• 제목/요약/키워드: analytic hierarchy process method

검색결과 670건 처리시간 0.027초

정보통신표준화분야 우선순위결정을 위한 방법론 연구

  • 박기식;구경철;서의호
    • 경영과학
    • /
    • 제11권3호
    • /
    • pp.129-151
    • /
    • 1994
  • This paper focuses on method of setting priorities for telecommunications Standardization in which usually includes prioritization, resource allocation, standardization schedule for each SWA is based on prioritization of SWAs. We mainly used the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and a modified Delphi technique as a method for planning process. Recently, rapid technology evolution in telecommunications fields increases the necessity of developing more and more new standards. Also increased complexity of technologies makes standards more complicated, more specified and more thick than the past ones. As a result, the number of SWAa(Standardization Work Areas) and SWIs(Standardization Work Iterms) is being increased continuously. Furthermore, rapid telecommunication environment changes such as deregulation, liberalization, privatization, regionalization, and globalization surrounding telecommunications standardization grows increasingly important. To cope with these challenges and to make the more efficient use of the limited standardization resources, i.e., time, financial, personal resources, we will suggest logical and rational approach that is a backbone of strategic plan for telecommunication standardization. The telecommunication standardization planning process involves a MCDM(Multi-Criteria Decision Making) process. The Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) is a kind of MCDM approach. Our method is based on a combination of a modified Delphi technique and an application of AHP(spreadsheet model). Analyzed data from Delphi technique is used as inputs to AHP. In addition we also focus on the technique how to combine group judgments and to handle a large number of comparisons.

  • PDF

AHP를 이용한 가상쇼핑몰 평가 (Evaluation of Virtual Shopping Malls Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process)

  • 변대호
    • 경영과학
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.55-68
    • /
    • 2001
  • A virtual shopping mall is like a real-world mall, supports electronic shopping by selling products or services through Interne. Although increasing numbers of products are being marketed on the Web, little efforts has been spent on evaluating what mall is more suitable for marketing electronically and for protecting consumers. Evaluation of virtual shopping malls is regarded as a major task in business-to-consumer electronic commerce. This paper considers the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method in the evaluation of virtual shopping malls and provides its applications. The AHP is a systematic procedure for representing the elements of any problem, hierarchically. A series of pairwise comparison judgments is performed to express the relative strength or intensity of impact of the elements in the hierarchy. The AHP model hierarchy consists of the four following levels: decision maker, main criteria, sub-criteria, and virtual shopping malls. the main criteria include the state of physical firms, representation of information on the virtual shopping malls, product or service, convenience for shopping, consumer protection, and consumer service. The total number of sub-criteria in the third level is twenty-nine. All decision makers selected belong to virtual shopping mall enterprises, or universities. As a case study, we show the synthesized priority of the five virtual shopping malls that have acquired an E-Trust mark. Finally a sensitivity analysis shows how well each virtual shopping mall performs on each criterion by increasing or decreasing the importance of the main criteria.

  • PDF

터널 붕괴 위험도 분석을 위한 영향인자 가중치 산정에 관한 연구 (A study on the weighting of influence factors for tunnel collapse risk analysis)

  • 김정흠
    • 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제26권4호
    • /
    • pp.315-326
    • /
    • 2024
  • 본 연구에서는 터널 붕괴 위험도를 종합적이고 다각적인 관점에서 평가하기 위해 델파이 기법과 AHP (analytic hierarchy process) 기법을 사용하였다. 영향인자 정립은 문헌조사, 선행 연구 및 전문가 집단의 브레인스토밍 과정을 통해 총 5개의 상위분류체계를 구축하였다. 21명의 전문가 패널을 구성하여 총 3차의 델파이 조사 과정을 통해 전문가 판단과정에서 오류 및 편향을 방지하여 신뢰성을 향상시켰다. 최종적으로 전문가 답변에 대한 CVR (content validity ration) 및 COV (coefficient of variation) 분석을 수행하여 총 14개의 영향인자를 도출하였다. 이후 AHP 기법을 적용하여 각 영향인자의 상대적 중요도를 평가하고 최종 복합 가중치를 산정하였다. 지보 및 보강 시행시기가 가장 높은 우선순위를 가지며, 지하수 유입량, 절리면 상태, 지보패턴수준, 보조공법이 그 뒤를 이었다. 이러한 연구 결과를 통해 터널붕괴 위험에 영향을 미치는 주요 요인들을 파악하고, 이를 토대로 터널 안전성을 향상시키는 전략을 수립하는데 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

