• 제목/요약/키워드: Test-Retest

검색결과 441건 처리시간 0.03초

한국판 맬버른 저시력 일상생활지수(Melbourne Low-vision ADL Index: MLVAI)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 (Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index)

  • 유연환;박지혁;정민예;박혜연
    • 재활치료과학
    • /
    • 제7권2호
    • /
    • pp.51-61
    • /
    • 2018
  • 목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 호주에서 개발된 수행기반의 관찰평가도구인 Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index(MLVAI)를 한국 문화에 적합하게 구성하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하는 것이었다. 연구방법 : 연구대상자는 지역사회에 거주하고 있는 만 20세 이상의 저시력인 26명, 정안인 42명으로 총 68명이었다. 한국판 MLVAI는 번역 검증 및 도구 구성에 대한 전문가 검증을 통해 완성하였다. 한국판 MLVAI의 타당도는 내용타당도, 판별타당도, 수렴타당도 검증을 통해 수립하였고, 신뢰도는 항목에 대한 내적일치도, 검사-재검사 신뢰도, 검사자간 신뢰도를 분석하였다. 결과 : 내용타당도 수립을 위해 저시력 관련 분야의 전문가들이 시행한 문항적합도 검증에서는 .78이상으로 타당성이 수립되었다. 판별타당도 검증은 저시력 집단의 평균점수가 통계적으로 낮았다(p<.05). 수렴타당도는 Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire(LVQOL)을 이용하여 한국판 MLVAL 총점과의 상관계수 .751을 산출하였고 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<.05). 전체 항목에 대한 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$값은 .983으로 높았으며 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 .976(p<.05), 검사자간 신뢰도는 급간 내 상관계수(ICC2,1) .91로 모두 양호하였다(p<.05). 결론 : 본 연구 결과 국내 실정에 맞게 수정한 한국판 MLVAI는 신뢰도와 타당도를 모두 갖춘 일상생활 평가도구로 작업치료 중재 시 저시력인의 일상생활활동의 평가를 위해 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Satisfaction with Care EORTC-in-patsat32 Questionnaire among Iranian Cancer Patients

  • Pishkuhi, Mahin Ahmadi;Salmaniyan, Soraya;Nedjat, Saharnaz;Zendedel, Kazem;Lari, Mohsen Asadi
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제15권23호
    • /
    • pp.10121-10128
    • /
    • 2015
  • Background: Cancers impose an increasing burden on health of the populations and individuals, but little is known about cancer patient satisfaction with care. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) In-Patsat32, as a recently developed questionnaire to assess cancer patient satisfaction with care and information provided during hospital admission. Materials and Methods: Complying with EORTC protocols, the Persian version of Inpatsat32 was translated and piloted in a small group of patients, then applied to 380 cancer patients admitted to different oncology wards in Tehran. Validity (convergent, discriminant, and divergent) and reliability of the tool was assessed through using multitrait analysis, factor analysis, intraclass correlations, Chronbach's alpha and test-retest (on a sample of 70 patients). Results: Good acceptance and high sensitivity of the questionnaire with low floor and ceiling effects were recognized, indicating power of the instrument to detect differences between groups with heterogeneous levels of satisfaction. Multitrait scaling analyses supported the convergent validity of the majority of scales (correlation coefficient >0.4) and favorable discriminant validity (item own scale correlation >0.8). There was no correlation between In-patsat32 scales and the EORTC-C30, which measures different concepts, confirming divergent validity of the tool. Internal consistency for all domains was high (${\alpha}$ >0.70) except for the hospital access score and the test-retest reliability was excellent (r=0.86-0.96). There was a weak responsiveness to change except for nurses technical skills. Principle component analysis confirmed five domains with much improved internal consistency (${\alpha}$ >0.9). Conclusions: The Persian version of the EORTC-in-patsat32 module is a reliable and valid instrument to measure cancer patient satisfaction with care received during their hospitalization period and can be utilized in clinical cancer research.

Psychometric Validation of the Bahasa Malaysia Version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29

