• Journal of Industrial Technology
• /
• v.18
• /
• pp.443-452
• /
• 1998

The future water quality of Youngwol Dam was predicted using FEMWASP. In the this study, point and non-point source in the basin was investigated in detail, and future pollutant loading was computed by various prediction technique. The water quality of 29 sites was analyzed over four seasons. FEMWASP was used to predict future water quality of Youngwol lake and downstream of proposed dam. Future water quality of Youngwol lake was predicted to configure eutrophication status, management criteria was suggested to minimize the pollution problems coming from future eutrophication. Discharge rate of dam was decided as 30CMS to conserve the water quality, and overall design of dam was changed.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2005.09a
• /
• pp.807-808
• /
• 2005

• Journal of Wetlands Research
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2006

This study discusses two canceled dam projects, Youngwol Dam in South Korea and Two Forks Dam in Colorado of the United States. Both of them illustrate how the new paradigm applies to regional water projects because they became victims of environmental opposition in the new paradigm. While the cases have no apparent close relationships and they occurred in different decades, they offer interesting comparisons. They were basically struggles between water development coalitions and environmental protection coalitions on regional water conflicts. The two proposed projects brought about fierce debates on large dam as they embraced a wide-range of environmental, social, and political issues rather than construction of dams themselves. Huge anti-dam oppositions scrapped them at the cost of nearly ten years for decision-makings and enormous financial resources for feasibility studies respectively. It identifies who the policy actors were, what the policy strategies were, and how the water policies evolved in both countries. The decision-makings on the two projects appeared at first glance to be made under formal institutional frameworks, but in actuality, they relied significantly on decisions of the two important political actors. The Korean society began to learn negotiation and cooperation approaches to solve the water conflict by establishing the Joint Task Force Team on Youngwol project in 1999. The team is recognized as a new conflict resolution method in South Korea because a diverse of stakeholder interests voluntarily participated in the decision-making process and discussed water issues directly. Even though the projects resulted in futile fruits in each country, they illustrate the images of the new paradigm that significantly affected in formulating regional water policies in South Korea and the United States.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry, and Cartography Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.389-393
• /
• 2010

The Objective of this study was to develop a system for visualizing inundation area by using 1-D numerical model analyzing damage information such as inundation area, facilities, land usages, population, building, loads. In this study, we have reviewed hydraulic models to select a flood model for simulation of discharges, water depths and velocities. The study area is Namhan River from Youngwol to Paldang Dam which had a flood damage on upper and below regions of Chungju Dam by a storm event in 2006. At the first, we developed the DB system base on GIS thematic map, ortho images, cadastral maps to analyze flood damages and support decisions making. Changing the boundary conditions such as discharge at the gauging stations, flood simulations were performed and then damages were extracted from the databases information support system based on 1-D numerical hydraulic model, it is expected to be able to analyze flood damages and support a decision making for reduce flood relate damages. In the future, the system developed in this study could be applied for flood forecasting system of small scaled streams.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.747-750
• /
• 2007

오늘날 사회적 다양성이 높아짐에 따라 정책결정을 둘러싼 정부간, 사회집단 간 갈등 역시 증가하고 있으며, 이러한 갈등은 사회발전을 저해하는 요소일 뿐만 아니라 이를 해결하는 과정에서 발생하는 사회적 비용이 매우 크다는 점에서 문제를 발생하고 있다. 따라서 사회적 갈등을 최소화하고 합리적인 의사결정을 도출해낼 수 있는 어떤 의사결정 조정기제가 필요하다고 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 새만금 간척사업 사례와 영월댐 사례의 비교를 통하여 갈등의 원인과 관련하여 각 이해 당사자들의 별도 인식 프레이밍이 상호 어떻게 형성, 대립되고 조정되는지, 그리고 이 과정이 어떻게 갈등에 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 한다.