• 제목/요약/키워드: Stable disease (SD)

검색결과 35건 처리시간 0.031초

Haematologic Parameters in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Capecitabine Combination Therapy

  • Inanc, Mevlude;Duran, Ayse Ocak;Karaca, Halit;Berk, Veli;Bozkurt, Oktay;Ozaslan, Ersin;Ozkan, Metin
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.253-256
    • /
    • 2014
  • Background: The standard treatment in the metastatic colorectal cancer consists of 5-FU based infusional regimens. However, with oral fluoropyrimidines, equal tumor responses may be obtained. Capecitabine causes macrocytosis of the cells by inhibition of DNA synthesis. In this context, a relationship was found between mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and response to therapy in breast cancer patients treated with Capecitabine, but whether this relationship also pertains in colorectal cancer has not been established. Materials and Methods: A total of 102 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with a oxaliplatin (XELOX)${\pm}$Bevacizumab combination were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were randomized into three groups. Hematological parameters (MCV, MPV, PCT, PLT, NLR) were recorded retrospectively, before treatment and after 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Results: After three cycles of therapy, 20 (19.6%) patients had progressive disease (PD), 41 (40.1%) had stable disease (SD), and 41 (40.1%) demonstrated a partial response (PR). In 62 (60.7%) treatment was with capesitabin plus XELOX therapy, and in 40 (39.2%) it was XELOX-Bevacizumab combination therapy. There was no difference among three groups before the treatment in terms of MCV, MPV, PCT, PLT, and NLR. MCV showed significant increase in chemotherapy response groups (PR and SD). In addition, a significant decrease was observed for platelet count in chemotherapy response groups. While NLR decrease was seen in only a PR group, PCT decrease was observed in all three groups. PCT and PLT values were higher in patients receiving Bevacizumab. Conclusions: PLT, PCT, MPV, and NLR values were decreased due to Capecitabine-based chemotherapy, however MCV was increased. PCT and PLT values were higher in patients who received Bevacizumab than those who did not. MCV, PLT, and NLR can be considered as important factors in predicting response to colorectal carcinoma treatment.

Manual Contouring Based Volumetric Evaluation for Colorectal Cancer with Liver Limited Metastases: A Comparison with RECIST

  • Fang, W.J.;Lam, K.O.;Ng, S.C.Y.;Choi, C.W.;Kwong, D.L.W.;Zheng, S.S.;Lee, V.H.F.
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제14권7호
    • /
    • pp.4151-4155
    • /
    • 2013
  • Background: To compare response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) and volumetric evaluation (VE) for colorectal cancer with liver-limited metastasis. Patients and Methods: VE of liver metastases was performed by manual contouring before and after chemotherapy on 45 pairs of computed tomography (CT) images in 36 patients who suffered from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with liver metastasis only. Cohen kappa was used to compare the agreement between VE and RECIST. Pearson correlation was performed for their comparison after cubic root transformation of the aggregate tumor volumes. Logistic regression was done to identify clinical and radiographic factors to account for the difference which may be predictive in overall response (OR). Results: There were 16 partial response (PR), 23 stable disease (SD) and 6 progressive disease (PD) cases with VE, and 14 PR, 23 SD and 8 PD with RECIST. VE demonstrated good agreement with RECIST (${\chi}$=0.779). Discordant objective responses were noted in 6 pairs of comparisons (13.3%). Pearson correlation also showed excellent correlation between VE and RECIST ($r^2$=0.966, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that VE was in slightly better agreement with RECIST for enlarging lesions than for shrinking lesions ($r^2$=0.935 and $r^2$=0.780 respectively). No factor was found predictive of the difference in OR between VE and RECIST. Conclusions: VE exhibited good agreement with RECIST. It might be more useful than RECIST in evaluation shrinking lesions in cases of numerous and conglomerate liver metastases.

