• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.17-22
• /
• 1992

Splanchnic nerve block(SNP) is performed to relieve intractable upper abdominal cancer pain. Boas, in a technique using fluoroscopy, was the first to note the difference between transcrural celiac plexus block and retrocrural splanchnic nerve block(SNB). We have experienced 10 cases of SNB at the T12 level under control of fluoroscopy. Our results support this approach as an effective method for upper abdominal cancer pain control.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.200-204
• /
• 1991

Neurolytic splanchnic nerve block is a relatively safe and effective method for the relief of intractable pain caused by upper abdominal cancer. We have experienced a case of severe acute respiratory failure during splanchnic nerve block under control of X-ray fluoroscopy. We think that the most likely cause of the acute respiratory failure was an asthmatic attack due to anxiety and dyspnea from the injury or stimulation of the diaphragm and pleura in this case.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.116-118
• /
• 1994

Neurolytic splanchnic nerve block is effective for treatment of intractable upper abdominal cancer in. The possibility of neurologic complication cannot be completely precluded. A 53 year-old female patient with hepatoma and lung metastasis was submitted for splanchnic nerve block with alcohol. Splanchnic nerve block was performed under radiologic control by image intensifier without any difficulty during procedure. One day after the block, she complained of numbness with sensory deficit in bilateral inguinal area. Neurologic examination revealed that asymmetrical anesthesia, hypoesthesia at $T_{12}-L_2$. She was discharged 70 days after the block with partial improvement. The possibility of alcohol spreading to the low theracic and upper lumbar somatic nerves cannot be excluded.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.111-121
• /
• 1991

It has been well known that the splanchnic nerve block is effective for patients who suffer from intractable upper abdominal pain. However, it is unclear whether the effect of the splanchnic nerve block depends on varied alcoholic concentration. In this study, an attempt was made to use absolute ethanol on patients who recieved a splanchnic nerve block at Severance Hospital during the period from September l990 to April l991. The results are as follows; 1) Among the 33 patients, including 22 males and 1l females, the fifties and sixties were the major age groups. 2) Stomach cancer was the most common underlying disease(13 cases), with pancreatic can- cer next(9 cases). 3) The main locations of pain were the upper abdomen, epigastrium, and entire abdomen in decreasing order. 4) There were 17 cases who had had chemotherapy, and 1l cases of whom had had surgery before the splanchnic nerve block. 5) The volume of alcohol used was 12 ml bilaterally. 6) Among the 33 patients, 15.2% required a second block within two weeks of the first block. One case required a third block. 7) The most common complications of splanchnic nerve block were hypotension(33.3%), occasional transient sharp burning pain, flushing of face, pain on injection site, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, chest discomfort and diarrhea. 8) The supplemental block most commonly used was a continuous epidural block. It was used both as a diagnostic block and to afford relief from pain before the splanchnic nerve block was done. 9) The interval between the receiving the absolute ethanol block and discharge was within 2 weeks in l5 cases. But, in the patients with poor general health, the interval between the splanchnic nerve block and discharge prolonged. The above results suggest that bilateral splanchnic nerve block done with absolute ethanol after an effective test block with 1% lidocaine under C-arm fluroscopic control is satisfactory and reliable. Still, 26.6% of the patients received a repeat block within 2 weeks. Insufficient spread of ethanol due to its small volume seems to be a major factor in the repeat block. Minimizing the incidence of repeat block remains a problem to be solved.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.36-41
• /
• 1989

Splanchnic nerve block is performed to relieve intractable upper abdominal pain caused by carcinoma of the pancreas, stomach, liver, or colon; and upper abdominal metastasis of tumors having more distant origins. We have performed splanchnic nerve blocks under control of X-ray fluoroscopy, for all cases of alcohol splanchnic nerve block at $L_1$ vertebra, to determine both the position of the needle tips and the spread of contrast media. During the period from December 1987 to August 1988, this method was used in 40 cases of malignancy at Severance Hospital and we clinically evaluated the location of the needle tip and the spread of contrast media. The results were as follows: 1) Our method was a retrocrural approach, the splanchnic nerve block, in all cases. 2) Most of the inserted needle points were located in the upper and anterolateral part of the $L_1$ vertebra on the antero posterior roentagenogram and in the upper quarter anteriorly on the lateral roentgenogram. 3) There was no specific relationship between the location of the needle and the spread of the contrast media. 4) The contrast media was spread around the needle and then upward along the anterior margin of the vertebral body in most of the cases. 5) Pain relief was obtained immediately in 37 cases (92.5%), but in 3 cases only after a second splanchnic nerve block.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2015

