• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.537-543
• /
• 2007

다기준 의사결정 문제에서 요인간의 가중치 계산과 계산된 요인의 평가값 종합화는 매우 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 다기준 의사결정 문제에 있어서 의사결정자의 의사전략 결합기법과 다기준의사결정 문제로의 적용을 연구하였다. 복잡한 환경에서 의사결정을 할 때 발생되는 모호함을 해결하기 위해 주관적 의견을 결합한 퍼지지합 이론을, 다기준 문제의 요인을 퍼지값으로 계층화하기 위해 계층분석법을 적용하였다. 또한, 의사결정자의 의사전략을 결합하기 위해 순위 가중치평균법을 이용하였다. 순위가 있는 가중치 평균방법은 퍼지집합의 orness 특성을 이용하여 의사결정자의 주관적 의지를 반영할 수 있는 기법으로, 순위가중치평균(OWA) 연산자에 따른 낙관적 혹은 비관적인 정도에 따라 주관적인 의도를 반영할 수 있는 방법이다. 다기준의사결정 문제의 적용사례로서 해상교통안전을 위한 대기정박지의 위치분석 문제를 본 연구에서 제시한 방법에 따라 적용하였다.

• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.133-145
• /
• 2015

Objectives: Food safety has become one of the major public-concerning issues in Korea. In order to set guidelines to create manuals for the response to a food safety crisis by food industry, this paper classified food safety crises and suggested techniques to determine crisis level. Methods: This study clarified common terminologies and definitions including in food safety crises. It reviewed various food safety crises and described characteristics, types, and states of crises. Results: The results of this study suggested that a food safety crisis implied a situation in which hazards/risk spreading in the food supply chain was widely described, causing strong public concern followed by a socioeconomic impact, and therefore, requiring the implementation of a prompt and full response regarding the situation. In terms of seeking response plans, food safety crises might be classified according to the penalties resulting from violations of laws and regulations, causative substances, stages of the food supply chain, and first contact point for incidents. The crisis level for a food safety crisis could be classified according to its severity parameters. The guideline matrix was divided into four major stages: Blue/guarded, Yellow/elevated, Orange/high, and Red/severe. This study also suggested several methods for determining the crisis level, such as the simple judgement method, scoring methods using a check-list and a weighted check-list. Conclusion: The severity of related parameters might be of great importance in understanding a crisis and determining response options/challenges for crisis levels.

• Geomechanics and Engineering
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.57-81
• /
• 2015

Water inrush and mud outburst always restricts the tunnel constructions in mountain area, which becomes a major geological barrier against the development of underground engineering. In view of the complex disaster-causing mechanism and difficult quantitative predictions of water inrush and mud outburst, several theoretical methods are adopted to realize dynamic assessment of water inrush in the progressive process of tunnel construction. Concerning both the geological condition and construction situation, eleven risk factors are quantitatively described and an assessment system is developed to evaluate the water inrush risk. In the static assessment, the weights of eight risk factors about the geological condition are determined using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Each factor is scored by experts and the synthesis scores are weighted. The risk level is ultimately determined based on the scoring outcome which is derived from the sum of products of weights and comprehensive scores. In the secondary assessment, the eight risk factors in static assessment and three factors about construction situation are quantitatively analyzed using fuzzy evaluation method. Subordinate levels and weight of factors are prepared and then used to calculate the comprehensive subordinate degree and risk level. In the dynamic assessment, the classical field of the eleven risk factors is normalized by using the extension evaluation method. From the input of the matter-element, weights of risk factors are determined and correlation analysis is carried out to determine the risk level. This system has been applied to the dynamic assessment of water inrush during construction of the Yuanliangshan tunnel of Yuhuai Railway. The assessment results are consistent with the actual excavation, which verifies the rationality and feasibility of the software. The developed system is believed capable to be back-up and applied for risk assessment of water inrush in the underground engineering construction.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.109-117
• /
• 2013

