• Title/Summary/Keyword: acquiescent silence motivation

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

The Impact of Prosocial Motivation on Silent Behavior: Focusing on the Mediating Effects of Job Burnout and Differences in Virtual Work Environments (친사회적 동기가 침묵행동에 미치는 영향: 직무소진의 매개효과와 비대면 근무환경의 차이를 중심으로)

  • Bohm-Mei Kim;Gyu-Young Ha
    • Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
    • /
    • v.30 no.3
    • /
    • pp.321-348
    • /
    • 2024
  • This study examined the relationship between prosocial motivation and acquiescent, defensive, and relational silence behaviors, and identified the mediating effect of emotional job burnout. We also examined whether these relationships differed depending on whether the organization is currently working virtually or not. To this end, we collected 359 samples from Korean employees working in general office jobs below managerial positions using online survey methods. The data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and PROCESS Macro, and the results showed that the relationship between prosocial motivation and acquiescent, defensive, and relational silence behaviors was mediated by emotional job burnout, with a partial mediation effect for acquiescent silence and a full mediation effect for defensive and relational silence behaviors. Furthermore, these relationships were found to be the same regardless of whether employees worked virtually or not. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings, limitations of this study, and suggestions for future research.

An Empirical Study on the Relationships among Employee Silence, Learning Inertia, and Knowledge Sharing Disengagement (구성원 침묵, 학습관성, 지식공유 비열의 간의 관계에 관한 실증연구)

  • Heo, Myung Sook;Cheon, Myun Joong
    • Knowledge Management Research
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.31-62
    • /
    • 2017
  • It found that employee silence negatively impacts both organizations and their employees as shown in findings from many studies and recently there has been a growing interest in it. Silence is described as intentionally withholding job-related ideas, information, concerns, and opinions. Employee silence may decrease organizational change and innovation and reduce employee learning motivation and knowledge sharing engagement as well. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among silence motivations, perceived silence climate, and employee silence; the relationships among employee silence, learning inertia and knowledge sharing disengagement; the mediating role of employee silence between antecedents of employee silence and consequences additionally. The results that analyzed using data from 225 employees in 42 organizations are as follows. First, the impact of silence motivation and perceived silence climate on employee silence are positively significant. Second, the influence of defensive silence motivation on the acquiescent and relational silence motivation is positively significant. Third, the influence of employee silence on learning inertia and knowledge sharing disengagement is positively significant. Forth, employee silence mediates the relationship between silence motivation and perceived silence climate and learning inertia and knowledge sharing disengagement. These results suggest that employee silence is another strong expression and message for organizations to try to establish a learning organization from the perspective of knowledge management.

The Development and Validation of the Silence Motivation Scale (침묵동기 척도 개발 및 타당화)

  • Choi, Myoung Ok;Park Dong gun
    • Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.239-270
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study investigated the nature and dimensionality of the motives why employees showed the silence even though they could speak up their opinions. It aimed to develop the scales measuring employee silence. Thus, three studies were designed and particularly, two studies featured two different studies, totaling five studies. Study 1 conducted open-ended survey asking and 104 workers from a variety of work field answered. With the results of open-ended questions, a were developed, consisting of 60-items to measure employee silence motivation. Study 2 examined the scale developed and 481 workers from diverse work fields participated in. The exploratory factor and 'intra-ESEM' analyses were confirmed the construct of silence motivation, composing 5 factors(acquiescent, defensive, disengaged, opportunistic, relational silence) the 20-items was developed to measure the construct(Study 2-1). Furthermore, 'inter-ESEM' analysis was examined the discriminant validity of scale developed by the current study with general silence behavior and voice behavior. It found that the employee silence was distinguished from general silence behavior and voice behavior(Study 2-2). Study 3 was designed for validation of silence motivation scale which developed from Study 1 and Study 2. Based on these results, the implications and limitations of this study as well as the direction for future study were discussed.

Discrimination between Silence and Voice Behavior in measurement and the incremental validity (침묵과 발언 행동의 변별성: 측정 모형 비교 및 침묵 행동의 증분 설명력)

  • Hyun-Sun Chung
    • Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-17
    • /
    • 2013
  • The present study aimed to investigate the discrimination between employee voice and silence behavior in measurement: it is silence behavior the absence of voice or not? It was examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Five measurement models based on the suggestion of Pinder & Harlos(2001) and Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero(2003) were compared. Additionally, the hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted for examining the incremental validity of silence behaviors over voice. A total of 204 employees who worked with their own supervisor were surveyed. Results indicated that silence behavior could be a separate construct from voice. Findings also showed that silence behaviors could be distinguished by the level of concreteness in definition, difference in content of motivation and have the incremental validity over voice in only acquiescent Silence. From these results, the theoretical implications of findings, limitations, suggestions for future research were discussed in discussion.