• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.310-316
• /
• 2021

기존의 인공위성은 다기능·높은 성능을 가진 대형위성을 국가 단위에서 운용하는 것이 일반적이었으나 최근의 전기·전자 및 광학 기술의 경량 소형화 발전에 따라 점차 소형위성이 주목받고 있다. 크기와 무게가 감소됨에 따라 적은 비용으로 개발 및 발사가 가능하여 위성 개발에 진입장벽이 낮아지고 있으나, 인공위성의 전력공급에 필수적인 태양전지 패널의 경우 태양광에 효율적으로 노출되기 위해 넓은 표면적이 필요하여 소형화 및 경량화가 제한적이다. 우주용 태양전지는 우주선과 태양열, 온도와 같은 다양한 우주환경을 고려하여 제작되어야하고, 부피를 최적화하기 위해 전개 매커니즘을 적용하며 경량화 및 고효율화를 위하여 태양전지 셀의 구조적 재료적인 연구개발이 필요하다. 현재 태양전지 패널로 개발되어 운용되고 있는 제품들은 고효율화를 위하여 주로 InGaP/GaAs/Ge 소재의 3중구조를 적용하고 있다. 최근에는 초고효율 다층구조 태양전지를 위하여 4중접합 이상의 구조가 연구되고 있으며, 나아가 소재적으로 경량화에 유리한 유연박막 태양전지, 유기 및 유무기 하이브리드 태양전지 등이 차세대 소형위성용 태양전지로 주목받고 있다.

• Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.415-431
• /
• 2022

Secondary flows have a huge impact on losses generation in modern low pressure gas turbines (LPTs). At design point, the interaction of the blade profile with the end-wall boundary layer is responsible for up to 40% of total losses. Therefore, predicting accurately the end-wall flow field in a LPT is extremely important in the industrial design phase. Since the inlet boundary layer profile is one of the factors which most affects the evolution of secondary flows, the first main objective of the present work is to investigate the impact of two different inlet conditions on the end-wall flow field of the T106A, a well known LPT cascade. The first condition, labeled in the paper as C1, is represented by uniform conditions at the inlet plane and the second, C2, by a flow characterized by a defined inlet boundary layer profile. The code used for the simulations is based on the Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation and solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations coupled with the Spalart Allmaras turbulence model. Secondly, this work aims at estimating the influence of viscosity and turbulence on the T106A end-wall flow field. In order to do so, RANS results are compared with those obtained from an inviscid simulation with a prescribed inlet total pressure profile, which mimics a boundary layer. A comparison between C1 and C2 results highlights an influence of secondary flows on the flow field up to a significant distance from the end-wall. In particular, the C2 end-wall flow field appears to be characterized by greater over turning and under turning angles and higher total pressure losses. Furthermore, the C2 simulated flow field shows good agreement with experimental and numerical data available in literature. The C2 and inviscid Euler computed flow fields, although globally comparable, present evident differences. The cascade passage simulated with inviscid flow is mainly dominated by a single large and homogeneous vortex structure, less stretched in the spanwise direction and closer to the end-wall than vortical structures computed by compressible flow simulation. It is reasonable, then, asserting that for the chosen test case a great part of the secondary flows details is strongly dependent on viscous phenomena and turbulence.