• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제65권3호
• /
• pp.29-42
• /
• 2023

Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is suggested and employed in the policy to conserve soil resources and to manage the impact of development, since soil loss is very essential to nonpoint source pollution management. The equation requires only five factors to estimate average annual potential soil loss, USLE is simplicity provides benefits in use of the equation. However, it is also limitation of the model, since the estimated results are very sensitive to the five factors. There is a need to examine the application procedures. Three approaches to estimate potential soil loss were examined, In the first approach, all factors were prepared with raster data, soil loss were computed for each cell, and sum of all cell values was determined as soil loss for the watersheds. In the second approach, the mean values for each factor were defined as representing USLE factors, and then the five factors were multiplied to determine soil loss for the watersheds. The third approach was same as the second approach, except that the Vegetative and Mechanical measure was used instead of the Cover and management factor and Support practice factor. The approaches were applied in 38 watersheds, they displayed significant difference, moreover no trends were detected for the soil loss at watersheds with the approaches. Therefore, it was concluded that there is a need to be developed and provided a typical guideline or public systems so that soil loss estimations have consistency with the users.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.257-271
• /
• 2017

국내에서는 국토개발 목적으로 토양을 반입하고 잔토 및 사토 처리를 위해 토양을 반출하고 있으나, 토양오염에 대한 고려 없이 특정 부지로 토양이 반입되고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 토양의 이동으로 인한 오염 확산을 방지하고 오염발생 부지에서의 정화책임을 명확하게 하기 위한 목적으로, 국내 반입토양 관리 현황을 살펴보고 국외 관련 제도를 분석하여 국내에서 토양 반입 부지의 관리체계를 효율적으로 운영하기 위한 방안을 고찰하였다. 본 연구에서는 반입되는 토양의 합리적인 이동 관리체계를 마련하기 위한 방안으로 자율적 규제, 의무적 규제, 단계적 규제를 제안하였다. 향후 국내에서 토양 반입부지에 대한 명확하고 합리적인 관리체계를 성립하기 위해서는 본 연구에서 제안한 것과 같이 현재 토양환경 보전법이 가지고 있는 법 제도적 한계점을 개선하여 토양 반입 부지에 대한 규제 및 지침을 빠른 시일 내에 보완해야 할 필요성이 있다.

• 한국토양환경학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.3-8
• /
• 1997

본 고에서는 네덜란드에서 시행하고 있는 토양환경정책에 대하여 정리하여 보았다. 네덜란드 토양환경관리목표는 토양의 다기능성의 유지 및 회복에 두고 있다. 네덜란드의 토양법체계는 토양보호법을 중심으로 환경관리법, 건축법 등을 통해 토양환경의 보전을 하고 있으며, 공장지대나 주유소는 토양보호법의 테두리 안에서 별도의 명령을 통해 관리되고 있다. 아울러 정화의 책임에 대하여 오염원인자부담원칙 및 정부부담의 원칙을 취하고 있는데, 1987년 이전에 대해서는 책임을 묻지 않는 방법을 취하고 있다. 정화의 책임순서로는 오염원인자, 소유자, 권리행사자 순으로 되어 있으며, 정화는 오염자 스스로 정화를 하도록 유도하고 그렇지 않을 경우에는 정부가 돈을 투자하여 정화를 행하고 있다. 아울러 건축물을 짓고자 할 경우에는 토양에 관한 조사를 하도록 하고 있으며, 토지를 사고 파는 과정에서는 반드시 토양의 질에 관한 정보를 확인하도록 행하고 있다.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.85-93
• /
• 2017

In this study, the concepts of soil degradation, soil pollution and soil damage are defined, and the domestic and foreign administrative systems related to soil pollution and soil damage management are analyzed. In case of foreign countries, laws and regulations on the soil conservation and soil damage management were analyzed. In case of Korea, the present state of the legal system governing soil pollution and damage management was analyzed in each aspect. Through this study, suggestions for amendments of relevant laws were proposed by establishing policy direction for integrated management of soil pollution and soil damage. The results of this study will provide a basis for integrated management of soil pollution and damage, and it can be utilized in establishing integrated management strategy of long term soil conservation and sustaninable soil development at national level.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지하수토양환경학회 2003년도 International Symposium
• /
• pp.28-57
• /
• 2003

