• 대기
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2013

2001년 4월 제주 고산기후관측소에서 AERONET sun/sky radiometer와 MPL을 통해 관측된 에어로졸 광학적 두께, 단산란 알베도, 비대칭 변수, 에어로졸 소산계수 프로파일 등을 대기복사모델의 입력 자료로 이용하여 대기가열효과를 산정하고, 이들 광학변수가 대기복사가열률에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 NCAR Climate Community Model (CCM-3.6)에 포함되어 있는 복사 모듈인 Column Radiation Model (CRM-2.1.2)을 연직 54층으로, AERONET sun/sky radiometer로부터 관측된 4 파장 (440, 670, 870, 그리고 1020 nm)에서의 관측 자료를 19개의 파장에서 계산 가능하도록 수정하였다. 에어로졸층이 존재하지 않은 맑은 날 (4월 14일과 16일)은 지표면과 대기상단에서의 에어로졸 직접복사강제력이 각각 $-20{\sim}-25\;W\;m^{-2}$와 $-10{\sim}-15\;W\;m^{-2}$로, 대기 중 흡수는 $+10{\sim}+15\;W\;m^{-2}$였다. 에어로졸층이 관측된 4월 15일과 4월 17~18일의 경우 지표면, 대기, 대기상단의 에어로졸 복사강제력이 맑은 날에 비해 3~4배 정도 크게 나타났다. 4월 14일과 16일에의 대기복사가열률 (${\Delta}H$)는 $1{\sim}2\;K\;day^{-1}$ 범위에서 산출되었으며, 4월 15일과 4월 17~18일에는 MPL 관측에서 보여지는 에어로졸층에서의 ${\Delta}H$와 ${\Delta}H_{aerosol}$가 각각 $3\;K\;day^{-1}$ 이상과 $1{\sim}3\;K\;day^{-1}$ 범위에서 산정되었다. 에어로졸 광학적 두께와 비대칭 변수의 변화에 따른 에어로졸층의 ${\Delta}H$ 변화는 미미하였으나, 단산란 알베도의 10% 변화는 지표면과 대기상단에서의 에어로졸 직접복사강제력의 30%, 대기복사강제력의 약 60%, 그리고 에어로졸층 ${\Delta}H$의 약 35% 변화를 유발하였다. 이는 에어로졸 광학적 두께 10% 변화와 비교하여 대기흡수 또는 에어로졸층의 가열 및 냉각 효과가 6배 가량 큰 결과로, 태양복사를 효과적으로 잘 흡수하는 에어로졸의 양에 의해 대기 가열 또는 ${\Delta}H$가 크게 좌우됨을 의미한다. 2001년 4월부터 2008년 3월까지 제주 고산기후관측소에서의 AERONET sun/sky radiometer 관측 자료를 이용하여 계산한 ${\Delta}H$와 ${\Delta}H_{aerosol}$의 월변화를 보면, ${\Delta}H$는 4~8월 사이에 대류권 하부에서 약 $1.0\;K\;day^{-1}$ 이상으로 뚜렷하게 나타났으나, ${\Delta}H_{aerosol}$의 경우 2월부터 6월까지 고도 2 km 이하에서 약 $0.8\;K\;day^{-1}$ 이하의 범위에서 나타나는데, 이는 대부분의 에어로졸이 지표면 부근의 대기경계층에 존재하며, 봄철 황사와 오염 에어로졸의 증가에 의한 영향으로 판단된다.

• 대한원격탐사학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.305-313
• /
• 2000

