• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제20권42호
• /
• pp.59-66
• /
• 1997

In the process to design a product, the values of the product will be designed must be considered in respect to the multi-dimensional properties consisted of subjective and objective attributes. As same reason, methods to evaluate the design alternatives in the process must evaluate the overall attributes and relationships among its, also. In this paper, the defectivenesses of evaluation methods in the process of product design are summarized. One of the severe defectivenesses of the methods is the insufficient rationality of calculation procedure. Then, we introduce the developed quantitative evaluation method to accomodate this defectiveness and to be considered a evaluator's feeling or ambiguity when evaluating design alternatives by means of fuzzy theory, and suggest it's application steps on the process of product design to be used easily.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.186-196
• /
• 2010

It has been well known that traffic accidents occur under combined functional contributions of drivers, vehicles and road facilities, and that evaluation of safety levels for a specific road section or point is generally much complicated. Additionally, most of traffic accidents occur randomly implicating it is necessary to be evaluated in terms of probability theory. Thus, the evaluation model which reflects various characteristics and probabilistic distributions of traffic accidents has been necessary. The present paper provides a reliability based model with variables of probabilistic operating speeds and design speeds together which have been individually explaining associated characteristics in traffic accidents. Consequently, the model made it possible for speed management and road improvement projects to be evaluated in a common index. Application studies were performed in three cases. Through the studies, couples of facts were identified that the model successfully considered the probabilistic operating speeds and design speeds together and that then, the model evaluated road safety alternatives relatively which are complicatedly characterized and differently located.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제21권45호
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 1998

This paper presents a more efficient evaluation of alternatives by use of multi-criteria decision making methodlogy under fuzzy intersectional dependence relations. The performance evaluation of most systems such as weapons, enterprise systems etc. are multiple criteria decision making problems. The descriptions and judgements on these systems are usually linguistic and fuzzy. The traditional methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) are mainly used in crisp(non-fuzzy) decision applications with a very unbalanced scale of judgements and rank reversal. To overcome these problems, we will propose a new, general decision making method for evaluation models using fuzzy AHP(FAHP) under fuzzy intersectional dependence relations. The T.M.S alternatives A, B and C will be evaluted by the Fuzzy Analytic Hierachy Process (FAHP) based on entropy weight in this study. We will use symmetric triangular fuzzy numbers to indicate the relative strength of the elements in the hierachy and degree of intersection between criteria. These problems are evaluated by five criteria : tactical criteria, technology criteria, maintenance criteria, economy criteria, advacement criteria.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:컴퓨팅의 실제 및 레터
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.349-357
• /
• 2006

본 논문에서는 프로그램의 성능을 향상시키기 위하여 프로그래머들이 다른 성능조율 대안들을 평가하는 것을 돕는 새로운 평가 방법론을 소개한다. 이 방법론은 조율 대안이 채택된 경우의 성능을 평가할 수 있게 한다. 구체적으로 말하자면, 성능 병목 지점의 확인을 위하여 프로그램 구성 요소들에서 소요되는 시간을 수량화하는 전통적인 성능 평가 방법론과는 대조적으로 분산 또는 병렬 프로그램이 처리하는 일의 이동 이후의 성능을 예측한다. 따라서, 이 방법론은 일의 처리 장소를 변경함으로써 성능을 향상시키는 것에 대한 가이드라인을 제공한다. 이 방법론을 사용하면 기반 네트워크 변경에 따른 성능에 대한 파급효과도 예측할 수 있다. 이 방법론은 조율할 프로그램이 실행되는 동안 점진적으로 그리고 온라인으로 성능을 평가할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 이 방법론을 구현한 후 사용했을 때 여섯 프로그램들의 검사 집합에 대하여 다른 조율 대안들의 성능을 정확히 예측할 수 있다는 실험 검증 결과를 보인다.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방재학회 2008년도 정기총회 및 학술발표대회
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2008