This study designed a "Diagnostic Model for Management Innovation of Medium Enterprises" based on the theoretical background of success factor and management diagnosis model for management innovation of medium enterprises and suggested a measure for utilization of strategic subject and diagnostic model that enterprises can apply. Utilization of medium enterprises management innovation diagnostic model designed through this study would be of help for making a diagnosis of the capability maturity level of enterprises' current management system and improving it by establishing a challenging capability objective and building a circulation system capable of innovating enterprises. It is expected for enterprises to overcome growing pains and establish a management system capable of achieving outcome (productivity) by repeating measurement and innovation through management diagnosis. In addition, this study provides a method to produce a strategic subject, select priority of implementation and prepare an implementation road map by classifying and filtering management issues produced as a result of management diagnosis in a systematic way. If variables necessary for production of an objective weighted value of scoring and discover of elements for category of diagnostic model and elementary items as well as design of a self-diagnosis questionnaire, measurement of management outcome suggested in this study can be able to be verified and supplemented through case study in the future, it is expected to make the degree of completion as a diagnostic model elevated that may help for growth and development through innovation of medium enterprises.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:소프트웨어및응용
• /
• 제31권7호
• /
• pp.959-967
• /
• 2004

Jain 등은 한 지문 영상에 특징점 기반 지문 정합 방법과 필터뱅크 기반 지문 정합 방법을 적용해 두 정합 방법의 성능을 혼합하는 혼합형 지문정합 방법을 제안하고, 이 방법이 두 가지 각 정합 방법에 비해 높은 성능을 보인다는 것을 실험을 통해 입증하였다［l］. 그러나 이 방법은 혼합을 수행할 때 두 정합 방법을 별도로 수행한 후, 각 방법의 정합도(matching score)에 가중치를 부여해 최종 정합도를 결정하므로 두 정합 방법의 특성을 상쇄 시키는 결과를 얻게 된다. 본 논문에서는 두 가지 정합 방법을 특징값 추출 과정에서 혼합하는 방법을 제안하였다. 이 방법은 필터뱅크 기반 방법보다는 낮은 ERR(Equal eRror Rate)을 보이나 특징점 기반 방법보다 높은 ERR을 보였다. 이에 본 논문에서는 적응적인 정합도 혼합방법을 제안하여, 두 가지 방법의 특성을 살리도록 적응적으로 정합도를 선택하는 방법을 취했다. 이 방법을 이용해 Jain 등의 혼합형 방법보다 더 낮은 ERR을 얻을 수 있었다. 제안한 방법에 따라 NIST Special Database 14 지문 데이타로 실험한 결과 ERR에서 약 1%의 성능 향상을 보였다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.2805-2810
• /
• 2016

Background: Differentiated thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy with a generally good prognosis. Knowing long-term outcomes of each patient helps management planning. The study was conducted to develop and validate a clinical prognostic score for predicting disease remission in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer based on patient, tumor and treatment factors. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1,217 differentiated thyroid cancer patients from two tertiary-care hospitals in the Northeast of Thailand was performed. Associations between potential clinical prognostic factors and remission were tested by Cox proportional-hazards analysis in 852 patients (development cohort). The prediction score was created by summation of score points weighted from regression coefficients of independent prognostic factors. Risks of disease remission were estimated and the derived score was then validated in the remaining 365 patients (validation cohort). Results: During the median follow-up time of 58 months, 648 (76.1%) patients in the development cohort had disease remission. Five independent prognostic factors were identified with corresponding score points: duration from thyroid surgery to $^{131}I$ treatment (0.721), distant metastasis at initial diagnosis (0.801), postoperative serum thyroglobulin level (0.535), anti-thyroglobulin antibodies positivity (0.546), and adequacy of serum TSH suppression (0.293). The total risk score for each patient was calculated and three categories of remission probability were proposed: ${\leq}1.628$ points (low risk, 83% remission), 1.629-1.816 points (intermediate risk, 87% remission), and ${\geq}1.817$ points (high risk, 93% remission). The concordance (C-index) was 0.761 (95% CI 0.754-0.767). Conclusions: The clinical prognostic scoring model developed to quantify the probability of disease remission can serve as a useful tool in personalized decision making regarding treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer patients.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제27권spc호
• /
• pp.92-98
• /
• 2022