Radioactive Seed Implantation and Lobaplatin Chemotherapy Are Safe and Effective in Treating Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer

  • Li, Jia-Rui;Sun, Yu;Liu, Lin
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제16권9호
    • /
    • pp.4003-4006
    • /
    • 2015
  • Objecive: To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of CT-guided $^{125}iodine$ (125I) seed implantation combined with percutaneous intra-tumor injection of chemotherapy emulsion of lobaplatin and lipiodol in treating patients with advanced lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients with advanced lung cancer and treated with spiral CT-guided $^{125}I$ seed implantation combined with percutaneous intra-tumor injection of chemotherapy emulsion of lobaplatin and lipiodol were recruited. Results: Of the 36 patients, there were 40 nidi in total. The contrast-enhanced CT evaluation was conducted 60 d after treatment. Response evaluation suggested that 4 patients achieved complete remission (CR), 24 partial remission (PR), 4 stable disease (SD) and 4 progression disease (PD), with a total response rate of 77.8% (28/36). Conclusions: CT-guided $^{125}I$ seed implantation combined with percutaneous intra-tumor injection of chemotherapy emulsion of lobaplatin and lipiodol are safe and effective in treating patients with advanced lung cancer.

Safety and Management of Toxicity Related to Aflibercept in Combination with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan in Malaysian Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

  • Yusof, Mastura Md;Abdullah, Nik MA;Sharial, MSN Mohd;Zaatar, Adel
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제17권3호
    • /
    • pp.973-978
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Between October 2012 and February 2015, 25 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (mean age, $57.0{\pm}12.1years$) were granted access to aflibercept via the Aflibercept Named Patient Program at four centers. Materials and Methods: Here we reported the initial experience of aflibercept / FOLFIRI in combination. We evaluated treatment-related adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The majority of the patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 1-2), with diarrhea (52%), mucositis (52%), and nausea/vomiting (20%) being largely observed. Neutropenia (16%) and febrile neutropenia (8%) were common grade 3-4 hematological events. Aflibercept-related toxicity was managed as per practice guidelines. No grade 5 event was reported. Median PFS was 6.12 months (95% CI, 4.80-7.20) and OS was 12 months (95% CI, 9.80-14.18). The partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) rates were 25% (95% CI: 23.4-27.0), 37.5% (95% CI: 31.6-43.3), and 37.5% (95% CI: 22.5-52.5), respectively. Conclusions: Aflibercept/FOLFIRI can be administered safely in a second line setting to Malaysian patients with mCRC, as the AEs experienced were generally reversible and manageable. The safety and efficacy outcomes were consistent with those observed in Western populations.

비소세포성 폐암환자에서의 Docetaxel과 Cisplatin의 복합요법에 대한 효과 (Effects of the Combination Chemotherapy of Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients)

  • 방은숙;오정미
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제12권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2002
  • Central Cancer Registry of Korean National Cancer Center in 1999 reported that mortality from lung cancer is higher than mortality from stomach cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma in Korean male. Lung cancer is classified into small cell cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and NSCLC patients account for $70\%$ of the whole lung cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel and cisplatin combination in Korean patients with NSCLC. All patients who had received the combination therapy of docetaxel and cisplatin for histologically confirmed NSCLC in Ajou University Hospital between 2000. $2\~2001$. 4 were retrospectively evaluated for the responses and toxicities of that combination therapy. Nineteen patients were treated with docetaxel 75 $mg/m^2$ on Day 1 and cisplatin 25 $mg/m^2$ on Day 1-3 every 4 weeks. The response for combination regimen was evaluated by CT scans after 2 or 3 cycles of treatments. Seventeen patients were evaluated for the responses and the 19 patients far the toxicities. Among the 19 patients (14 men and 5 women), there were one patient $(5.3\%)$ with stage I disease, 4 patients $(21.1\%)$ with stage III disease, and 14 patients $(73.1\%)$ with stage IV disease. Of the 17 patients who were evaluable for response, complete response (CR) was not observed in any patient while partial response (PR) was observed in 5 patients $(29.4\%)$. The overall response rate (CR+PR) was $29.4\%$. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 11 patients $(64.7\%)$ and progressive disease (PD) in 1 patient $(5.9\%)$. The toxicities were graded by NCI (National Cancer Institute) Common Toxicity Criteria for the evaluable 70 cycles. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 53 cycles $(76\%)$. Four patients were hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia. The combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin was effective as NSCLC treatments, however, the regimen must be administered carefully due to its hematological side effects.