현재 유역종합치수계획의 구조적 홍수방어시설의 평가는 다차원홍수피해액 산정방법에 의해 수행되어지고 있으며, 건설교통부(2004)에서 제시한 경제성 분석과 안전 위험성, 지속 가능성을 고려하여 계층화분석(AHP)기법을 통하여 최적대안이 선정되고 있다. 그 결과 홍수방어시설의 정책성 분석의 결여로 인해 사회적 문제, 민원발생, 정부기관간의 마찰 등 많은 문제가 발생하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이같은 문제를 해결하기 위해 유역종합 치수계획을 위한 계층화분석(AHP)기법의 정책성 평가의 계층구조를 재구성하고, 구조적 홍수방어시설의 최적대안 선정을 위해 정책적 세부 평가항목별 가중치를 설정하여 계층화분석(AHP)기법에 적용할 수 있는 정책적 평가기법을 개발하였다. 정책적 평가기법을 개발하기 위해서 치수사업의 정책성 평가 항목과 가중치 설정에 대해 전문가 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사 결과와 한국개발연구원에서 제시한 국가 공공사업의 예비타당성 조사를 위한 가중치를 비교 분석하였다. 치수경제성에 높은 가중치를 부여하였던 과거와 달리 설문조사 결과는 치수경제성이 중요하지만 정책성 분석 역시 중요하다는 인식의 변화와 기본 평가항목을 추가하여 정책성 분석의 세부 평가항목의 다양성이 필요하다고 나타났다.

• 한국도로학회지:도로
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.40-45
• /
• 2013

• 한국원자력학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국원자력학회 2004년도 추계학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.1461-1462
• /
• 2004

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.101-113
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 안양천 유역의 물순환 건전화를 위한 최종 대안을 제시하기 위해 비용효과분석을 수행하였다. 이중 편익산정은 진술선호기법 중 하나인 실험선택법(Choice Experiments, CE)과 대안의 평가지수(Alternative Evaluation Index, AEI)를 결합하여 수행하였다. 실험선택법은 지역별로 다양한 속성을 보이는 안양천 유역을 잠재적 위험도와 지리적 특성을 바탕으로 6개 지역으로 나누어 설문과 분석을 수행하였다. NB > 0 이상인 대안들은 공학적, 경제적으로 매우 우수한 대안이므로 실행을 적극 검토할 필요가 있다.

• 한국태양에너지학회 논문집
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2003

This study aims to presents Evaluation Method of Green Remodeling that analyze the value of environment through expense, using the method of life cycle cost and life cycle assessment simultaneously. The results of this study are summarized as follows. Evaluation Model developed in this study can convert economical value of environment into cost by integrating. In addition, the model can apply as a useful tool to estimation of economical design alternative as well as quantification of environmental loads and costs. Evaluation Model presented In this study observe energy consumption and the environmental load emission with qualification, it can forecast effect of environmental cost that cost estimation is expected to be added to energy cost rate by being possible. Synthetically, when Estimation Model and computer program that developed in this study is applies to the construction industry; reasonable management of environmental load is convenient at each step of Green Remodeling. In addition, at preliminary design phase, practical use may be possible by reasonable yardstick about various alternatives and improvement of design alternatives likewise by grasping environmental effect.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.139-147
• /
• 2003

The main purpose of this study is to obtain forest scenic beauty management informations toward forest working systems in pinus densiflora forest stands, etc. To get these information, visual preference and spatial image analysis methods are used. 25 different alternatives were simulated to visualize on basis of actual forest working methods with taken photos from May to July, 2003. The options were illustrated as photos produced by computer software. Respondents' ratings for 25 landscape scenes were obtained by interview survey method. Each alternatives were evaluated by forest major student group with total 103 respondents after reliability test. Visual preference evaluation was used 10 point rating scale. Spatial images of 12 alternatives were measured by 12 semantic differential scale. In general, the respondents preferred refreshing and ordering forest stand after forest working to natural forest stand before forest working. High visual preference for forest density produces 400-600 trees/ha in small diameter class forest stands. Regarding visual preference according to pavement type of trail, soil trail is ranked high. Visual preference for cutting area ranks mature forest stand and visual preference for trail slope cover type ranks shrub with grass as relatively high on the preference scale. Through the factor analysis, spatial images of 12 coniferous forest stands are classified as 'ordered opened' and 'beautiful healthy'. Results indicate how to conduct forest working systems for forest scenic beauty management.