AHP 방법을 이용한 노후학교 에너지절감을 위한 요소기술의 우선순위 결정 (Determining the Priority of Factors for Reducing Energy at Deteriorated School Buildings Using AHP Method)

  • 이상춘;최영준;최율
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • 제11권6호
    • /
    • pp.127-132
    • /
    • 2011
  • Since the late 20th century, countries of the world have made every effort to solve environmental problems due to global warming. The Korean Government has also made various efforts on reducing energy and $CO_2$ emission under the motto of "Low-Carbon Green Growth". In order to achieve the goal to reduce energy in the construction field, severe design standards and regulations on saving energy in new buildings have been established. However, for maximizing the reduction of energy in buildings, it is time to focus on deteriorated buildings where applications of energy saving designs and techniques have been insufficient. Especially, there are little guidelines and researches on reducing energy through remodeling at deteriorated school buildings which were built over 20 years ago. This paper suggests the priority of factors to reduce energy on the remodeling process at deteriorated school buildings using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. For applying the AHP method, the survey of staffs in the Education Offices and board members in the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment was conducted via e-mail. As a result, factors of insulation, daylighting, system control, and windows turned out important in the energy reducing remodeling process at deteriorated school buildings, while factors of artificial lighting, solar heating, ventilation, and system did relatively unimportant.

MULTICRITERIA MODELS FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING : COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING VS. THE ANALYTIC HIERACHY PROCESS

  • Kwak, N.K.;McCarthy, Kevin J.
    • 한국경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제16권1호
    • /
    • pp.97-112
    • /
    • 1991
  • This paper describes two contrasting approaches to group decision making involving multiple criteria. A compromise programming method and the analytic hierarchy process are analyzed and compared by using an illustrative example of a computer model selection problem to demonstrate their usefulness as a viable tool for group decision making. This paper further considers some extensions and modifications of there two methods for future study.

  • PDF

AHP 분석도구 개발에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Development of AHP Analytic Tools)

  • 김동길;최성호;한성수
    • 한국IT서비스학회지
    • /
    • 제17권2호
    • /
    • pp.101-110
    • /
    • 2018
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a systematic and objective decision method that stratifies multiple criteria to determine various evaluation factors' order of priority. Since AHP requires several stages of analysis with complicated attributes, they normally rely on computer programs for the execution of such analyses. However, the existing AHP analytic tools carry the inconvenience of having to repeatedly input massive amounts data generated in every stage. This repetitious data entry process results in prolonged analysis times and higher possibility of errors, leading to decreased reliability of the results. Thus, in this study, we develop an analytic tool that effectively simplifies the data entry process in AHP analysis, for the purpose of reducing analysis times and increasing the reliability of the results.

교통수요모형과 의사결정모형을 이용한 자동차 배출저감정책 평가 (Evaluation of Mobile Emissions Reduction Strategies Using Travel Demand Model and Analytic Hierarchy Process)