  • PDF

소세포폐암에 대한 Etoposide와 Carboplatin 병합요법과 Topotecan 화학요법의 효과 (Clinical Response to Etoposide Plus Carboplatin and Topotecan Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer)

  • 박경화;조계중;주진영;손창영;위정욱;김규식;김유일;임성철;김영철;박경옥
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제54권4호
    • /
    • pp.415-428
    • /
    • 2003
  • 연구배경 : 소세포폐암에 대한 항암화학치료에 etoposide와 cisplatin(EP) 또는 etoposide와 carboplatin(EC)이 가장 흔히 사용되는 병합요법인데, 전반적인 관해율은 75-85%(제한기 65-90%), 완전관해율은 20-30%(제한기 45-75%)로 보고되고 있다. 치료후 재발되는 소세포폐암환자에 대하여 구제(salvage)화학요법제로 topotecan을 사용하였을 때 90일 이내에 재발되는 불응성 재발(refractory relapse, RR)인 경우 관해율이 6.4%인 반면에, 90일 이후에 재발되는 감수성 재발(sensitive relapse, SR)에서는 37.8%의 관해율이 보고되고 있다. 저자는 EC요법과 2차 구제화학요법으로 topotecan요법의 치료효과와 부작용을 조사하여 기존의 성적들과 비교하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 1996년부터 2002년 6월까지 전남대병원 내과에서 소세포 폐암으로 치료를 받았던 환자들 중에서 EC요법과 재발되어 topotecan구제 화학요법을 받은 환자를 대상으로 임상경과를 후향적으로 조사하였다. 일차치료로서 etoposide 100 $mg/m^2$ (day 1-3), carboplatin 300 $mg/m^2$(day 1)을 3주 이상의 간격을 두고 투여하여, 3주기 이상 화학요법을 받은 경우들을 대상으로 하였고, 이차치료로 topotecan을 투여한 경우에는 1.5 $mg/m^2$을 제 1일에서 제 5일까지 3주 간격으로 2주기 이상 받은 환자들을 대상으로 하였다. 치료에 대한 반응의 평가는 완전관해(complete remission, CR), 부분관해(partial remission, PR), 불변(stable disease, SD), 진행(progressive disease, PD)으로 구분하였고 생존기간은 치료시작일로부터 중앙생존기간(median survival time, MST)으로 표기하였다. 결 과 : 총 101예에서 1차 선택 약제로 EC요법 후 관해율은 57.4%(58예)로 CR은 15.8%(16예), PR은 41.6%(42예)이었다. 제한기(69명)에서의 관해율은 69.6%(48예)로 CR은 23.2%(16예), PR은 46.4%(32예)였으며, 확장기(32명)에서의 관해율은 31.3%(10예)로 모두 PR반응을 보였다. 수행 능력(performance status score, PS)과 동통, 호흡곤란, 기침 등 임상 증상의 변화를 평가하였는데 58예(57.4%)에서 전신상태와 증상의 호전을 보였다. 전체 관해군의 관해 유지기간(중앙값)은 10.3개월(5.8개월~57.7개월)이었고 치료에 따른 호중구 감소증(G4)은 24예(23.8%), 혈소판감소증(Grade 4)은 2예(2%)에서 관찰되었다. 1차 화학치료에 불응하여 바로 다른 약제로 바꾸어 치료한 9예와 1차 치료 후 2차구제화학요법을 받지 않았던 71예를 제외한, 21예의 환자들은 EC요법으로 SD이상 반응을 보였으나 재발하여 topotecan을 투여 받은 군이었다. 총 21예 중 관해율은 SR군(8예)의 경우 PR 25%(2예), SD 25%(2예), PD 50%(4예)를 보였고, RR군(13예)에서는 PR 15.4%(2예), SD 15.4%(2예), PD 69.2%(9예)를 나타냈으나 유의한 차이는 아니었다. 생존 기간의 비교에서도 SR군은 MST 8개월로 RR군의 MST 7개월과 비교하여 유의한 차이는 없었다. 치료에 따른 독성으로 호중구감소증(Grade 4)은 6예 (28.3%), 혈소판감소증(Grade 4)은 3예(14.3%)에서 관찰되었다. 결 론 : EC와 topotecan 치료 모두 기존의 보고들과 비슷한 관해율을 보였으며 수용 가능한 정도의 부작용이 관찰되었다.