Germany as a densely populated and heavily industrialised country has a long and broad experience in handling contaminated sites. With this presentation we want to describe some main aspects of the soil protection policies and the remediation of contaminated sites in Germany. Due to the history of working on contaminated sites in Germany the Federal Soil Protection Act came into force in 1998. A lot of programmes and network in Germany and in Europe, funded by the State or the European Union, helped developing new measures and techniques for remediation and also for implementing regulations for the involved authorities. Questions like 'who is responsible？' and 'who has to pay for measurements and the remediation？' became more and more important. In the near future there will be an official European Soil Protection Policy (is expected in June 2004). Besides the contaminated sites also other soil protection policies as 'Reducing the land consumption' are pursued and an indicator is developed.and an indicator is developed.

• 한국토양비료학회지
• /
• 제42권별호
• /
• pp.212-237
• /
• 2009

• 기술사
• /
• 제43권6호
• /
• pp.39-45
• /
• 2010

Soil plays a huge role in climate change, because even a tiny loss of 0.1% of carbon emitted into the atmosphere from European soils is the equivalent to the carbon emission of 100million extra cars on Europe's roads - an increase of about half of the existing car fleet. Soils contain around twice the amount of carbon in the atmosphere and three times the amount to be found in vegetation. Europe's soils are an enormous carbon reservoir, containing around 75billion tonnes, and poor management can have serious consequences. Soil degradation is accelerating across the EU, with negative effects on human health, ecosystems and climate change - and on economic prosperity and quality of life. Climate change is identified as a common element in many soil threats. Europe's soils urgently need better protection. The current trend of soil degradation needs to be reversed, and soil management practices must be improved if a high rate of soil carbon sequestration is to be achieved.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지하수토양환경학회 2004년도 임시총회 및 추계학술발표회
• /
• pp.17-19
• /
• 2004

Recently, we have recognized that ‘Soil Environmental Prevention Act’could not provide perfect solutions on many complicated problems which are now emerging and/or can be solved by adopting comprehensive policies. In this study, some suggestions were made to solve a few tangled problems such as conducting the Land Partnership Plan(LPP) project, investigating soil and ground water contamination of the industrial area, building a integrated information system for soil and ground water, establishing detailed guidelines for remediation and verification, and re-constructing the legal and institutional framework for integrated management of soil and ground water. These suggestions may help policy makers to build conceptual frameworks for solving these problems.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지하수토양환경학회 2003년도 International Symposium
• /
• pp.58-69
• /
• 2003

Soil contamination in the United States is managed using a risk-based decision making process. In other words, we don't ask, 'how much soil contamination can be cleaned up\ulcorner' Instead we ask, 'how much contamination can be safely left in place\ulcorner' The determination of 'safe' levels of contamination is based upon the potential for exposure and the toxicity of the contaminants of concern in soil. Potential for exposure is determined by evaluating potential exposure pathways from source to receptor given current or reasonably anticipated land use. Soil cleanup goals are then calculated for any complete exposure pathways based upon toxicity and the route of exposure. In some cases, institutional or engineering controls are also used to limit the potential for exposure. In order to prevent a continuous degradation of environmental quality, risk-based cleanup approaches must be combined with strong contamination prevention programs. In addition, alternative risk management approaches should be incorporated into an overall risk reduction strategy.erall risk reduction strategy.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.176-185
• /
• 2021

This paper aims to develop a new paradigm for groundwater management which is compatible with integrated water management policies in Korea. Three key roles of groundwater are defined for addressing water cycle distortion, high water stress, water quality degradation, aquatic ecosystems deterioration, and water-related hazards. Firstly, groundwater plays an important role in contributing soundness of water cycle as a component of water cycle. Secondly, it is a local water resource to ensure water supply sustainability. Thirdly, groundwater is an essential water resource for drought and emergencies. In order to support the groundwater roles, we propose a paradigm shift for groundwater management and policy directions towards integrated water management. The new paradigm consists of managements for sound water cycle on a watershed scale and groundwater environment(quantity, quality, and groundwater dependent ecosystems) managements for both human and nature. A prospective management also constitutes the new paradigm. In addition, this paper proposes four policy directions in groundwater management. The policies emphasize the integrated management of groundwater and surface water, management of groundwater environment(quantity, quality, and groundwater dependent ecosystems), management of groundwater uses for water sustainability and security, and enhancement of groundwater publicity.