  • Magaji, Bello Arkilla;Moy, Foong Ming;Roslani, April Camilla;Law, Chee Wei;Raduan, Farhana;Sagap, Ismail
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제16권18호
    • /
    • pp.8101-8105
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Bahasa Malaysia (BM) version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Colorectal Cancer-specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29). Materials and Methods: We studied 93 patients recruited from University Malaya and Universiti Kebangsaan Medical Centers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia using a self-administered method. Tools included QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 and Karnofsky Performance Scales (KPS). Statistical analyses included Cronbach's alpha, test-retest correlations, multi-traits scaling and known-groups comparisons. A p vaue ${\leq}0.05$ was considered significant. Results: The internal consistency coefficients for body image, urinary frequency, blood and mucus and stool frequency scales were acceptable (Cronbach's alpha ${\alpha}{\geq}0.65$). However, the coefficients were low for the blood and mucus and stool frequency scales in patients with a stoma bag (${\alpha}=0.46$). Test-retest correlation coefficients were moderate to high (range: r = 0.51 to 1.00) for most of the scales except anxiety, urinary frequency, buttock pain, hair loss, stoma care related problems, and dyspareunia (r ${\leq}0.49$). Convergent and discriminant validities were achieved in all scales. Patients with a stoma reported significantly higher symptoms of blood and mucus in the stool, flatulence, faecal incontinence, sore skin, and embarrassment due to the frequent need to change the stoma bag (p < 0.05) compared to patients without stoma. None of the scales distinguished between patients based on the KPS scores. There were no overlaps between scales in the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 (r < 0.40). Conclusions: the BM version of the QLQ-CR29 indicated acceptable psychometric properties in most of the scales similar to original validation study. This questionnaire could be used to complement the QLQ-C30 in assessing HRQOL among BM speaking population with colorectal cancer.

소방공무원과 구조대원에서 한국어판 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist의 신뢰도와 타당도 (Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist in Public Firefighters and Rescue Workers)

  • 박신원;정현석;임주연;전유진;마지영;최예라;반순현;김성은;유시영;이선호;전새롬;강일향;이보라;이수연;손지희;임재호;윤수정;김의정;김지은;류인균
    • 생물정신의학
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.29-36
    • /
    • 2016
  • Objectives Firefighters and rescue workers are likely to be exposed to a variety of traumatic events; as such, they are vulnerable to the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The psychometric properties of the Korean version of the PTSD Checklist (PCL), a widely used self-report screening tool for PTSD, were assessed in South Korean firefighters and rescue workers. Methods Data were collected via self-report questionnaires and semi-structured clinical interviews administered to 221 firefighters. Internal consistency, item-total correlation, one-week test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity were examined. Content validity of the PCL was evaluated using factor analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to estimate the optimal cutoff point and area under the curve. Results The PCL demonstrated excellent internal consistency (${\alpha}=0.97$), item-total correlation (r = 0.72-0.88), test-retest reliability (r = 0.95), and convergent and divergent validity. The total score of PCL was positively correlated with the number of traumatic events experienced (p < 0.001). Factor analysis revealed two theoretically congruent factors: re-experience/avoidance and numbing/hyperarousal. The optimal cutoff was 45 and the area under the ROC curve was 0.97. Conclusions The Korean version of the PCL may be a useful PTSD screening instrument for firefighters and rescue workers, further maximizing opportunities for accurate PTSD diagnosis and treatment.

Development and Validation of a Novel Generic Health-related Quality of Life Instrument With 20 Items (HINT-20)

  • Jo, Min-Woo;Lee, Hyeon-Jeong;Kim, Soo Young;Kim, Seon-Ha;Chang, Hyejung;Ahn, Jeonghoon;Ock, Minsu
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제50권1호
    • /
    • pp.38-59
    • /
    • 2017
  • Objectives: Few attempts have been made to develop a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument and to examine its validity and reliability in Korea. We aimed to do this in our present study. Methods: After a literature review of existing generic HRQoL instruments, a focus group discussion, in-depth interviews, and expert consultations, we selected 30 tentative items for a new HRQoL measure. These items were evaluated by assessing their ceiling effects, difficulty, and redundancy in the first survey. To validate the HRQoL instrument that was developed, known-groups validity and convergent/discriminant validity were evaluated and its test-retest reliability was examined in the second survey. Results: Of the 30 items originally assessed for the HRQoL instrument, four were excluded due to high ceiling effects and six were removed due to redundancy. We ultimately developed a HRQoL instrument with a reduced number of 20 items, known as the Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 20 items (HINT-20), incorporating physical, mental, social, and positive health dimensions. The results of the HINT-20 for known-groups validity were poorer in women, the elderly, and those with a low income. For convergent/discriminant validity, the correlation coefficients of items (except vitality) in the physical health dimension with the physical component summary of the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) were generally higher than the correlations of those items with the mental component summary of the SF-36v2, and vice versa. Regarding test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total HINT-20 score was 0.813 (p<0.001). Conclusions: A novel generic HRQoL instrument, the HINT-20, was developed for the Korean general population and showed acceptable validity and reliability.

