Browse > Article

The Effect of Dentin Desensitization Treatment on the Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements  

Park, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Lee, Joon-Soek (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.22, no.3, 2006 , pp. 231-242 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: The sealing of the opened dentinal tubules that follows the tooth preparation for the prosthodontic restoration is considered as clinical process to reduce postoperative sensitivity. Purpose: This study investigated the effect of desensitization treatment on shear bond strength of luting cements. Materials and Method: Total 80 dentin specimens were divided into two groups according to the kinds of luting cements. Each groups was further divided into 4 subgroups with AQ $bond^{(R)}$, $Saforide^{(R)}$, Diode laser $MDL-10^{(R)}$ application and without desensitization treatment. After desensitization treatment application, Ni-Cr specimens were luted to dentin surface with Fuji $CEM^{(R)}$ and $Panavia-F^{(R)}$. Specimens were placed in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours and shear bond strength between metal and dentin was measured by a universal testing machine. Results: 1. In Fuji $CEM^{(R)}$ cemented groups, the combination of AQ $bond^{(R)}$ showed the greatest strength, followed by diode laser, no desensitizer treatment, and $Saforide^{(R)}$. Both AQ $bond^{(R)}$ and Diode laser groups had a significant difference than no desensitization treatment group and $Saforide^{(R)}$ group(p<0.05). 2. In $Panavia-F^{(R)}$ cemented groups, the combination of Diode laser showed the greatest strength, followed by AQ $bond^{(R)}$, $Saforide^{(R)}$, and No desensitization treatment. All desensitization treatment groups had a significant difference than no desensitization treatment group(p<0.05). 3. All $Panavia-F^{(R)}$ groups showed a significant higher shear bond strength than all Fuji $CEM^{(R)}$ groups(p<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed possibility of bond strength increase after desensitization treatment. The application of desensitization treatments like AQ $bond^{(R)}$, $Saforide^{(R)}$, and Diode laser $MDL-10^{(R)}$ have advantages in exposed dentin surface after tooth prep.
Keywords
Desensitization treatment; Shear bond strength; Universal testingmachine;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Xavier L, David JB, Glean HJ. Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J Prosthet 1999;81:4: 469-475   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Brannstrom M, Aastrpm A. The hydrodynamics of dentin : Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972;22:219-227
3 Bergenhoiz G, Jonteil M, Tuttle A, Knutsson G. Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentin following conditioning with Gluma primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalate. J Dent 1993;21:220-227   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Tagami J, Hosoda H, Imai Y,Masuhara E. Evaluation of a new adhesive lineras an adhesive promotor and a desensitizer on hypersensitive dentin. Dent Mater J 1987;6:201-208   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Yu DG, Kimura Y, Fujita A, Hossain M, Kinoshita JI, Suzuki N, Matsumoto K. Study on acid resistance of human dental enamel and dentin irradiated by semiconductor laser with $Ag(NH_3)_2F$solution. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001;19(3):141-146   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J 1972;132:133-135   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kanca J. One year evaluation of dentin enamel bonding system. J Esthet Dent 1990;2:100-103   DOI
8 Titley KC, Smith DC. An SEM examination of etched dentin and the structure of the hybrid layer. J Can Dent Assoc 1995;61:887-894
9 Nakabayashi N, Takarada K.; Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125-130   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability : Effect of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:219-225
11 Malament KA, Grossman DG. The cast glass ceramic restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:674-683   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Horsted PB. Monkey pulp reactions to cavities treated with gluma dentin bond and restored with a microfilled composite. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:347-355
13 Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. J Am Dent 1975;91:817-528   DOI
14 Ivar A Mjor, Macro Ferrari. Reaction to restorative materials, tooth restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques. The Quintessence 2004;9:91-95
15 Pameijer DH, Richardson J. Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement in primates. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:36-39   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulpal irritation by adhesive composite resin restoration. Quintessence Int 1987;18:633-641
17 Jacobsen T, Finger WJ. Morphology of coupling sites between bonding agents and dentin in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 1993;21:150-157   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Pashley DH, Derkson GD, Tao L, Derkson M, Kalathoor S. The effects of a multistep dentin bonding system on dentin permeability. Dent Mater J 1988;4:60-63   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Aboush YEY, Jenkines CBG. The effect to post extraction storage on the adhesion of glass ionomer to dentin. Abstract#237 J Dent Res 1983;62:441
20 Grossman LE. The treatment of hypersensitive dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1935;22:592-602.28
21 Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:133-138   DOI
22 Langdon RS, Moon PC, Barnes RF. Effect of dentin bonding adhesive thickness on bond strength. J Dent Res 1994;73:132-138
23 Poletto LTA, Souza Junior HSE, Navarro MFL, Carvalho RM. Tensile bonding strength of repaired glass ionomer cement. [Abstract#22] J Dent Res 1989;68:527
24 Yoshiyama M, Noiri Y, Ozaki K, Uchida A, Ishikawa Y, Ishida H. Transmission electron microscopic characterization of hypersensitive human radicuilar dentin, J Prostho Dent 1990;69:1293-1297
25 Stem RH, and Sognnaes RF. Laser beam effect on dental hard tissues. J Dent Res 1990;69:780-785   DOI
26 Ladalardo TC, Pinheiro A, Campos RA, Brugnera Junior A, Zanin, F, Albemaz PL, Weckx LL. Laser therapy in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J 2004;15(2):144-150   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Hamachi T, Iwamoto Y, Hirofuji T, Kabashima H, Maeda K. Clinical evaluation of GaAlAs-semiconductor laser in the treatment of cervical hypersensitive dentin. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 1992;35:12-17
28 Abelson J. Cementation of cast complete crown retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:174-179   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Pashley DH, Depew DO. Effects of the smear layer, copalite, and oxalate on microleakage. Oper Dent 1986;11:95-102
30 Pashley DH. Mechanism of dentin sensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:449-473
31 Seekamp C, Roulet JF. The influence of laser pretreatment on dentin adhesion. J dent Res 1991;70:397 abstract 1027
32 Kimura Y, Wilder Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K. Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:715-721   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Lee IK, Han SB, Ko JS, and Kim HM. Clinical scanning electron microscopic observations after treatment of dentin hypersensitivity in vivo. Kor J Periodontol 1990;20:371-383
34 Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M, Obara M. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1994;13:148-154   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. Mosby Co. St Louis USA 1993;9:70
36 Brannstrom M, Garberoglio, R. The dentinal tubules and the odontoblast processes. Acta odont Scand 1972;30:291-311   DOI   ScienceOn