Background: The celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves are targets for neurolytic blocks for pain relief from pain caused by upper gastrointestinal tumors. Therefore, we investigated the analgesic effect of a celiac plexus block versus a splanchnic nerve block and the effects of these blocks on the quality of life six months post-intervention for patients with upper GIT tumors. Methods: Seventy-nine patients with inoperable upper GIT tumors and with severe uncontrolled visceral pain were randomized into two groups. These were Group I, for whom a celiac plexus block was used with a bilateral needle retrocrural technique, and Group II, for whom a splanchnic nerve block with a bilateral needle technique was used. The visual analogue scale for pain (0 to 100), the quality of life via the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, and survival rates were assessed. Results: Pain scores were comparable in both groups in the first week after the block. Significantly more patients retained good analgesia with tramadol in the splanchnic group from 16 weeks onwards (P = 0.005, 0.001, 0.005, 0.001, 0.01). Social and cognitive scales improved significantly from the second week onwards in the splanchnic group. Survival of both groups was comparable. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the efficacy of the splanchnic nerve block technique appears to be clinically comparable to a celiac block. All statistically significant differences are of little clinical value.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.21-26
• /
• 1990

One hundred among 320 patients who underwent splanchnic nerve block were evaluated retrospectively by telephone or letters. After splanchnic nerve block most of the patient experienced relatively good pain relief until death. The results were as follows 1) The duration of pain relief and survival time were well correlated. 2) The duration of survival time after the block was varied from 35 days to 240 days. These data suggest that the splanchnic nerve block is a satisfactory and reliable method for terminal cancer pain and results in a painless life until death.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.89-92
• /
• 1997

Neurolytic splanchnic nerve block is effective for treatment of intractable upper abdominal cancer pain. Conventional approach for splanchnic nerve block is conducted in the prone position to ensure proper orientation and to allow insertion of needles on each side of the vertebral body. However, the prone position has some technical disadvantages as this position is frequently poorly tolerated by a majority of patients with advanced cancer due to severe abdominal pain, ascites and so on. Male patient, 53-year old with transverse colon cancer, carcinomatosis peritonei and $L_1,\;L_2$ vertebral body metastasis, was admitted for treatment of severe right upper quadrant and right iliac crest pain. We performed neurolytic splanchnic nerve block with transdiscal technique in the lateral decubitus position under fluoroscopic guidance, and well noted the usefulness and the advantage of this technique. The benefits of this technique are safe, simple and effective because the lateral position is better tolerated by patients and makes bony landmarks more accessible during fluoroscopy.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.122-128
• /
• 1993

Two cases are described transient unilateral paraplegia following a splanchnic nerve block (SNB) among 683 procedures in 708 patients from 1968 to 1992. The first case, 64 year-old male, had bilteral splanchnic nerve block twice with pure alcohol 4 months and 2month ago. The paraparesis of right leg was developed 4 minutes after the pure alcohol injection during the third SNB and was completely recovered after 37 minutes. The second case, 60 year-old male, had also a first SNB with temporary relief of pain for a week. The Second SNB with 95% alcohol was followed by paraplegia of left leg. He showed almost complete improvement but expired 18 days later. The probable cause was the spread of alcohol onto the lumbar plexus or paravertebral space unilaterally, because of adhesion or paravertebral space due to previous alcohol injections.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.59-64
• /
• 1994

Splanchnic nerve block is effective in relief of upper abdominal cancer pain. But we often get confused at the unexpected complaints of pain accompanying a metastatic of referred origin in spite of the precise block under image intensifier. We could found aut a thermographic change from the diffuse hyperemission state of abdomen before the block to the localized state after the block. It may be helpful in differentiating objectively the accuracy of the block at the unexpected complaints of pain by using thermography before and after the block.