• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.401-412
• /
• 1998

The aim of this study was to measure the regional micro-shear bond strength of dentin bonding agents to dentin, and to investigate the relationship between the micro-shear bond strength and two dentinal characteristics ; Vickers hardness and remaining dentin thickness. Twenty-four freshly extracted, noncarious human molars were selected for this study. The materials tested in this study consisted of two commercially available dentin bonding agents (MAC-BOND, ONE-STEP) and two restorative light-cured composite resins (AELITEFIL, Z100). The occlusal or side surface of tooth crown was sectioned to expose dentin, and the exposed surface was finally polished with # 600 sandpaper. Four groups of application methods were used combining the filling materials and the dentin bonding agents. The composite resin-attached tooth specimens were embeded in a cold cure acrylic resin, and were cut with a low speed diamond saw to the dimension of 1mm $\times$ 1mm. Nine specimens were obtained from each tooth. The cut specimens were divided into three groups depending on the position of the dentin bonding surface. The micro-shear bond strength, remaining dentin thickness, and dentinal hardness were measured. Experimental results were then statistically analyzed with ANOVA. t-test, Scheffe test, and regression analysis. From this experiment, the following results were obtained : 1. In the case of occlusal surface bonding, the pooled micro-shear bond strength of ONST-AELIT group (16.62 MPa) was significantly higher than that of MACB-AELIT group (9.91 MPa) (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the micro-shear bond strength depending on the dentin position (p>0.05). 2. In the case of side surface bonding of crown, the pooled micro-shear bond strength of four different bonding groups was not significantly different among each other (p>0.05). However, in three of the test groups (ONST-AELIT, MACB-Z100, ONST-Z100), the micro-shear bond strength to the lower 1/3(III) position was significantly lower than that to middle 1/3(II) position of surface (p<0.05). 3. In the ONST-AELIT bonding group, the pooled micro-shear bond strength to the occlusal surface was significantly lower than that to the side surface of crown (p<0.05). 4. There was no significant correlation between the micro-shear bond strength and dentin hardness / remaining dentin thickness (p>0.05).

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.47-50
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE. This study aimed to discover a way to increase the bond strength between bis-acryl resins, using a comparison of the shear bond strengths attained from bis-acryl resins treated with light curing, pressure, oxygen inhibition, and heat. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Self-cured bis-acryl resin was used as both a base material and as a repair material. Seventy specimens were distributed into seven groups according to treatment methods: pressure - stored in a pressure cooker at 0.2 Mpa; oxygen inhibition- applied an oxygen inhibitor around the repaired material,; heat treatment - performed heat treatment in a dry oven at $60^{\circ}C$, $100^{\circ}C$, or $140^{\circ}C$. The shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine, and the shear bond strength (MPa) was calculated from the peak load of failure. A comparison of the bond strength between the repaired specimens was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. There were no statistically significant differences in the shear bond strength between the control group and the light curing, pressure, and oxygen inhibition groups. However, the heat treatment groups showed statistically higher bond strengths than the groups treated without heat, and the groups treated at a higher temperature resulted in higher bond strengths. Statistically significant differences were seen between groups after different degrees of heat treatment, except in groups heated at $100^{\circ}C$ and $140^{\circ}C$. CONCLUSION. Strong bonding can be achieved between a bis-acryl base and bis-acryl repair material after heat treatment.

• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.28-34
• /
• 2008

Objectives. The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the effect of varying timing of light curing on shear bond strength, and; 2) to compare the shear bond strength of three self-adhesive cements. Materials and methods. A total of 72 extracted non-carious teeth were divided into 24 for Unicem tests, 24 for Maxcem tests, and 24 for Biscem tests; they were assigned 3 * 2 subgroups of 12 teeth each. The specimens were prepared as follows: 1) The calculus and periodontal ligament were removed from the teeth; 2) The teeth were stored in normal saline; 3) The occlusal enamel of each tooth was removed using high-speed coarse diamond burs under water cooling, and; 4) Finally, the teeth were flattened by 600-grit silicone carbide paper disks. Resin blocks were adhered using either Unicem, Maxcem, or Biscem. Light curing timing was divided into two groups: U10, M10, and B10 were exposed to light after 10 seconds, and; U150, M150, and B150 on the other side were exposed to light after 150 seconds. Shear bond strength was measured by a Universal testing machine with cross head speed of 1mm/min. T-test and One way ANOVA were used for the statistical analysis of data. Results. The shear bond strength of U150 was not significantly higher than that of U10 (U150: 20.55.7Mpa, U10: 18.73.80Mpa). On the other hand, the shear bond strength of M150 was significantly higher than that of M10. The shear bond strength of B150 was also significantly higher than that of B10 (M150:14.45.7Mpa, M10: 9.94.2Mpa, B150: 24.38.3Mpa, B10: 17.27.3Mpa). When the light curing timing was 10sec after bonding, the shear bond strength of Unicem was highest; the shear bond strength of Biscem was highest when the light curing timing was 150sec after bonding (U10: 18.73.80Mpa, B150: 24.38.3Mpa). Significance. Since Unicem is less sensitive based on light curing timing, dentists seem to use it without considering the light curing timing. Maxcem showed the lowest bonding strength (especially M10). Thus, when using Maxcem, dentists need to delay the light curing after adhesion.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.231-242
• /
• 2006

Statement of problem: The sealing of the opened dentinal tubules that follows the tooth preparation for the prosthodontic restoration is considered as clinical process to reduce postoperative sensitivity. Purpose: This study investigated the effect of desensitization treatment on shear bond strength of luting cements. Materials and Method: Total 80 dentin specimens were divided into two groups according to the kinds of luting cements. Each groups was further divided into 4 subgroups with AQ $bond^{(R)}$, $Saforide^{(R)}$, Diode laser $MDL-10^{(R)}$ application and without desensitization treatment. After desensitization treatment application, Ni-Cr specimens were luted to dentin surface with Fuji $CEM^{(R)}$ and $Panavia-F^{(R)}$. Specimens were placed in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours and shear bond strength between metal and dentin was measured by a universal testing machine. Results: 1. In Fuji $CEM^{(R)}$ cemented groups, the combination of AQ $bond^{(R)}$ showed the greatest strength, followed by diode laser, no desensitizer treatment, and $Saforide^{(R)}$. Both AQ $bond^{(R)}$ and Diode laser groups had a significant difference than no desensitization treatment group and $Saforide^{(R)}$ group(p<0.05). 2. In $Panavia-F^{(R)}$ cemented groups, the combination of Diode laser showed the greatest strength, followed by AQ $bond^{(R)}$, $Saforide^{(R)}$, and No desensitization treatment. All desensitization treatment groups had a significant difference than no desensitization treatment group(p<0.05). 3. All $Panavia-F^{(R)}$ groups showed a significant higher shear bond strength than all Fuji $CEM^{(R)}$ groups(p<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed possibility of bond strength increase after desensitization treatment. The application of desensitization treatments like AQ $bond^{(R)}$, $Saforide^{(R)}$, and Diode laser $MDL-10^{(R)}$ have advantages in exposed dentin surface after tooth prep.

• 한국지반공학회논문집
• /
• 제27권10호
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2011

동토기반 말뚝기초의 지지력은 말뚝구조물 표면과 주변 토사의 접촉면에서 발현되는 동착강도에 의해 산정되며, 이는 동착-강도가 동토지반 기초설계를 위한 가장 주요한 설계정수임을 의미한다. 동착강도는 토사종류, 동결온도, 말뚝표면에 수직방향으로 작용하는 지중응력, 재하속도, 말뚝구조물의 표면 거칠기 등 다양한 인자들에 동시다발적인 영향을 받는 것으로 보고되고 있다. 1960년대부터 동토지반 기초설계를 위한 동착강도 산정방법들이 제안되어 왔으나, 대부분 동결온도와 말뚝구조물 표면특성에 대한 영향은 고려하고 있는 반면 동착강도의 주요 영향인자 중 하나인 지중응력에 의한 영향을 고려하지 않고 있어 소정깊이 이상의 말뚝기초 설계를 위한 동착강도 산정방법으로 활용되기에는 한계가 있는 것으로 판단된다. 본 연구에서는 동결온도뿐 아니라 지중응력이 동착강도에 미치는 영향을 파악하기 위하여 직접전단시험기를 활용한 동결토 전단강도 및 동착강도 측정실험을 각각 수행하였다. 실험결과 전단강도와 동착강도는 모두 동결온도 조건이 낮아질수록, 혹은 수직응력 조건이 커질수록 증가하는 경향을 보였다. 전단강도와 동착강도의 정량적 관계분석을 위해 정의된 전단강도와 동착강도의 비 $r_s$는 초기 동결온도에서는 급격하게 감소하는 경향을 나타냈으나, 동결온도가 낮아질수록 증가하며 수렴구간을 형성해가는 경향을 보였다. 본 연구에서는 최종적인 연구결과로서 동결온도 및 수직응력 조건을 바탕으로 결정된 $r_s$값을 이용하여 동결토의 전단강도로부터 동착강도를 예측할 수 있는 방법을 제안하고 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권9호
• /
• pp.384-394
• /
• 2015

