• Title/Summary/Keyword: Taxonomy of educational objects

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Study on the Restructure of Information Literacy Process Based on Taxonomy Educational Objectives (교육목표분류학에 의한 정보활용과정모형의 재구조화에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Byeong-Ki
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.41 no.2
    • /
    • pp.107-126
    • /
    • 2010
  • Education is an intentional and planned change process for achieving the objective. Thus, an educational objects sets is very important in elementary and secondary instructional practice. Bloom created the original taxonomy of the cognitive, affective, psychomotor domain for categorizing level of abstraction of questions that commonly occur in educational settings in 1956. During the 1990, Anderson & Krathwohl, Marzano led a new educational taxonomy which met for the purpose of updating the Bloom's taxonomy, hoping to add relevance for 21st century teaching and learning. The educational taxonomy with information literacy process is relationship. The purpose of this study is restructure of information literacy process based on educational object taxonomy.

  • PDF

Analysis of the End-of-Chapter Questions in Chemistry II according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Bloom의 개정된 교육목표 분류에 따른 화학II 단원 평가 문항 분석)

  • Seo, Young-Jin;Kim, Hyoung-Soo;Chae, Hee-K.
    • Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
    • /
    • v.54 no.3
    • /
    • pp.329-337
    • /
    • 2010
  • In this study, we analyzed the end-of-chapter questions in 8 types of chemistry II textbooks for science teachers according to revised Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives not only to raise interests of questions in textbooks but also acquire a basic material for using questions in textbooks effectively. The results of classification following Bloom's cognitive category showed that 'Understanding(44.7%)' level was the most, then 'Application(29.9%)', Knowledge(15.6%) and 'Analysis (9.5%)' in order, which is distinct difference from the result of classification of the end-of-chapter questions in college general chemistry books which was 'Application', 'Analysis' and 'Understanding' in order. Especially, questions of 'Evaluation' level were not found at all in any textbook investigated and 'Synthesis(0.3%)' level was very few. On the other hand, the percentage of questions in 'Understanding' and 'Executing Quantitative' which required specific algorithms was 70% of total with most of the questions in 'Application' were 'Executing Quantitative'.