• 대한전자공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전자공학회 2000년도 ITC-CSCC -1
• /
• pp.97-100
• /
• 2000

In previous research of social dilemma, there is no extended game that the players can select one game out of some social dilemma games. We propose this kind of game as ＂Distributed Social Dilemma＂ In this game, each player tries to acquire the adaptive strategy throughout local interactions. We make use of GA as evolutionary operations. In this paper, our purpose is to examine how the game selection of players influences the evolution of cooperation in distributed social dilemma. In order to examine, we formulate distributed social dilemma by Game Theory and use agent-based simulation that each agent is regard as player

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제80권3호
• /
• pp.287-295
• /
• 1991

국립공원(國立公園)을 포함한 자연휴양지(自然休養地)에서 과도한 개발에 따른 자원파괴나 무절제한 이용행위로 인한 환경오염현상은 Social Dilemma에 기인하는 현상으로 볼 수 있다. 자연휴양지(自然休養地)의 Social Dilemma는 공공자원(公共資源)인 산림휴양자원(山林休養資源)을 개발하고 관리하는 과정에서 발생하는 "개인의 이윤추구행위와 공공이익간의 갈등(葛藤)"을 말한다. Social Dilemma는 2가지 특성으로 요약된다. 첫째, 공동체의 구성원 각자가 자신의 이익만을 추구할 경우, 서로 협동하는 경우와 비교해서 더 큰 손해의 댓가를 치러야 하고, 둘째, 공동의 이익을 위해 협동을 하는 경우에는 구성원 각자는 더 큰 보상을 받게 된다. 국립공원(國立公園)에서 Social Dilemma의 해소방안(解消方案)은 크게 구조적(構造的)인 접근방법(接近方法)과 개별적(個別的)인 접근방법(接近方法)으로 구분되고, 구조적(構造的)인 접근방법(接近方法)에는 관리대표자(管理代表者)의 선출(選出), 선택적(選擇的) 보상제도(補償制度) 및 자원(資源)의 소유(所有)나, 관리(管理)를 개별화(個別化)하는 방법이 있으며, 개별적(個別的)인 접근방법(接近方法)에는 직접대화(直接對話)와 홍보(弘報) 및 교육적(敎育的)인 접근법이 포함된다. 본 연구에서는 실험실 연구와 공원현장실험연구의 결과를 Social Dilemma 이론에 의해 종합함으로써 자연휴양지자원에서의 Social Dilemma 이론의 적용을 위한 근거를 제시하였다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권7호
• /
• pp.548-562
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 글로벌 콘텐츠에 나타난 AI 윤리의 문제적 상황을 진단하고, 인간의 정체성을 강화하기 위한 담론이 무엇인지를 파악하고자 했다. 연구 진행을 위해 넷플릭스(Netflix) 오리지널 콘텐츠 <소셜딜레마>(The Social Dilemma)를 분석대상으로 선정했다. 연구방법은 서사분석을 채택했다. 분석결과 <소셜딜레마>는 전통적인 시사 다큐멘터리 구조를 보였으며, 이야기 전개를 위해 주로 전문가와 통계자료를 활용한 것으로 확인되었다. 미얀마 학살 사건, 가짜뉴스 전파 등 국내외 사례를 열거하며 콘텐츠 핵심 주장을 강화하기도 했다. 인물의 관계에서는 개발자와 미디어 기업, 이용자와 광고주 사이의 이항대립이 명확하게 드러났다. 해결책으로는 기업에 대한 강력한 규제와 소셜미디어의 이용 중단을 주장했다. 하지만, <소셜딜레마>는 AI 기술의 오남용을 지적하는 수준에 머무르며, 인간 고유의 정체성과 사회적 관계를 외면하는 서사를 구성했다. 이러한 결과는 AI 시대를 맞아 인간의 사회성과 관계성, 학습 능력의 중요성을 강조하는 콘텐츠의 필요성을 제기한다.

• 호남수학학술지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.225-234
• /
• 2013

Many studies of experimental economics have produced outcomes which contradict the predictions of Nash equilibrium, which relies heavily upon the premise of selfishness of an individual. In the games involving contexts of social conflicts represented by the prisoners' dilemma game, the experiments yields outcomes quite different from what are predicted by the conventional wisdom. In order to fill this gap between the conventional Nash Equilibrium and experimental outcomes, non-selfish (or other-regarding) motives of human behavior are introduced and then a new equilibrium concept, RAE-equilibrium is developed. It is also proved that an RAE-equilibrium exists under quite general conditions. Then it is applied to the prisoners' dilemma game that some of the experimental outcomes can be explained.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.39-48
• /
• 2019

