• Title/Summary/Keyword: Technology-Assisted Language Learning

Search Result 14, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Automatic Error Detection of Morpho-syntactic Errors of English Writing Using Association Rule Analysis Algorithm (연관 규칙 분석 알고리즘을 활용한 영작문 형태.통사 오류 자동 발견)

  • Kim, Dong-Sung
    • Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
    • /
    • 2010.10a
    • /
    • pp.3-8
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구에서는 일련의 연구에서 수집된 영작문 오류 유형의 정제된 자료를 토대로 연관 규칙을 생성하고, 학습을 통해서 효용성이 검증된 연관 규칙을 활용해서 영작문 데이터의 형태 통사 오류를 자동으로 탐지한다. 영작문 데이터에서 형태 통사 오류를 찾아내는 작업은 많은 시간과 자원이 소요되는 작업이므로 자동화가 필수적이다. 기존의 연구들이 통계적 모델을 활용한 어휘적 오류에 치중하거나 언어 이론적 틀에 근거한 통사 처리에 집중하는 반면에, 본 연구는 데이터 마이닝을 통해서 정제된 데이터에서 연관 규칙을 생성하고 이를 검증한 후 형태 통사 오류를 감지한다. 이전 연구들에서는 이론적 틀에 맞추어진 규칙 생성이나 언어 모델 생성을 위한 대량의 코퍼스 데이터와 같은 다량의 지식 베이스 생성이 필수적인데, 본 연구는 적은 양의 정제된 데이터를 활용한다. 영작문 오류 유형의 형태 통사 연관 규칙을 생성하기 위해서 Apriori 알고리즘을 활용하였다. 알고리즘을 통해서 생성된 연관 규칙 중 잘못된 규칙이 생성될 가능성이 있으므로, 상관성 검정, 코사인 유사도와 같은 규칙 효용성의 통계적 검증을 활용해서 타당한 규칙만을 학습하였다. 이를 통해서 축적된 연관 규칙들을 영작문 오류를 자동으로 탐지하는 실험에 활용하였다.

  • PDF

Web-based Education for Practical Business English. (웹을 기초로 한 실무 영어 교육)

  • 김대빈
    • Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
    • /
    • v.1 no.2
    • /
    • pp.227-242
    • /
    • 2001
  • It is noted that although the current state of development of web-based English education (hereafter referred to as WBEE) might not meet the criteria some educators have set for themselves in the field, students certainly seem to prefer studying in a web-based and computer-assisted learning environment. This kind of demand is fueling the drive to develop more suitable variations of WBEE. In order for WBEE to work out, a teacher should be a multifunctional type of instructor handling responsibilities such as the role of scriptwriter to create text, act as technician for the sound mixing and recording, preside over online chat rooms and discussion boards, and finally, as webmaster to maintain the site and supervise all academic/ clerical work related to the course. Therefore, it is suggested that WBEE be accompanied by a small personnel to divide the labor and lessen the burden on the actual teacher. Finally, it is noted that the traditional relationship between students and teacher may no longer be sustainable since WBEE does not provide the face-to-face style of class discussion and office hours in its current form. Until the technology is fully developed to compensate for these kinds of differences, it is an immediate challenge to provide other more compelling reasons for students to participate in WBEE.