A vicarious calibration method was developed for the OSMI sensor calibration. Employing measured aerosol optical thickness by a sunphotometer and a sky radiometer and water leaving radiance by ship measurements as inputs, TOA (top of the atmosphere) radiance at each OSMI band was simulated in conjunction with a radiative transfer model (Rstar5b) by Nakajima and Tanaka (1988). As a case of examining the accuracy of this method, we simulated TOA radiance based on water leaving radiance measured at NASA/MOBY site and aerosol optical thickness estimated nearby at Lanai, and compared simulated results with SeaWiFS-estimated TOA radiances. The difference falls within about $\pm$5%, suggesting that OMSI sensor can be calibrated with the suggested accuracy. In order to apply this method for the OSMI sensor calibration, ground-based sun photometry and ship measurements were carried out off the east coast of Korean peninsula on May 31, 2000. Simulations of TOA radiance by using these measured data as input to the radiative transfer model show that there are substantial differences between simulated and OSMI-estimated radiances. Such a discrepancy appears to be mainly due to the cloud contamination because satellite image indicates optically thin clouds over the experimental area. Nevertheless results suggest that sensor calibration can be achieved within 5% uncertainty range if there are ground-based measurements of aerosol optical thickness, and water leaving radiances under clear-sky and optically thin atmospheric conditions.

• Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.193-203
• /
• 2018

The operational aerosol retrieval algorithm for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) measurements was recently updated and named collection 6 (C6). The C6 MODIS aerosol algorithm, a substantially improved version of the collection 5 (C5) algorithm, uses an enhanced aerosol optical thickness(AOT) retrieval process consisting of new surface reflection and aerosol models. This study reports on the estimation and validation of the two latest versions, the C5 and C6 MODIS aerosol products over the East Asian region covering $20^{\circ}N$ to $56^{\circ}N$ and $80^{\circ}E$ to $150^{\circ}E$. This study also presents a comparative validation of the two versions(C5 and C6) of algorithms with different methods(Dark Target(DT) and Deep Blue (DB) retrieval methods) from the Terra and Aqua platforms to make use of the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sites for the years 2000-2016. Over the study region, the spatially averaged annual mean AOT retrieved from C6 AOT is about 0.035 (5%) less than the C5 counterparts. The linear correlations between MODIS and AERONET AOT are R = 0.89 (slope = 0.86) for C5 and R = 0.95 (slope = 1.00) for C6. Moreover, the magnitude of the mean error in C6 AOT-the difference between MODIS AOT and AERONET AOT-is 40% less than that in C5 AOT.

• 한국대기환경학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2007

Vertical distribution and optical properties of atmospheric aerosols above the Korean peninsula are quite important to estimate effects of aerosol on atmospheric environment and regional radiative forcing. For the first time in Korea, vertical microphysical properties of atmospheric aerosol obtained by inversion algorithm were analyzed based on optical data of multi-wavelength Raman lidar system developed by the Advanced Environmental Monitoring Research Center (ADEMRC), Gwangju Institute Science and Technology (GIST). Data collected on 14 June 2004 at Gwangju ($35.10^{\circ}N,\;126.53^{\circ}E$) and 27 May 2005 at Anmyeon island ($36.32^{\circ}N,\;126.19^{\circ}E$) were used as raw optical data for inversion algorithm. Siberian forest fire smoke and local originated haze were observed above and within the height of PBL, respectively on 14 June 2004 according to NOAA/Hysplit backstrajectory analysis. The inversion of lidar optical data resulted in particle effective radii around $0.31{\sim}0.33{\mu}m$, single scattering albedo between $0.964{\sim}0.977$ at 532 nm in PBL and effective radii of $0.27{\mu}m$ and single scattering albedo between $0.923{\sim}0.924$ above PBL. In the case on 27 May 2005, biomass burning from east China was a main source of aerosol plume. The inversion results of the data on 27 May 2005 were found to be particle effective radii between $0.23{\sim}0.24{\mu}m$, single scattering albedo around $0.924{\sim}0.929$ at 532 nm. Additionally, the inversion values were well matched with those of Sun/sky radiometer in measurement period.