Lobaplatin-TACE Combined with Radioactive 125I Seed Implantation for Treatment of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Peng, Sheng;Yang, Qiu-Xia;Zhang, Tao;Lu, Ming-Jian;Yang, Guang;Liu, Zhen-Yin;Zhang, Rong;Zhang, Fu-Jun
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제15권13호
    • /
    • pp.5155-5160
    • /
    • 2014
  • Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of lobaplatin-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radioactive $^{125}I$ seed implantation in treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: 75 patients with primary HCC were enrolled in the study, among them 43 receiving lobaplatin-TACE (TACE group) and 32 lobaplatin-TACE combined with $^{125}I$ seed implantation (TACE+$^{125}I$ group). After treatment, the local remission rates and postoperative complications of two groups were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test. Overall survival in the two groups was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the differences were tested using Log-rank test. Results: There were 7 cases of complete response (CR), 13 of partial response (PR), 6 of stable disease (SD) and 17 of progressive disease (PD) in the TACE group, with 13 cases of CR, 9 of PR, 5 of SD and 5 of PD in the TACE+$^{125}I$ group. The disease control rates of TACE and TACE+$^{125}I$ group were 60.5% (26/43) and 84.4% (27/32), respectively, with a significant difference between them (P < 0.05). The survival rates at 6, 12 and 18 months in the TACE group were 100.0%, 81.8% and 50.0%, respectively, and those in TACE+$^{125}I$ group were 100.0%, 93.8% and 65.6%. The mean survival times in the TACE and TACE+$^{125}I$ groups were 19.5 and 22.9 months, respectively. There was a significant difference in the overall survival rate between two groups (P < 0.05). No serious complications were encountered in either group. Conclusion: Lobaplatin-TACE combined with $^{125}I$ seed implantation is favorable and safe for treatment of primary HCC.

A Case Series of Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced-stage IIIb/IV Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Treated with HangAm-Plus

  • Bang, Sun-Hwi;Yoon, Jeung-Won;Cho, Chong-Kwan;Shin, Ji-Eun;Lee, Yeon-Weol;Yoo, Hwa-Seung
    • 대한약침학회지
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.31-35
    • /
    • 2012
  • Background and Objectives: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 80% of all lung cancers. Unfortunately, at their time of diagnosis, most patients have advanced to unresectable disease with a very poor prognosis. The oriental herbal medicine HangAm-Plus (HAP) has been developed for antitumor purposes, and several previous studies have reported its therapeutic effects. In this study, the efficacy of HAP was evaluated as a third-line treatment for advanced-stage IIIb/IV NSCLC. Methods: The study involved six patients treated at the East- West Cancer Center (EWCC) from April 2010 to October 2011. Inoperable advanced-stage IIIb/IV NSCLC patients received 3,000 or 6,000 mg of HAP on a daily basis over a 12-week period. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained from the patients at the time of the initial administration and after 12 weeks of treatment. We observed and analyzed the patients overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Of the six patients, three expired during the study, and the three remaining patients were alive as of October 31, 2011. The OS ranged from 234 to 512 days, with a median survival of 397 days and a one-year survival rate of 66.7%. In the 12-week-interval chest CT assessment, three patients showed stable disease (SD), and the other three showed progressive disease (PD). The PFS of patients ranged from 88 to 512 days, the median PFS being 96 days. Longer OS and PFS were correlated with SD. Although not directly comparable, the OS and the PFS of this study were greater than those of the docetaxel or the best supportive care group in other studies. Conclusion: HAP may prolong the OS and the PFS of inoperable stage IIIb/IV NSCLC patients without significant adverse effects. In the future, more controlled clinical trials with larger samples from multi-centers should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of HAP.

원발 혹은 재발성 비소세포 폐암 환자에서 사이버나이프률 이용한 체부 방사선 수술의 치료 결과 (Treatment Results of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Patients with Primary or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer)