  • PDF

Why A Multimedia Approach to English Education\ulcorner

  • Keem, Sung-uk
    • Proceedings of the KSPS conference
    • /
    • 1997.07a
    • /
    • pp.176-178
    • /
    • 1997
  • To make a long story short I made up my mind to experiment with a multimedia approach to my classroom presentations two years ago because my ways of giving instructions bored the pants off me as well as my students. My favorite ways used to be sometimes referred to as classical or traditional ones, heavily dependent on the three elements: teacher's mouth, books, and chalk. Some call it the 'MBC method'. To top it off, I tried audio-visuals such as tape recorders, cassette players, VTR, pictures, and you name it, that could help improve my teaching method. And yet I have been unhappy about the results by a trial and error approach. I was determined to look for a better way that would ensure my satisfaction in the first place. What really turned me on was a multimedia CD ROM title, ELLIS (English Language Learning Instructional Systems) developed by Dr. Frank Otto. This is an integrated system of learning English based on advanced computer technology. Inspired by the utility and potential of such a multimedia system for regular classroom or lab instructions, I designed a simple but practical multimedia language learning laboratory in 1994 for the first time in Korea(perhaps for the first time in the world). It was high time that the conventional type of language laboratory(audio-passive) at Hahnnam be replaced because of wear and tear. Prior to this development, in 1991, I put a first CALL(Computer Assisted Language Learning) laboratory equipped with 35 personal computers(286), where students were encouraged to practise English typing, word processing and study English grammar, English vocabulary, and English composition. The first multimedia language learning laboratory was composed of 1) a multimedia personal computer(486DX2 then, now 586), 2) VGA multipliers that enable simultaneous viewing of the screen at control of the instructor, 3) an amplifIer, 4) loud speakers, 5)student monitors, 6) student tables to seat three students(a monitor for two students is more realistic, though), 7) student chairs, 8) an instructor table, and 9) cables. It was augmented later with an Internet hookup. The beauty of this type of multimedia language learning laboratory is the economy of furnishing and maintaining it. There is no need of darkening the facilities, which is a must when an LCD/beam projector is preferred in the laboratory. It is headset free, which proved to make students exasperated when worn more than- twenty minutes. In the previous semester I taught three different subjects: Freshman English Lab, English Phonetics, and Listening Comprehension Intermediate. I used CD ROM titles like ELLIS, Master Pronunciation, English Tripple Play Plus, English Arcade, Living Books, Q-Steps, English Discoveries, Compton's Encyclopedia. On the other hand, I managed to put all teaching materials into PowerPoint, where letters, photo, graphic, animation, audio, and video files are orderly stored in terms of slides. It takes time for me to prepare my teaching materials via PowerPoint, but it is a wonderful tool for the sake of presentations. And it is worth trying as long as I can entertain my students in such a way. Once everything is put into the computer, I feel relaxed and a bit excited watching my students enjoy my presentations. It appears to be great fun for students because they have never experienced this type of instruction. This is how I freed myself from having to manipulate a cassette tape player, VTR, and write on the board. The student monitors in front of them seem to help them concentrate on what they see, combined with what they hear. All I have to do is to simply click a mouse to give presentations and explanations, when necessary. I use a remote mouse, which prevents me from sitting at the instructor table. Instead, I can walk around in the room and enjoy freer interactions with students. Using this instrument, I can also have my students participate in the presentation. In particular, I invite my students to manipulate the computer using the remote mouse from the student's seat not from the instructor's seat. Every student appears to be fascinated with my multimedia approach to English teaching because of its unique nature as a new teaching tool as we face the 21st century. They all agree that the multimedia way is an interesting and fascinating way of learning to satisfy their needs. Above all, it helps lighten their drudgery in the classroom. They feel other subjects taught by other teachers should be treated in the same fashion. A multimedia approach to education is impossible without the advent of hi-tech computers, of which multi functions are integrated into a unified system, i.e., a personal computer. If you have computer-phobia, make quick friends with it; the sooner, the better. It can be a wonderful assistant to you. It is the Internet that I pay close attention to in conjunction with the multimedia approach to English education. Via e-mail system, I encourage my students to write to me in English. I encourage them to enjoy chatting with people all over the world. I also encourage them to visit the sites where they offer study courses in English conversation, vocabulary, idiomatic expressions, reading, and writing. I help them search any subject they want to via World Wide Web. Some day in the near future it will be the hub of learning for everybody. It will eventually free students from books, teachers, libraries, classrooms, and boredom. I will keep exploring better ways to give satisfying instructions to my students who deserve my entertainment.

  • PDF

Effects of Different Types of Chatbots on EFL Learners' Speaking Competence and Learner Perception (서로 다른 챗봇 유형이 한국 EFL 학습자의 말하기능력 및 학습자인식에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Na-Young
    • Cross-Cultural Studies
    • /
    • v.48
    • /
    • pp.223-252
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study explores effects of two types of chatbots - voice-based and text-based - on Korean EFL learners' speaking competence and learner perception. Participants were 80 freshmen students taking an English-speaking class at a university in Korea. They were divided into two experimental groups at random. During the sixteen-week experimental period, participants engaged in 10 chat sessions with the two different types of chatbots. To take a close examination of effects on the improvement of speaking competence, they took the TOEIC speaking test as pre- and post-tests. Structured questionnaire-based surveys were conducted before and after treatment to determine if there are changes in perception. Findings reveal two chatbots effectively contribute to improvement of speaking competence among EFL learners. Particularly, the voice-based chatbot was as effective as the text-based chatbot. An analysis of survey results indicates perception of chatbot-assisted language learning changed positively over time. In particular, most participants preferred voice-based chatbot over text-based chatbot. This study provides insight on the use of chatbots in EFL learning, suggesting that EFL teachers should integrate chatbot technology in their classrooms.