This paper considers the Prisoner's Dilemma Game in which there exists a dilemma that the best response is that both players are to confess, but doing not confess can give a higher gain to the both players in a social perspective. To resolve such a dilemma in the game, an incentive model to encourage to confess and a penalty model for being imposed when not confessing are introduced, respectively. Then, the conditions are characterized under which incentive or penalty involved in the game's payoffs can make the game rational without a dilemma on both the personal and social perspectives, by taking the payoff values as variables with the incentive and penalty factors. Furthermore, it turns out that the resulting values of incentive and penalty are inversely proportional to each other, and thus, obtaining one of these amounts can provide the other. Simple examples are shown to interpret the theoretical verifications of our models, and randomly generated data based simulation results investigate the tendency of incentive and penalty and the resulting game values for a variety of instances. These results can provide a framework on resolving the dilemma by artificially putting incentive or penalty, although it is careful to apply more generalized real world games.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.91-105
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to examine an immoral effectiveness decrease by information access monitoring between ethical dilemma and unethical information-sharing behavior. Firms are raising the demand of confidential information management and are highlighting the ethical awareness of organizational members. The individuals in organization are concerned information sharing for future-oriented social networking. To prevent their immoral behavior, Firms should consider investing the information access monitoring. This system is aiming at log verification of movement, storage and deletion on information and will reduce an ethical conflict and unethical behavior on employees. I used the structural equation methodology for this empirical study. The research model constructs the voluntary and involuntary dilemma of information sharing on the two independent-variables, the unethical information behavior and the improper networking reinforcement on the two dependent-variables and the information access monitoring the one mediating-variables. This model tests the power effect of direct path, indirect path and total path. According to the study, the two ethical dilemma of information sharing provided a high influence to the unethical sharing action and to the inappropriate social networking strengthens. However, the mediating role of information access monitoring shows the effect weakens of independent and dependent variables. Thus, the mediating variables appeared to be important for the controlling role of an unethical behavior and improper social networking. Ultimately, The firms will need to invest the information access monitoring for a compulsory ethics behavior of organizational members. In addition, this can hinder networking enhancements for future opportunistic behaviors.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제29권
• /
• pp.218-240
• /
• 1996

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2004

This study was conducted to examine the ethical dilemma and coping types of nurses, and identify the relationship between ethical dilemma and coping types of nurses. The subjects of this study consisted of 210 nurses from two university hospitals in Taegu and one university hospital and one general hospital in Pohang. The data were collected with self reported questionnaire from June 2003 to July 2003. The data were analysed using the SPSS program. The results of this study were as follows : 1. The mean score of level of ethical dilemma was 0.55/1, and client area was the highest(M=0.65). 2. The mean score of level of coping about ethical dilemma was 2.22/4, and seeking social support area was the highest (M=2.42). 3. The conflict of proffering the best care with courtesy to impolite patient was the highest in total items of ethical dilemma. Criticized or lectured myself was the highest in total items of coping type. 4. In general characteristics, age(F=4.74, p<.01), marital status(t=2.67, p<.01), career (F=5.95, p<.01) were significantly related to level of ethical dilemma and religion(t=2.27, p<.05) was significantly related to types of coping. There was positive correlation between ethical dilemma and types of coping(r=.228, p<.01). On the basis of these findings, it is needed a correlation study according to category of ethical dilemma and coping types of nurses, and to develop the coping strategy that resolves ethical dilemma in nursing practice.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제16권7호
• /
• pp.131-144
• /
• 2018

본 연구의 목적은 조직 구성원들의 정보비대칭 수준에 따른 비윤리 정보공유를 실증적으로 검정하는 것이다. 정보비대칭 상황에 따라 조직 구성원들의 정보공유 딜레마, 비윤리적 공유의도와 행동의 차이가 있는지를 확인하고자 한다. 연구방법은 구조방정식을 사용하였다. 분석결과, 정보공유의 윤리적 딜레마, 비윤리적 의도, 비윤리적 행동은 서로 인과적 영향력이 있다고 나타났다. 특히, 직급별로는 윤리적 딜레마와 비윤리적 의도 간에 윤리적 딜레마의 세부 요인들이 다르다고 나타났다. 이에 연구 결과로서, 조직은 직급 수준에 따라서 윤리적 이슈를 다르게 관리해야 한다. 본 연구의 기여도는 사회과학 관점에서 깨진 유리창 이론의 해석 범위를 넓혔으며, 실무적 관점에서 직급별로 윤리적 딜레마 관리가 다르게 요구된다고 설명하였다. 향후 연구는 정보보안 시스템에 의해서 비윤리적 행동이 감소하는지 조사할 필요가 있다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.7-24
• /
• 2003

Considering on the crisis and dilemma of monumentality in Modern architecture, this study analyse the historic reason of decay and new possibility of monumentality within the context of contemporary socio-cultural context. Historically monumentality has been considered as a main substance of High architecture in e tradition of Western Architecture. Difference between building and architecture mainly lies in monumentality which brings about esthetic quality. Usually architects take it granted that the physical and formal characteristics automatically cause the monumentality, But since the modem period the decline of communicative and representative function of architecture made this belief questionable. As Monumentality itself faced the dilemma with the modernity, ironically architects has to response to the task to handle the increasing social demands of monumental building. This study firstly shows the dilemma of monumentality in depth in case of the holocaust museum. Then we analyse the concept of monumentality itself by means of theoretical view of A. Loos and A Riegl We also analyse the change of role which monumental building played in history. Cultural and social change of context, and fundamental change of architecture old way of building a monument impossible. In conclusion this study proposes the new concept and searches new horizon of monumentality with a finding of the otherness of monumentality. Conventional monumental building language has to give way to new approaches. With some examples we already can find a new possibility.