• 제목/요약/키워드: Social Cost of Odor

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.015초

축산농가의 악취가 주택가격에 미치는 영향 - 공간헤도닉모형 - (Livestock Industry Odor Reduces the Property Value - Spatial Hedonic Model -)

  • 박두호
    • 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.923-941
    • /
    • 2005
  • 축산농가로부터 발생되는 악취문제는 지역사회에 중요한 이슈로 떠오르고 있다. 본 연구는 미국의 콜로라도 주의 한 지역(Weld County)에서 거래된 3,355개의 주택이 199개의 축산농가의 악취 때문에 거래가격에 얼마나 영향을 받았는지를 분석하였다. 특히 주택시장에 잠재적으로 존재하는 공간상관관계를 분석에 포함하기 위해 공간 헤도닉 모형을 이용하였다. 결과를 보면 이 지역은 전통적으로 육우와 비육우 농가가 많아서인지 소규모의 육우와 비육우 농장은 오히려 농촌의 전형적인 전원생활의 일부로 주택가격에 양의 파급효과로 나타났다. 그러나 악취로 인한 주택가격의 영향은 축산업의 규모와 업종에 따라 차이를 보였다. 일정규모 이상을 넘어서는 농가와 특정 업종은 주택가격을 하락시키는 것으로 분석되었다. 특히 대규모의 양돈과 양(sheep)은 주택과 근거리에 있는 경우 지역사회에 결정적인 경제적 손실을 초래하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 축산업의 악취는 부정적인 외부효과의 하나로 지역사회에 사회적인 비용으로 나타난다. 정책결정자는 이 같은 사회적인 비용을 최소화하고 지역경제개발 효과를 극대화하기 위해 이 같은 사회적인 비용을 지역계획 수립에 반영해야 한다. 특히 주택과 축산업의 위치와 특성을 적절히 고려해야 할 것이다.

  • PDF

파일럿 플랜트 규모에서 일체형 침전부상공정 (SeDAF)의 설계인자 및 운전특성에 대한 실증적 평가 (Empirical evaluation for design parameters and operating characteristics of the integrated sedimentation and dissolved air flotation (SeDAF) process at the pilot-scale plant)

  • 장여주;정진홍;임현만;김원재
    • 상하수도학회지
    • /
    • 제35권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-14
    • /
    • 2021
  • Eutrophication and algal blooms can lead to increase of taste and odor compounds and health problems by cyanobacterial toxins. To cope with these eco-social issues, Ministry of Environment in Korea has been reinforcing the effluent standards of wastewater treatment facilities. As a result, various advanced phosphorus removal processes have been adopted in each wastewater treatment plant nation-widely. However, a lot of existing advanced wastewater treatment processes have been facing the problems of expensive cost in operation and excessive sludge production caused by high dosage of coagulant. In this study, the sedimentation and dissolved air flotation (SeDAF) process integrated with sedimentation and flotation has been developed for enhanced phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment facilities. Design and operating parameters of the SeDAF process with the capacity of 100 ㎥/d were determined, and a demonstration plant has been installed and operated at I wastewater treatment facility (located in Gyeonggi-do) for the verification of field applicability. Several empirical evaluations for the SeDAF process were performed at demonstration-plant scale, and the results showed clearly that T-P and turbidity values of treated water were to satisfy the highest effluent standards below 0.2 mg/L and 2.0 NTU stably for all of operation cases.

주거복지지표 개발에 관한 연구 II - 수요자 측면의 주거복지체감지표와 지수를 중심으로 - (Development of the Sentiment Indicators of Housing Welfare)

  • 지은영;은난순;홍형옥
    • 한국주거학회논문집
    • /
    • 제19권5호
    • /
    • pp.85-92
    • /
    • 2008
  • The aim of this research is to develop the sentiment indicators of housing welfare for evaluating housing welfare policies conducted by the Korean government. The methods of this research are used by analysis of related documents, FGI (Focus Group Interview), and survey. The survey was made by experts and consumers. To analyze the survey, this research also uses confirmatory factor analysis by SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science) program, AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) by Expert Choice program, frequency, average, percentages, Factor analysis etc. As a result of this research, selected housing welfare indicators are settled as follows: In the housing welfare aspect, 11 indicators in the department of 'Housing Satisfaction' and 11 indicators in the department of 'Community Satisfaction' (22 in total) are suggested. The indicators are 1) Water Supply and Distribution Equipment 2) Heating equipment 3) the size of the exclusive residential area 4) the number of rooms 5) Ventilation and Lighting 6) Sound Insulation (Indoor Noise) 7) Air Pollution/Odor 8) House Deposit 9) Rent Paid 10) Maintenance (Dwelling) Cost 11) The length of Occupation 12) Proximity to Welfare Facilities 13) Educational Environment 14) Convenience of Facilities (shops, hospitals etc.) 15) Convenience of Transportation and Commuting 16) Distance from Workplace 17) Landscape and Green Space (Tree, Flowers, Grass etc.) 18) Vandalism (Destruction Behavior, graffiti etc.) 19) Privacy 20) Noise in Public Places (Drinking, Loudly Talking etc.) 21) Safety from Crime 22) Safety from a Disaster. As of 2007, the housing welfare sentiment index is measured by the survey of 1,000 inhabitants in the public housing, which shows 3.51.