하지 정렬 평가를 위한 체표면 토포그래피를 이용한 측정법: 새로운 임상 및 연구 도구에 대한 검토 (Surface Topographic Measurement Method for Assessing Lower Extremity Alignment: Examination on a novel clinical and research Tool)

  • 임지영;임현승;박대성;이재헌;이나경
    • 재활복지공학회논문지
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.37-45
    • /
    • 2016
  • 이 연구의 목적은 래스터입체사진술이 적용된 ABW-mapper를 사용하여 얻은 관상면 상에서의 하지 정렬 측정에 대하여 측정자 내, 측정자 간, 측정-재측정 간 각각의 신뢰도와 타당도를 조사하고 평가하는 것이다. 열여덟 명의 대상자가 이 연구에 참여하였다. 일주일간격으로 두 번의 세션에 걸쳐서 두 사람의 측정자가 각각 ABW-mapper를 사용하여 기립자세에서의 S각(입체사진 각-래스터입체사진 촬영을 통해 측정한 관상면상의 하지 정렬 측정 각)을 측정하였고, 첫 번째 세션에서는 짧은 시간 간격으로 한 측정자가 같은 대상자에 대하여 두 번씩 측정하였다. Q각은 디지털카메라로 기립자세를 촬영한 사진에서 고니어미터로 측정하였다. HKA각은 컴퓨터 기반 디지털 방사선 영상사진 위에서 측정 소프트웨어를 사용하여 측정하였다. 급내상관계수(ICC)를 통해 신뢰도를 분석하였고, 피어슨 상관계수를 사용하여 타당도를 검사하였다. 그 결과, S각 측정은 매우 높은 측정자 내 (ICC=0.956~0.974), 측정자 간 (ICC=0.962) 검사-재검사 간 (ICC=0.945) 신뢰도를 나타냈으며, S각과 Q각, S각과 HKA각 사이에는 강한 음의 상관관계(각각 r=-0.739, -0.702)를 나타냈다. 따라서, ABW-mapper에 의한 래스터입체사진법을 통한 S각 측정은 관상면에서의 하지정렬의 측정에 대하여 Q각이나 HKA각 측정에 관련하여 예비적 또는 보완적 도구로 사용될 수 있을 것이라 생각된다.

뇌졸중(腦卒中) 환자(患者)의 기능평가방법(機能評價方法)에 대(對)한 연구(硏究) (Study on function evaluation tools for stroke patients)

  • 고성규;고창남;조기호;김영석;배형섭;이경섭
    • 대한한의학회지
    • /
    • 제17권1호
    • /
    • pp.48-83
    • /
    • 1996
  • Our conclusions for function evaluation tools of Stroke patients are as follows. 1. Evaluating tools of Activities of Daily Living, Katz Index, Barthel Index, Modified Barthel Index have high validity and reliability because of ease of measuring, high accuracy, consistency, sensitivity and sufficient stastistics, but they mainly measure motor function except sense, mentation, language, and social conception. Therefore cerebrovascular disease and brain injury in trauma patients with lacked acknowledgement and sensation, we are not able to apply these tools. 2. PULSES Profile is a useful scale for measuring the patient's over-all status, upper and lower limb functions, sensory components, excretary functions, and intellectual and emotional adaptabilities. It is recognized as a good, useful tool to evaluate patient's whole function. 3. Motor Assessment Scale was designed to measure the progress of stroke patients. The scale was supplemented with upper arm function items. We believe that the Motor Assessment Scale could be a useful evaluation tool with inter-rater reliability ,test-retest reliability. 4. The existing evaluation tools, Katz Index, Barthel Index, Modified Barthel Index, PULSES Profile, Motor Assessment Scale, mainly measured the rehabilitational motor function of sequela of cerebrovascular patients. On the other hand CNS & INH stroke scale can measure cerebrovascular disease patient's neurologic deficits and over-all stautus, which are recognition ability, speech status, motor function, sensory function, activities of daily living. Those scales have been recognized as useful tools to measure function of cerebrovascular disease patients and have increased in use. 5. Every function evaluation tool was recognized to have some validity and inter-rater, test-retest reliability in items of each evaluation tool and total scores of each evaluation tools, but it is thought that none of these scales have been fully validated and proved reliable. Therefore afterward, the development of a highly reliable rating system may best be accomplished by a careful comparison of several tools, using the same patients and the same observers in order to choose the most reliable items from each. 6. Ideal evaluation tools must have the following conditions; (1) It should show the objective functional statues at the same time. (2) It should be repeated consecutively to know changed function status. (3) It should be easy to observe the treatment program. (4) It should have the same result with another rater to help rater exchange information with treatment team members. (5) It should be practical and simple. (6) The patient should not suffer from the observer.