본 연구에서는 원통형 지르코니아 코어에 다섯 종류의 지르코니아 비니어 세라믹을 축성하여 push-전단결합강도를 측정하고, 비니어 세라믹의 이축굽힘강도와 지르코니아 글라스 라이너 처리에 따른 전단결합강도 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 지르코니아 비니어 세라믹은 piston-on-three-ball test로 이축굽힘강도를 측정하였고, 지르코니아 실린더 코어와 비니어 세라믹은 push-shear test로 결합강도를 측정하였으며, 결과값은 이원분산분석을 사용하여 분석하였다. 이축굽힘강도는 Cercon ceram kiss (CE)군에서 가장 높게 측정되었고 전단결합강도는 글라스 처리군과 Triceram(TR)군이 높게 측정 되었으며 Creation ZI(CR)군에서 가장 낮은 값이 측정 되었다. 실험군에서 지르코니아 라이너 처리군이 라이너 처리하지 않는 군보다 전단결합강도가 높게 나타났으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<0.05). 따라서 지르코니아 라이너 처리는 지르코니아와 비니어 세라믹의 결합강도를 향상시킬 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.73-81
• /
• 2013

연구 목적: 이 연구의 목적은 지르코니아 표면처리에 따른 3종의 레진시멘트와 지르코니아의 전단결합강도를 평가하기 위함이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 총 143개의 디스크 모양의 지르코니아 블록(HASS Co., Gangneung, Korea) 시편을 제작하고 총 13개군(n=11)으로 나누었다. 그중9개군은 표면처리 방식(1. 알루미나 분사, 2. 알루미나 분사와 지르코니아 라이너의 도포, 3.알루미나 분사와 Rocatec (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) 처리) 및 사용한 3종류의 레진시멘트(Bistite II (Tokuyama Dental Co., Japan), Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray Medical, Japan), Super-bond C&B (Sun Medical, Japan))에 따라 나누어 열순환처리 전 접착강도 실험을 시행하였다. 열순환처리 전 접착강도 실험은 위 3종류의 레진시멘트를 3가지 방법으로 표면처리한 지르코니아 시편에 접착하고, 상온의 증류수에 24시간 동안 보관한 후, 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 열순환처리 후 접착강도 실험은, 열순환처리 전 접착강도 실험에서 우수한 전단결합강도를 보인 지르코니아 표면처리군(알루미나 분사와 Rocatec 처리를 하고 3종류의 레진시멘트를 접착한 3개의 군)과 대조군으로 알루미나만으로 표면처리 후 Super-bond C&B를 접착한 1개의 군을 대상으로 $5^{\circ}C$와 $55^{\circ}C$사이에서 5,000회 열순환처리를 시행하고 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 결과: 열순환처리 전 접착강도 실험에서는 알루미나 분사와 Rocatec 처리를 한 지르코니아 표면에 Super-bond C&B를 접착한 군이 가장 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다. Super-bond C&B를 사용한 군이 다른 시멘트 군보다 유의성 있게 높은 전단결합강도를 보였으며, 지르코니아 표면에 Rocatec 처리를 한 군이 다른 표면처리를 한 군보다 유의성 있게 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다. 열순환처리를 한 후에는, Rocatec 처리를 한 지르코니아 표면에 Super-bond C&B를 접착한 군만이 유일하게 전단결합강도가 증가하였으며, 다른 모든 군에서는 전단결합강도가 감소하였다. 결론: 본 실험에서는 Super-bond C&B 시멘트가 가장 높은 전단결합강도를 보였으며, Rocatec 시스템은 레진시멘트와 지르코니아의 전단결합강도를 향상시키는 방법이 될 것이라고 사료된다.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.957-967
• /
• 1994

