• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.479-498
• /
• 2013

교육격차를 완화하여 국가 경쟁력을 높이고 평생학습 사회에서 개인의 장래 성장과 발전의 기틀을 마련하기 위하여 모든 학생들의 기초학력을 보장하려는 움직임이 다양하게 전개되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 학생들의 기초학력을 결정짓는 성취수준 설정의 의미와 방법을 알아보고, 2013년 초등학교 3학년을 대상으로 실시되는 기초학력 진단평가의 '기초수학' 과목에 대한 성취수준과 분할점수 설정 방법을 살펴보고자 한다. 학교현장에서 활용할 수 있는 성취수준 설정 방법과 적용 사례의 제시는 준거참조평가에서 성취수준 설정 시 고려해야 하는 것에 대한 시사점을 제공할 수 있으리라 기대된다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.152-155
• /
• 2007

The object of this research is to evaluate the priority of R&B project alternatives which were already screened by both feasibility and suitability of technological performance. This research is a selection model for R&D project alternatives after setting phase. And it is designed by CHP model which include individual and mutual weights. This model have 5 steps. (1) Setting Technology-Modules derived on the setting phase (2) Presenting the evaluation standards divided with 'M-Field' and 'T-Field' (3) Assessing the evaluation standard and technology modules (4) Obtaining and integrating the individually and mutually effective weights (5) Selecting the technology modules based on the priority of order by CHP. Through these steps, this model can suggest the evaluation way from specific technology levels to project level. And it can be guaranteed to perform the selected module set.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.139-151
• /
• 2008

Objectives: Since 2000 interests in Healthy City Project has been growing fast in Korea. Amid this atmosphere, the need for establishing priorities when planning Healthy City Project and carrying forward the plan has arisen. Therefore, this study tries to conduct practical research on the manner of setting priorities of business valuation standard about Healthy City Project. Methods: The research was carried out with Healthy City experts and government official. And in this research the responses of 28 participants among 37 have been taken into consideration due to their consistent responses. Results: The results of Level 1 showed that the "social & environmental approach" accounted for more than the "individual approach". In the case of Level 2, fields resulted in order of "environment", "infrastructure", "behavior", "evaluation and reflection", "disease prevention and rehabilitation", and "setting approach". Conclusions: The findings derived from this study are first, it is feasible to suggest the ways of establishing priorities as to the evaluation standards for the Healthy City Project and second, the results present the ways to proceed in terms of what tasks should be done for the healthy City Project development.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.29-41
• /
• 2014

The Korean government has purchased land properties alongside any significant water bodies before setting up the buffers to secure water qualities. Since the annual budgets are limited, however, there has always been the issue of which land parcels ought to be given the priority. Therefore, this study aims to develop efficient mechanism for land acquisition priorities in stream corridors that would ultimately be vegetated for riparian buffer zones. The criteria of land acquisition priority were driven through literary review along with experts' advice. The relative weights of their value and priorities for each criterion were computed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) method. Major findings of the study are as follows: 1. The decision-making structural model for land acquisition priority focuses mainly on the reduction of non-point source pollutants(NSPs). This fact is highly associated with natural and physical conditions and land use types of surrounding areas. The criteria were classified into two categories-NSPs runoff areas and potential NSPs runoff areas. 2. Land acquisition priority weights derived for NSPs runoff areas and potential NSPs runoff areas were 0.862 and 0.138, respectively. This implicates that much higher priority should be given to the land parcels with NSPs runoff areas. 3. Weights and priorities of sub-criteria suggested from this study include: proximity to the streams(0.460), land cover(0.189), soil permeability(0.117), topographical slope(0.096), proximity to the roads(0.058), land-use types(0.036), visibility to the streams(0.032), and the land price(0.012). This order of importance suggests, as one can expect, that it is better to purchase land parcels that are adjacent to the streams. 4. A standard scoring system including the criteria and weights for land acquisition priority was developed which would likely to allow expedited decision making and easy quantification for priority evaluation due to the utilization of measurable spatial data. Further studies focusing on both point and non-point pollutants and GIS-based spatial analysis and mapping of land acquisition priority are needed.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2016

As one of recent issues in the information and communication industry, internet of things has attracted attention to provide intelligent infrastructure services which connect and share data and information between real and virtual world. According to the development of these internet of things technologies, types of machines, telecommunication devices, and terminals are increasing tremendously. In this situation, connectivity and interoperability between internet of things components are important issues to build a hyper connected society. To visualize this society, it is important to set up and develop information and communication technology (ICT) standards among stakeholders. However, under limited budget and human resources, it is essential to rank standardization work items for setting standards with respect to efficiency. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for setting standardization strategies within group decision making. As a multi-criteria group decision making tool, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted and applied to determine the priorities of setting work items. The proposed method first defines decision making problem with objective, criteria, and alternatives which produces a hierarchy consisting of upper and lower criteria. Then, pairwise comparisons of academy and public sector experts are performed with respect to their relative meaning and importance. Individual surveys of expert groups are collected and summarized to determine relative criteria importance measures. Furthermore, to deliver reliable importance criteria measures, differences between academy and public sector expert groups are compared and tested using Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The results are illustrated for useful guidelines to practical group decision making in standardization strategy establishments.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.264-275
• /
• 2015

