• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제19D권3호
• /
• pp.257-262
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 화주와 물류업체의 협업을 통하여 급변하는 물류 환경에 유연하기 대응하기 위한 공급사슬망에서의 리스크 관리의 중요성과 리스크 분류체계를 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위하여 첫째, 공급사슬리스크와 관련된 기존연구를 고찰하여 18가지의 리스크 발생 원인별로 47개의 리스크요인을 파악하였다. 둘째, 파악된 리스크 요인을 토대로 기업 전문가 집단의 의견을 수렴하여 공급사슬망 관점에서 3개의 대분류와 10개의 중분류로 분류하였다. 셋째, 분류된 리스크에 대해 화주기업과 물류기업을 대상으로 설문 실시 후 확인적 요인분석, 집중타당성, 판별타당성 검증기법을 이용하여 공급사슬망 리스크 분류의 타탕도를 검증하였다. 마지막으로 검증결과를 바탕으로 시사점을 제시한다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.125-140
• /
• 2015

공급사슬에서 발생한 위험의 영향력은 위험이 발생한 영역에만 국한되는 것이 아니라 연결구조를 따라 네트워크 전체에 퍼지게 된다. 이러한 위험의 전파 현상으로 인해 공급사슬은 네트워크 연결 구조에 의해 위험의 영향을 받게 될 가능성이 달라진다. 따라서 공급사슬 네트워크를 설계하는 시점에 구조적 연결성을 고려하여 내외부 위험의 발생에 따른 비용을 최소화할 수 있어야 한다. 일반적으로 매개 중심성은 위험의 발생가능성과 영향력의 확산을 설명하는 지표로 해석할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 구조적 취약성 관점에서의 재해석과 수정을 통해 서로 다른 공급사슬의 취약성을 정량적으로 비교하고, 보다 안정적인 네트워크 구조를 선택할 수 있는 방안을 제시한다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.34-41
• /
• 2010

This paper proposes the compliance collaboration index(CCI) which can be useful to measure the level of supply chain's compliance collaboration quantitatively. It can be shown that the proposed index is quite flexible when applied in real situations at the request of the index user. For instance, even if only one company of many companies in trade supply chain to be tested through the AEO certification test is not satisfied the required specification. the index is designed in such a way that the score can't be higher than a certain predetermined value. The proposed CCI can be used as the guidance for a trade company's collaboration process control strategy to increase the efficiency of compliance improvement activity. In this paper, we use the Analysis Hierarchy Process(AHP) which is one of the methods recommended by ISO/ICE as a measurement of weight to be assigned to the relevant parameters considered in the CCI.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.203-209
• /
• 2014

This research designed and implemented a supply chain risk management platform and applied it to a case study of reduced-fat Lanna pork sausage as a new product development project. The proposed framework has three stages: risk identification, risk assessment, and risk mitigation. Seventeen risk agents with 17 risk events were identified based on SWOT analysis and the Porter Five Forces concept through the process of planning, sourcing, making and delivering, partially captured from the supply chain operations reference model in the first stage. In the second stage, an house of risk (HOR) framework was applied to present the impacts of each risk agent. In the third stage, eight risk agents with high impact were selected to design 21 preventive actions. Finally, three preventive actions with the highest effectiveness to difficulty ratio scores-'sales evaluation of familiar products', 'increasing distribution channels and promotions to improve sales', and 'work flow improvement for work safety'-were then recommended for this new product development.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.321-327
• /
• 2012

Logistics in a supply chain network has become an important operational strategy in a competitive market. A number of internal and external risks involved in the logistics operations in a company tend to create problems in fulfilling customer orders. This research presents how ERM (enterprise risk management) can be used to identify, assess, and control logistics risks. An electronic company's logistics activities were used as an industry case to demonstrate a way to identify and assess risks surrounding global logistics function. This paper has further presented action plans to mitigate the impact of the risks that occur.

• 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 하나의 공급자와 하나의 소매자가 구성된 분산화된 공급사슬에서 도매가 계약과 수익공유 계약, 수량유연 계약, 판매환급 계약을 비교·분석한다. 선행 연구의 결과에 따라 공급사슬 조정(coordination)이 이루어지는 각 조정 계약의 모수를 설정하였다. 이들 모수의 조합에 대해 @RISK를 활용하여 시뮬레이션을 수행하고 공급사슬 조정을 이루는 상태 하에서 계약의 성사율과 각 계약에 유리한 참여자를 평가한다. 결과적으로 수량 유연 계약은 소매자 쪽에 가장 유리하고 판매환급 계약은 공급자 쪽에 가장 유리하다. 수익공유 계약은 공급자와 소매자의 이익 재배분에 가장 넓은 범위에서 선택할 수 있어 더 유연하게 사용할 수 있음을 밝혔다.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.21-47
• /
• 2021

