• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.262-272
• /
• 2015

The aim of this study is to analysis factors that determine the competitiveness of container ports using the KJ and AHP methods. For this, 54 detailed attributing factors were identified both by previous studies and port users. 24 attributing factors were identified by a group of port experts. also, These were grouped 18 detailed attributing factors into 6 attributing factors by a group of port experts using the KJ method. These were made into a model of hierarchical structure with 3 levels, taking 1 goal factor, 6 evaluation factors and 18 detailed evaluation factors. The collected date of questionnaires were analyzed by a group of port experts using the AHP method. The analysis result of the evaluation factors in container port shows that port cargo volume is the most important factor, followed by port location, port cost, port service, port facility and port management. The analysis results of detailed evaluation factors in container port shows that import and export cargo volume is the most important factor, followed by transshipment cargo volume, distance from main trunk, cargo handling cost, distance from the point of importing and exporting, speediness of cargo handling, stability of cargo handling, vessel/cargo cost in port entry and leaving, punctuality in port entry and leaving, number and length of berth, collateral service cost, terminal area, hinterland accessibility, ability of terminal operation company, front depth of berth, etc.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 1998년도 추계학술대회논문집:21세기에 대비한 지능형 통합항만관리
• /
• pp.331-351
• /
• 1998

The main purpose of this study is to design the port maketing strategies for strengthening the competitive power of container terminal. So far many attempts have been to analyze the international competitiveness of the terminal. As a results, Six factors hypothesized by this study come from previous research analysis about customers preference for port selection. Those are Cost, Centrality, and Intermediacy, Free trade port, Inland transportation connections, Political and Economic institution, and Port facilities. This study analyze the most important factor about hub port, and transhipment port separately, though questionnaire analysis about users(shipper, shipping company, and freight forwarder) influenced on port selection. The results of this study were found as follows : Equations See Full-text

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.41-50
• /
• 1999

The main purpose of this study is to design the port marketing strategies for strengthening the competitive power of container terminal. So far many attempts have been made to analyze the international competitiveness of the terminal. Six factors hypothesized by this study come from previous research analyses about customers preference for port selection. Those are Cost Centrality and Intermediacy Free trade port Inland transportation connections Political and Economic institution and Port facilities. this study analyzes the most important factors about hob port and transhipment port separately through questionnaire analysis about users(shipper shipping company and freight forwarder) influencing on port selection. The results of this study were found as follows:

• 한국시뮬레이션학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국시뮬레이션학회 1992년도 제2회 정기총회 및 추계학술 발표회 발표논문 초록
• /
• pp.1-1
• /
• 1992

This paper presents a user-oriented port expansion simulation model that determines the future economic port capacity to meet the projected demand. The model consists of two parts; a physical impact simulation, and an economic impact simulation. The first part of the model simulates the effects caused by the port capacity expansion. The second part evaluates the port economics due to changes in the port capacity. The model was validated by applying it to the actual port expansion followed at the Port of Mobile, Alabama. A case study is then presented to demonstrate the capacity of the model with a coal handling port, the McDuffie Terminals at the Port of Mobile.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.231-245
• /
• 2011

평택항이 자동차 수출입 특화항으로 부상하고 있다. 울산항에 이어 줄곧 2위항 자리를 지켜 온 평택항이 2010년 우리나라 31개 항만 중 자동차 수출입 처리 실적 전국 1위항을 기록했다. 2011년에는 수출입 자동차 물동량이 100만대를 넘어설 전망이다. 평택항은 특히 외국산 수입자동차들에게 인기가 높다. 2011년 상반기 수입물량이 2010년 한해 물량에 거의 육박하고 있는 수준이다. 본 연구는 수입자동차들이 평택항 선택 결정 요인과 평택항의 개선 필요 요인에 대한 관계자들의 견해를 묻고 그 중요도를 분석했다. 본 연구는 2011년 7월 현재 평택항을 이용하고 있는 14개 수입자동차 회사를 대상으로 설문조사와 AHP분석 방법을 통해 실시했다. 본 연구에 따르면 우리나라 외국산 수입자동차들의 항만선택 시 가장 중요한 결정요인은 '항만입지'이며, 개선이 가장 시급한 요인은 '항만시설'로 분석됐다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2007