  • PDF

뇌성마비 환아 중증도별 시각화척도, 시간교환법, EQ-5D-Y Proxy를 이용한 삶의 질 측정 (Measuring Quality of Life in Cerebral Palsy Children According to the Severity Using the Visual Analogue Scale, Time Trade-Off, and EQ-5D-Y Proxy)

  • 이고은;김남권;윤영주;왕혜민;김정훈;이동효
    • 동의신경정신과학회지
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.49-59
    • /
    • 2017
  • Objectives: To measure the quality of life in patients according to virtual cerebral palsy severity by using the Korean version of EQ-5D-Y proxy, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Time Trade-Off method (TTO). Methods: The study was conducted in parents of children and adolescents aged 4 to 15 years in Seoul. We analyzed the difference in the utility value according to five levels of cerebral palsy severity in the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and test-retest reliability. Results: 1. There were significant differences in VAS, TTO, and EQ-5D-Y proxy according to the cerebral palsy severity (p<.001). 2. VAS was significantly different according to the respondent's visit to the medical institution, the presence of disease in the respondent, a visit to the child's medical institution, the age of the child, and the sex of the child. The value of TTO was significantly different according to the respondent's visit to the medical institution, respondent's sex, and the age of the child. Also, EQ-5D-Y proxy was significantly different according to the age of the child. 3. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were more than 0.6 for both VAS and TTO at all stages. But for the EQ-5D-Y proxy, the value was less than 0.6 at all stages. Conclusions: The quality of life assessment using EQ-5D-Y proxy showed significant differences in the severity of cerebral palsy. However, large-scale studies using EQ-5D-Y proxy are needed because of low test-retest reliability.

지역사회 노인의 신체기능 평가도구 개발 (The Development of Physical Functioning Scale for Community-Dwelling Older Persons)

  • 이경종;한근식;윤수진;이연경;김찬호;김정림;이윤환
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제35권4호
    • /
    • pp.359-374
    • /
    • 2002
  • Objectives : To develop a physical functioning instrument for older adults living in the community. Methods : A representative sample of 979 people aged 65 years or over were interviewed in-person. Of these, 199 people also completed a detailed in-hospital examination. The scale items were selected based on the frequency of endorsement, along with the item-total and inter-item correlations. The associations of the scale with their physical performance and clinical examination were analyzed to evaluate the criterion-related validity. Construct validity was assessed using factor analysis, and internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlations. Test-retest reliability was measured by agreement between the household survey and the repeat survey at the in-hospital examination. Results : Initially, 23 items on the level of difficulty, ranging from no difficulty to an inability to complete a task, with the specific mobility and self-care tasks were included. Those with a high frequency of endorsement and a low inter-item or item-total correlations were excluded, resulting in a 10-item Physical Functioning (PT) scale. Equal weights were given to each item and a summated score was calculated. Significant associations were found between the PF scores and the physical performance, surrey and clinical data. The scale revealed a 2-factor (mobility and self-care) structure. Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 and the item-total correlations were in the 0.63 to 0.78 range. Pearson's correlations for the test-retest ranged between 0.56 and 0.61. Conclusions : The newly developed Physical Functioning (PF) scale showed good psychometric properties in older people. Further work, however, is needed to improve its sensitivity to discriminate higher levels of functioning, in addition to assessing its predictive value in detecting changes in health.

위암 수술 환자의 건강결과 측정을 위한 동반상병 측정도구의 유용성 연구 (Usefulness of Comorbidity Indices in Operative Gastric Cancer Cases)

  • 황세민;윤석준;안형식;안형진;김상후;경민호;이은경
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제42권1호
    • /
    • pp.49-58
    • /
    • 2009
  • Objectives : The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of the following four comorbidity indices in gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery: Charlson Comorbidity Index(CCI), Cumulative Illness rating scale(CIRS), Index of Co-existent Disease(ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein Scale(KFS). Methods : The study subjects were 614 adults who underwent surgery for gastric cancer at K hospital between 2005 and 2007. We examined the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of 4 comorbidity indices for 50 patients. Reliability was evaluated with Spearman rho coefficients for CCI and CIRS, while Kappa values were used for the ICED and KFS indices. Logistic regression was used to determine how these comorbidity indices affected unplanned readmission and death. Multiple regression was used for determining if the comorbidity indices affected length of stay and hospital costs. Results : The test-retest reliability of CCI and CIRS was substantial(Spearman rho=0.746 and 0.775, respectively), while for ICED and KFS was moderate(Kappa=0.476 and 0.504, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of the CCI, CIRS, and ICED was moderate(Spearman rho=0.580 and 0.668, and Kappa=0.433, respectively), but for KFS was fair(Kappa=0.383). According to the results from logistic regression, unplanned readmissions and deaths were not significantly different between the comorbidity index scores. But, according to the results from multiple linear regression, the CIRS group showed a significantly increased length of hospital stay(p<0.01). Additionally, CCI showed a significant association with increased hospital costs (p<0.01). Conclusions : This study suggests that the CCI index may be useful in the estimation of comorbidities associated with hospital costs, while the CIRS index may be useful where estimatation of comorbiditie associated with the length of hospital stay are concerned.