetic effect, body temperature, respiratory rate (breaths/minute), heart rate (beats/minutes). Also, hematological and serum chemical changes were monitored. In all experimental groups, the animals were recumbent just after propofol injection and time difference was not detected. Except vomitting after xylazine injection and insignificant ataxia during recovery, no significant side effects were observed. In group 2, loss of toe-web needle prick response time was slightly longer than group 1 but the response in group 2 and group 3 were similar, In group 2 and 3, the duration of anesthesia was longer than group 1 (2 folds) but there was no difference between group 2 and 3. Recovery time was prolonged in proportion to administration dosage of xylazine. In all experimental groups, the body temperature of animals was decresed gradually according to experimental time but no significant changes were monitored. The heart rate and respiratory rate were significantly (p<0.01, p<0.05) decreased after propofol injection Hematologically, no significant changes were monitored in total leukocye numbers, total erythrocye numbers, MCV, MCH, MCHC, serum GOT and GPT values Significant changes in all groups were not observed except significant increase in BUN, total-protein and abumin values of group 3. On the basis of these result, premedication of xylazine can be helpful in decresing some side effects and the dosage of propofol. 1 mg/kg of xylazine as preanesthetics on the propofol anesthesia in the dog is considered to be available.

  • PDF

Atrial Septal Defect Closure: Comparison of Vertical Axillary Minithoracotomy and Median Sternotomy

  • Poyrazoglu, Huseyin Hakan;Avsar, Mustafa Kemal;Demir, Serafettin;Karakaya, Zeynep;Guler, Tayfun;Tor, Funda
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.46 no.5
    • /
    • pp.340-345
    • /
    • 2013
  • Background: This study aims to evaluate whether or not the method of right vertical axillary minithoracotomy (RVAM) is preferable to and as reliable as conventional sternotomy surgery, and also assesses its cosmetic results. Methods: Thirty-three patients (7 males, 26 females) with atrial septal defect were admitted to the Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic of Cukurova University from December 2005 until January 2010. The patients' ages ranged from 3 to 22. Patients who underwent vertical axillary minithracotomy were assigned to group I, and those undergoing conventional sternotomy, to group II. Group I and group II were compared with regard to the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables. Group I included 12 females and 4 males with an average age of $16.5{\pm}9.7$. Group II comprised 14 female and 3 male patients with an average age of $18.5{\pm}9.8$ showing similar features and pathologies. The cases were in Class I-II according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification, and patients with other cardiac and systemic problems were not included in the study. The ratio of the systemic blood flow to the pulmonary blood flow (Qp/Qs) was $1.8{\pm}0.2$. The average pulmonary artery pressure was $35{\pm}10$ mmHg. Following the diagnosis, performing elective surgery was planned. Results: No significant difference was detected in the average time of the patients' extraportal circulation, cross-clamp and surgery (p>0.05). In the early postoperative period of the cases, the duration of mechanical ventilator support, the drainage volume in the first 24 hours, and the hospitalization time in the intensive care unit were similar (p>0.05). Postoperative pains were evaluated together with narcotic analgesics taken intravenously or orally. While 7 cases (43.7%) in group I needed postoperative analgesics, 12 cases (70.6%) in group II needed them. No mortality or major morbidity has occurred in the patients. The incision style and sizes in all of the patients undergoing RVAM were preserved as they were at the beginning. Furthermore, the patients of group I were mobilized more quickly than the patients of group II. The patients of group I were quite pleased with the psychological and cosmetic results. No residual defects have been found in the early postoperative period and after the end of the follow-up periods. All of the patients achieved functional capacity per NYHA. No deformation of breast growth has been detected during 18 months of follow-up for the group I patients, who underwent RVAM. Conclusion: To conclude, the repair of atrial septal defect by RVAM, apart from the limited working zone for the surgeon in these pathologies as compared to sternotomymay be considered in terms of the outcomes, and early and late complications. And this has accounted for less need of analgesics and better cosmetic results in recent years.