• Title/Summary/Keyword: Sharps injuries

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Needlestick and Sharps Injuries of Nursing Students (학년에 따른 간호학생의 찔림사고 현황 조사 및 관련요인)

  • Kim, Sang-Suk;Shin, Gi-Soo;Kim, Ji-Young
    • Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.174-178
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to find factors influencing needlestick and sharp injuries (NSI). Methods: This study was a descriptive research for current situation of NSI, recognition and implementation for standard precaution, and factors influencing NSI exposures. The subjects were 450 nursing students of 2 universities in Seoul and Kyunggi-do. The data were collected from June to November, 2008. The gathered data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Results: The 33.8% of 450 nursing students experienced NSI during 2 weeks clinical training. NSI events were more common among third-year students than second-year students. The most common causative device causing needlestick injuries was blood glucose lancet as 12.4%. Frequencies influencing NSI were students' year and experience of needlestick injuries. Conclusion: The results suggest development of education guidelines for nursing students and implementation of continual systematic education and training in clinic to control blood-borne infections efficiently.

Effects of a Finger Guard while Opening the Glass Ampoule by Nursing Students (손가락보호대의 적용이 간호대학생의 유리앰플 개봉 시 찔림사고, 불안 및 사용자만족도에 미치는 효과)

  • Lee, Jung-Ok
    • Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
    • /
    • v.21 no.4
    • /
    • pp.318-325
    • /
    • 2019
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of a finger guard developed to prevent sharp injuries in nursing students. Methods: This study was an equivalent control group posttest design. Seventy nursing students were randomly allocated to either the experimental group (n= 35) or the control group (n= 35). The finger guard was used whileopening the glass ampoule in the experimental group. The outcome variables such as sharp injuries, anxiety and user satisfaction were measured. Results: Sharp injuries were 0 in the experimental group and 2 in the control group (p= .160). Anxiety in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group (p< .001). User satisfaction was 4.33 score in the range from 1 to 5, the highest item was the weight (4.63), followed by effectiveness (4.51). Conclusion: Using a protective device while opening the glass ampoule was observed to be effective in reducing anxiety among the nursing students, and exhibited protection of skin.