• 대한원격탐사학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.243-251
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 인공위성과 지상 원격탐사 자료를 이용하여 동북아 지역에서 발생하는 황사현상의 중장거리 이동에 따른 광학적 특성 변화를 분석하였다. 동북아시아 지역의 Aerosol Robotic Network(AERONET)의 선포토미터 관측 지점 중에 황사의 발원지로 Dunhuang과 Inner-Mongolia, 발원지에 근접한 풍하측 지점으로 Yulin과 Beijing, 그리고 장거리 이동 지점으로 한국의 Anmyon과 Gosan, 일본의 Noto, 이렇게 7곳을 선정하여 자료를 분석하였다. 황사의 발생 및 이동 경로를 파악하기 위하여 자외선 원격탐사 기법을 사용하는 인공위성인 Ozone Monitoring Instrument(OMI) 관측자료를 활용하였다. 발원지에서의 단산란알베도는 440 nm에서 0.90에서 0.96 사이의 값으로 높았으나 풍하측이나 장거리 이동 지역에서는 그 값이 감소하였다. 또한, 파장에 따른 단산란알베도 값의 차이는 발원지에서는 높게 나타났으나 이동된 지역에서는 그 차이가 감소하였다. 이러한 장거리 이동에 따른 황사의 광흡수 특성의 변화는 이동 중 탄소입자와 같은 대기 오염물질과의 혼합으로부터 기인하는 것으로 판단된다.

• 대한원격탐사학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한원격탐사학회 2007년도 Proceedings of ISRS 2007
• /
• pp.298-301
• /
• 2007

Vertical distribution and optical properties of atmospheric aerosols above the Korean peninsula are quite important to estimate effects of aerosol on atmospheric environment and regional radiative forcing. For the first time in Korea, vertical microphysical properties of atmospheric aerosol obtained by inversion algorithm were analyzed based on optical data of multi-wavelength Raman lidar system developed by the Advanced Environmental Monitoring Research Center (ADEMRC), Gwangju Institute Science and Technology (GIST). Data collected on 14 June 2004 at Gwangju ($35.10^{\circ}N$, $126.53^{\circ}E$) and 27 May 2005 at Anmyeon island ($36.32^{\circ}N$, $126.19^{\circ}E$) were used as raw optical data for inversion algorithm. Siberian forest fire smoke and local originated haze were observed above and within the height of PBL, respectively on 14 June 2004 according to NOAA/Hysplit backstrajectory analysis. The inversion of lidar optical data resulted in particle effective radii around 0.32 ${\mu}m$, single scattering albedo between 0.97 at 532 nm in PBL and effective radii of 0.27 ${\mu}m$ and single scattering albedo of 0.92 above PBL. In the case on 27 May 2005, biomass burning from east China was a main source of aerosol plume. The inversion results of the data on 27 May 2005 were found to be particle effective radii between 0.24 ${\mu}m$, single scattering albedo around 0.91 at 532 nm. Additionally, the inversion values were well matched with those of Sun/sky radiometer in measurement period.

• Journal of the Optical Society of Korea
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.215-220
• /
• 2010

Aerosol observation with Raman LIDAR in NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan) LIDAR network was conducted from 17 April to 12 June 2008 over Beijing, China. The aerosol optical properties derived from Raman LIDAR were compared with the retrieved data from sun photometer and sky radiometer observations in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The comparison provided the complete knowledge of aerosol optical and physical properties in Beijing, especially in pollution and Asian dust events. The averaged aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 675 nm was 0.81 and the Angstrom exponent between 440 nm and 675 nm was 0.99 during experiment. The LIDAR derived AOD at 532 nm in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) was 0.48, which implied that half of the total AOD was contributed by the aerosol in PBL. The corresponding averaged LIDAR ratio and total depolarization ratio (TDR) were 48.5sr and 8.1%. The negative correlation between LIDAR ratio and TDR indicated the LIDAR ratio decreased with aerosol size because of the high TDR associated with nonspherical and large aerosols. The typical volume size distribution of the aerosol clearly demonstrated that the coarse mode radius located near 3 ${\mu}m$ in dust case, a bi-mode with fine particle centered at 0.2 ${\mu}m$ and coarse particle at 2 ${\mu}m$ was the characteristic size distribution in the pollution and clean cases. The different size distributions of aerosol resulted in its different optical properties. The retrieved LIDAR ratio and TDR were 41.1sr and 19.5% for a dust event, 53.8sr and 6.6% for a pollution event as well as 57.3sr and 7.2% for a clean event. In conjunction with the observed surface wind field near the LIDAR site, most of the pollution aerosols were produced locally or transported from the southeast of Beijing, whereas the dust aerosols associated with the clean air mass were transported by the northwesterly or southwesterly winds.