  • 김우철;김헌정;박정훈;허현도;최상현
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제29권1호
    • /
    • pp.28-35
    • /
    • 2011
  • 목 적: 초기 비소세포성 폐암 환자에서 수술적 절제 이외의 국소 치료로 최근 방사선 수술의 사용이 늘고 있다. 이에 저자들은 초기 혹은 재발한 비소세포성 폐암 환자를 대상으로 시행한 체부 방사선 수술의 치료 결과를 분석하여 그 유용성을 알아 보고하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 비소세포성 폐 종양에 대하여 방사선 수술이 시행되었던 24명의 환자, 28 lesion에 대하여 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 이 중 원발성 종양은 19명 재발한 환자는 5명이었고 재발한 환자 5명 중 3명이 이전 치료 부위에서 재발한 환자 이었다. 원발성 종양 19명 중에서 4명은 외부 방사선 치료 후 추가로 방사선 수술을 시행 받았다. 24명의 초기 병기는 IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IV가 각각 7, 3, 2, 2, 3, 1, 6명이었고, 방사선 수술 당시의 T 병기는 T1 lesion이 13곳, T2가 12곳, T3가 3곳이었다. 방사선 수술은 6 MV X-ray를 이용하였고 planning target volume 1 (PTV1)에 총 방사선량 15~60 Gy(median, 50 Gy)를 3회 혹은 5회에 걸쳐 처방하여 시행하였다. 중앙 추적관찰기간은 469일이었다. 결 과: 28곳의 GTV는 0.7~108.7 mL (median, 22.9 m L)이었고, PTV1 은 5.3~184.8 mL (median, 65.4 m L)이었다. 3개월 반응률은 complete response (CR) 14곳, partial response (PR) 11곳, stable disease (SD) 3곳이었고, 마지막 추적에서의 치료반응은 CR 13곳, PR 9곳, SD 2곳, progressive disease (PD) 4곳이었다. 원발종양으로 초기 병기 IA, IB 10명에서는 50일만에 1명이 폐렴으로 사망하였고 1명이 국소재발 하였으나 나머지 환자는 6개월에서 2년간 국소재발 없이 추적관찰 되고 있으며, IIA-IIB 환자는 4명으로 환자 수가 적어서 뚜렷한 결론을 내리기 어려웠고, 재발성 폐암 환자 5명을 포함하는 10명의 IIIA-IV 병기에서는 사망 3명, 국소재발 1명, loco-regional failure 1명, regional failure 2명으로 좋지 않은 치료 결과를 보였다. 이 중에서 방사선 수술을 시행한 장소에서 재발한 경우는 총 28 1esion 중 4곳으로 85.8%의 국소제어율을 보였다. 방사선치료 양은 biologically equivalent dose (BEd) 100 $Gy_{10}$ 이하인 8 lesion 중에서 3 lesion에서 국소 재발하여 100 $Gy_{10}$ 이상인 20 lesion 중에서는 1 lesion에서만 재발한 경우보다 나빴다. 또한 중앙부의 종양과 방사선수술 당시의 병기가 T2 이상인 경우가 재발이 많았다. 결 론: 비소세포성 폐암환자에서 사이버나이프를 이용한 체부 방사선 수술은 부작용이 적으면서 높은 국소제어율을 얻을 수 있는 치료이며, 주변부의 T1 병기의 폐암에 대해서 BED 100 $Gy_{10}$ 이상의 방사선 치료가 국소제어율을 높이는데 도움이 된다고생각된다.

Predictive Factors Determining Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer - a Single Center Experience

  • Yu, Yang;Xiang, Hua;He, Xiang-Ming;Yang, Hong-Jian;Zong, Xiang-Yun
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.2401-2406
    • /
    • 2013
  • From January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2010, 101 patients with stage II-III breast cancer were enrolled in this study and subjected to an anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with or without docetaxel. Surgery was performed after 2-6 cycles of chemotherapy, and the clinical response was determined by pathological and histochemical assessments. The clinical response rate, as indicated by complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), were 6.9, 52.5, 36.6, and 4.0%, respectively. A multivariable correlation analysis indicated that the overall clinical response rate correlated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes, number of chemotherapy cycles, and vessel invasion status. Importantly, the CR rate was only associated with the number of chemotherapy cycles. Nonparametric tests failed to detect a correlation between HER2 or Topo $II{\alpha}$ status and clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in these patients. When they were stratified by HER2 or HR status, for HER2-positive patients the CR rate was associated with vessel invasion and Topo $II{\alpha}$ status. Based on our findings, we propose that HR, HER-2 and Topo $II{\alpha}$ are not putative predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy outcome for breast cancer patients. Topo $II{\alpha}$ expression level was only inversely correlated with CR rate among HR-positive patients. Importantly, the achievement of CR was largely related to the number of chemotherapy cycles.