• Title/Summary/Keyword: Sialolith

Search Result 24, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

A CLINICAL STUDY OF SUBMANDIBULAR GLAND EXCISION (악하선 절제 환자에 대한 임상적 연구)

  • Noh, Sang-Yup;Kim, Il-Kyu;Oh, Seong-Seob;Choi, Jin-Ho;Chun, Hye-Kyung;Kim, Joon-Mee
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.61-69
    • /
    • 1997
  • The submandibular gland is one of the major salivary glands, salivary diseases frequently occuring site due to its anatomical weakness. This retrospective study evaluated data pertaining to history, sex, operation method, age distribution, diagnosis through the chart, operation record, radiographs, histologic finding of 51 patients operated on for the submandibular gland excision from 1986 to 1995 in our hospital so that we improve on the understand of the salivary gland diseases. The results were as follows ; 1. The chief complaints was mass, swelling mainly. 2. The ratio of affected site was 47.1 : 51 in left : right respectly, both sites was 1 case especially. 3. The ratio of men to women was 56.9 : 43.1 4. The operation performed all through the extraoral approach. 5. The sialolith presented at 24 cases. 6. The most patients had a two weeks duration period. 7. The age distribution was the third decade(29.4%), the second decade(27.5%) in order. 8. The symptoms accompanied the chief complaints was pain(37.3%), mass(17.6%), swelling(13.7%), trismus(13.7%) in order. 9. The diagnosis was sialadenitis with stone(S.W.S.) (45.1%), sialadenitis without stone(S.W.O.S.) (17.6%), pleomorphic adenoma(P.A.) (15.7%), abscess(Abs) (5.9%), tuberculosis(Tbc) (5.9%) in drder.

  • PDF

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of panoramic and occlusal radiographs in detecting submandibular sialoliths

  • Kim, Jun Ho;Aoki, Eduardo Massaharu;Cortes, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez;Abdala-Junior, Reinaldo;Asaumi, Junichi;Arita, Emiko Saito
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • v.46 no.2
    • /
    • pp.87-92
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of panoramic and occlusal radiographs in detecting submandibular sialoliths. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients (20 cases and 20 controls) were included in this retrospective study. Cases were defined as subjects with a submandibular sialolith confirmed by computed tomography (CT), whereas controls did not have any submandibular calcifications. Three observers with different expertise levels assessed panoramic and occlusal radiographs of all subjects for the presence of sialoliths. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were assessed using the kappa test. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and the diagnostic odds ratio of panoramic and occlusal radiographs in screening for submandibular sialoliths were calculated for each observer. Results: The sensitivity and specificity values for occlusal and panoramic radiographs all ranged from 80% to 100%. The lowest values of sensitivity and specificity observed among the observers were 82.6% and 80%, respectively (P=0.001). Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were higher for occlusal radiographs than for panoramic radiographs, although panoramic radiographs demonstrated a higher overall accuracy. Conclusion: Both panoramic and occlusal radiographic techniques displayed satisfactory diagnostic performance and should be considered before using a CT scan to detect submandibular sialoliths.

SIALOLITHIASIS ON THE MOUTH FLOOR IN A CHILD (소아의 구강저에 발생한 타석증)

  • Lee, Hyo-Seol;Choi, Byung-Jai;Choi, Hyung-Jun;Kim, Seong-Oh;Son, Heung-Kyu;Song, Je-Seon;Lee, Jae-Ho
    • Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
    • /
    • v.36 no.1
    • /
    • pp.114-118
    • /
    • 2009
  • Sialolithiasis is the formation of calcific concretions within the ductal system of major or minor salivary glands. The submandibular gland is most involved because of its high viscosity of the saliva and the long, curved duct. It may occur at any age but, it is most common in middle-aged adults and rare in childhood. Clinical symptoms in sialolithiasis are variable but, swelling is the most common, followed by the pain. Clinical examination and radiographic examination(panoramic and mandibular occlusal radiographs, sialography, intraoral-, extraoral- ultrasound, CT scan, MRI and sialoendoscopy) can help to confirm a diagnosis and localize a stone. The treatment is surgical intervention, either removal of the sialolith or sialoadenectomy. However, non-invasive techniques including shock-wave lithotripsy, $CO_2$ laser and endoscopic treatment used in selected cases. A 5-Year-old girl referred from private practice for evaluation of a yellowish mass on the floor of the mouth. She complained that it had became three times bigger than four months ago when it was found for the first time and she had some pain on submandibular gland area occasionally. On physical examination, a firm and yellowish mass could be seen at the orifice of the submandibular duct. Diagnosis is the submandibular sialolithiasis in the anterior Wharton`s duct. Under local anesthesia, stone was removed.

  • PDF

Layered structure of sialoliths compared with tonsilloliths and antroliths

  • Buyanbileg Sodnom-Ish;Mi Young Eo;Yun Ju Cho;Mi Hyun Seo;Hyeong-Cheol Yang;Min-Keun Kim;Hoon Myoung;Soung Min Kim
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • v.50 no.1
    • /
    • pp.13-26
    • /
    • 2024
  • Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the ultrastructural and chemical composition of sialoliths, tonsilloliths, and antroliths and to describe their growth pattern. Materials and Methods: We obtained 19 specimens from 18 patients and classified the specimens into three groups: sialolith (A), tonsillolith (B), and antrolith (C). The peripheral, middle, and core regions of the specimens were examined in detail by histology, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: In the micro-CT, group A showed alternating radiodense and radiolucent layers, while group B had a homogeneous structure. Group C specimens revealed a compact homogeneous structure. Histopathologically, group A showed a laminated, teardrop-shaped, globular structure. Group B demonstrated degrees of immature calcification of organic and inorganic materials. In group C, the lesion was not encapsulated and showed a homogeneous lamellar bone structure. SEM revealed that group A showed distinct three layers: a peripheral multilayer zone, intermediate compact zone, and the central nidus area; groups B and C did not show these layers. The main elemental components of sialoliths were O, C, Ca, N, Cu, P, Zn, Si, Zr, F, Na, and Mg. In group B, a small amount of Fe was found in the peripheral region. Group C had a shorter component list: Ca, C, O, P, F, N, Si, Na, and Mg. TEM analysis of group A showed globular structures undergoing intra-vesicular calcification. In group B, bacteria were present in the middle layer. In the outer layer of the group C antrolith, an osteoblastic rimming was observed. Conclusion: Sialoliths had distinct three layers: a peripheral multilayer zone, an intermediate compact zone and the central nidus area, while the tonsillolith and antrolith specimens lacked distinct layers and a core.