지역보건의료사업의 효과성과 효율성을 개선하기 위해 지역사회 요구에 기반한 우선순위과제가 선정되어 추진되고 있으나, 선정방법의 체계적인 사용이 이루어지지 못하고 있다. 본 연구는 우선순위선정 방법의 개선방안을 제시하고자 수행되었다. 81개의 지역보건의료계획에서 사용된 우선순위선정에 대해 방법 및 기준의 빈도를 파악하고, 각 방법이 제시한 내용을 바탕으로 실제 사용의 적절성을 분석하였다. 우선순위선정을 위한 분석대상으로 건강문제가 아닌 사업 자체를 하고 있는 경우가 많았다. 가장 많이 사용된 우선순위선정 방법은 Basic priority rating 이었으며 다음은 우선순위화 매트릭스이었다. 우선순위기준 중 문제의 크기를 보면, 만성질환에서는 유병률, 건강행위에서는 주로 건강문제를 가진 사람의 비율이 지표로 사용되고 있었다. 문제의 크기를 비롯하여 심각성, 중재 효과 등의 우선순위선정 기준이 객관적 자료 없이 평가되고 있었으며, 점수화기준도 명확하지 않았다. 우선순위선정의 분석대상을 건강문제로 한정하고, 건강문제 영역별로 점수화 기준을 제시해 줄 필요가 있다.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2011년도 정기총회 및 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.343-352
• /
• 2011

철도설계의 최적화에는 절대성의 위치정보 기반위에 현지 지형에 조화 일치되는 시설물의 형태 및 규격 설정, 정확한 공사 수량 산출, 적정용지 확보 등이 핵심 사항이며, 이를 충족하기 위하여는 명확하고 고도화된 측량기준과 기술제공이 우선되어야 한다. 본 연구에서는 현 철도설계 사례에서의 측량기준 및 기술제공 현황을 분석 연구하여 이를 토대로 시대가 요구하는 고도화, 디지털화, 표준화 그리고 논리성과 적법성이 체계적으로 정리된 설계측량의 기준, 절차, 방법 확립과 그 실용화 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제32권6호
• /
• pp.46-53
• /
• 2017

The risk is expressed as consequence of damage multiplied by likelihood of failure. The installation of a protective system reduces the risk by reducing the likelihood of failure at the facility. Also, the protective system has different effects on the likelihood of failure according to the proof test cycle. However, when assessing risks in the Off-site Risk Assessment (ORA) system, the variation in risk was not reflected according to the proof test cycle of protective system. This study was conducted to examine the need for proof test and the importance of cycle setting by applying periodic proof test of the protective system to ORA. The results showed that the likelihood of failure and the risk increased with longer proof test cycle. The risk of a two-yearly proof test was eight times greater than that of a three-month cycle. From the results, the protective system needs periodic proof test. Untested protective system for a long term cannot be reliable because it is more likely to be failed state when it is called upon to operate. In order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, it is effective to differently set the proof test cycle according to the priority. This study suggested a more systematic and accurate risk analysis standard than ORA. This standard is expected to enable an acceptable level of risk management by systematically setting the priority and proof test cycle of the protective system. It is also expected to contribute to securing the safety of chemical facilities and at the same time, will lead to the development of the ORA system.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.51-63
• /
• 1996

This study is about the problems found in the process of the current governments planning rural settlement area development. As a measure to solve them, It proposed the analysis method of village characteristic in terms of standard score and tried to use this method as a basic material in planning more effective rural settlement area development. On the basis of the above analysis, which is an objective basic material to solve the problems revealed in the process of the bottom-up development planning by the residents' demands, It shows the following conclusion about what method should be applied to each part according to a village's characteristics and its development level. 1. Accessibility can be a basic material for setting the local area, analyzing its settlement system, and them such development facilities as village-linking roads, rural road, or various kinds of bridges and determining the investment priority. 2. With the index of the industrial basis, we can see what village has plenty of social, economical resources including advanced industrial facilities and looking into the advance level of the industrial basis, we can get some information about determining the local area development direction such as estashing the plan to build a farm product gathering center, a collective work place, storage facilities, and special housing development. 3. Since the issue about living environment is raising it's head, compared to weakened agricultural competitive power, with the analysis of this living environment, we can get an objective basic material for solving problems caused by the local egoism and the effective investment strategy of the limited resources. Therefore, It is necessary that we should abstain from expert-centered planning and formal public opinion-collecting and on the basis of this analytic result, we should plan development. We need to continue our research about index selecting and differentiation, weight etc. and using these analysis methods, we should make up a systematic development plan by analyzing village characteristics and setting the development direction.

• 한국환경농학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.351-373
• /
• 1995

The objective of this paper is to present relevant information and data from domestic and foreign references and to propose legal standards on pesticide residues in order to mitigate the pesticide contamination in the water environment. Among 200 pesticide ingredients in use in Korea, items necessary for standard setting were selected and theoretical residue limits were computed. The results are summarized as follows. In advanced countries, drinking water standards are established on the basis of health index ADI and water intake, whereas standards for surface water are established temporarily on the basis of different parameters, inconsistent with different countries. Pesticide residue limits applicable in Korea were proposed for 24 pesticides in drinking water(health basis) and for 25 pesticides in surface water(ecotoxicological basis), as selected by risk priority. It was recommended to accumulate scientific data by persistent research efforts in order to maintain the justification of the pesticide residue limits in water and relevant research topics to be undertaken in future were proposed.