• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.207-213
• /
• 1997

Basic science teaching and clinical education should be integrated whenever appropriate, and the development of skills, values, and attitudes which are emphasized to the same extent as the acquisition of knowledge in nursing. Problem-based learning provides a students-centered learning environment and encourages an inquisitive style of learning. The purpose of this paper is to review and comment the role of tutors and students on problem-based learning. The use of problem-based learning places a high demand on faculty members' time and support. The role of tutors in Problem-based learning focuses primarily on issues of developing and teaching the curriculum and on organizational implementation and institutionalization. Tutors are an integral part of course planning. Tutors serve as a constant source of feedback on student needs and concerns to the course director and constitute an informal steering committee while the course is in progress. Tutors write cases, develop student evaluation methods, recommend resources, suggest modifications in lectures and laboratories. Students have a limited amount of time available to study what is traditionally defined as the core content of nursing. But, the role of students in Problem-based learning would be active, independent learners and problem-solvers rather than passive recipients of information. Students using a deep level approach attempt to integrate what they learn with what they already know, to understand the meaning underlying the material to be learned, and to look for explanations rather than facts. Students are encouraged, with appropriate guidance, to define their own learning goals, to select appropriate experiences to achieve these goals, and to be responsible for assessing their own learning progress. Problem-based learning is more flexible and meaningful, by encouraging student interaction, and by having a better emotional climate than the conventional learning.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제63권2호
• /
• pp.139-163
• /
• 2024

The purpose of this study is to examine the capabilities of ChatGPT as a tool for supporting students in generating mathematical arguments that can be considered proofs. To examine this, we engaged students enrolled in a mathematics pathways course in evaluating and revising their original arguments using ChatGPT feedback. Students attempted to find and prove a method for the area of a triangle given its side lengths. Instead of directly asking students to prove a formula, we asked them to explore a method to find the area of a triangle given the lengths of its sides and justify why their methods work. Students completed these ChatGPT-embedded proving activities as class homework. To investigate the capabilities of ChatGPT as a proof tutor, we used these student homework responses as data for this study. We analyzed and compared original and revised arguments students constructed with and without ChatGPT assistance. We also analyzed student-written responses about their perspectives on mathematical proof and proving and their thoughts on using ChatGPT as a proof assistant. Our analysis shows that our participants' approaches to constructing, evaluating, and revising their arguments aligned with their perspectives on proof and proving. They saw ChatGPT's evaluations of their arguments as similar to how they usually evaluate arguments of themselves and others. Mostly, they agreed with ChatGPT's suggestions to make their original arguments more proof-like. They, therefore, revised their original arguments following ChatGPT's suggestions, focusing on improving clarity, providing additional justifications, and showing the generality of their arguments. Further investigation is needed to explore how ChatGPT can be effectively used as a tool in teaching and learning mathematical proof and proof-writing.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.403-409
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 경기도 지역 치위생과 학생들의 현장임상실습교육에 있어 교수효율성을 파악하기 위하여 2010년 4월 12일부터 4월 26일까지 경기도에 소재한 7개 대학의 치위생과 3학년 학생 371명을 대상으로 자기기입식 설문법을 실시하였으며, SPSS WIN 12.0 프로그램을 이용하여 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 치위생과 학생의 임상실습교육 교수효율성은 '중' 정도인 것으로 나타났고, 교수효율성 요인에 대한 평가는 역할모델 요인이 3.40점으로 가장 높았다. 2. 임상실습기관 규모에 따른 교수효율성은 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었고, 교수효율성 하위영역에서는 전문적 지식요인이 대학병원에서 가장 높았고, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p=.005). 3. 치위생 전공만족도에 따른 교수효율성은 전공만족도가 높을수록 교수효율성이 높았고(p=.001), 교수효율성 하위영역에서는 대인 관계술, 원조자로서의 기능, 공정한 평가, 교과에 대한 조직력(p=.005), 격려와 지지, 교수법, 교과에 대한 전문적 지식(p=.001), 의사소통술, 좋은 역할모델, 치과직원과의 협조(p=.000)에서 통계적으로 유의하였다. 4. 현장임상실습 교수유형에 따른 교수효율성은 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었고, 교수효율성 하위 영역에서는 격려와 지지 항목에서만 통계적으로 유의하였다(p=.005). 이상의 결과를 종합해 볼 때 현장임상실습교육에 관한 교수효율성은 '중' 정도인 것으로 나타났고, 전공만족도가 높을수록 교수효율성이 높음을 알 수 있으므로, 교수효율성을 높이기 위해서는 다양한 교수법 및 체계적인 실습프로그램이 개발되어 임상실습교육의 질을 높여야 할 것이다.