• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 1996

This study aims at finding a new home economics education which will include male and female students as its teaching objects, and then providing home economics teachers with useful materials. For this purpose I examined analized male and female the upper secondary school students’and parents’recognition and demand to the home economics education The conclusion of this study is summarized as follows： 1. There was significant difference between male students(73.7％) and female students(89.8％) in the necessity for studying Home Economics(P＜.001). In the necessity of Home Economics education, male students emphasized the spiritual part but female students emphasized the functional part. In part of parents, there was no significant difference between fathers(95.5％) and mothers(96.4％). 2. The necessity of each part in the contents of Home Economics 1) In the part of family, there was significant difference between male and female students in the true nature of family, the role and responsibility of family, and the laws relating to family(P＜.001). There was significant difference between mothers and fathers in the true nature of family and the role and responsibility of family. Fathers and male students emphasized the true nature of family and the role and responsibility of family more than mothers and female students did. 2) In the Home management and economy parts, there was significant difference between male and female students in the significance of home management(P＜.001), the relation of family to society(P＜.001), and fluctuating measures for home economy. There was significant difference between fathers and mothers in the relation of family to society(P＜.05). Fathers and male students emphasized the relation of family to society more than mothers and female students did. Mothers, male and female students emphasized the importance of the protection of consumers. 3) In the clothes part, male students emphasized the role of clothes, the disign and making of clothes(P＜.001), the present situation of the resources of clothing and the distribution of clothes (P＜.05) more than female students did. 4) In the part of food, there was significant difference between male and female students in the kinds and function of nutritive elements(P＜.05). Parents and students emphasized the importance of selecting good food. 5) In the part of housing, male students emphasized home planning, and arrangements and facilities of house more than female students did. Female students emphasized the interior of the house(P＜.05). Fathers emphasized the planning of a residential space and arrangements and facilities of a house(P＜.05) more than mothers did. 6) In the parts of human development and upbringing, and upbringing, male students emphasized the significance of being parents, family planning and the population problem(P＜.001), pregnancy and delivery(P＜.01), and the chracteristic of juvenile development(P＜.05) more than female students did. Parents and students emphasized the importance of prevention and countermeasures for diseases and the significance of being parents.

• 한국안광학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.445-455
• /
• 2014

목적: 학점은행제 학사학위과정 안경광학전공 학습자를 대상으로 학습자 특성을 조사하여 안경사 계속교육으로서의 학점은행제 운영과 개선의 기초자료로 활용하고자 하였다. 방법: 학점은행제에 학습자로 등록한 전문학사 98명을 대상으로 학습자 특성에 관한 설문조사를 하고 통계분석을 실시하였다. 결과: 학점은행제 선택 목적은 학사취득(51.0%)이 많았고, 정보경로는 학교 또는 직장선배(33.7%), 학점은행제 교육기관은 모교(31.6%)가 가장 많았다. 학점은행제 학습자에 대한 가족협조(72.4%)가 직장협조(46.9%)나 사회적 협조(39.8%)보다 높았다. 학점은행제 학사학위과정에 소요된 기간은 2학기(55.6%)가 가장 많았고 대학원 진학은 38.9%, 4년제 대학편입은 5.6%이다. 연령에 따라 학점은행제 정보경로(p<.05)와 교육기관 선택기준(p<.05), 직장협조(p<.01)에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 현재 근무처에 따라 학점은행제 선택 목적(p<.01)과 평균 등교일수(p<.05), 직장협조(p<.01), 어려운 점(p<.01)에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 출신 전문대학 학제에 따라 교육기관 선택기준(p<.01)과 가족협조(p<.05)에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 전문대학 졸업 후 학점은행제를 시작한 시기에 따라 정보경로(p<.05)와 교육기관 선택기준(p<.01), 직장협조(p<.05)에 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 결론: 안경사들의 계속교육에 관한 관심과 연구가 필요하며 학습자의 특성을 고려한 학점은행제의 운영과 지원이 필요하다.