Purpose - Offshoring has emerged as one of the major trends in international trade and has become one of the strategies for achieving competitiveness in the global market. In spite of this, the expected gains of offshoring can be offset by hidden costs and risks, such as those associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the trade war between the USA and China, and the ongoing trade dispute between Korea and Japan. To obviate such business failure and prevent critical business blunders, offshoring strategies that efficiently consider both risk elements and potential wealth creation are urgently need. The first purpose of this study is to contribute to the development of more advanced offshoring strategies to help host countries select the best locations to manage supply chain risks and create unique value. The second purpose is to specifically analyze the current status of Korea and provide Korean companies with implications to be considered when deciding whether to offshore or re-shore. Design/methodology - A Network DEA model was applied to measure the comparative location efficiency of national competencies for offshoring strategy from perspectives of wealth creation opportunities (profitability and marketability) and supply chain risk management. The location efficiencies are compared among a total 70 countries selected from the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) and globally attractive locations outlined by Kearney (2017). For the secondary analysis of efficiency, a t-test examining the nature of competitive advantage and the level of sophistication in production processes was implemented in three divisions. We then analyzed differences in offshoring performance in terms of the identified national traits. Moreover, Tobit regression analysis is conducted to investigate the correlation between value-added business activities and each divisional efficiency, seeking to determine how each degree of value-added business activity influences the increase in offshoring productivity. Findings - Regarding overall location efficiency for offshoring performance, only the USA and Italy were identified as being efficient as host countries for offshoring, under circumstances of advanced development, such as productivity and risk management. Korea ranks 13th among 70 countries. The determinants of national competitiveness depend on national traits (the nature of competitive advantage and business sophistication). Countries with labor/resource advantages and labor-intensive industries are more competitive in terms of marketability than others. In contrast, countries with strong technology-intensive industries benefit offshoring companies, particularly in the technology sector, with the added advantage of supply chain risk management. As the perception of a value chain is broader in a country, it can achieve both production sophistication and competitive advantages such as marketability and SCRM. Originality/value - Existing studies focus on offshoring effectiveness from a company perspective. This paper contributes to comparing country efficiency in producing core competencies related to an offshoring strategy and also segments countries into three performance-based considerations associated with the global offshoring market. It also details Korea's position as an offshoring location according to national efficiency and competency.

• Ocean Systems Engineering
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.137-150
• /
• 2014

In the marine industry although there has been significant growth towards safety, security and risk assessments or risk-based strategies such as marine insurance and regulations to avoid the risks of damage to properties and the environment or the prospect of premature death caused by accidents etc, the moves toward managing the risks which are linked directly to the business functions and decision making processes have been very slow. Furthermore in the marine industry most perceptions, methodologies and frameworks of dealing with hazards, risks, safety and security issues are for their assessment rather than their management. This trend reveals the fact that in different marine industry sectors such as logistics and shipping there is a lack of coherent risk management framework or methodology from which to understand the risk-based decisions especially for the purpose of design, construction, operation, management and even decommissioning of the marine related applications. On the other hand risk management is not yet viewed holistically in the marine industry in order to, for example, assign a right person, i.e. risk manager, who can act as a coordinator and advisor with responsibilities that are only specific to risk management. As a result this paper, by examining the present physical borders and risk-based activities in the marine industry, aims to propose an appropriate risk management methodology in addition to the emergent role of risk managers which will enable the industry users initially to become familiar with the concept of risk management at its holistic level. In the later stages this eventually can lead to development of risk management capabilities at an exclusive level and its integration into the marine industry functions in future.

• 자원환경지질
• /
• 제56권2호
• /
• pp.155-166
• /
• 2023

COVID-19를 겪으면서 광물자원의 공급망 관리 중요성이 극대화되었다. 특히 수요 및 공급 관리가 어려운 광물자원은 우리나라가 적극적으로 추진하고 있는 소재부품산업의 원료확보 차원에서 공급망 관리가 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 광종별로 글로벌 공급위험과 공급위험 발생시 국내 경제적 영향의 유·무형 요인을 정량화하고 위험상태 행렬(criticality matrix-criticality level)을 이용하는 핵심광물을 선정하는 체계를 수립하고 평가를 수행하였다. 독과점성, 생산국가 불안정성, 사회환경정책 규제성, 수입 불안정성, 리스크 대응력, 시장규모, 시장 확장성, 경제적 중요성 등을 평가항목으로 하였다. 국내 신성장 사업에 활용되는 40여종의 광물을 평가하여 15종(Li, Pt, Co, V, REE, Mg, Mo, Cr, Ti, W, C, Ni, Al, Mn, Si)을 핵심광물로 선정하였다. 해당 결과는 자원안보 강화를 위한 정책 수립과 기업의 원료 포트폴리오 구성을 위한 의사결정 등에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.112-119
• /
• 2017

Selecting suppliers in the global supply chain is the very difficult and complicated decision making problem particularly due to the various types of supply risk in addition to the uncertain performance of the potential suppliers. This paper proposes a multi-phase decision making model for supplier selection under supply risks in global supply chains. In the first phase, the model suggests supplier selection solutions suitable to a given condition of decision making using a rule-based expert system. The expert system consists of a knowledge base of supplier selection solutions and an "if-then" rule-based inference engine. The knowledge base contains information about options and their consistency for seven characteristics of 20 supplier selection solutions chosen from articles published in SCIE journals since 2010. In the second phase, the model computes the potential suppliers' general performance indices using a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) based on their scores obtained by applying the suggested solutions. In the third phase, the model computes their risk indices using a TOPSIS based on their historical and predicted scores obtained by applying a risk evaluation algorithm. The evaluation algorithm deals with seven types of supply risk that significantly affect supplier's performance and eventually influence buyer's production plan. In the fourth phase, the model selects Pareto optimal suppliers based on their general performance and risk indices. An example demonstrates the implementation of the proposed model. The proposed model provides supply chain managers with a practical tool to effectively select best suppliers while considering supply risks as well as the general performance.