• Title/Summary/Keyword: TWO HAND BACKHAND STROKE

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

3-D Kinematic comparison of One Hand Backhand Stroke and Two Hand Backhand Stroke in Tennis (테니스 한손 백핸드 스트로크와 양손 백핸드 스트로크 동작의 3차원 운동학적 비교 분석)

  • Choi, Ji-Young;Shin, Je-Min
    • Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics
    • /
    • v.15 no.4
    • /
    • pp.85-95
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between the segments of the body, the three dimensional anatomical angle during One Hand Backhand Stroke and Two Hand Backhand in tennis. For the movement analysis three dimensional cinematographical method(APAS) was used and for the calculation of the kinematic variables a self developed program was used with the LabVIEW 6.1 graphical programming(Johnson, 1999) program. By using Eular's equations the three dimensional anatomical Cardan angles of the joint and racket head direction were defined. 1. In three dimensional maximum linear velocity of racket head the X axis and Y axis(horizontal direction) showed $-11.04{\pm}2.69m/sec$, $-9.31{\pm}0.49m/sec$ before impact, the z axis(vertical direction) maximum linear velocity of racket head did not show at impact but after impact this will resulted influence upon hitting ball. It could be suggest that Y axis velocity of racket head influence on ball direction and z axis velocity influence on ball spin after impact. The stance distance between right foot and left foot was mean $75.4{\pm}5.86cm$ during one hand backhand stroke and $72.6{\pm}4.67cm$ during two hand backhand stroke. 2. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk in interna rotation-external rotation showed most important role in backhand stroke. and is follwed by flexion-extension. the three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk did not show significant difference between one hand backhand stroke and two hand backhand stroke but the three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk was bigger than one hand backhand stroke. 3. while backhand stroke, the flexion-extension and adduction-abduction of right shoulder joint showed significant different between one hand backhand stroke and two hand backhand stroke. the three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of right shoulder joint showed more flex and abduct in one hand backhand stroke. 4. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of left shoulder showed flexion, adduction, and external rotation at impact. after impact, The angular displacement as adduction-abduction of left shoulder changed motion direction as abduction. angular displacement of left shoulder as flexion-extension showed bigger than the right shoulder.

A Kinematic Analysis of Two Hand Backhand Stroke Swings in Tennis (테니스 양손 백핸드 스트로크 스윙자세의 운동학적 분석)

  • Kang, Sang-Hack;Son, Won-Il
    • Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.41-52
    • /
    • 2007
  • The present study analyzed the two hand backhand stroke motion of six female high school tennis players who won the championship at the National Athletic Meeting in 2006, and drew conclusions as follows. The open angle of the racket at the moment of impact was 90 degree without significant difference among the players, making a wide contact between the ball and the racket. The racket angle was 43 degree at take back and 91 at impact, showing a style of holding the racket rather upright in general. In back swing from the top to the impact, the shoulders and the hips turned by 97 degree and 40 degree, respectively. At the moment of impact, the height of the impact was 54%H, and the position of the impact was 10%H ahead of and 37%H left from the central axis of the body. The right hand made a continental grip and the left hand made a Western or semi Western grip. Through the entire swing motion, the grip angle of the left hand was smaller than that of the right hand, and those who maintained a large grip angle of the right hand at the moment of take back put the racket head slightly farther from the body. In the swing of the racket head from the lowest point to the impact, the vertical length of movement was 11%H and the horizontal length of movement was 60%H, quite long.

Racket Head and COM of Velocity of Kinematic Analysis of Two-Handed Backhand Stroke Between Male and Female Tennis Player (남·여 테니스 선수의 양손 백핸드 스트로크 동작의 운동학적 비교 분석)

  • Na, Doo-Ri;Kang, Young-Taek;Park, Tae-Jin;Seo, Kook-Eun;Kim, Yong-Jae;Lee, Kyung-Soon
    • Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics
    • /
    • v.21 no.4
    • /
    • pp.421-427
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference between male and female tennis players' two-handed backhand stroke and to provide basic data which helps precise and efficient instruction for the sake of precise postures, enhanced performances and skills. 5 male and 5 female university players were recruited as subjects, and the mean difference between the kinematic variables such as the time from backswing to impact and total swing time, racket head velocity, change of the center of body gravity in two-handed backhand stroke through three-dimensional motion analysis. The test data was analyzed by t-test, and the alpha level of ${\alpha}$=.05 was set for all tests of significance. The findings of the study were as follows; First, there was no difference in the time from backswing to impact and total time of

Kinetic comparative analysis of tennis backhand stroke for interdisciplinary convergence research (학제간 융합연구를 위한 테니스 백핸드 스트로크 동작의 운동역학적 비교 분석)

  • Cha, Jung-Hoon
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.13 no.7
    • /
    • pp.373-380
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study which was conducted on male tennis player on one hand(OH) & two hand(TH) backhand stroke and how both motion differed on low extremity movement with each feature analyzed in detail, the result as follow. The motion of TH based on resultant velocity, appeared to be a higher than OH, which was important variable in determining the ball speed. Contrary to TH where the player minimized the motion in the lower body and finalized a stroke through the turn of the trunk as if sticking the ball closed to the body, OH was carried out such that the player appeared to chase the ball. Whereas in OH, the knee joint extension moment was not found to be larger than TH, the opposite result came out for abduction moment and internal rotation moment. In the case of hip joint, consisted of extension, abduction and internal rotation moment, the outcome emerged to be greater for TH with conspicuous difference in abduction moment. Flection moment for TH overwhelmed in TH though both adduction and external rotation moment brought about similar outcome for both strokes.