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different bases of ceramic brackets on shear bond strength and to observe failure patterns of bracket bondings. Lower bicuspid brackets whose bases designed for the macromechanical and silane treated chemical bonding those for silane treated chemical bonding, those for micromechanical bonding, and those for macromechanical bonding were tested as experimental groups, and foil mesh-backed metal brackets as a control group. All the brackets were bonded with $Mono-Lok\;2^{(TM)}$ on the labial surface of extracted human lower bicuspids after etching the enamel with $38\%$ phosphoric acid solution for 60 seconds. The shear bond strengths were measured on the universal test machine after 24 hours passed in the $37^{\circ}C$ water bath. The gathered data were evaluated and tested by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test, and those results were as follows. The shear bond strengths of brackets for macromechanical and chemical bonding, those for chemical bonding, and those for micromechanical bonding were not different (p>0.05), but showed statistically higher than those of metal bracket and those of ceramic bracket for micromechanical bonding(p<0.05). The shear bond strengths of ceramic bracket for micromechanical bonding showed statistically lower than those of metal bracket(p<0.05). The enamel fractures and/or ceramic bracket fractures were observed in the cases of higher bond strength than that of metal bracket. These results supported that silane treated base of ceramic bracket show higher shear bond strength than that of metal bracket, and suggested that micromechanical form of ceramic bracket bases show higher shear bond strength than that of macromechanical form.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제6권6호
• /
• pp.434-443
• /
• 2014

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of different surface pretreatment techniques on the surface roughness and shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for use with lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of one hundred thirty lithium disilicate CAD/CAM ceramic plates with dimensions of $6mm{\times}4mm$ and 3 mm thick were prepared. Specimens were then assigned into five groups (n=26) as follows: untreated control, coating with $30{\mu}m$ silica oxide particles ($Cojet^{TM}$ Sand), 9.6% hydrofluoric acid etching, Er:YAG laser irradiation, and grinding with a high-speed fine diamond bur. A self-adhering flowable composite resin (Vertise Flow) was applied onto the pre-treated ceramic plates using the Ultradent shear bond Teflon mold system. Surface roughness was measured by atomic force microscopy. Shear bond strength test were performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Surface roughness data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD tests. Shear bond strength test values were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests at ${\alpha}=.05$. RESULTS. Hydrofluoric acid etching and grinding with high-speed fine diamond bur produced significantly higher surface roughness than the other pretreatment groups (P<.05). Hydrofluoric acid etching and silica coating yielded the highest shear bond strength values (P<.001). CONCLUSION. Self-adhering flowable composite resin used as repair composite resin exhibited very low bond strength irrespective of the surface pretreatments used.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.593-610
• /
• 1996

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the shear bond strength of luting glass ionomer cement with defferent calcium based solution treatment on dentin surface. 120 extracted human teeth were classified into 12 group based on presence of smear layer on dentin surface and type of treatment solution. Smear layer remove on dentin surface was done using 6% citric acid for 60 seconds. Five different dentin surface treatment solutions(calcium acetate, calcium carbonate, clacium chlorided, calcium hydroxide, and calcium phosphate) were evaluated in this study. After surface modification, metal ring(inner diameter : 3mm, depth : 1mm) was placed to expose the same dentin surface area and inner space was filled with luting glass ionomer cement according to the recommended procedure for stadard clinical procedure. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement was determined after 24 hours. SEM was used for the evaluation of the surface morphologic changes and EDAX analysis was done for determination of the change of the calcium contents of treated dentin. Follwing conclusion can be drawn : 1. In the group of the dentin surface with smear layer, the calcium carbonate solution was the most effective for the increase of the clacium content and the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement to dentin surfaces. 2. In the group of the calcium carbonate treated dentin with msear layer, the shear bond strength was increased twice compared to the control group and cohesive failure mode was observed. 3. The shear bond strength of cement was increased significantly be the removal of smear layer using 6% citric aicd. However, additional calcium solution treatments were not effective for further bond strength increase. 4. The shear bond strength of cement was significantly improved by both of the removal of smear layer and the calcium solution treatment, and the former was more effective for bond strength improvement. 5. The smear layer removed/calcium solution treated groups showed dentinal tubule obstruction and crystal attachment in SEM evaluation. However, the shear bond strengths of these groups were not increased compared to the smear layer removed/no dentin treatment group.