  • 이규진;박관휘;심상우;최기주
    • 대한토목학회논문집
    • /
    • 제35권5호
    • /
    • pp.1123-1133
    • /
    • 2015
  • 본 연구는 자동차 배출저감정책에 대한 기존 정량적 요소 중심의 평가 방법과 차별된, 교통수요모형(Travel Demand Model, TDM)과 다기준 의사결정기법(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)의 연계된 평가 체계를 제시하고자 한다. 자동차 배출저감정책의 다기준 평가항목은 대기오염물질 및 온실가스 감축효과, 상위계획과의 일치성, 정책추진 용이성, 기술적용 용이성으로 설정하였고, AHP분석 결과 정량적 평가항목인 대기오염물질과 온실가스의 감축효과에 대한 상대적 중요도가 각 0.373, 0.218로 정책적 평가항목들에 비해 중요도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 평가 방법론을 적용하여 각 정책들을 평가한 결과, 노후 경유차 조기폐차 정책이 가장 효과적인 정책으로 나타났고, 승용차 요일제 정책, 경차보급 활성화 정책 순으로 나타났으며, 이는 기존의 TDM 또는 AHP에 의해 평가된 우선순위와 다소 차이가 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 연구 결과는 저감정책 시나리오를 구성한 기본적인 가정과 범위에 국한된 결과라는 한계점이 있지만, 자동차 배출저감 효과와 더불어 정책적 요소들을 반영하여 보다 합리적인 자동차 배출저감정책 방향을 설정하고 효과적인 대응을 하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

작업환경 소음 개선을 위한 작업자 관점의 우선순위 파악에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Priority Ranks to Improve Work Environments in the Worker's Point of View)

  • 김화일
    • 한국산업보건학회지
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.202-212
    • /
    • 2005
  • This study was aimed at rating the existing work environment noise components and alternatives in point of worker's view. To answer the purpose, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method is adopted in this research. Based on the AHP method, this research abstracts a mathematically rigorous noise components and alternative's weights and proven process for priority and decision-making. By reconstructing complex hearing conservation programs to a series of pair-wise comparisons, and then synthesizing the results, this study not only helps establishments of noise countermeasure, but also provides a clear rationale for noise alternatives. The result of this study is summarized as follows; 1) Job satisfaction index and noise identification index are 63, 56 respectively. 2) Noise level(15.7%), frequency(14.1%) and directivity(13.6%) are main reasons in worker's ground. 3) There are some difference between the estimation of worker's identification and that of work sites. 4) Low noise machine(14.7%), enclosure(13.2%) and shielding(9.6%) are chosen for noise protection method by workers. 5) Noise environment improvement should be focused on noise source rather than personal protection. 6) By the AHP method, noise source countermeasure have a key role at work environments.

AHP를 활용한 문화.관광웹 사이트 평가 (Web site Evaluation of Culture and Tourism using AHP method)

  • 김민철
    • 한국정보통신학회논문지
    • /
    • 제13권9호
    • /
    • pp.1737-1744
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구에서는 3C_D_T 웹사이트 평가모델의 항목 구성을 접목시켜, 현재 운영되고 있는 J지역 내 문화 관광 웹 사이트 평가 요소들에 대하여 중요하게 생각하는 상대적인 중요도를 계층적 분석과정(AHP: analytic hierarchy process)을 적용하여 네티즌들이 우선적으로 고려하는 평가요소들의 상대적인 비중과 우선순위를 산출하였다. 분석 결과, 콘텐츠(Contents) 요인이 가장 중요한 요소로 나타났으며, 민감도 분석 등을 추가로 실시하여 개선 방안에 대해 제시하였다.

베이커리 기업의 경쟁력 평가모델개발 (A Study on Evaluating the Competitiveness of Bakery Corporations)

  • 이재진
    • 한국조리학회지
    • /
    • 제12권1호
    • /
    • pp.203-215
    • /
    • 2006
  • This study tried to develop an estimation model on the competitive power as a method to understand a practical index on the competitive power in order to improve the competitiveness of domestic bakery corporations and look into their internal structure. The results of the practical analysis are summarized below. First, eight critical success factors, which are considered important in competitive power in bakery corporations, were derived from preceding studies and an expert meeting. Second, this study performed a questionnaire with eight derived factors for bakery managers and employees. Seven critical success factors suitable for bakery corporations were chosen through validity and reliability tests. Third, this study performed an AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis in order to establish preference according to each factor and weight. The importance of factor concerned with the competitive power of bakery corporations according to the result of weight analysis appeared in order of customer resources, personnel resources, corporate images, material resources and qualities, technical capability, financial factors and pliability(time).

  • PDF