본 논문은 인천항과 청도항, 천진항, 대련항을 대상으로 항만별 서비스품질 구성요인들 각각이 고객만족에 미치는 영향정도가 어떻게 다른지와 항만별 서비스품질의 각 차원 및 만족도에 대한 고객의 지각 수준을 비교하였다. 연구결과 항만서비스의 품질차원은 '내적품질', '외적환경품질', '상호작용품질'로 구분됨을 확인하였고, 대련항의 '외적환경품질'을 제외하곤 항만의 서비스품질 3차원 모두가 고객만족에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 항만간 서비스품질 각 차원에 대한 고객의 지각 수준을 그룹비교를 통해 살펴 본 결과 인천항은 '내적품질'에서 청도항, 천진항, 대련항에 비해 낮게 평가되었으며, '외적환경품질'의 경우도 청도항, 천진항에 비해 낮았지만, '상호작용품질'은 천진항과 대련항에 비해 높게 평가되었다. 그러나 항만에 대한 고객의 만족은 인천항이 청도항, 천진항에 비해 부족한 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2019년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.182-184
• /
• 2019

Ports are responsible fro the creation of positive and negative impacts towards the city. The study's contribution focuses on empirically evaluating the perception of Busan citizens of the local port through an application of Q methodology.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.135-141
• /
• 2009

The circumstances surrounding world ports have changed rapidly and port competition to attract cargoes has been increasing fiercely. Specifically, deploying large container vessels resulted fewer port visits and strategic alliance among liner shipping companies. Recently, many studies have worked for improving port competitiveness. However, these studies were limited to evaluation of only port competitiveness and few studies suggested strategies for reinforcing port competitiveness. Although implications of these previous studies are practically available to build policies for port, there have been very few academic studies such as identifying port competitiveness and port selection with related attributes for reasonable evaluation and analysis. Therefore, this study aims to classify the existing studies, which dealt with port selection problem, based on basic structure that was suggested by Murphy (1992). Furthermore, the conceptual definition will be carried out by comparison analysis in terms of time of study, type of data and methodology and decision factor of each study.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.193-216
• /
• 2004

The management strategies of each company has been changed fundamentally owing to the emergence of digital economics by using internet. Therefore the efficient management of global e-port causes the main issues not only effect the survival and growth of ports but also exert new opportunities and fatal threats on them. Under the circumstances of these change, the Kwangyang port have to introduce e-biz for the purpose of increasing the level of their competition. The focus of this article is to suggest some strategies on the implementation of Kwangyang Global e-port in Korea. To analyse the e-port realities, I first reviewed the trends of e-marketing and e-biz. I chose and analysed website of four ports like Hongkong, Singapore, Antwerp and Hamburg as successful global e-port models. This article is focused to suggest the theoretical background by analysing the strategic points of Kwangyang global e-port which are divided in 6C: Contents, Communities, Connection, Commerce, Communication and Customization. This paper analyses many problems of Gwangyang port and presents various develpment ways to activate Gwangyang port. In order to be a global e-port, first of all Gwangyang port must improve global web-site by 6C. And also Gwangyang port have to constitute logistics hub site, create infrastructure needed to run electronic business more easily over the internet, establish nationwide network of industries, build up marine and port logistics information system.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.215-232
• /
• 1999

Privatisation has emerged within the past few decades as one of the most significant challenges to public ports and their governments throughout the world. More than forty countries have committed to some form of port privatisation thus far and they will quite likely be joined by dozens more by the turn of the century. A decision to privatise ports can be driven by a variety of forces. The most obvious is to relieve a financially strapped government by turning to the private sector for an infusion of capital required to modernise and sustain port operations, or to bolster the national treasury. Inefficient and costly port operations can seriously impair the competitiveness of a nation’s export industries and artificially raise the cost and thus constrain the availability of imported goods. Privatisation in certain circumstances therefore holds the promise of stimulating economic growth particularly for those whose livelihood depends directly upon port activity and trade. The main objective of this paper is first of all, to introduce a variety of methods of port privatisation after reviewing the reason why port facilities should be privatised. This paper also aims to make some proposals with which a port privatisation process in Korea can be improved after summarising the present Terminal Operating Company(TOC) system propelled by Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.