DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Atrial Septal Defect Closure: Comparison of Vertical Axillary Minithoracotomy and Median Sternotomy

  • Received : 2012.12.03
  • Accepted : 2013.03.29
  • Published : 2013.10.05

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate whether or not the method of right vertical axillary minithoracotomy (RVAM) is preferable to and as reliable as conventional sternotomy surgery, and also assesses its cosmetic results. Methods: Thirty-three patients (7 males, 26 females) with atrial septal defect were admitted to the Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic of Cukurova University from December 2005 until January 2010. The patients' ages ranged from 3 to 22. Patients who underwent vertical axillary minithracotomy were assigned to group I, and those undergoing conventional sternotomy, to group II. Group I and group II were compared with regard to the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables. Group I included 12 females and 4 males with an average age of $16.5{\pm}9.7$. Group II comprised 14 female and 3 male patients with an average age of $18.5{\pm}9.8$ showing similar features and pathologies. The cases were in Class I-II according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification, and patients with other cardiac and systemic problems were not included in the study. The ratio of the systemic blood flow to the pulmonary blood flow (Qp/Qs) was $1.8{\pm}0.2$. The average pulmonary artery pressure was $35{\pm}10$ mmHg. Following the diagnosis, performing elective surgery was planned. Results: No significant difference was detected in the average time of the patients' extraportal circulation, cross-clamp and surgery (p>0.05). In the early postoperative period of the cases, the duration of mechanical ventilator support, the drainage volume in the first 24 hours, and the hospitalization time in the intensive care unit were similar (p>0.05). Postoperative pains were evaluated together with narcotic analgesics taken intravenously or orally. While 7 cases (43.7%) in group I needed postoperative analgesics, 12 cases (70.6%) in group II needed them. No mortality or major morbidity has occurred in the patients. The incision style and sizes in all of the patients undergoing RVAM were preserved as they were at the beginning. Furthermore, the patients of group I were mobilized more quickly than the patients of group II. The patients of group I were quite pleased with the psychological and cosmetic results. No residual defects have been found in the early postoperative period and after the end of the follow-up periods. All of the patients achieved functional capacity per NYHA. No deformation of breast growth has been detected during 18 months of follow-up for the group I patients, who underwent RVAM. Conclusion: To conclude, the repair of atrial septal defect by RVAM, apart from the limited working zone for the surgeon in these pathologies as compared to sternotomymay be considered in terms of the outcomes, and early and late complications. And this has accounted for less need of analgesics and better cosmetic results in recent years.

Keywords

References

  1. Park PW, Roh JR, Kim CW, Suh KP, Lee Y. Secundum type atrial septal defect. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;14:241-6.
  2. Burke RP. Minimally invasive techniques for congenital heart surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;9:337-44.
  3. Massetti M, Babatasi G, Rossi A, et al. Operation for atrial septal defect through a right anterolateral thoracotalomy: current outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1100-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00440-7
  4. Rosengart TK, Stark JF. Repair of atrial septal defect through a right thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:1138-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90020-I
  5. Cremer JT, Boning A, Anssar MB, et al. Different approaches for minimally invasive closure of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1648-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00233-7
  6. Black MD, Freedom RM. Minimally invasive repair of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:765-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01241-1
  7. Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chu JJ, et al. Surgical closure of atrial septal defect: minimally invasive cardiac surgery or median sternotomy? Surg Endosc 1998;12:820-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900721
  8. Abdel-Rahman U, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Matheis G, et al. Correction of simple congenital heart defects in infants and children through a minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1645-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03051-X
  9. Yang X, Wang D, Wu Q. Repair of atrial septal defect through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy in a beating heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:2053-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02470-5
  10. Nicholson IA, Bichell DP, Bacha EA, del Nido PJ. Minimal sternotomy approach for congenital heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:469-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02328-6
  11. Lancaster LL, Mavroudis C, Rees AH, Slater AD, Ganzel BL, Gray LA Jr. Surgical approach to atrial septal defect in the female. Right thoracotomy versus sternotomy. Am Surg 1990;56:218-21.
  12. Grinda JM, Folliguet TA, Dervanian P, Mace L, Legault B, Neveux JY. Right anterolateral thoracotomy for repair of atrial septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:175-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00182-8
  13. Cherup LL, Siewers RD, Futrell JW. Breast and pectoral muscle maldevelopment after anterolateral and posterolateral thoracotomies in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:492-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)63025-1
  14. Liu YL, Zhang HJ, Sun HS, Li SJ, Su JW, Yu CT. Correction of cardiac defects through a right thoracotomy in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:359-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70141-2
  15. Mishra YK, Malhotra R, Mehta Y, Sharma KK, Kasliwal RR, Trehan N. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right anterolateral minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1520-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00963-7
  16. Kluytmans JA, Mouton JW, Ijzerman EP, et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus as a major risk factor for wound infections after cardiac surgery. J Infect Dis 1995;171:216-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/171.1.216
  17. Salzer GM, Klingler P, Klingler A, Unger A. Pain treatment after thoracotomy: is it a special problem? Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1411-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00081-7
  18. Baeza OR, Foster ED. Vertical axillary thoracotomy: a functional and cosmetically appealing incision. Ann Thorac Surg 1976;22:287-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)64918-1

Cited by

  1. Comparison of clinical outcomes and postoperative recovery between two open heart surgeries: minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracomy and traditional median sternotomy vol.7, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1995-7645(14)60105-x
  2. Comparison of clinical outcomes and postoperative recovery between two open heart surgeries: minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracomy and traditional median sternotomy vol.7, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1995-7645(14)60105-x
  3. Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery versus Conventional Median Sternotomy for Atrial Septal Defect Closure vol.49, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.6.421
  4. The Mid-term Results of Thoracoscopic Closure of Atrial Septal Defects vol.47, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2017.0059
  5. Clinical outcomes of a combined transcatheter and minimally invasive atrial septal defect repair program using a 'Heart Team' approach vol.13, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0701-1
  6. Transaxillary Approach for Surgical Repair of Simple Congenital Cardiac Lesions: Pitfalls, and Complications vol.12, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135121989663