Although various methods have been proposed to assess groundwater vulnerability, most of the models merely consider the mobility of contaminants (i.e., intrinsic vulnerability), and the attenuation capacity of vadose zone is often neglected. This study proposed an evaluation model for the attenuation capacity of vadose zone to supplement the limitations of the existing index method models for assessing groundwater vulnerability. The evaluation equation for quantifying the attenuation capacity was developed from the combined linear regression and weighted scaling methods based on the lab-scale experiments using various vadose zone soils having different physical and biogeochemical properties. The proposed semi-quantifying model is expected to effectively assess the attenuation capacity of vadose zone by identifying the main influencing factors as input parameters together with proper weights derived from the coefficients of the regression results. The subsequent scoring and grading system has great versatility while securing the objectivity by effectively incorporating the experimental results.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제54권6호
• /
• pp.2067-2076
• /
• 2022

The importance of safety culture has been emphasized to achieve a high level of safety. In this light, a systematic method to more properly deal with safety culture is necessary. Here, a decision-making tool that can apply a graded approach to the analysis of safety culture is proposed, called the F-D matrix, which determines the frequency and the difficulty of safety culture attributes recently defined by the IAEA. A hierarchical model of difficulty contributors was developed as a scoring standard, and its elements were weighted via expert evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process. The frequency of the attributes was derived by analyzing reported events from nuclear power plants in the Republic of Korea. Period-by-period comparisons with the F-D matrix can show trends in the change of the maturity level of an organization's safety culture and help to evaluate the effectiveness of previously implemented measures. In the evaluating the difficulty of the attributes in the recently developed harmonized safety culture model, the difficulties of Trending, Benchmarking, Resilience, and Documentation and Procedures were found to be relatively high, while the difficulties of Conflicts are Resolved, Ownership, Collaboration, and Respect is Evident were found to be relatively low. A case study was conducted with an analysis period of 10 years to attempt to reflect the many changes in safety culture that have been made following the Fukushima accident in March 2011. As a result of comparing two periods following the Fukushima accident, the overall frequency decreased by about 40%, providing evidence for the effects of the various improvements and measures taken following the increased emphasis on safety culture. The proposed F-D matrix provides a new analytical perspective and enables an in-depth analysis of safety culture.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제103권1호
• /
• pp.137-146
• /
• 2014

2013년 3월에 발효된 '탄소흡수원 유지 및 증진에 관한 법률' 제26조에서 규정한 신규조림 재조림 활동의 산림탄소흡수원 지수를 개발하였다. 특정 시점에서의 개별 산림탄소상쇄사업의 실적을 평가하여 상호 비교하고자 하는 법적인 목적에 따라 점수화 방법을 사용하여 산림탄소흡수원 지수값을 산출하였다. 탄소흡수원법을 바탕으로 하여 '탄소'(온실가스 감축), '인간'(사회경제적 영향), '자연'(환경적 영향)의 3대 기준을 설정하였다. 각 기준에 속하는 9개의 지표를 top-down 방식으로 선정하였고, 전문가 온라인 설문조사를 통하여 기준과 지표의 정합성을 검토하고 가중치를 도출하였다. 사회공헌형을 대상으로 하고 있는 국내 산림탄소상쇄사업의 특성을 반영하여, 기준과 지표 간 가중치의 간격을 최소화하는 점수가중치 부여 방식을 적용하였다. 국내에서 시행중인 5개 산림탄소상쇄사업을 대상으로 개발된 지수를 시범적으로 적용하여 평가한 결과, 상대적으로 가중치가 낮은 '인간' 및 '자연' 기준이 실제적으로 부정적인 사회경제적 환경적 영향을 저감하도록 유인하는 역할을 할 수 있음을 확인했다. 산림탄소흡수원 지수의 평가 결과를 바탕으로 우수 사업자에 대한 포상이 가능하며, 이는 국내 산림탄소상쇄사업의 참여 활성화를 위한 유인수단이 될 것이다.